The effects of fenoldopam on renal function in patients undergoing elective aortic surgery:

Fenoldopam Mesylate: A Narrative Review of Its Use in Acute Kidney Injury

Background:

Fenoldopam mesylate is a selective agonist of DA-1 receptors. It is currently used for the in-hospital treatment of severe hypertension. DA-1 receptors have high density in renal pa-renchyma and for this reason, a possible reno-protective role of Fenoldopam mesylate was investigated.

Methods:

We examined all studies regarding the role of Fenoldopam mesylate in Acute Kidney Injury (AKI); particularly, those involving post-surgical patients, intensive care unit patients and contrast-induced nephropathy.

Results:

Fenoldopam mesylate was found to be effective in reducing the onset of postoperative AKI, when used before the development of the kidney damage. Positive results were also obtained in the management of intensive care unit patients with AKI, although the clinical studies investigated were few and conducted on small samples.

Conclusion:

Conflicting results were achieved in contrast-induced nephropathy.

Management of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms and Occlusive Disease with Preferential Suprarenal Clamping Via a Midline Transperitoneal Incision: Technique and Results

Surgical management of juxtarenal aortic (JR-Ao) aneurysms and occlusive disease may include supraceliac aortic clamping, a retroperitoneal approach, or medial visceral rotation. The authors report their results using preferential direct suprarenal aortic clamping via a midline transperitoneal incision. Between July 1, 1992, and July 31, 2001, they treated 58 patients with JR-Ao disease (44 aneurysmal, 14 occlusive) via a midline incision without medial visceral rotation. Preferential suprarenal aortic clamping was used in 53 cases (42 proximal to both renal arteries, 11 proximal to the left renal artery only) and supraceliac or supramesenteric clamping in 5 cases when there was insufficient space for an aortic clamp between the superior mesenteric artery and renal arteries. This strategy avoided mesenteric ischemia associated with supraceliac clamping in the majority of cases and afforded better exposure of the right renal artery than obtainable with a left retroperitoneal approach or medial visceral rotation. Eleven patients underwent concomitant renal revascularization. Critical adjuncts included the following: (1) selective left renal vein (LRV) division if the vein stump pressure was <35 mm Hg (suggesting sufficient renal venous collaterals existed), (2) bilateral renal artery occlusion during aortic clamping to prevent thromboembolism, (3) flushing of aortic debris before restoring renal perfusion, and (4) routine administration of perioperative intravenous mannitol and renal-dose dopamine. Patients with type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, ruptured aneurysms, or JR-Ao disease approached via a retroperitoneal incision (severely obese patients, re-do aortic surgery) were excluded. No patients died or required dialysis during their hospital stay. The LRV was divided in 12 (21%) cases and reanastomosed in 2 cases (elevated stump pressures). The average suprarenal clamp time was 26 minutes (range, 10–60). Postoperative serum creatinine remained >0.5 ng/dL above baseline in 3 (5%) patients. These results support suprarenal aortic clamping with a midline transperitoneal incision as the optimal strategy for treating juxtarenal aortic aneurysms and occlusive disease. The authors believe that selective left renal vein division enhances juxtarenal aortic exposure, and routine administration of renal protective agents, along with occlusion of both renal arteries during suprarenal aortic clamping, are critical adjuncts in performing these operations.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

Various methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These most often include pharmacological interventions such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and erythropoietin (EPO).

OBJECTIVES

This review is aimed at determining the effectiveness of various measures advocated to protect patients' kidneys during the perioperative period.We considered the following questions: (1) Are any specific measures known to protect kidney function during the perioperative period? (2) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period, does any one method appear to be more effective than the others? (3) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period,does any one method appear to be safer than the others?

SEARCH METHODS

In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) (1966 to August 2012) and EMBASE (Ovid SP) (1988 to August 2012). We originally handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery) (1985 to 2004). However, because these journals are properly indexed in MEDLINE, we decided to rely on electronic searches only without handsearching the journals from 2004 onwards.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery for which a treatment measure was used for the purpose of providing renal protection during the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 72 studies for inclusion in this review. Two review authors extracted data from all selected studies and entered them into RevMan 5.1; then the data were appropriately analysed. We performed subgroup analyses for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analyses for studies with high and moderately good methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The updated review included data from 72 studies, comprising a total of 4378 participants. Of these, 2291 received some form of treatment and 2087 acted as controls. The interventions consisted most often of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, NAC, ANP, sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and EPO or selected hydration fluids. Some clinical heterogeneity and varying risk of bias were noted amongst the studies, although we were able to meaningfully interpret the data. Results showed significant heterogeneity and indicated that most interventions provided no benefit.Data on perioperative mortality were reported in 41 studies and data on acute renal injury in 44 studies (all interventions combined). Because of considerable clinical heterogeneity (different clinical scenarios, as well as considerable methodological variability amongst the studies), we did not perform a meta-analysis on the combined data.Subgroup analysis of major interventions and surgical procedures showed no significant influence of interventions on reported mortality and acute renal injury. For the subgroup of participants who had pre-existing renal damage, the risk of mortality from 10 trials (959 participants) was estimated as odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.52; the risk of acute renal injury (as reported in the trials) was estimated from 11 trials (979 participants) as OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80. Subgroup analysis of studies that were rated as having low risk of bias revealed that 19 studies reported mortality numbers (1604 participants); OR was 1.01, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.90. Fifteen studies reported data on acute renal injury (criteria chosen by the individual studies; 1600 participants); OR was 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.97.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No reliable evidence from the available literature suggests that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. However, the criteria used to diagnose acute renal damage varied in many of the older studies selected for inclusion in this review, many of which suffered from poor methodological quality such as insufficient participant numbers and poor definitions of end points such as acute renal failure and acute renal injury. Recent methods of detecting renal damage such as the use of specific biomarkers and better defined criteria for identifying renal damage (RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end-stage renal failure) or AKI (acute kidney injury)) may have to be explored further to determine any possible benefit derived from interventions used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period.

Acute kidney injury: not just acute renal failure anymore?

Until recently, no uniform standard existed for diagnosing and classifying acute renal failure. To clarify diagnosis, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative group stated its consensus on the need for a clear definition and classification system of renal dysfunction with measurable criteria. Today the term acute kidney injury has replaced the term acute renal failure, with an understanding that such injury is a common clinical problem in critically ill patients and typically is predictive of an increase in morbidity and mortality. A classification system, known as RIFLE (risk of injury, injury, failure, loss of function, and end-stage renal failure), includes specific goals for preventing acute kidney injury: adequate hydration, maintenance of renal perfusion, limiting exposure to nephrotoxins, drug protective strategies, and the use of renal replacement therapies that reduce renal injury.

Fenoldopam use in a burn intensive care unit: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Fenoldopam mesylate is a highly selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of hypertensive emergencies that may have a role at low doses in preserving renal function in those at high risk for or with acute kidney injury (AKI). There is no data on low-dose fenoldopam in the burn population. The purpose of our study was to describe our use of low-dose fenoldopam (0.03-0.09 mug/kg/min) infusion in critically ill burn patients with AKI.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted to our burn intensive care unit (BICU) with severe burns from November 2005 through September 2008 who received low-dose fenoldopam. Data obtained included systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, vasoactive medication use, urine output, and intravenous fluid. Patients on concomitant continuous renal replacement therapy were excluded. Modified inotrope score and vasopressor dependency index were calculated. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, Wilcoxson signed rank, and chi-square tests were used. Differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were treated with low-dose fenoldopam out of 758 BICU admissions (10%). Twenty (26%) were AKI network (AKIN) stage 1, 14 (18%) were AKIN stage 2, 42 (55%) were AKIN stage 3, and 1 (1%) was AKIN stage 0. Serum creatinine improved over the first 24 hours and continued to improve through 48 hours (p < 0.05). There was an increase in systolic blood pressure in the first 24 hours that was sustained through 48 hours after initiation of fenoldopam (p < 0.05). Urine output increased after initiation of fenoldopam without an increase in intravenous fluid requirement (p < 0.05; p = NS). Modified inotrope score and vasopressor dependency index both decreased over 48 hours (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that renal function was preserved and that urine output improved without a decrease in systolic blood pressure, increase in vasoactive medication use, or an increase in resuscitation requirement in patients treated with low-dose fenoldopam. A randomized controlled trial is required to establish the efficacy of low-dose fenoldopam in critically ill burn patients with AKI.

Postoperative renal failure

Acute renal failure (ARF) or acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common problem occurring in about 1% to 5% of all hospitalized patients. It leads to poor quality of life and increased length of stay (LOS), cost of care, morbidity, and mortality. The survival rate for ARF has not drastically changed over the past 4 decades because of the aging population and presence of multiple comorbid conditions. About 200 patients per million population develop severe ARF each year. Approximately one-third of these patients require ICU care. Recent studies have shown that even milder forms of renal dysfunction are associated with increased LOS and mortality.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

A number of methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These include the administration of dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and hydration fluids.

OBJECTIVES

For this review, we selected randomized controlled trials which employed different methods to protect renal function during the perioperative period. In examining these trials, we looked at outcomes that included renal failure and mortality as well as changes in renal function tests, such as urine output, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, fractional excretion of sodium and renal plasma flow.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to June, 2007), and EMBASE (1988 to June, 2007); and handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery where a treatment measure was used for the purpose of renal protection in the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 53 studies for inclusion in this review. As well as data analysis from all the studies, we performed subgroup analysis for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure, and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analysis on studies with high and moderately good methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included data from 53 studies, comprising a total of 2327 participants. Of these, 1293 received some form of treatment and 1034 acted as controls. The interventions mostly consisted of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, or selected hydration fluids. The results indicated that certain interventions showed minimal benefits. All the results suffered from significant heterogeneity. Hence we cannot draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting patients' kidneys during surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable evidence from the available literature to suggest that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. There is a need for more studies with high methodological quality. One particular area for further study may be patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction undergoing surgery.

Can we prevent acute kidney injury?

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI).

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE- and PubMed-based review of literature published from 1965 to 2007.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is very common among critically ill patients. Even mild forms of AKI have significant attributable mortality. Hence, it is imperative that every effort to prevent AKI be made in clinical practice. However, there are very few interventions that have been shown to consistently prevent AKI. Measures such as adequate hydration, maintenance of adequate circulating blood volume and mean arterial pressure, and avoidance of nephrotoxins are still the mainstay of prevention. Loop diuretics and "renal-dose" dopamine have been clearly shown not to prevent AKI and may, in fact, do harm. Among the remaining pharmacologic options, N-acetylcysteine has the strongest evidence in prevention of AKI. Fenoldopam and theophylline need further investigation before being used to prevent septic AKI and contrast nephropathy, respectively. The role of prophylactic dialysis in preventing contrast nephropathy needs to be investigated further.

A comparison between fenoldopam and low-dose dopamine in early renal dysfunction of critically ill patients*

OBJECTIVE

Fenoldopam mesylate is a selective dopamine-1 agonist, with no effect on dopamine-2 and alpha1 receptors, producing a selective renal vasodilation. This may favor the kidney oxygen supply/demand ratio and prevent acute renal failure. The aim of the study was to investigate if fenoldopam can provide greater benefit than low-dose dopamine in early renal dysfunction of critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, multiple-center, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

University and city hospital intensive care units.

PATIENTS

One hundred adult critically ill patients with early renal dysfunction (intensive care unit stay<1 wk, hemodynamic stability, and urine output<or=0.5 mL/kg over a 6-hr period and/or serum creatinine concentration>or=1.5 mg/dL and<or= 3.5 mg/dL).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive 2 microg/kg/min dopamine (group D) or 0.1 microg/kg/min fenoldopam mesylate (group F). Drugs were administered as continuous infusion over a 4-day period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic hemodynamic and renal function variables were recorded daily. The two groups were well matched at enrollment for illness severity and hemodynamic and renal dysfunction. No differences in heart rate or systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial pressure were observed between groups. Fenoldopam produced a more significant reduction in creatinine values compared with dopamine after 2, 3, and 4 days of infusion (change from baseline at time 2, -0.32 vs. -0.03 mg/dL, p=.047; at time 3, -0.45 vs. -0.09 mg/dL, p=.047; and at time 4, -.041 vs. -0.09 mg/dL, p=.02, in groups F and D, respectively). The maximum decrease in creatinine compared with baseline was significantly greater in group F than group D (-0.53+/-0.47 vs. -0.34+/-0.38 mg/dL, p=.027). Moreover, 66% of patients in group F had a creatinine decrease>10% of the baseline value at the end of infusion, compared with only 46% in dopamine group (chi-square=4.06, p=.04). Total urinary output during drug infusion was not significantly different between groups. After 1 day, urinary output was lower in group F compared with group D (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, a continuous infusion of fenoldopam at 0.1 microg/kg/min does not cause any clinically significant hemodynamic impairment and improves renal function compared with renal dose dopamine. In the setting of acute early renal dysfunction, before severe renal failure has occurred, the attempt to reverse renal hypoperfusion with fenoldopam is more effective than with low-dose dopamine.

Effects of fenoldopam on renal blood flow and its function in a canine model of rhabdomyolysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Our hypothesis was that fenoldopam, a selective DA1 agonist, would protect against rhabdomyolysis-induced renal injury.

METHODS

We studied the effects of intravenous fenoldopam (0.1-1.0 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) or saline on renal blood flow and function in 10 anaesthetized Labrador dogs in whom rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuric acute renal failure had been induced by administration of glycerol 50% (10mL kg(-1)) intramuscularly. Haemodynamic measurements including renal blood flow and derived parameters of renal function including creatinine clearance were recorded before and for the 30 min following glycerol injection, and during the 3 h following commencement of each infusion. Serum malondialdehyde concentrations were measured before and 15 min after glycerol intramuscularly, and 30 and 150 min after commencement of the infusion.

RESULTS

In the fenoldopam group, creatinine clearance was less than placebo at 1 and 2 h after commencing the infusion (12.7 +/- 11.5 versus 31.3 +/- 9.9 mL min(-1), P = 0.04; 8.5 +/- 5.3 versus 20.1 +/- 7.4 mL min(-1), P = 0.03). A 140-fold increase in serum malondialdehyde concentration occurred in one dog (fenoldopam group).

CONCLUSION

Fenoldopam increased the severity of the renal injury in this canine model of myoglobinuric acute renal failure.

Novel approaches to the treatment of acute renal failure

Acute renal failure (ARF) occurs frequently in hospitalised patients and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many therapeutic strategies have been undertaken both to prevent acute renal injury and, once ARF occurs, to improve renal function and reduce mortality. Among the available pharmacological options, no specific therapy has been shown to alter the course of ARF. This article reviews the efficacy of several strategies in experimental renal disease and raises the possibility that similar interventions might be available to the clinician in the near future for the prevention and management of ARF. The prospect of these novel strategies, together with the ever-increasing understanding of the complex pathophysiology of ARF, offers the promise of effective and more physiological therapeutic interventions in this new millennium.