Norepinephrine administration in septic shock: how much is enough?

Catecholamines and vasopressin during critical illness

This article summarizes the effects of catecholamines and vasopressin on the cardiovascular system, focusing on their metabolic and immunologic properties. Particular attention is dedicated to the septic shock condition.

Management of sepsis during the early "golden hours"

Severe sepsis and septic shock are common causes of morbidity and mortality. Interventions directed at specific endpoints, when initiated early in the "golden hours" of patient arrival at the hospital, seem to be promising. Early hemodynamic optimization, administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and effective source control of infection are the cornerstones of successful management. In patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, provision of physiologic doses of replacement steroids may result in improved survival. Administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated), (activated protein C) has been shown to improve survival in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who have a high risk of mortality. In this article we review the multi-modality approach to early diagnosis and intervention in the therapy of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Catecholamines and vasopressin during critical illness

In critical care medicine, catecholamines are most widely used to reverse circulatory dysfunction and thus to restore tissue perfusion. However, catecholamines not only influence systemic and regional hemodynamics, but also exert a variety of significant metabolic, endocrine, and immunologic effects. Arginine vasopressin is a vasomodulatory hormone with potency to restore vascular tone in vasodilatory hypotension. Although the evidence supporting the use of low doses of vasopressin or its analogs in vasodilatory shock is increasing, lack of data regarding mortality and morbidity prevent their implementation in critical care protocols.

Renal failure secondary to acute tubular necrosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management

Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is a form of acute renal failure (ARF) that is common in hospitalized patients. In critical care units, it accounts for about 76% of cases of ARF. Despite the introduction of hemodialysis > 30 years ago, the mortality rates from ATN in hospitalized and ICU patients are about 37.1% and 78.6%, respectively. The purpose of this review is to discuss briefly the cause, diagnosis, and epidemiology of ARF, and to review in depth the clinical trials performed to date that have examined the influence of growth factors, hormones, antioxidants, diuretics, and dialysis. In particular, the role of the dialysis modality, dialyzer characteristics, and dosing strategies are discussed.

Vasoactive drugs and the kidney

Protection of renal function and prevention of acute renal failure (ARF) are important goals of resuscitation in critically ill patients. Beyond fluid resuscitation and avoidance of nephrotoxins, little is known about how such prevention can be achieved. Vasoactive drugs are often administered to improve either cardiac output or mean arterial pressure in the hope that renal blood flow will also be improved and, thereby, renal protection achieved. Some of these drugs (especially low-dose dopamine) have even been proposed to have a specific beneficial effect on renal blood flow. However, when all studies dealing with vasoactive drugs and their effects on the kidney are reviewed, it is clear that none have been demonstrated to achieve clinically important benefits in terms of renal protection. It is also clear that, with the exception of low-dose dopamine, there have been no randomized controlled trials of sufficient statistical power to detect differences in clinically meaningful outcomes. In the absence of such data, all that is available is based on limited physiological gains (changes in renal blood flow or urine output) with one or another drug in one or another subpopulation of patients. Furthermore, given our lack of understanding of the pathogenesis of ARF, it is unclear whether haemodynamic manipulation is an appropriate avenue to achieve renal protection. There is a great need for large randomized controlled trials to test the clinical, instead of physiological, effects of vasoactive drugs in critical illness.

Management of Severe Sepsis: Integration of Multiple Pharmacologic Interventions

Severe sepsis is an infection-induced process that often promotes organ dysfunction and death in up to 50% of afflicted patients. Clinical advances that improve patient survival include early goal-directed volume resuscitation, broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobial therapy with deescalation strategies, therapy with drotrecogin alfa (activated), glucocorticoid replacement in patients with adrenal insufficiency, and tight control of blood glucose levels. The challenge for critical care practitioners is to integrate the many pharmacologic and supportive interventions required for optimal care of these patients.

Pediatric septic shock: why has mortality decreased?-the utility of goal-directed therapy

Mortality from septic shock in children has decreased by 92 percent in the last 36 years. The contributions of goal-directed therapy, intensive care, and other forms of support are responsible for this decrease. A deeper and more specific understanding of innate immunity and the biomolecular processes that operate in septic shock has offered the scientific basis to implement goal-directed therapies. However, therapies that are aimed specifically at manipulating the inflammatory cascade have yet to prove safe and effective.