Flumazenil in drug overdose: randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess cost effectiveness

Strategies for the treatment of acute benzodiazepine toxicity in a clinical setting: the role of antidotes

INTRODUCTION

Although not a potentially life-threatening poisoning, benzodiazepine (BZD) intoxication may be life-threatening in special situations/populations or those with background diseases.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to evaluate all possible treatment options available in the literature for the management of benzodiazepine poisoning with special attention to antidote administration. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register from 1 January 1980 to 10 November 2021 using keywords 'benzodiazepine,' 'poisoning,' 'toxicity,' 'intoxication,' and 'treatment.'

EXPERT OPINION

Careful patient selection, ideally by a clinical toxicologist, may decrease the complications of flumazenil and add to its efficacy. The cost-to-benefit ratio should be considered in every single patient who is a candidate for flumazenil administration. In case a decision has been made to administer flumazenil, careful consideration of the possible contraindications is essential. We recommend slow administration of low doses of flumazenil (0.1 mg/minute) to avoid complications or withhold the administration with development of first signs of adverse effects. The main treatment of benzodiazepine toxicity is conservative with administration of activated charcoal, monitoring of the vital signs, prevention of aspiration and development of deep vein thrombosis due to prolonged immobilization, and respiratory support.

Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Poor Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-A Concise Review

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) disproportionately affects poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients. An unreliable neurological exam and the lack of appropriate monitoring leads to unrecognized DCI, which in turn is associated with severe long-term deficits and higher mortality. Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) offers simple, continuous, real time, non-invasive cerebral monitoring. It provides regional cerebral oxygen saturation (c-rSO2), which reflects the balance between cerebral oxygen consumption and supply. Reports have demonstrated a good correlation with other cerebral oxygen and blood flow monitoring, and credible cerebrovascular reactivity indices were also derived from NIRS signals. Multiple critical c-rSO2 values have been reported in aSAH patients, based on various thresholds, duration, variation from baseline or cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Some were associated with vasospasm, some with DCI and others with clinical outcomes. However, the poor grade aSAH population has not been specifically studied and no randomized clinical trial has been published. The available literature does not support a specific NIRS-based intervention threshold to guide diagnostic or treatment in aSAH patients. We review herein the fundamental basic concepts behind NIRS technology, relationship of c-rSO2 to other brain monitoring values and their potential clinical interpretation. We follow with a critical evaluation of the use of NIRS in the aSAH population, more specifically its ability to diagnose vasospasm, to predict DCI and its association to outcome. In summary, NIRS might offer significant potential for poor grade aSAH in the future. However, current evidence does not support its use in clinical decision-making, and proper technology evaluation is required.

Flumazenil, naloxone and the 'coma cocktail'

Flumazenil and naloxone are considered to be pharmacologically ideal antidotes. By competitive binding at the molecular target receptors, they are highly specific antagonists of two important drug classes, the benzodiazepines and opioids, respectively. Both antidotes enjoy rapid onset and short duration after parenteral administration, are easily titrated and are essentially devoid of agonist effects. Yet only naloxone is widely used as a component of the 'coma cocktail', a sequence of empirical treatments to correct altered mental status, while experts discourage the use of flumazenil for such patients. This review contrasts the history, indications, published evidence and novel applications for each antidote in order to explain this disparity in the clinical use of these 'ideal' antidotes.

A one-year observational study of all hospitalized acute poisonings in Oslo: complications, treatment and sequelae

Objectives

Changes in poisoning trends may affect both complications and outcomes in patients with acute poisoning. This study reports the treatments given and the frequency of complications, also related to treatment, mortality and sequelae related to various toxic agents.

Methods

All acute poisonings in adults (≥16 years) admitted to the five hospitals in Oslo were included consecutively during one year (2008 to 2009) in an observational cross-sectional multicenter study. A standardized form was completed by the treating physician, which covered the study aims.

Results

There were 1065 admissions in 912 patients. The median length of hospital stay was one day, and 49% were observed in an intensive care unit (ICU). Active treatment was given to 83%, and consisted of supportive therapy (70%), antidote(s) (38%), activated charcoal (16%) and gastric lavage (9%). The most commonly used antidotes were flumazenil (19%), naloxone (17%) and N-acetylcysteine (11%). The rate of treatment-related complications was 2.4% (21/884). Neither flumazenil, naloxone, nor the combination, was associated with convulsions or other complications. Among those receiving N-acetylcysteine, 5% (6/120) developed allergic reactions, one of which mandated discontinuation of treatment. Nineteen percent presented in a coma. Complications developed in 30%, compared with 18% in a 2003 study, mainly respiratory depression (12%), prolonged QTc interval (6%) and hypotension (5%). Eight patients died (0.8%) and five (0.5%) survived with permanent sequelae, mainly anoxic brain damage.

Discussion

Few patients stayed more than two days. The use of the ICU was liberal, considering that only one out of five presented in a coma. Antidotes were frequently given diagnostically. Although N-acetylcysteine induced allergic reactions, most were mild and treatment discontinuation was only necessary once. The frequency of complications had almost doubled in five years, although the poisoning pattern was largely unchanged. However, few patients developed permanent sequelae.

The approach to the patient with an unknown overdose

Toxic overdose can present with various clinical signs and symptoms. These may be the only clues to diagnosis when the cause of toxicity is unknown at the time of initial assessment. The prognosis and clinical course of recovery of a patient poisoned by a specific agent depends largely on the quality of care delivered within the first few hours in the emergency setting. Usually the drug or toxin can be quickly identified by a careful history, a directed physical examination, and commonly available laboratory tests. Once the patient has been stabilized, the physician must consider how to minimize the bioavailability of toxin not yet absorbed, which antidotes (if any) to administer, and if other measures to enhance elimination are necessary.

Should a benzodiazepine antagonist be used in unconscious patients presenting to the emergency department?

Patients in coma with suspected drug poisoning are commonly encountered in the emergency department. Benzodiazepines are one of the most commonly used drugs in self-poisoning. Flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist has been suggested as a diagnostic and treatment tool in suspected poisoning of unclear cause, but caution is required due to potential side effects. No systemic review of this literature has been done on this topic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to examine if flumazenil should be used in patients with coma from suspected drug poisoning.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Library, Pubmed and EMBASE. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were searched. Content experts were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients who presented with altered mental state from suspected drug poisoning were treated with intravenous flumazenil as compared to placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised controlled trials were included. A total of 466 patients were involved. Flumazenil was found to reverse coma from suspected drug poisoning with a relative benefit of 4.45 (95% CI 2.65, 7.45). In terms of major side effects, there was no statistical difference between flumazenil and placebo (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.12-69.32). However, in terms of minor side effects, flumazenil was associated with a higher incidence of anxiety (RR 2.84, 95% CI 1.28-6.30) and other side effects (RR 3.73, 95% CI 2.078-6.73). There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting (RR 4.28, 95% CI 0.95-19.35).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence shows that flumazenil may be effective in the reversal of coma in patients presenting to the emergency department with coma from suspected drug poisoning.

Flumazenil—Treatment or Toxin

Flumazenil is frequently administered to the poisoned patient. Seizures may be precipitated and resedation may occur in patients who awakened following flumazenil administration. Seizures may increase morbidity and mortality of the overdose. Benefit:Risk ratio of administering flumazenil should be determined in each overdose patient. Indications for flumazenil are limited.

5,7-Dihydroxy-6-methoxyflavone, a benzodiazepine site ligand isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, with selective antagonistic properties

As part of an effort to identify naturally occurring GABA(A) receptor benzodiazepine binding site (BDS) ligands from traditional medicinal herbs, we previously reported that flavonoid derivatives isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis (S. baicalensis) Georgi exhibited significant affinities for the BDS. The present study describes the characterization of 5,7-dihydroxy-6-methoxyflavone (oroxylin A), one of the major components of the herbal extract. Oroxylin A inhibited [3H]flunitrazepam binding to rat cerebral cortical membrane with a IC(50) value of 1.09+/-0.07 microM. A GABA ratio of 1.09+/-0.04 suggests that oroxylin A interacts as an antagonist at the recognition site. In neuropharmacological studies, oral administration of oroxylin A (3.75-60 mg kg(-1)) did not result in significant changes in animal models routinely employed for benzodiazepine (BD) evaluation. However, oroxylin A selectively abolished the anxiolytic, myorelaxant and motor incoordination, but not the sedative and anticonvulsant effects elicited by diazepam, a BDS agonist. These results add oroxylin A to the list of CNS active flavonoids, and as the first naturally occurring member endowed with selective antagonistic actions via the BDS.

Flumazenil reversal of lorazepam-induced acute delirium

We report the case of a 63-year-old man who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a 1-week history of sore throat, hoarseness and dysphagia. During his ED workup, the patient experienced an acute delirium 25 min after being given 2 mg of Lorazepam. The patient's mentation returned to normal within 1-2 min of being given 1 mg of Flumazenil. We discuss the various behavioral side effects of benzodiazepines and the indications for the use of Flumazenil.

Adult toxicology in critical care: part I: general approach to the intoxicated patient

Intensivists are confronted with poisoned patients on a routine basis, with clinical scenarios ranging from known drug overdose or toxic exposure, illicit drug use, suicide attempt, or accidental exposure. In addition, drug toxicity can also manifest in hospitalized patients from inappropriate dosing and drug interactions. In this review article, we describe the epidemiology of poisoning in the United States, review physical examination findings and laboratory data that may aid the intensivist in recognizing a toxidrome (symptom complex of specific poisoning) or specific poisoning, and describe a rational and systematic approach to the poisoned patient. It is important to recognize that there is a paucity of evidence-based information on the management of poisoned patient. However, the most current recommendations by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and European Association of Poisons Centers and Clinical Toxicologists will be reviewed. Specific poisonings will be reviewed in the second section of these review articles.

Flumazenil use in an emergency department: a survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of flumazenil use by a one-year survey of practice in tan emergency department.

DESIGN

During a one-year period, an observational prospective study in the emergency department of an urban community hospital enrolled every patient admitted with a history of pure or mixed benzodiazepine acute poisoning. Case records were secondarily reviewed by an expert group. Actual flumazenil use during hospitalization was compared to currently recommended indications. In order to evaluate the efficacy of flumazenil use, patients who received flumazenil were matched with those who did not and effects on mortality, morbidity, number of costly procedures (CT scan, diagnostic toxicology, etc.) and duration of hospital stay were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 1529 patients admitted in 1 year for acute poisoning, 478 reportedly ingested at least one benzodiazepine. Twenty-nine patients (6%) received flumazenil in the emergency department whereas the expert reviewers recommended flumazenil use in only 18 (3.7%). In 11/29 (38%) cases, the use of fumazenil was considered inappropriate. The expert group considered flumazenil to be contraindicated in 93 of 478 patients. Nonetheless, flumazenil was used in 11 patients (rate of potentially harmful flumazenil use: 11/93; 12%), and a severe complication occurred in one of these patients after flumazenil. No significant difference could be shown in outcome, complication rate, number of complex procedures or duration of hospital stay between patients who received flumazenil and matched patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

The use of flumazenil in the clinical practice of an emergency department fails to show any beneficial effect in adult patients. Moreover, contraindications are frequently overlooked and this may expose patients to substantial risk of complications.