Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring

Use of lithium dilution and pulse contour analysis cardiac output determination in anaesthetized horses: a clinical evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the suitability of a human algorithm for calculation of continuous cardiac output from the arterial pulse waveform, in anaesthetized horses.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

ANIMALS

Twenty-four clinical cases undergoing anaesthesia for various conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cardiac output (Qt), measured by lithium dilution (QtLiDCO), was compared with a preceding, calibrated Qt measured from the pulse waveform (QtPulse). These comparisons were repeated every 20-30 minutes. Positive inotropes or vasopressors were administered when clinically indicated. Cardiac indices from 30.7 to 114.9 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) were recorded. Unusually shaped QtLiDCO curves were rejected and the measurement was repeated immediately.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine comparisons were made between QtLiDCO and QtPulse. The bias between the mean (+/-SD) of the two methods (QtLiDCO - QtPulse) was -0.07 L minute(-1)(+/-3.08) (0.24 +/- 6.48 mL kg(-1) minute(-1)). The limits of agreement were -12.72 and 13.2 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) (Bland & Altman 1986; Mantha et al. 2000). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.89. Cardiac output in individual patients varied from 49.1 to 183% of the initial measurement at the time of calibration. Linear regression of log-transformed Qt variation for each method found a mean difference of 9% with limits of agreement of -4.1 to 22.1%.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This method of pulse contour analysis is a relatively noninvasive and reliable way of monitoring continuous Qt in the horse under anaesthesia. The ability to easily monitor Qt might decrease morbidity and mortality in the anaesthetized horse.

A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients

In three clinical centres, we compared a new method for measuring cardiac output with conventional thermodilution. The new method computes beat-to-beat cardiac output from radial artery pressure by simulating a three-element model of aortic input impedance, and includes non-linear aortic mechanical properties and a self-adapting systemic vascular resistance. We compared cardiac output by continuous model simulation (MF) with thermodilution cardiac output (TD) in 54 patients (18 female, 36 male) undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. We made three or four conventional thermodilution estimates spread equally over the ventilatory cycle. In 490 series of measurements, thermodilution cardiac output ranged from 2.1 to 9.3, mean 5.0 litre min(-1). MF differed +0.32 (1.0) litre min(-1) on average with limits of agreement of -1.68 and +2.32 litre min(-1). Differences decreased when the first series of measurements in a patient was used to calibrate the model. In 436 remaining series, the mean difference became -0.13 (0.47) litre min(-1) with limits of agreement of -1.05 and +0.79 litre min(-1). When consecutive measurements were made, the change was greater than 0.5 litre min(-1), on 204 occasions. The direction of change was the same with both methods in 199. The difference between the methods remained near zero during surgery suggesting that a single calibration per patient was adequate. Aortic model simulation with radial artery pressure as input reliably monitors changes in cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients. Before calibration, the model cannot replace thermodilution, but after calibration the model method can quantitatively replace further thermodilution estimates.

Gastric intramucosal PCO2 and pH variability in ventilated critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

Gastric intramucosal PCO2 (PiCO2) and pH (pHi) are currently used as indices of the adequacy of splanchnic perfusion and as end points to guide therapeutic intervention. However, little is known about their spontaneous variability over time. The present study was designed to define the magnitude of spontaneous variability of PiCO2 and pHi in sedated medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients using an automated recirculating air tonometer and to test whether high-level positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or inverse inspiratory/expiratory (I:E) ratio ventilation resulted in a greater variability than low PEEP with conventional I:E ratio ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Medical ICU in a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three acute respiratory failure patients.

INTERVENTIONS

After being sedated, patients were randomized to undergo pressure control ventilation at the following three settings: A, high PEEP (15 cm H2O) with conventional I:E ratio (1:2), and B, low PEEP (5 cm H2O) with inverse I:E ratio (2:1) alternately, and then C, low PEEP (5 cm H2O) with conventional I:E ratio (1:2). Each ventilation setting period lasted 1 hr.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The PiCO2 and pHi were measured at baseline (time 0), and at 15, 30, 45, and 60 mins thereafter. The corresponding coefficients of variation (CVs) of PiCO2 for overall pooled group and settings A, B, and C were 4.0%, 4.4%, 3.4%, and 4.2%, respectively. The corresponding CVs of pHi for overall pooled group and settings A, B, and C were 0.36%, 0.37%, 0.33%, and 0.4%, respectively. Analysis of variance showed no significant difference in the CVs of PiCO2 or pHi between the three settings. The 95% confidence interval is approximately +/-8% variability for PiCO2 and +/-0.7% variability for pHi.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill medical ICU patients with stable hemodynamics, the spontaneous variability of PiCO2 or pHi are not substantial. High PEEP (15 cm H2O) and inverse ratio ventilation (2:1), which does not change the cardiac output or hemodynamics, does not contribute to increased spontaneous variability in PiCO2 or pHi.

Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography with two electrodes on either both wrists or one wrist and one ankle for the measurement of cardiac output compared with the thermodilution method.

DESIGN

Prospective, clinical investigation

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated community hospital.

PATIENTS

Simultaneous cardiac output measurements by noninvasive whole-body impedance cardiography (nCO) and invasive thermodilution (thCO) in 22 high-risk surgical patients scheduled for extended surgery requiring perioperative pulmonary artery catheter monitoring.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 109 sets of measurements consisting of 455 single comparison measurements between nCO and thCO were included in the analysis. The mean cardiac output difference between the two methods was 1.62 L/min with limits of agreement (2 SD) of +/- 4.64 L/min. The inter-measurement variance was slightly higher for nCO. The correlation coefficient between nCO and thCO was r2 = 0.061 (p < .001) for single measurements and r2 = 0.083 (p < .002) for sets of three to six measurements. The two most predictive factors for between-method differences were the absolute thCO value (r2 = 0.13; p < .001) and whether or not a continuous nitroglycerin infusion was used (p < .05, Student's t-test).

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between whole-body impedance cardiography and thermodilution in the measurement of cardiac output was unsatisfactory. Factors that can explain these differences are differences between the populations used for calibration of nCO and the study population, the influence of changing peripheral perfusion, and the effect of a supranormal hemodynamic state on the bioimpedance signal. Whole-body impedance cardiography cannot be recommended for assessing the hemodynamic state of high-risk surgical patients as studied in this investigation.

Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy and reliability of thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) and the arterial pulse waveform analysis with simultaneous measurement of thermodilution cardiac output (TD-CO) in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Prospective data collection.

SETTING

Emergency department and critical care unit in a 2,000-bed inner-city hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 29 critically ill patients requiring invasive hemodynamic monitoring for clinical management were prospectively studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Noninvasive cardiac output was simultaneously measured by a TEB device and by analysis of the arterial pulse waveform derived from the finger artery. Invasive cardiac output was determined by the thermodilution technique.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 175 corresponding TD-CO and noninvasive hemodynamic measurements were collected in 30-min intervals. They revealed an overall bias of 0.34 L/min/m2 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.44 L/min/m2; p < .001) for the arterial pulse waveform analysis and of 0.61 L/min/m2 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.72 L/min/m2; p < .001) for the TEB. In 39.4% (n = 69) of all measurements, the discrepancy between arterial pulse waveform analysis and TD-CO was >0.50 L/min/m2. The discrepancies of the arterial pulse waveform analysis correlated positively with the magnitude of the cardiac index (r2 = 0.29; p < .001). In 56.6% (n = 99) of all measurements, the discrepancy between TEB and TD-CO was >0.50 L/min/m2. The magnitude of the discrepancies of the TEB was significantly correlated with age (r2 = 0.17; p = .02). Measurements were in phase in 93.2% of all arterial pulse waveform analysis and in 84.9% of all TEB readings (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The arterial pulse waveform analysis exhibits a greater accuracy and reliability as compared with the TEB with regard to overall bias, number of inaccurate readings, and phase lags. The arterial pulse waveform analysis may be useful for the monitoring of hemodynamic changes. However, both methods fail to be a substitute for the TD-CO because of a substantial percentage of inaccurate readings.

Spontaneous variability of cardiac output in ventilated critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

To define the magnitude of spontaneous cardiac output variability over time in sedated medical intensive care unit patients attached to a continuous cardiac output monitor, and to determine whether high level positive end-expiratory pressure or inverse inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio ventilation resulted in greater variability over time than low positive end-expiratory pressure with conventional I:E ratio ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Medical intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 22 hemodynamically stable acute respiratory failure patients with a pulmonary artery catheter inserted for hemodynamic monitoring

INTERVENTIONS

After being sedated, patients were randomized ultimately to receive pressure control ventilation first at setting A (high positive end-expiratory pressure [15 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]) and then at setting B (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with inverse I:E ratio [2:1]), or vice versa, and then at setting C (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]). Each ventilation setting period lasted 1 hr.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cardiac output (CO) was measured continuously. The continuous CO value displayed was updated every 30-60 secs. The updated value reflected an average of the previous 3-6 mins. The coefficient of variation (CV) of CO for each setting in each patient was calculated to represent the spontaneous variability. The mean CO+/-SD and CV of each setting was 5.7+/-1.8 L/min and 4.4% for setting A, 5.6+/-1.5 L/min and 4.6% for setting B, and 5.9+/-1.7 L/min and 4.8% for setting C. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the CVs of the three settings. The 95% confidence interval for the COs for each setting was approximately the mean CO+/-0.1 x mean CO measured.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill sedated medical intensive care unit patients with stable hemodynamics, the spontaneous variability of cardiac output over time was not significant. High positive end-expiratory pressure (15 cm H2O) and inverse ratio ventilation (2:1) did not contribute to increased spontaneous variability of cardiac output.

Non-invasive cardiac output determination: state of the art

This review deals with recent developments in non-invasive cardiac output measurement. In the past few years significant progress has been made with semi-invasive transoesophageal echocardiography; the method now provides advanced facilities to measure cardiac output and other important characteristics of cardiac function. The method is, however, operator-dependent and the equipment used is expensive, which means that large-scale use on intensive care patients is not feasible. Whole-body impedance cardiography has recently shown good accuracy and flexibility in use, and seems to be the most promising method for the non-invasive measurement of cardiac output.