Monitoring Patients During Procedures Conducted Outside the Operating Room

Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The demand for anesthesia services is increasing due to more complex procedures being performed outside the operating room. We reviewed the literature and closed malpractice claims in the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Closed Claims database to assess liability and injury associated with anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room (nonoperating-room anesthesia, n = 24) compared with intra-operative surgical anesthesia (operating room, n = 1927) claims.

RECENT FINDINGS

A higher proportion of patients in nonoperating-room anesthesia claims underwent monitored anesthesia care (58 vs. 6%, P < 0.001) and were at the extremes of age (50 vs. 19%, P = 0.003) than in operating room claims. Half of the nonoperating-room anesthesia claims occurred in the gastrointestinal suite. Inadequate oxygenation/ventilation was the most common specific damaging event in nonoperating-room anesthesia claims (33 vs. 2% in operating room claims, P < 0.001). The proportion of death was increased in nonoperating-room anesthesia claims (54 vs. 24%, P = 0.003). Nonoperating-room anesthesia claims were more often judged as having substandard care (P = 0.003) and being preventable by better monitoring (P = 0.007).

SUMMARY

Nonoperating-room anesthesia claims had a higher severity of injury and more substandard care than operating room claims. Inadequate oxygenation/ventilation was the most common mechanism of injury. Maintenance of minimum monitoring standards and airway management training is required for staff involved in patient sedation.

Equipment and environmental issues for nonoperating room anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The demand for anesthesia care outside the operating room continues to grow, driven by trends in advanced diagnostic techniques and the financial advantages of providing care out of the hospital setting. This review examines recent literature identifying new equipment and environmental issues that impact on nonoperating-room anesthesia care.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review addresses the safety implications of the new high-field-strength (3 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging scanners and also the differences in anesthesia delivery system design that influence the duration of function when only gas cylinders are available.

SUMMARY

Practitioners who render anesthesia care outside of the operating room need to be cognizant of changing equipment design, which raises new challenges for rendering safe care.

Anesthesia for neuroradiology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of anesthesia outside the operating room is rapidly expanding and evolving alongside with the advances in interventional neuroradiology. Increasingly complex diagnostic and therapeutic neuroradiological procedures are being performed on sicker patients. This review provides an overview of the principles of anesthetic management and summarizes recent advances in interventional neuroradiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are many new areas of development in interventional neuroradiology, but each also brings with it controversy. Use of newer agents for anesthesia and for anticoagulation may change the intraoperative management of patients. The role of neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular procedures is still to be validated. The optimal mode of treating cerebral aneurysms is still being debated. There has been increasing interest in and evidence of the efficacy of carotid artery stenting in the treatment of carotid artery disease. The utility of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery is expanding rapidly.

SUMMARY

Providing anesthesia in the interventional neuroradiology suite continues to be a challenge to the anesthesiologist. Understanding the anesthetic constraints and complexities and keeping abreast of the current developments in neuroradiology are crucial in ensuring the maximal benefits to and safety of patients.

Nonoperating room anesthesia for children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the continuous development of technological advances for diagnosis and treatment comes the increased need for anesthesia outside of the operating room. Children, because of their inability to cooperate with lengthy imaging procedures or painful treatments, form the largest group needing non operating room anesthesia (NORA). As the distinction between deep sedation and general anesthesia becomes less clear, it has become increasingly common for institutions to dedicate resources for pediatric NORA (as opposed to sedation services) to improve predictability, comfort, and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anesthesia away from the operating room must meet all standards mandated for general anesthesia in the operating suite. In addition, NORA teams must meet non anesthesia specialty guidelines and requirements of the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. The complexities and hazards of distinct environments must be met and technical support provided. Communication, backup, and emergency systems must be integrated, often at significant geographical distances from central anesthesia services. Anesthesia personnel are often required to interact in multiple roles that may be unfamiliar.

SUMMARY

NORA is a specific microsystem environment that must integrate operating room systems with those of other departments and specialties. Often the children that require these procedures have chronic illnesses and return at frequent intervals with complex medical, psychological, and behavioral issues. Special knowledge, training, and support infrastructure are required to provide optimal care for these expanding services.