Biplane transoesophageal echocardiographic detection of myocardial ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery: segmental wall motion vs. electrocardiography and haemodynamic performance:

Rescue transoesophageal echocardiography for refractory haemodynamic instability during transvenous lead extraction

AIMS

The rising number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has led to a steep increase in transvenous lead extractions (TLEs). Procedure-related, haemodynamically significant adverse events are uncommon during TLE yet remain an inevitable risk. While the use of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as a guide to clinical decision-making during refractory circulatory instability has been well established, the specific utility of rescue TEE during TLE has not been comprehensively studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six patients who required emergent TEE to determine the aetiology of intractable haemodynamic instability during TLE were evaluated. Pericardial effusion requiring urgent pericardiocentesis and/or cardiac surgical intervention was diagnosed by TEE in 10 patients, and progressed to cardiac arrest in 4 patients. Haemorrhagic shock developed in two patients suffering from femoral vein laceration and right haemothorax, respectively. One additional patient developed acute respiratory compromise and right ventricular dysfunction diagnosed by TEE, which necessitated prolonged post-operative intubation and inotropic therapy. In 14 patients, TEE excluded life-threatening cardiovascular injuries and enabled the pursuit of continued medical management. Two patients with reassuring TEE findings underwent intra-operative placement of chest tubes for pneumothorax. All the 26 patients were discharged from the hospital.

CONCLUSION

While TLE is a relatively safe procedure, life-threatening cardiovascular injuries remain a rare risk. In this study, the use of rescue TEE ruled out significant cardiovascular injuries in the majority of patients. Furthermore, rescue TEE had a substantial impact on the efficiency of determining the aetiology of refractory haemodynamic instability during TLE and thereby facilitated the timely initiation of definitive intervention.

Transesophageal echocardiography and noncardiac surgery

The use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for monitoring during cardiac and noncardiac surgery has increased exponentially over the past few decades. TEE has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a monitoring device and a procedural adjunct. The close proximity of the TEE transducer to the heart generates high-quality images of the intracardiac structures and their spatial orientation. The use of TEE in noncardiac and critical care settings is not well studied, and the evidence of the benefits of its use in these settings is lacking. Despite the widespread availability of TEE equipment in US hospitals, less than 30% of anesthesiologists are formally trained in the use of perioperative TEE. In this review, the safety and indications of TEE are reviewed and detailed analysis of the best available evidence in this regard is presented. Landmark trials evaluating the use of TEE and its therapeutic impact in noncardiac surgical setting are critically reviewed. This article details recommendations to familiarize anesthesiologists with TEE technology to exploit it to its fullest potential to achieve better patient monitoring standards and eventually improve outcome. Training of greater numbers of anesthesiologists in TEE is needed to increase awareness of the indications and contraindications. Until relatively inexpensive TEE equipment is available, the initial cost of equipment acquisition remains a significant prohibitive factor limiting its widespread use.

The usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography during intraoperative cardiac arrest in noncardiac surgery

According to guidelines established by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, life-threatening hemodynamic disturbances are classified as a category I indication for the intraoperative use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). However, the usefulness of TEE during intraoperative cardiac arrest and its impact on patient management have not been rigorously investigated. Using our departmental TEE database, we identified a population of 22 patients who underwent noncardiac surgical procedures and experienced unexpected intraoperative hemodynamic collapse requiring the initiation of Advanced Cardiac Life Support procedures between the time of induction of general anesthesia and the termination of the surgical procedure. Results of TEE examinations, patient records, detailed operative records, and outcome of patients were reviewed for the utility of TEE to diagnose the etiology of the hemodynamic collapse. Furthermore, the impact on subsequent patient management was evaluated. A primary suspected diagnosis of the underlying pathological process was established in 19 of 22 patients with TEE, including 9 with thromboembolic events, 6 with acute myocardial ischemia, 2 with hypovolemia, and 2 patients with pericardial tamponade. A definitive diagnosis could not be made in 3 patients with TEE. In 18 patients, TEE guided specific management beyond implementation of Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols, including the addition of surgical procedures in 12 patients. Fourteen patients survived to leave the operating room, and 7 of these patients were eventually discharged from the hospital. Thus, TEE may provide additional diagnostic information in patients with intraoperative cardiac arrest and may directly guide specific, potentially life-saving therapy.

Segmental myocardial wall motion during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using open and endoscopic surgical techniques

Current options for minimally invasive surgical treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease include beating heart procedures without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via mini-thoracotomy (MIDCAB) and totally endoscopic robot-assisted techniques (TECAB) with CPB. Both procedures are associated with potential myocardial stress before revascularization, such as single-lung ventilation (SLV), temporary coronary artery occlusion, cardiac luxation, intrathoracic carbon dioxide insufflation, and extended CPB and operating time. In this echocardiographic study we sought to evaluate the extent of intraoperative segmental wall motion abnormalities (SWMA) during MIDCAB and TECAB surgery and to identify factors affecting SWMA. Forty-six patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease were studied. Sixteen patients were operated using the MIDCAB technique and 30 patients with TECAB. In both groups sequential transesophageal echocardiograms were recorded during the entire procedure. Hemodynamic data and oxygenation variables were acquired simultaneously. In both groups, mild but obvious perioperative SWMA were identified and noted to increase during the course of the operation. These SWMA were more pronounced in the TECAB group. Independent of operating time, these changes disappeared completely after revascularization. No significant hemodynamic compromise was observed. We conclude that MIDCAB and TECAB techniques are associated with significant perioperative SWMA. The appearance of more profound SWMA in the TECAB group compared with the MIDCAB patients might have been the result of intrathoracic CO(2) insufflation, as SLV was used in both groups. No persistent SWMA or post-CPB SWMA were apparent in either group. More extensive intraoperative ventricular SWMA was detected in the TECAB group, suggesting that a more frequent risk for right ventricular dysfunction may exist during TECAB procedures.

Survey of observer variation in transesophageal echocardiography: comparison of anesthesiology and cardiology literature

OBJECTIVE

Transesophageal echocardiographic examination tends to be somewhat observer and experience dependent, and observer bias can arise easily when data are calculated and interpreted by unskilled, nonblinded, or single observers. The study plan was to see whether authors have adequately described how observer bias is minimized in their studies. Thus, a study was conducted systematically reviewing methods reported in transesophageal echocardio graphy articles in peer-reviewed anesthesiology journals versus those reported in peer-reviewed cardiology journals.

INTERVENTIONS

After MEDLINE searches of the literature published from 1997 through 1999, the authors investigated 56 anesthesiology reports and 56 randomly selected, year-matched cardiology reports. An 8-item questionnaire was developed that examined several factors: the number of observers and their experience levels, whether observers were blind to clinical data, whether low-quality images were excluded, the use of on-line or off-line analysis, and observer variability.

MAIN RESULTS

The analysis revealed inadequacies in reporting of important information that relates to bias and quality in 91.1% of anesthesiology and 98.2% of cardiology articles. Observer variability was not reported in 50.0% of the anesthesiology reports and 67.9% of the cardiology reports; however, difference between the 2 bodies of literature was not significant. The journal impact factor was significantly higher for the cardiology literature than for the anesthesiology literature (2.42 [0.386-10.893] v 1.07 [0.664-3.439]; median [range], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Articles reviewed had at least some inadequacies in reporting the methods to minimize observer bias in both the anesthesiology and cardiology literature. Reporting methodology standards in TEE examinations remain to be established.

Echocardiographic monitoring during induction of general anesthesia with a miniaturized esophageal probe

Standard transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) does not allow cardiac monitoring during the induction of anesthesia because standard probes would limit the oropharyngeal space and impair mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. We hypothesized that a prototype, miniaturized TEE probe could be safely introduced transnasally in awake patients and that mask ventilation and orotracheal intubation could be performed while continuously monitoring left ventricular (LV) function during the induction of anesthesia. Forty-five patients were studied prospectively. The transnasal TEE probe was introduced through one of the nares and advanced until a transverse plane image of the LV at the level of the papillary muscles was seen. Anesthesia was induced, and the patients were ventilated with a mask that had previously been threaded over the TEE probe via a central perforation. Probe insertion was successful in 12 patients under local anesthesia alone and in an additional 31 patients with a combination of local anesthesia and mild sedation. In two cases, probe placement was unsuccessful. Overall, hemodynamic variables did not change significantly during insertion. No case of significant mucosal bleeding was seen. In one patient, regurgitation of gastric contents occurred without affecting the perioperative outcome. The two-dimensional echocardiogram image quality of the LV during the induction of anesthesia was good or acceptable in 95% of patients. We conclude that transnasal TEE can effectively be used for cardiac monitoring during the induction of general anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrates that it is feasible and generally safe to introduce a miniaturized transesophageal echocardiography probe transnasally in awake cardiac risk patients to monitor cardiac performance during the induction of general anesthesia.

The influence of transoesophageal echocardiography on intra-operative decision making. A European multicentre study. European Perioperative TOE Research Group

The role of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in anaesthesia remains controversial because it is a rapidly evolving technique with few proven benefits and considerable cost. Recently, the Society of Cardiovascular Anaesthesiologists has published practice guidelines for the use of peri-operative TOE. To determine the current role of transoesophageal echocardiography and the relative impact of category-based transoesophageal echocardiographic indications the present study investigated its use in seven Western European countries. The study sample was taken from a prospective cohort of 224 patients with acute or chronic haemodynamic disturbances or at risk of myocardial ischaemia. All patients were monitored with two-lead electrocardiography and radial and pulmonary artery catheters, as well as biplane or multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography. A total of 2232 clinical interventions were made in these patients. The most frequently observed intervention was the administration of a fluid bolus (45% of all interventions). Overall, transoesophageal echocardiography was the most important guiding factor in 560 (25%) interventions. It was the most important monitor in guiding the following therapeutic interventions: anti-ischaemic therapy--207 of 372 interventions (56%); fluid administration--275 of 996 (28%) interventions; vasopressor or inotrope administration--56 of 316 (16%) interventions; vasodilator therapy--six of 142 (4%) interventions and depth of anaesthesia--four of 211 (2%) interventions. We found that transoesophageal echocardiography is frequently influential in guiding clinical decision making and is used most frequently for category II indications but category I indications were associated with more frequent change in management.