Indomethacin pretreatment in continuous positive-pressure ventilation

Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

In patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, massive alveolar collapse and cyclic lung reopening and overdistention during mechanical ventilation may perpetuate alveolar injury. We determined whether a ventilatory strategy designed to minimize such lung injuries could reduce not only pulmonary complications but also mortality at 28 days in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 53 patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (including 28 described previously), all of whom were receiving identical hemodynamic and general support, to conventional or protective mechanical ventilation. Conventional ventilation was based on the strategy of maintaining the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for acceptable oxygenation, with a tidal volume of 12 ml per kilogram of body weight and normal arterial carbon dioxide levels (35 to 38 mm Hg). Protective ventilation involved end-expiratory pressures above the lower inflection point on the static pressure-volume curve, a tidal volume of less than 6 ml per kilogram, driving pressures of less than 20 cm of water above the PEEP value, permissive hypercapnia, and preferential use of pressure-limited ventilatory modes.

RESULTS

After 28 days, 11 of 29 patients (38 percent) in the protective-ventilation group had died, as compared with 17 of 24 (71 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group (P<0.001). The rates of weaning from mechanical ventilation were 66 percent in the protective-ventilation group and 29 percent in the conventional-ventilation group (P=0.005): the rates of clinical barotrauma were 7 percent and 42 percent, respectively (P=0.02), despite the use of higher PEEP and mean airway pressures in the protective-ventilation group. The difference in survival to hospital discharge was not significant; 13 of 29 patients (45 percent) in the protective-ventilation group died in the hospital, as compared with 17 of 24 in the conventional-ventilation group (71 percent, P=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with conventional ventilation, the protective strategy was associated with improved survival at 28 days, a higher rate of weaning from mechanical ventilation, and a lower rate of barotrauma in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation was not associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge.

Effect of jet ventilation on heart failure: decreased afterload but negative response in left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume function

OBJECTIVE

To examine the mechanism of cardiac assist with systolic jet ventilation, specifically effects on loading conditions and left ventricular pressure-volume function. Both systolic and diastolic jet ventilation were compared in the absence and presence of heart failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-factor, repeated-measures study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Ten anesthetized, closed-chest dogs.

INTERVENTIONS

The measurement protocol consisted of two phases: a) apnea, randomized jet ventilation (systole- and diastole-synchronized); b) postjet ventilation apnea, before and after heart failure, induced with a propranolol-imipramine-plasma expansion treatment.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic jet ventilation was associated with mean airway pressures of approximately 7 mm Hg and intrapleural pressures of approximately 3 mm Hg in both heart conditions. In normal hearts, jet ventilation (either mode) decreased transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 40% to 60% (p < .05), left ventricular end-diastolic volume 25 +/- 8%, and stroke volume by 28% to 30%. Heart failure was associated with decreases (41 +/- 6%) in end-systolic pressure-volume function (i.e., pressure change/volume change or elastance), transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure (22 +/- 3%), and stroke volume (16 +/- 4%), and increased transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (139 +/- 6%). Application of jet ventilation (either mode) during heart failure did not affect stroke volume but significantly (p < .05) attenuated transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 30% to 40%, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes by 33 +/- 9%, and transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure by 11% to 19% (p < .05). After jet ventilation, left ventricular elastance was decreased 36 +/- 8% in normal hearts and 35 +/- 11% in failing hearts. Stroke volume, however, returned to baseline levels because of increases in transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in both heart conditions, and also in failing hearts, because transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure remained decreased approximately 30% (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Jet ventilation did not decrease stroke volume in failing hearts because of the afterload-reducing benefit (decreased transmural left ventricular end-systolic pressure) of increased intrapleural pressure in dilated ventricles. Moreover, jet ventilation did not have positive effects on myocardial function and had negative effects on left ventricular elastance in the postjet ventilation period in both normal and failing hearts. Cardiac assist by jet ventilation was not cycle specific, suggesting no selective benefit of jet ventilation over conventional positive-pressure ventilation during heart failure. These studies demonstrate a negative inotropy associated with jet ventilation that, during heart failure, may compromise the general benefit of positive-pressure-mediated increases in intrapleural pressure.

PEEP ventilation does not cause humorally mediated cardiac output depression in pigs

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to see if humorally mediated negative inotropism contributes to the cardiac output (CO) depression seen during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation.

DESIGN

8 pairs of piglets were used and a combined blood circulation was established between the two animals in each pair. One animal was ventilated with a PEEP of 15 cmH20 (donor) and the other was ventilated without PEEP (recipient).

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

CO and stroke volume deteriorated in the donors by 32% and 44%, respectively, while no change was seen in the recipients.

CONCLUSION

As humorally mediated negative inotropism during PEEP ventilation has earlier been demonstrated in dogs, the results suggest that this mechanism might be species-dependent.

The effect of peep-ventilation on cardiac function in closed chest pigs

OBJECTIVE

Does ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) depress myocardial contractility?

DESIGN

Ten piglets were anaesthetized and prepared for the measurement of cardiac output (SV) and right (MRAPtm) and left (MLAPtm) mean transmural atrial pressure, the latter serving as indices of preload. 500 ml of autologous blood was re-transfused during intermittent positive pressure ventilation without PEEP (IPPV) and continuous positive pressure ventilation with 15 cm H2O PEEP (CPPV).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Right and left ventricular function curves were drawn by plotting MRAPtm and MLAPtm respectively versus the corresponding strokevolumes before and after re-transfusion. Similar inclinations were obtained during IPPV and CPPV on either side of the heart.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the ventricular function curves during IPPV and CPPV covered partially different preload levels, the results suggest that CPPV i.e. PEEP does not affect myocardial contractility.