Anaesthetic management of the airway in The Netherlands: a postal survey:

National survey on the current status of airway management in China

Apparently, understanding airway management status may help to reduce risk and improve clinical practice. Given these facts, our team conducted a second survey on the current status of airway management for mainland China following our 2016 national airway survey. The national survey was conducted from November 7 to November 28, 2022. An electronic survey was sent to the New Youth Anesthesia Forum, where Chinese anesthesiologists completed the questionnaire via WeChat. A total of 3783 respondents completed the survey, with a response rate of 72.14%. So far, in 2022, 34.84% of anesthesiologists canceled or delayed surgery at least once due to difficult airway. For the anticipated difficult airway management, 66.11% of physicians would choose awake intubation under sedation and topical anesthesia, while the percentage seeking help has decreased compared to the 2016 survey. When encountering an emergency, 74.20% of respondents prefer to use the needle cricothyrotomy, albeit less than a quarter have actually performed it. Anesthesiologists with difficult airway training experience reached 72.96%, with a significant difference in participation between participants in Tier 3 hospitals and those in other levels of hospitals (P < 0.001). The videolaryngoscope, laryngeal mask, and flexible intubation scope were equipped at 97.18%, 95.96%, and 62.89%, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of brain damage or death caused by difficult airways was significantly decreased. The study may be the best reference for understanding the current status of airway management in China, revealing the current advancements and deficiencies. The future focus of airway management remains on training and education.

Practice Patterns for Predicted Difficult Airway Management and access to Airway Equipment by Anaesthetists in Queensland, Australia

A postal survey was conducted to investigate difficult airway management, training and equipment availability among Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists in Queensland. The survey aimed to determine practise patterns for predicted difficult airways and investigate equipment availability.

Participants were asked to nominate an induction method, intubation method and airway adjunct for each of the five difficult airway scenarios. The cases consisted of one elective and four emergency scenarios. Availability of difficult airway devices in their institution was also assessed, as well as demographics of practice and airway-related maintenance of professional standards participation.

There were 454 surveys distributed and 250 returned (response rate 55%). Direct laryngoscopy and flexible fibreoptic intubation were the most commonly selected techniques for all five cases. Difficult intubation trolleys were available to 98% of responders. Certain types of equipment (such as fibreoptic bronchoscopes and cricothyroidotomy kits) were available less frequently in private institutions. We recommend a standardisation of difficult airway management equipment and an on-going training program to provide support for anaesthetists in all locations.

Advances in airway management for outpatients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As outpatient anaesthesia increases in volume so does research, especially in ways to reduce morbidity from relatively minor complications such as sore throat and hoarseness, as well as aiming to reduce costs and length of hospital stay. The past year has produced many studies in which newer airway devices have been compared with the laryngeal mask airway and this review evaluates them all.

RECENT FINDINGS

The relatively recent introduction of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway shows promise when insertion of a gastric tube is preferred in patients breathing spontaneously, whilst the intubating laryngeal mask airway has demonstrated its usefulness in those situations where the patient prefers to be anaesthetized but intubation may be difficult following classic laryngoscopy. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway and combitube probably only have a place in emergency airway management rather than elective anaesthesia.

SUMMARY

Despite the introduction of new airway devices, some of which have specific indications for use, the classic laryngeal mask airway remains the 'gold standard' with which newer devices are compared. Whilst some of these new devices show promise in the outpatient setting, further research is required before their universal acceptance.