Propofol bashing: the time to stop is now!

Comparison in anesthetic effects of propofol among patients with different ABO blood groups

Our study was aimed to investigate anesthetic effects of propofol in patients with different blood groups.A total of 72 participants were enrolled from patients arranged for surgeries of cholecystectomy, tonsillectomy, and spinal operation. Each blood group (A, B, AB, and O) contained 18 participants. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) were assayed with Philips monitor. These indexes were observed before propofol anesthesia (T0), and then were recorded when concentration of propofol was 1 μg/mL (T1), 2 μg/mL (T2), 3 μg/mL (T3), and 4 μg/mL (T4). The differences in MAP, HR, and BIS at T0 among groups were compared with the χ test. Multiple comparisons were adopted to calculate the differences in MAP, HR, and BIS between groups at T1, T2, T3, and T4.No significant differences in age, sex, and weight of all groups were found (P > .05). Before propofol anesthesia (T0), all the participants exhibited no differences in MAP, HR, and BIS (P > .05). Subsequently, we found obvious differences in ΔMAP, ΔHR, and ΔBIS between groups. The patients in the B blood group showed highest ΔMAP and ΔHR at each time point (P < .05 for both). As for ΔBIS, patients in A blood group exhibited highest value at T3 and T4 (P < .05).The blood group remarkably affects the anesthetic effects of propofol.

Pediatric Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis: A Review with Pooled Analysis and Critical Care Emphasis

PURPOSE

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is being recognized with increasing frequency among children. Given the paucity of evidence to guide the critical care management of these complex patients, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature with pooled analysis of published case reports and case series.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science for relevant published studies. The literature search was conducted using the terms NMDA, anti-NMDA, Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate, pediatric encephalitis, and anti-NMDAR and included articles published between 2005 and May 1, 2016.

RESULTS

Forty-eight references met inclusion criteria accounting for 373 cases. For first-line treatments, 335 (89.8%) received high-dose corticosteroids, 296 received intravenous immunoglobulin (79.3%), and 116 (31%) received therapeutic plasma exchange. In these, 187 children (50.1%) had a full recovery with only minor deficits, 174 patients (46.7%) had partial recovery with major deficits, and 12 children died. In addition, 14 patients were reported to require mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSION

Anti-NMDA encephalitis is a formidable disease with great variation in clinical presentation and response to treatment. With early recognition of this second most common cause of pediatric encephalitis, a multidisciplinary approach by physicians may provide earlier access to first- and second-line therapies. Future studies are needed to examine the efficacy of these current therapeutic strategies on long-term morbidity.

Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation

Propofol is an intravenous agent used commonly for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, procedural, and critical care sedation in children. The mechanisms of action on the central nervous system involve interactions at various neurotransmitter receptors, especially the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor. Approved for use in the USA by the Food and Drug Administration in 1989, its use for induction of anesthesia in children less than 3 years of age still remains off-label. Despite its wide use in pediatric anesthesia, there is conflicting literature about its safety and serious adverse effects in particular subsets of children. Particularly as children are not "little adults", in this review, we emphasize the maturational aspects of propofol pharmacokinetics. Despite the myriad of propofol pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies and the ability to use allometrical scaling to smooth out differences due to size and age, there is no optimal model that can be used in target controlled infusion pumps for providing closed loop total intravenous anesthesia in children. As the commercial formulation of propofol is a nutrient-rich emulsion, the risk for bacterial contamination exists despite the Food and Drug Administration mandating addition of antimicrobial preservative, calling for manufacturers' directions to discard open vials after 6 h. While propofol has advantages over inhalation anesthesia such as less postoperative nausea and emergence delirium in children, pain on injection remains a problem even with newer formulations. Propofol is known to depress mitochondrial function by its action as an uncoupling agent in oxidative phosphorylation. This has implications for children with mitochondrial diseases and the occurrence of propofol-related infusion syndrome, a rare but seriously life-threatening complication of propofol. At the time of this review, there is no direct evidence in humans for propofol-induced neurotoxicity to the infant brain; however, current concerns of neuroapoptosis in developing brains induced by propofol persist and continue to be a focus of research.

Living donor liver transplantation for an infant with osteogenesis imperfecta and intrahepatic cholestasis: report of a case

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a group of genetic disorders characterized by bone fragility and connective tissue manifestations. We report a successful liver transplantation (LT) in an 8-month-old boy with OI and cholestatic biliary cirrhosis. After 4 cycles of intravenous pamidronate, LT was performed under intravenous anesthesia using a left lateral section from his mother without mechanical retractors. The operation time was 420 min and estimated blood loss was 520 mL requiring one unit of RBC transfusion. He was discharged without surgical complications. Therefore, LT should be considered for patients with end stage liver disease and OI under organic multidisciplinary cooperation.

Propofol infusion syndrome: a lethal condition in critically injured patients eliminated by a simple screening protocol

Propofol infusion syndrome (PIS) is defined by arrhythmia, rhabdomyolysis, lactic acidosis, and unrecognized leads to death. We sought to determine the incidence of PIS in trauma patients and evaluate the efficacy of a prospective screening protocol in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Phase I of the before-and-after study (1st January, 2005-31st December, 2005), trauma patients who received propofol were evaluated. Records were reviewed for demographics, injury severity, propofol time, dose, and rates, laboratory values, and adverse events. Patients were identified with PIS based on two of the following criteria: (1) cardiac arrhythmia/collapse, (2) metabolic acidosis, (3) rhabdomyolysis, and (4) acute kidney injury. Phase II (1st January, 2006-31st December, 2011) consisted of a prospective screening protocol (elevated lactate or creatine phosphokinase (CPK)) to identify patients at risk for PIS.

RESULTS

207 patients were identified in Phase I. 6 (2.9%) developed PIS with a 50% mortality. No differences were seen in age, gender, or mechanism. PIS patients were more injured (median ISS 44 vs 26, p=0.04; median head AIS 5 vs 4, p=0.003) and received more propofol (median 50,350 vs 9770 mg, p=0.001) with longer infusion times (413 vs 65 h, p=0.001). Sodium, creatinine, and CPK levels were higher in those that developed PIS (160 vs 145 mmol/L, p=0.001; 4.3 vs 1.1mg/dL, p=0.005; 59,871 vs 520 U/L; p=0.002). Pre-screening PIS incidence was 2.9% (6/207), but after screening (January 2006) the incidence dropped to 0.19% (2/1038, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PIS is a morbid and lethal entity associated with sedation of critically injured patients. A simple screening procedure utilizing serum CPK (<5000 U/L) can essentially eliminate the development of PIS.

Propofol for procedural sedation/anaesthesia in neonates

BACKGROUND

Elective medical or surgical procedures are commonplace for neonates admitted to NICU. Agents such as opioids are commonly used for achieving sedation/analgesia/anaesthesia for such procedures; however, these agents are associated with adverse effects. Propofol is used widely in paediatric and adult populations for this purpose. The efficacy and safety of the use of propofol in neonates has not been defined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of propofol treatment compared to placebo or no treatment or alternate active agents in neonates undergoing sedation or anaesthesia for procedures. To conduct subgroup analyses according to method of propofol administration (bolus or continuous infusion), type of active control agent (neuromuscular blocking agents with or without the use of sedative, analgesics or anxiolytics), type of procedure (endotracheal intubation, eye examination, other procedure), and gestational age (preterm and term).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1950 to September 30, 2010), EMBASE (1980 to September 30, 2010) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2) for eligible studies without language restriction. We searched reference lists of identified articles and abstracts submitted to Pediatric Academic Societies (2002 to 2009), and international trials registries for eligible articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of propofol versus placebo, no treatment or other sedative/anaesthetic/analgesic agents in isolation or combination used in neonates for procedures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected and analysed data in accordance with the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

One open-label randomised controlled trial of 63 neonates was eligible for inclusion. Thirty-three neonates in the propofol group were compared to 30 infants in the morphine-atropine-suxamethonium group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of infants who required multiple intubation attempts (39% in the propofol group versus 57% in the morphine-atropine-suxamethonium group; RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.29). Times required to prepare medication, to complete the procedure and for recovery to previous clinical status were shorter in the propofol group. No difference in clinically significant side effects was observed; however, the number of events was small.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No practice recommendation can be made based on the available evidence regarding the use of propofol in neonates. Further research is needed on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in neonates and once a relatively safe dose is identified, randomised controlled trials assessing the safety and efficacy of propofol are needed.

Propofol infusion syndrome: an overview of a perplexing disease

Propofol (2, 6-diisopropylphenol) is a potent intravenous hypnotic agent that is widely used in adults and children for sedation and the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Propofol has gained popularity for its rapid onset and rapid recovery even after prolonged use, and for the neuroprotection conferred. However, a review of the literature reveals multiple instances in which prolonged propofol administration (>48 hours) at high doses (>4 mg/kg/h) may cause a rare, but frequently fatal complication known as propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS). PRIS is characterized by metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis of both skeletal and cardiac muscle, arrhythmias (bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia, bundle branch block and asystole), myocardial failure, renal failure, hepatomegaly and death. PRIS has been described as an 'all or none' syndrome with sudden onset and probable death. The literature does not provide evidence of degrees of symptoms, nor of mildness or severity of signs in the clinical course of the syndrome. Recently, a fatal case of PRIS at a low infusion rate (1.9-2.6 mg/kg/h) has been reported. Common laboratory and instrumental findings in PRIS are myoglobinuria, downsloping ST-segment elevation, an increase in plasma creatine kinase, troponin I, potassium, creatinine, azotaemia, malonylcarnitine and C5-acylcarnitine, whereas in the mitochondrial respiratory electron transport chain, the activity of complex IV and cytochrome oxidase ratio is reduced. Propofol should be used with caution for sedation in critically ill children and adults, as well as for long-term anesthesia in otherwise healthy patients, and doses exceeding 4-5 mg/kg/h for long periods (>48 h) should be avoided. If PRIS is suspected, propofol must be stopped immediately and cardiocirculatory stabilization and correction of metabolic acidosis initiated. So, PRIS must be kept in mind as a rare, but highly lethal, complication of propofol use, not necessarily confined to its prolonged use. Furthermore, the safe dosage of propofol may need re-evaluation, and new studies are needed.

Propofol infusion syndrome

The clinical features of propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) are acute refractory bradycardia leading to asystole, in the presence of one or more of the following: metabolic acidosis (base deficit > 10 mmol.l(-1)), rhabdomyolysis, hyperlipidaemia, and enlarged or fatty liver. There is an association between PRIS and propofol infusions at doses higher than 4 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) for greater than 48 h duration. Sixty-one patients with PRIS have been recorded in the literature, with deaths in 20 paediatric and 18 adult patients. Seven of these patients (four paediatric and three adult patients) developed PRIS during anaesthesia. It is proposed that the syndrome may be caused by either a direct mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition or impaired mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism mediated by propofol. An early sign of cardiac instability associated with the syndrome is the development of right bundle branch block with convex-curved ('coved type') ST elevation in the right praecordial leads (V1 to V3) of the electrocardiogram. Predisposing factors include young age, severe critical illness of central nervous system or respiratory origin, exogenous catecholamine or glucocorticoid administration, inadequate carbohydrate intake and subclinical mitochondrial disease. Treatment options are limited. Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion with cardiorespiratory support has been the most successful treatment.

Propofol in paediatric anaesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review we intend to ascertain trends in propofol administration for paediatric anaesthesia and sedation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Propofol is being 'discovered' by non-anaesthesiologist practitioners of paediatric sedation. However it appears that the drug is not infrequently administered alone for painful procedures, necessitating large doses that result in uncontrolled general anaesthesia with a high potential for adverse events. An elegant technique comprises small doses of short-acting opioid (e.g. fentanyl 1 mug/kg) with low-dose propofol infusion. This does not result in worsening of pre-existing right-to-left intracardiac shunts. The dilemma is to educate non-anaesthesiologists about propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and in particular about the advantages of combined drug therapy. A paediatric target-controlled system for propofol has undergone preliminary clinical evaluation and it is hoped that administration according to pharmacokinetic principles will refine administration to infants and children. Sporadic cases of the propofol infusion syndrome in patients receiving prolonged sedation in intensive care units continue to be reported (characterized by metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis and myocardial failure). It appears that one mechanism may be a deficiency of mitochondrial oxidative processes possibly induced by a dialyzable substance, perhaps a propofol metabolite. Propofol has been used with some success in treating postoperative laryngospasm and for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants.

SUMMARY

Propofol should be used with extreme caution for prolonged sedation in intensive care unit patients, at dose rates of below 5 mg/kg per h, while maintaining extreme vigilance for signs of developing propofol infusion syndrome. If used correctly propofol is a suitable drug for sedation outside the operating room.

Propofol use in pediatric patients with severe cancer pain at the end of life

This article describes the use and effectiveness of adjuvant propofol for pain control for pediatric oncology patients at the end of life. All patients experienced severe pain and agitation, not well controlled by continuous infusion opioids and benzodiazepines. Upon starting propofol, most patients had a temporary stabilization in the dose of opioids with subjective improvement in pain control, increased alertness, and improved ability to interact. Propofol infusions were continued until death in most patients. Two patients received propofol infusions at home. Subsequent increases in opioids in 6 patients and propofol in all patients were required for optimal pain control. Adverse effects included agitation in 5 patients and hallucinations in 2, which were controllable with benzodiazepines. One patient developed severe tetany, requiring propofol interruption; propofol was successfully restarted at a lower dose with an adjuvant benzodiazepine. The authors conclude that propofol is a useful and tolerable adjuvant agent for pain management in pediatric oncology patients at the end of life. It is a useful adjuvant if pain is unresponsive to continuous infusion opioids or if rapidly escalating doses of opioids are required.

Propofol-Infusionssyndrom

Propofol infusion syndrome has not only been observed in patients undergoing long-term sedation with propofol, but also during propofol anesthesia lasting 5 h. It has been assumed that the pathophysiologic cause is propofol's impairment of oxidation of fatty acid chains and inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria, leading to lactate acidosis and muscular necrosis. It has been postulated that propofol might act as a trigger substrate in the presence of priming factors. Severe diseases in which the patient has been exposed to high catecholamine and cortisol levels have been identified as trigger substrates. Once the development of propofol infusion syndrome is suspected, propofol infusion has to be stopped immediately and specific therapeutic measures initiated, including cardiocirculatory stabilization and correction of metabolic acidosis. To increase elimination of propofol and its potential toxic metabolites, hemodialysis or hemofiltration are recommended. Due to its possible fatal side effects, the use of propofol for long-term sedation in critically ill patients should be reconsidered. In cases of unexplained lactate acidosis occurring during continuous propofol infusion, propofol infusion syndrome must be taken into consideration.

Short-term propofol infusion as an adjunct to extubation in burned children

Children who require intubation as a component of their burn management generally need heavy sedation, usually with a combination of opiate and benzodiazepine infusions with a target sensorium of light sleep. When extubation approaches, the need for sedation to prevent uncontrolled extubation can conflict with the desire to lighten sedation enough to ensure that airway protective reflexes are strong. The several hours' half-life of these medications can make this period of weaning challenging. Therefore, the hours preceding extubation are among the most difficult in which to ensure safe adequate sedation. The pharmacokinetics of propofol allow for the rapid emergence of a patient from deep sedation. We have had success with an extubation strategy using short-term propofol infusions in critically ill children. In this work, children were maintained on morphine and midazolam infusions per our unit protocol, escalating doses as required to maintain comfort. Approximately 8 hours before planned extubation, these infusions were decreased by approximately half and propofol infusion added to maintain a state of light sleep. Extubation was planned approximately 8 hours later to allow ample time for the chronically infused opiates and benzodiazepines to be metabolized down to the new steady-state level. Thirty minutes before planned extubation, propofol was stopped while morphine and midazolam infusions were maintained at the reduced level. When the children awakened from the propofol-induced state of light sleep, they were extubated while the reduced infusions of morphine and midazolam were maintained. These were subsequently weaned slowly, depending on the child's need for ongoing pain and anxiety medication, per our unit protocol to minimize the incidence of withdrawal symptoms. Data are shown in the text as mean +/- standard deviation. These 11 children (eight boys and three girls) had an average age of 6.6 +/- 5.6 years (range, 1.2-13 years), average weight of 36.9 +/- 28.7 kg (range, 9.3-95 kg), and burn size of 43 +/- 21.4% (range, 10-85%). Three children had sustained scald burns and eight had flame injuries with associated inhalation injury. They had been intubated for an average of 12.7 +/- 10.9 (range, 2-33 days). Morphine infusions immediately before the initiation of propofol averaged 0.26 +/- 0.31 mg/kg/hour (range, 0.04-1.29 mg/kg/hr) and midazolam averaged 0.15 +/- 0.16 mg/kg/hr (range, 0.06-0.65 mg/kg/hr). Morphine infusions after beginning propofol and at extubation averaged 0.16 +/- 0.16 (range, 0.04-0.65 mg/kg/hr) and midazolam averaged 0.09 +/- 0.08 mg/kg/hr (range, 0.02-0.32 mg/kg/hr). Propofol doses after initial titration during the first hour of infusion averaged 3.6 +/- 2.9 mg/kg/hr (range, 0.4-8.1 mg/kg/hr). Nine of the 11 children (82%) were successfully extubated on the first attempt. Two required reintubation for postextubation stridor 2 to 6 hours after extubation but were successfully extubated the next day after a short course of steroids, again using the same propofol technique. All were awake at extubation and went on to survive. Morphine and midazolam infusions were gradually weaned, and there were no withdrawal symptoms noted. Although prolonged (days) infusions of propofol have been associated with adverse cardiovascular complications in critically ill young children and should probably be avoided, short-term (in hours) use of the drug can facilitate smooth extubation.

Lacticacidosis after short-term infusion of propofol for anaesthesia in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta

We describe the case of a 7-year-old boy with osteogenesis imperfecta, who underwent anaesthesia with propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide-suxamethonium for orthopaedic surgery of a distal femur fracture. He developed lacticacidosis after short-term propofol infusion (150 min, mean infusion rate 13.5 mg.kg-1.h-1) associated with a prolonged recovery time without serious haemodynamic changes. The highest lactate concentration was 9.2 mmol.l-1 at 160 min after discontinuation of propofol. There was no significant increase in body temperature. The boy fully recovered.

Sedation and neuromuscular blockade in paediatric intensive care: a review of current practice in the UK

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to investigate the current practice of sedation and neuromuscular blockade in critically ill children in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the UK.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to all PICUs in the UK.

RESULTS

The most commonly used sedative agents were midazolam in combination with morphine. Written clinical guidelines for the sedation of critically ill children were available in 45% of units. Sedation is formally assessed in 40% of units. Vecuronium is the most commonly used neuromuscular blocking agent. In the UK, 31% of critically ill children are likely to receive neuromuscular blocking agents. Depth of neuromuscular blockade is routinely assessed in 16% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively few units possess clinical guidelines for the sedation of critically ill children, and only a minority formally assess sedation levels. Where neuromuscular blocking agents are administered, sedation is frequently inadequately assessed and the depth of neuromuscular blockade is rarely estimated.

Ventilation and metabolism during propofol anesthesia in rats

Many anesthetics are known to decrease ventilation (V(E)) and metabolic rate (MR). Because MR is known to contribute to the V(E) level, one would expect some parallelism between the changes in V(E) and MR during anesthesia. We tested this hypothesis in normoxia and hypoxia (12% O2) on male Wistar rats (n = 10; 221-288 g) by using a short-acting intravenous anesthetic, propofol. Propofol anesthesia was induced with a 7-7.5 mg kg(-1) (60-70 s) dose and maintained with a 20-22 mg kg(-1) h(-1) (<40 min) dose. In normoxia, propofol significantly decreased V(E) and MR and maintained the V(E)/MR ratio. In hypoxia, propofol decreased MR without a significant decrease in V(E), and the V(E)/MR ratio tended to increase. As a result, both in normoxia and hypoxia, propofol did not significantly increase the partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood (PaCO2). Propofol was also associated with decreased body temperature and mean arterial pressure. The results suggest that during anesthesia, a large part of the drop in V(E) can be accounted for by the drop in MR, and that in both normoxia and hypoxia the V(E)/MR ratios and PaCO2values are maintained close to the levels of the conscious state.

Use of propofol infusion in Australian and New Zealand paediatric intensive care units

Despite the risk of propofol infusion syndrome, a rare but often fatal complication of propofol infusion in ventilated children and possibly adults, propofol infusion remains in use in paediatric intensive care units (PICU). This questionnaire study surveys the current pattern of use of this sedative infusion in Australian and New Zealand PICUs. Thirty-three of the 45 paediatric intensive care physicians surveyed (73%), from 12 of the 13 intensive care units, returned completed questionnaires. The majority of practitioners (82%) use propofol infusion in children in PICU, the main indication being for short-term sedation in children requiring procedures. 39% of respondents consider propofol infusion useful in ventilated children requiring longer-term sedation. 67% of paediatric intensivists use maximum infusion doses that may be considered dangerously high (> or = 10 mg/kg/h). Nineteen per cent use propofol infusion for prolonged periods (> 72 hours). A smaller proportion (15%) of respondents indicate that they may use both higher doses and prolonged periods of infusion, a practice likely to lead to a greater chance of serious adverse events. Knowledge of local protocols for the use of propofol infusion is associated with a significantly greater level of monitoring for possible adverse events. We suggest that national guidelines for the use of propofol infusion in children should be developed. These should include clear indications and contraindications to its use, a maximum dose rate and maximum period of infusion, with a ceiling placed on the cumulative dose given and clearly stated minimum monitoring requirements.

Continuous propofol infusion in 142 critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, continuous intravenous propofol infusion has been widely used in pediatric intensive care units. Several case reports have raised concerns about its safety. The objective of this study was to report our experience with continuous intravenous propofol in consecutive patients during an 18-month period.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective review of a case series. Case was defined as a critically ill child who was treated with continuous intravenous propofol. The attending physician staff agreed to prescribe propofol via continuous intravenous infusion at a dose not to exceed 50 microg/kg/min. The protocol allowed for each patient to receive an additional intravenous bolus of propofol at a dose of 1 mg/kg no more than once per hour. The study entailed data collection from consecutive patients who were prescribed a continuous infusion of propofol in either the pediatric intensive care unit or bone marrow transplant unit.

RESULTS

Data from 142 patients were analyzed. Each patient enrolled was adequately sedated. Administration of propofol via continuous intravenous infusion was not associated with metabolic acidosis or hemodynamic compromise. No patient in the study group was inadvertently extubated or had a central venous catheter accidentally discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol can be safely and effectively used to provide sedation to critically ill infants and children. We speculate that continuous infusion of propofol for extended periods of time should not exceed 67 microg/kg/min.

Pharmacokinetics and effects of propofol 6% for short-term sedation in paediatric patients following cardiac surgery

AIMS

This paper describes the pharmacokinetics and effects of propofol in short-term sedated paediatric patients.

METHODS

Six mechanically ventilated children aged 1-5 years received a 6 h continuous infusion of propofol 6% at the rate of 2 or 3 mg kg-1 h-1 for sedation following cardiac surgery. A total of seven arterial blood samples was collected at various time points during and after the infusion in each patient. Pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM. Effects were assessed on the basis of the Ramsay sedation score as well as a subjective sedation scale.

RESULTS

The data were best described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. In the model, body weight was a significant covariate for clearance. Pharmacokinetic parameters in the weight-proportional model were clearance (CL) = 35 ml kg-1 min-1, volume of central compartment (V1) = 12 l, intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.35 l min-1 and volume of peripheral compartment (V2) = 24 l. The interindividual variabilities for these parameters were 8%, < 1%, 11% and 35%, respectively. Compared with the population pharmacokinetics in adults following cardiac surgery and when normalized for body weight, statistically significant differences were observed the parameters CL and V1 (35 vs 29 ml kg-1 min-1 and 0.78 vs 0.26 l kg-1P < 0.05), whereas the values for Q and V2 were similar (23 vs 18 ml kg-1 min-1 and 1.6 vs 1.8 l kg-1, P > 0.05). In children, the percentage of adequately sedated patients was similar compared with adults (50% vs 67%) despite considerably higher propofol concentrations (1.3 +/- 0.10 vs 0.51 +/- 0.035 mg l-1, mean +/- s.e. mean), suggesting a lower pharmacodynamic sensitivity to propofol in children.

CONCLUSIONS

In children aged 1-5 years, a pharmacokinetic model for propofol was described using sparse data. In contrast to adults, body weight was a significant covariate for clearance in children. The model may serve as a useful basis to study the role of covariates in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in paediatric patients of different ages.

The propofol infusion syndrome in infants and children: can we predict the risk?

Propofol has been an immensely successful anaesthetic induction agent but there is an increasing number of reports of serious complications when it has been used as an infusion to provide sedation for prolonged periods. The first reports involved children who died from intractable myocardial failure preceded by a metabolic acidosis, lipaemic plasma, fatty infiltration of the liver and evidence of muscle damage. As more cases have been reported the association between propofol and the syndrome has become more certain. Recently adult cases have appeared and a metabolic explanation has been suggested. The syndrome has a high mortality and the only effective treatment appears to be dialysis.

Treatment of pain in acutely burned children

The child with burns suffers severe pain at the time of the burn and during subsequent treatment and rehabilitation. Pain has adverse physiological and emotional effects, and research suggests that pain management is an important factor in better outcomes. There is increasing understanding of the private experience of pain, and how children benefit from honest preparation for procedures. Developmentally appropriate and culturally sensitive pain assessment, pain relief, and reevaluation have improved, becoming essential in treatment. Pharmacological treatment is primary, strengthened by new concepts from neurobiology, clinical science, and the introduction of more effective drugs with fewer adverse side effects and less toxicity. Empirical evaluation of various hypnotic, cognitive, behavioral, and sensory treatment methods is advancing. Multidisciplinary assessment helps to integrate psychological and pharmacological pain-relieving interventions to reduce emotional and mental stress, and family stress as well. Optimal care encourages burn teams to integrate pain guidelines into protocols and critical pathways for improved care.

Metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiovascular collapse after prolonged propofol infusion

The authors present the hospital course of a 13-year-old girl with a closed head injury who received a prolonged infusion of propofol for sedation and, subsequently, died as a result of severe metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiovascular collapse. The patient had been treated for 4 days at a referring hospital for a severe closed head injury sustained in a fall from a bicycle. During treatment for elevations of intracranial pressure, she received a continuous propofol infusion (100 microg/kg/min). The patient began to exhibit severe high anion gap/low lactate metabolic acidosis, and was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit at the authors' institution. On arrival there, the patient's Glasgow Coma Scale score was 3 and this remained unchanged during her brief stay. The severe metabolic acidosis was unresponsive to maximum therapy. Acute renal failure ensued as a result of rhabdomyolysis, and myocardial dysfunction with bizarre, wide QRS complexes developed without hyperkalemia. The patient died of myocardial collapse with severe metabolic acidosis and multisystem organ failure (involving renal, hepatic, and cardiac systems) approximately 15 hours after admission to the authors' institution. This patient represents another case of severe metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiovascular collapse observed after a prolonged propofol infusion in a pediatric patient. The authors suggest selection of other pharmacological agents for long-term sedation in pediatric patients.

Pain management in the critically ill child

Children frequently received no treatment, or inadequate treatment, for pain and for painful procedures. The newborn and critically ill children are especially vulnerable to no treatment or under-treatment. Nerve pathways essential for the transmission and perception of pain are present and functioning by 24 weeks of gestation. The failure to provide analgesia for pain results in rewiring the nerve pathways responsible for pain transmission in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and results in increased pain perception for future painful results. Many children would withdraw or deny their pain in an attempt to avoid yet another terrifying and painful experiences, such as the intramuscular injections. Societal fears of opioid addiction and lack of advocacy are also causal factors in the under-treatment of pediatric pain. False beliefs about addictions and proper use of acetaminophen and other analgesics resulted in the failure to provide analgesia to children. All children even the newborn and critically ill require analgesia for pain and painful procedures. Unbelieved pain interferes with sleep, leads to fatigue and a sense of helplessness, and may result in increased morbidity or mortality.

Anaesthesia for procedures in the intensive care unit

Taking in charge severely ill patients in the intensive care environment to manage complex procedures is a performance requiring highly specific knowledge. Close collaboration between anaesthetists and intensive care specialists is likely to improve the safety and quality of medical care. Three forms of anaesthetic care should be considered in clinical practice: sedation and analgesia; monitored anaesthetic care; and general anaesthesia or conduction block anaesthesia. Even in the field of sedation and analgesia, the anaesthesiologist can offer expertise on new anaesthetic techniques like: the most recent concepts of balanced anaesthesia in terms of pharmacokinetics and dynamics, favouring the use of short-acting agents and of sedative-opioid combinations. New modes of administration and monitoring intravenous anaesthesia have been developed, with potential application in the intensive care unit. These include the use of target-controlled administration of intravenous drugs, and of electroencephalographic signals to monitor the level of sedation.

Early tracheal extubation after paediatric cardiac surgery: the use of propofol to supplement low-dose opioid anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

After institutional approval and parental consent, 103 children, aged 6 months to 18 years, who were undergoing repair of simple and complex congenital heart lesions using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied and compared with a group of 135 children who had undergone similar surgery in our institution in the year before.

METHODS

Anaesthesia for study patients included fentanyl (< 20 microg.kg-1) and isoflurane. Infusions of propofol (median infusion rate 70 microg.kg-1.min-1) and morphine (median infusion rate 20 microg.kg-1.h-1) were started after weaning from CPB and continued postoperatively. Preestablished criteria were used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to assess readiness for tracheal extubation.

RESULTS

Median time from admission to ICU to tracheal extubation was 5 h. Fifty-six children were extubated within 6 h and 73 within 9 h of ICU admission. Mean ICU stay for study patients was 1.7 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.2] and 2.6 days (95% CI 2.3-2.9) in the comparison group (P<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

We found the propofol regimen to be satisfactory with a shorted ICU stay for these patients.

Propofol infusion syndrome in children

The use of propofol infusions to sedate children in intensive care units has decreased after reports of deaths from myocardial failure. More recently it has been suggested that propofol might have been prematurely condemned. Information about 18 children who had received propofol infusions and suffered serious unwanted effects was used to define their common features. Three of the deaths occurred in one intensive care unit where propofol infusions had been used between 1987 and 1993. During this period 44 children with respiratory tract infections had been admitted to this unit and sedated for at least 48 h. Nine had received long-term (> 48 h), high-dose (> 4 mg.kg-1.h-1) propofol infusions and three had developed progressive myocardial failure and died. There was a significant association between receiving a long-term, high-dose propofol infusion and developing progressive myocardial failure (Fisher's Exact Test, two-tailed hypothesis, P = 0.0128) although a causative relationship could not be proved.

Lactic acidemia and bradyarrhythmia in a child sedated with propofol

OBJECTIVES

To describe a severe adverse reaction in a child who received an infusion of propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). To describe the management and further investigation of this patient and review similar published reports.

DESIGN

Case report and literature review.

SETTING

Community hospital ICU and tertiary pediatric ICU.

PATIENT

Infant with upper respiratory obstruction secondary to an esophageal foreign body who required tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

Conventional cardiovascular and respiratory support. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and plasmapheresis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The patient received a propofol infusion at a mean rate of 10 mg/kg/hr for 50.5 hrs. He developed lipemia and green urine and subsequently, a progressive severe lactic acidemia and bradyarrhythmias unresponsive to conventional treatment. These abnormalities resolved with CVVH. He was encephalopathic and developed liver and muscle necrosis histologically compatible with a toxic insult. Examination of homogenized muscle tissue demonstrated a reduction in cytochrome C oxidase activity. There was no evidence of systemic infection or underlying metabolic disease. He eventually recovered completely.

CONCLUSION

Propofol has been associated with severe adverse reactions in children receiving intensive care. The biochemical and histologic abnormalities described in this patient may guide further investigation. We advise against prolonged use of propofol for sedation in children.