Thiopental impairs neutrophil oxidative response by inhibition of intracellular signalling:

Isolated head injury in children affects the neutrophil function and lymphocyte count

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of treatment of postinjury complications remain unsatisfactory and research continues into the impact of trauma on innate and acquired immunity. The aim of our study was to describe how head injury affects a child's immunity by measuring the neutrophil function and lymphocytes subsets.

METHODS

The peripheral blood of 16 children with head trauma (Glasgow Coma Score < or =9) was examined. The blood samples were collected on the first and on the seventh day after trauma. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), spontaneous and stimulated, the expression of CD11b, and the lymphocyte subpopulations were measured. The blood of healthy children was studied as control. The impact of endotracheal intubation on the examined parameters was analyzed as well.

RESULTS

Head trauma leads to the increase of leukocytosis; the total production of ROS by peripheral blood neutrophils does not change after head injury. Correction of the results according to the number of neutrophils revealed a significant decrease in ROS production by a single neutrophil. The expression of adhesion molecule CD11b did not change. Head injury in children causes the decrease of the total lymphocyte count, CD3, CD4, CD8, and natural killer cells count on both the first and the seventh postinjury day. On the seventh day the significant decrease of natural killer cells subset was observed. The CD4/CD8 ratio increased from 1.5 (the first day) to 2.5 (the seventh day). The intubation did not affect the examined parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

After head injury, total ROS production and adhesion molecule CD11b expression remained unchanged when compared with control. The study did not demonstrate evidence for neutrophil activation in patients with head injuries. The total lymphocyte count was found to be decreased and the composition of lymphocytes' subsets was deeply impaired.

Effects of propofol vs methohexital on neutrophil function and immune status in critically ill patients

PURPOSE

Patients with severe brain injury often require long-term sedation and have a high incidence of nosocomial infections, causing an increased mortality rate. However, whether anesthetic drugs might contribute to immunosuppressive effects remains unclear.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we investigated the effects of propofol (4-6 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) and methohexital (1-3 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) on neutrophil leukocyte function and immune status in 21 patients with brain injury who either received propofol (n = 12; 9 male, 3 female; mean age, 51 +/- 15 years) or methohexital (n = 9; 8 male, 1 female; mean age, 48 +/- 17 years) after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Both sedatives were administered over 7 days and individual dosage was adapted according to clinical requirements. Neutrophil leukocyte function was assessed as phagocytosis and respiratory oxidative burst activity. Furthermore, leukocyte subpopulations, and surface markers of lymphocytes and monocytes (CD3; CD4; CD45RO; CD4/CD45RO; CD25; CD4 and CD25; CD54; CD69; CD14/HLA-DR; CD8; CD3/HLA-DR; CD4 : CD8 ratio) were assessed. Blood samples were drawn on ICU admission, and on days 3, 7, and 14. Patients' demographics were compared by Wilcoxon test and laboratory results were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements, with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in neutrophil oxidative burst and phagocytosis within or between the two groups at the different time points. With respect to cellular markers of lymphocytes and monocytes, all values throughout remained in the normal range.

CONCLUSION

Methohexital and propofol exhibited no significant effects on neutrophil function and immune status in patients with severe brain injury requiring long-term sedation.

Interactions of anesthetics with their targets: non-specific, specific or both?

What makes a general anesthetic a general anesthetic? We shall review first what general anesthesia is all about and which drugs are being used as anesthetics. There is neither a unique definition of general anesthesia nor any consensus on how to measure it. Diverse drugs and combinations of drugs generate general anesthetic states of sometimes very different clinical quality. Yet the principal drugs are still considered to belong to the same class of 'general anesthetics'. Effective concentrations of inhalation anesthetics are in the high micromolar range and above, and even for intravenous anesthetics they do not go below the micromolar range. At these concentrations, many molecular and higher level targets are affected by inhalation anesthetics, fewer probably by intravenous anesthetics. The only physicochemical characteristic shared by anesthetics is the correlation of their anesthetic potencies with hydrophobicity. These correlations depend on the group of general anesthetics considered. In this review, anesthetic potencies for many different targets are plotted against octanol/water partition coefficients as measure of hydrophobicity. Qualitatively, similar correlations result, suggesting several but weak interactions with proteins as being characteristic of anesthetic actions. The polar interactions involved are weak, being roughly equal in magnitude to hydrophobic interactions. Generally, intravenous anesthetics are noticeably more potent than inhalation anesthetics. They differ considerably more between each other in their interactions with various targets than inhalation anesthetics do, making it difficult to come to a decision which of these should be used in future studies as representative 'prototypical general anesthetics'.

Anaesthetic sensitivity of fMLP-induced cell signalling in Xenopus oocytes

FMLP stimulation of Xenopus oocytes expressing fMLP receptors leads to a concentration-dependent biphasic inward current. To identify the evolution of these currents we have examined the effects of blocking various cell signalling pathways. In addition we have analysed the effects of three intravenous anaesthetics on these fMLP-induced currents. Xenopus oocytes were microinjected with cRNA encoding the fMLP receptor and fMLP-stimulated (100 nM) currents measured, using two-electrode voltage-clamp (-70 mV), before and after injection of heparin (120 ng ml-1), wortmannin (1 microM), U73122 (5 microM) or buffer. Concentration-response curves were established for the action on fMLP-stimulated currents of thiopentone (5-500 microM), methohexitone (0.2-200 microM) and propofol (0.5-500 microM). Heparin significantly enhanced the fast current (p<0.05). Wortmannin had no effect on either current. U73122 inhibited only the slow current (p<0.05). All anaesthetics inhibited both currents, with the maximum inhibition for the fast/slow currents 70%/100%, 60%/60% and 100%/100% for thiopentone (IC50 147/120 microM), methohexitone (IC50 4.7/2.2 microM) and propofol (IC50 33/8 microM), respectively. We suggest (a) the slow current arises via the PLC/PKC pathway because it is reduced by the PLC inhibitor U73122, (b) the PI3K- and PLD-mediated pathways are not involved because wortmannin had no effect and (c) activation of the two conductance channels must be different because U73122 reduced the slow but not the fast current. Since both currents are decreased by all three anaesthetics, their inhibition might be mediated through an action at the agonist/receptor, although, since the slow current is consistently more sensitive than the fast, there may be additionally an action on cell signalling.

Effects of general anaesthesia on inflammation

General anaesthesia accompanied by surgical stress may influence the inflammatory responses that are essential for maintaining the homeostatic state during the postoperative course. Severe dysregulation of the inflammatory process may provoke or aggravate postoperative complications, e.g. increased susceptibility to infections, inadequate stress reactions and hypercatabolism. Anaesthetics have been suspected of impairing various functions of the immune system either directly, by disturbing the functions of immune-competent cells, or indirectly by modulating the stress response. In the past, conflicting data on the possible immunological side effects of anaesthetics have been published. Potential reasons for these controversial findings include heterogeneous patient study groups with diverse pre-existing diseases, lack of standardisation of surgical procedures, major differences in the length and severity of surgical tissue injury and a small number of randomised studies. Although the immunological effects are of minor consequence in subjects with normal immune functions, the suppression of cellular and humoral immunity following surgery and general anaesthesia may be relevant in patients with pre-existing immune disorders.

Differential effects of clindamycin on neutrophils of healthy donors and septic patients

Antibiotics are frequently administered to ICU patients in case of bacterial infections. Little is known, however, about the interference of antibiotics with neutrophil host defence mechanisms in patients with sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). With our study, evidence for differential clindamycin effects on neutrophils in healthy donors and septic patients without or with MODS was sought. Functional parameters (oxidative response and phagocytosis) and fMLP receptor expression were analysed. The study was approved by the local ethical board. Venous blood was drawn from healthy donors and septic patients. Neutrophils in PBS were incubated with 0, 5, 25 or 125 microg/ml clindamycin and analysed flow cytometrically. Neutrophils of patients with sepsis and MODS showed a significantly higher basal activation compared to healthy donors. Clindamycin application led to a dose-dependent significant suppression of the fMLP-induced oxidative response in patients with sepsis and MODS, but not in healthy donors or septic patients in the absence of MODS. In patients with sepsis and MODS, phagocytosis of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was significantly suppressed by clindamycin 125 microg/ml. In both other treatment groups, clindamycin did not affect phagocytosis. fMLP receptor expression was not altered by clindamycin. High-dose clindamycin selectively suppresses functional responses of neutrophils in septic patients with MODS. Simultaneously applied drugs, such as general anaesthetics, may potentiate this modulation of antibacterial defence and inflammation.