The Topcon SP 1000 and Image-NET systems. A comparison of four methods for evaluating corneal endothelial cell density

Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability of corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) obtained by automated specular microscopy versus that of validated manual methods and factors that predict such reliability.

METHODS

Sharp central images from 94 control and 106 glaucomatous eyes were captured with Konan specular microscope NSP-9900. All images were analyzed by trained graders using Konan CellChek Software, employing the fully- and semi-automated methods as well as Center Method. Images with low cell count (input cells number <100) and/or guttata were compared with the Center and Flex-Center Methods. ECDs were compared and absolute error was used to assess variation. The effect on ECD of age, cell count, cell size, and cell size variation was evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed between the Center and Flex-Center Methods in corneas with guttata (p=0.48) or low ECD (p=0.11). No difference (p=0.32) was observed in ECD of normal controls <40 yrs old between the fully-automated method and manual Center Method. However, in older controls and glaucomatous eyes, ECD was overestimated by the fully-automated method (p=0.034) and semi-automated method (p=0.025) as compared to manual method.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that automated analysis significantly overestimates ECD in the eyes with high polymegathism and/or large cell size, compared to the manual method. Therefore, we discourage reliance upon the fully-automated method alone to perform specular microscopy analysis, particularly if an accurate ECD value is imperative.

Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare the repeatability, reproducibility and inherent precision of ultrasound pachymetry (USP), noncontact specular microscopy (SP-2000P) and the Confoscan 4 confocal microscope (z-ring CS4) in measuring endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation of cell size (CV), and central corneal thickness (CCT) in normal eyes.

METHODS

In this prospective study, one eye was selected from each of 30 subjects for the measurements of ECD, CV and CCT, which were taken by two observers. Results were analyzed statistically by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for intra-observer repeatability, inter-observer reproducibility, unpaired t-test, paired t-test, and Bland-Altman analyses to determine limits of agreement (LOA) between the three instruments.

RESULTS

Mean ECD, measured by SP-2000P and z-ring CS4, were 3115.50 ± 279.70 cells/mm(2) and 3167.50 ± 264.75 cells/mm(2), respectively (observer 1), and 3192.63 ± 249.42 cells/mm(2) (z-ring, observer 2). Mean CV measurements were 27.12 ± 2.51 and 27.10 ± 2.41 (SP-2000P and z-ring CS4, respectively; observer 1), and 27.17 ± 2.25 (z-ring, observer 2). Mean CCT values were 555.11 ± 35.83 μm (USP), 535.82 ± 41.10 μm (SP-2000P) and 552.57 ± 36.83 μm (z-ring CS4), and 554.97 ± 36.34 μm (z-ring CS4, observer 2). However, pairwise tests in all cases there was good repeatability and reproducibility as shown by inter-observer and intra-observer analysis of variance for each of the instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

The SP-2000P and the z-ring CS4 can be used interchangeably to measure ECD and CV. For CCT, the sample size was too small to test for differences of the CCT measurements between the three instruments.

Long-term Study of Artisan Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for the Correction of Moderate to High Myopia

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term performance of the Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) for the correction of myopia.

DESIGN

Long-term (10 years) retrospective follow-up study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-nine eyes of 49 patients who underwent Artisan PIOL implantation for the correction of myopia.

METHODS

Comparisons were made between preoperative clinical data and the clinical data at 1, 6, and 10 years after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Refractive stability, refractive predictability, safety, efficacy, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), intraocular pressure, intraoperative problems, corneal endothelial cell density, corneal endothelial cell loss, and glare levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean spherical equivalent (SE) after 10 years was -0.70+/-1.00 diopters (D; range, -4.00 to 2.00 D), with no significant change in mean SE between 1, 6, and 10 years. At 10 years, 68.8% of all eyes were within 1.0 D of the intended correction. At 10 years, 31.2% (n = 24) gained 1 or more Snellen lines of BCVA and 2.6% (n = 2) lost more than 2 Snellen lines of BCVA; 93.3% reached a BCVA of 20/40 or better, and 82.0% reached a UCVA of 20/40 or better. The mean intraocular pressure remained stable and was 15.5+/-3.5 mmHg (range, 7-25 mmHg) at 10 years. The mean endothelial cell loss was -8.86+/-16.01% (range, -51.69% to 34.43%) at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results demonstrate that the implantation of an Artisan PIOL for the correction of moderate to high myopia is a stable, predictable, and safe method when strict inclusion criteria for surgery are applied. There was no significant loss of corneal endothelial cells and no reports of long-term glare.

Specular microscopy ancillary study methods for donor endothelial cell density determination of Cornea Donor Study images

PURPOSE

To describe reliable methods for determining central corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) in a multicenter eye bank study.

METHODS

The Specular Microscopy Reading Center utilized a dual-grading procedure and adjudication process to classify image quality and determine ECD for a subset of donor endothelial images obtained in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study, which is part of the Cornea Donor Study. Two certified readers classified images as analyzable (excellent, good, fair) or unanalyzable and determined the ECD using a variable frame technique. An adjudicator also evaluated the images if quality classifications by the two readers differed by one grade, if any reader found the image unanalyzable, and/or if the ECD determination between the two readers was >or= 5%.

RESULTS

Image quality categorization by the two readers was identical for 441 (64%) of 688 donor images. The ECD differed by < 5% for 442 (69%) of the 645 analyzable images. The ECD determined by the adjudicator was < 5% different than the ECD determined by at least one reader for 193 (95%) of the 203 remaining images.

CONCLUSIONS

The dual-grading and adjudication procedures produce reliable, reproducible assessments of image quality and ECD. The importance of two independent readings is evident in that image quality ratings differed between the two readers by one grade in 36% of all images and ECD counts differed by >or=5% for 31% of analyzable images.

Corneal Endothelium Evaluation With 2 Noncontact Specular Microscopes and Their Semiautomated Methods of Analysis

PURPOSE

Noncontact specular microscopes and semiautomated methods of endothelial analysis are widely used in the clinical practice and for research purposes. In this study, the interexaminer reproducibility between two noncontact specular microscopes using different semiautomated methods was assessed in normal corneas.

METHODS

Average cell size (ACS), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonality values were independently calculated by two examiners with the Topcon SP 2000P Image-NET retraced method and the Konan CC7000 center method in 49 normal subjects. Interexaminer reproducibility and correlation between instruments/methods were assessed through 95% limits of agreement, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient, and Spearman rank test.

RESULTS

Interexaminer reproducibility was good for ACS and ECD measurements (ICC > 0.85) but weak for CV and hexagonality (ICC < 0.65). Significantly higher ACS and lower ECD values (P < 0.05) were obtained with the Topcon in comparison with the Konan method by both examiners. ACS and ECD mean differences were respectively, +26 microm2 and -184 cell/mm2 for examiner 1 and +36 microm2 and -228 cell/mm2 for examiner 2. No significant difference (P > 0.05) between instruments/methods was found in CV or hexagonality values; however, the correlation for these parameters was low (r < 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Either instrument or method allows reproducible and accurate ACS and ECD measurements on normal corneas, but the difference between the two instruments is systematic and significant. The difference found were not clinically meaningful however for research/longitudinal study purposes, the data collected with the two systems cannot be used interchangeably.

Validity of Endothelial Cell Analysis Methods and Recommendations for Calibration in Topcon SP-2000P Specular Microscopy

PURPOSE

To report on the calibration of the Topcon SP-2000P specular microscope and the Endothelial Cell Analysis Module of the IMAGEnet 2000 software, and to establish the validity of the different endothelial cell density (ECD) assessment methods available in these instruments.

METHODS

Using an external microgrid, we calibrated the magnification of the SP-2000P and the IMAGEnet software. In both eyes of 36 volunteers, we validated 4 ECD assessment methods by comparing these methods to the gold standard manual ECD, manual counting of cells on a video print. These methods were: the estimated ECD, estimation of ECD with a reference grid on the camera screen; the SP-2000P ECD, pointing out whole contiguous cells on the camera screen; the uncorrected IMAGEnet ECD, using automatically drawn cell borders, and the corrected IMAGEnet ECD, with manual correction of incorrectly drawn cell borders in the automated analysis. Validity of each method was evaluated by calculating both the mean difference with the manual ECD and the limits of agreement as described by Bland and Altman.

RESULTS

Preset factory values of magnification were incorrect, resulting in errors in ECD of up to 9%. All assessments except 1 of the estimated ECDs differed significantly from manual ECDs, with most differences being similar (< or =6.5%), except for uncorrected IMAGEnet ECD (30.2%). Corrected IMAGEnet ECD showed the narrowest limits of agreement (-4.9 to +19.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

We advise checking the calibration of magnification in any specular microscope or endothelial analysis software as it may be erroneous. Corrected IMAGEnet ECD is the most valid of the investigated methods in the Topcon SP-2000P/IMAGEnet 2000 combination.

Reliability of Corneal Thickness and Endothelial Cell Density Measures

PURPOSE

We evaluated the reliability and agreement between the Orbscan, an ultrasonic pachymeter (Humphrey 855), and the Konan SP 9000-LC in terms of central corneal thickness. The Konan was also used to study the reliability and agreement between endothelial cell density measures.

METHODS

Twenty-five normal subjects were examined on two occasions (mean separation = 9 +/- 5 days) by a single examiner using all three instruments for central corneal pachymetry. The Konan Center Method and a manual counting method were performed by two examiners to determine endothelial cell density. Reliability and agreement were assessed by calculating the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

For corneal pachymetry test-retest reliability, the 95% limits of agreement were -20 to +17 microm for the ultrasound, -27 to +22 microm for the Konan, and -13 to +13 microm for the Orbscan. There was fair-to-good agreement between the pachymeters (intraclass correlation coefficients range = 0.85 to 0.92). For endothelial cell density test-retest reliability, the 95% limits of agreement for the Konan Center Method was -498 to +530, and -482 to +333 cells/mm2 for examiners 1 and 2, respectively. The test-retest 95% limits of agreement for the manual overlaid grid method was -355 to +355, and -535 to +670 cells/mm2 for examiners 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability and agreement of the Orbscan and Konan corneal pachymeters was good, although the reliability of the Konan for estimating endothelial cell density was fair, at best.

A semi-automated assessment of cell size and shape in monolayers, with optional adjustment for the cell-cell border width-application to human corneal endothelium

Measurements of large numbers of feature sizes within defined domains (e.g. cell areas within cell-cell borders) can be a time-consuming activity, but automation that includes defining such domains has not be proven to be very reliable. Other alternatives are therefore needed, and the goal of the present studies was both to develop a semi-automated (interactive) measurement system for cell areas and to carefully compare the output to that obtained using a manual digitiser pad method. A particular interest was in the contribution made by the cell-cell border zones. Non-contact specular micrographs of central corneal endothelium were obtained from 20 white male adults, aged 40-60 years. An overlay of the endothelial image was generated manually, from which the areas of around 200 cells were measured manually with a digitiser pad and also by a computer-assisted scanning method. The pad data was typed into a spread sheet along with details of the number of cell apices (sides). The computerised analysis identified borders of the same cells on the overlay, reduced these borders to a minimum, and then assessed cell area by the pixel count along with the number of neighbouring cells (to give cell sides data). The average cell area was 393 +/- 28 and 422 +/- 29 microm(2) (mean+/-SD) by the digitiser pad and computer-based methods, respectively. The average areas for each cell type were 153, 270, 392, 519 and 685 microm(2) for 4-, 5-, 6-, 7- and 8-sided cells, respectively. Assessment of the relationship between cell area and the number of cell sides (area-side relationships) showed a highly significant and positive correlation (P<0.001; r(2)=0.865). Comparing the two methods, the average cell area was 7.5% higher in the computer scan method, and this is attributed to the fact that the contribution made by the cell borders (the para-cellular space) had been essentially eliminated. A proportional correction factor can be applied to add back the cell borders/intercellular space to the computerised output, and examples are given based on using the average data from digitiser pad for each cell type. In conclusion, a computer assisted method has been developed to simultaneously provide data on the variance in cell areas (polymegethism) and cell shape (pleomorphism) from overlays of 200 cells from human corneal endothelial images, with the cell border zone corrected to allow for a finite para-cellular space.

Quantitative and morphological characteristics of the human corneal endothelium in relation to age, gender, and ethnicity in cataract populations of South Asia

PURPOSE

To describe the differences of corneal endothelial cell densities, cell size variability and cell hexagonality in cataract populations of south Asia between sexes and ethnic groups.

METHODS

1,235 eyes of 1,235 male and female patients 40-75 years of age with senile cataract were examined with non contact specular microscopy with semi-automated analysis technique. The cell data of the study population was analyzed in relation to age, sex, and ethnic groups. Mean arithmetic differences and the coefficient of variation of repeated observations were calculated to estimate precision of the technique utilized. The main outcome measures were corneal endothelial cell density, cell size variability and cell hexagonality.

RESULTS

The mean corneal endothelial cell density was 2,720 cells/mm2, mean cell size variability was 37.8% and percent cell hexagonality 40%. We found statistical significant difference between the three ethnic populations in all the corneal endothelial cell measurements (p<0.0001). Females had a 2.9% greater cell density than males (p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in mean cell density according to age. Variability of cell size, however, increased with age (p<0.001). These findings were consistent across the three ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a total sample of 1,235 eyes distributed evenly in three cataract patient populations of south Asia, we found statistically significant differences of corneal endothelial cell densities of cell size variability and cell hexagonality between sexes and ethnic groups.

The South Asian cataract management study: complications, vision outcomes, and corneal endothelial cell loss in a randomized multicenter clinical trial comparing intracapsular cataract extraction with and without anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinical outcomes of primary intracapsular cataract surgery with and without implantation of anterior chamber lenses.

DESIGN

A multicenter randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand two hundred twenty-nine male and female patients 40-75 years of age with senile cataract.

METHODS

Study patients were recruited from screening eye camps and outpatient clinics. Randomization to the two treatment groups was performed after screening for predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographics, visual acuity, intraocular pressures, and corneal endothelial cell data were recorded before surgery and at 6 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery. Monitoring of the study was secured by a standardized image documentation procedure on all patients using the IMAGEnet digital imaging system. Analysis of corneal endothelial cell images was performed with the Cell Soft software (Topcon Corporation, Japan).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity and central corneal endothelial cell loss.

RESULTS

The patients were randomized to intraocular lens (IOL; n = 616) and no IOL (n = 613) implantation. Surgical complications were reported in 177 (14.4%) patients (IOL = 14.8%; no IOL = 14.0%). The most frequent complication observed was vitreous loss which occurred in 10.3% of eyes (IOL = 11.2%; no IOL = 9.5%). At the final examination (2 years after surgery), 88% of the operated eyes had a best corrected vision of 6/18 or better (IOL = 88.8%; no IOL = 86.6%). Analysis of corneal endothelial cell data showed a small but significantly greater cell loss 6 weeks after surgery in eyes with IOL compared with those without IOL, but no overall difference was found between the treatment groups in the long term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that there is a rationale for the use of anterior chamber intraocular lenses in primary intracapsular cataract surgery.

Automatic segmentation of contours of corneal cells

A fully automatic computerized method for segmenting contours of corneal endothelial cells is proposed. As part of the method, scale-space filtering (i.e. Gaussian filtering) is used to achieve tasks different from noise removal. This type of filtering is applied making use of the separability property of Gaussian kernels, avoiding the erosion of images. A variant of unsharp masking is used to considerably increase the visibility of dark areas of images. It is shown how the overflow that occurs when two images are subtracted can be handled to produce better results than normal unsharp masking. The method is exemplified with a low quality specular micrograph. To test the performance of the method, its output is used to automatically calculate the average cell size of images of different samples of tissue and different visual quality. The obtained results are successfully compared to those obtained with a manual semi-automatic method. A method for reading the segmented contours is suggested as well as two shape representations to achieve morphometric analysis of individual cells.