MIB-1 expression is useful in distinguishing dysplasia from atrophy in elderly women

Diagnostic Challenges during Inflammation and Cancer: Current Biomarkers and Future Perspectives in Navigating through the Minefield of Reactive versus Dysplastic and Cancerous Lesions in the Digestive System

In the setting of pronounced inflammation, changes in the epithelium may overlap with neoplasia, often rendering it impossible to establish a diagnosis with certainty in daily clinical practice. Here, we discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms driving tissue response during persistent inflammatory signaling along with the potential association with cancer in the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, extrahepatic bile ducts, and liver. We highlight the histopathological challenges encountered in the diagnosis of chronic inflammation in routine practice and pinpoint tissue-based biomarkers that could complement morphology to differentiate reactive from dysplastic or cancerous lesions. We refer to the advantages and limitations of existing biomarkers employing immunohistochemistry and point to promising new markers, including the generation of novel antibodies targeting mutant proteins, miRNAs, and array assays. Advancements in experimental models, including mouse and 3D models, have improved our understanding of tissue response. The integration of digital pathology along with artificial intelligence may also complement routine visual inspections. Navigating through tissue responses in various chronic inflammatory contexts will help us develop novel and reliable biomarkers that will improve diagnostic decisions and ultimately patient treatment.

Human papillomavirus, p16(INK4A), and Ki-67 in relation to clinicopathological variables and survival in primary carcinoma of the vagina

Background:

This study aimed to determine human papillomavirus (HPV) status and to investigate p16^INK4A and Ki-67 expression and their correlation with clinical parameters and survival in women with primary carcinoma of the vagina (PCV).

Methods:

The presence of HPV DNA was evaluated by PCR. Genotyping was performed by Luminex in 68 short-term (⩽2 years) and long-term (⩾8 years) PCV survivors. p16^INK4A and Ki-67 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

Results:

Human papillomavirus DNA was detected in 43% of patients, the majority (63%) of whom were HPV16 positive. High p16^INK4A expression was significantly correlated with low histopathological grade (P=0.004), HPV positivity (P=0.032), and long-term survival (P=0.045). High Ki-67 expression was negatively correlated with histopathological grade (P<0.001) and tumour size (P=0.047). There was an association between HPV positivity and low histopathological grade, but not between HPV positivity and survival.

Conclusion:

High p16^INK4A expression was associated with long-term survival, but the only independent predictors for survival were tumour size and histopathological grade. Our results indicate that p16^INK4A and Ki-67 expression might be useful in tumour grading, and that it might be possible to use p16^INK4A expression as a marker for HPV positivity, but this has to be further elucidated.

Utility of p16, Ki-67, and HPV Test in Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Atrophy in Women Older Than 50 Years With 3- to 7-Year Follow-up

Background. Differentiating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) from atrophy in postmenopausal women based on morphology alone is challenging. p16 and Ki-67 help distinguish CIN2/3 from atrophy. The goal of this study is to further characterize the utility of p16, Ki-67, and human papillomavirus (HPV) tests in women older than 50 years, particularly in CIN1. Design. The authors retrospectively identified cervical specimens from three, 1-year time periods. Included were cases from women older than 50 years with benign diagnoses, atrophy, and CIN. Slides were stained with p16 and Ki-67 and graded as positive or negative. Medical records were reviewed for cytology, HPV test, and histopathologic diagnoses from the time of biopsy to 2010. Results. A total of 97 cervical samples were included. In all, 34 (74%) CIN1 cases were negative for p16 and Ki-67. Of CIN1 cases with positive HPV tests, only 1/10 (10%) had positive p16 staining versus 2/2 (100%) of CIN2/3 cases. Of 39 women with CIN1 who had follow-up data available, 4 (10%) had subsequent histologic progression to CIN2/3 and none developed invasive disease. Conclusions. In our study, the majority of cases (74%) diagnosed as CIN1 in women ≥ 50 years are negative for p16 and Ki-67 and do not progress to high-grade dysplasia during 3- to 7-year follow-up. A combination of morphology, p16, and Ki-67 on cervical specimens in women older than 50 years, and furthermore, use of these stains on Pap tests in combination with HPV testing may help distinguish CIN from atrophy and reduce unnecessary invasive follow-up testing.

Application of immunohistochemistry to gynecologic pathology

CONTEXT

A large variety of tumors and lesions arise in the female genital tract. Although the majority of these can be correctly recognized on routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides, occasional cases present a diagnostic challenge. Immunohistochemical stains are extremely useful in resolving many of these problematic cases. As the knowledge in this area is constantly expanding, it is useful to have this updated information in a review form for easy access.

OBJECTIVE

To present our current knowledge of immunohistochemistry of the lesions of the female genital tract in a readily accessible form.

DATA SOURCES

The review is based on previously published articles on this topic.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical stains help in reaching a conclusive diagnosis in a variety of problematic lesions seen in gynecologic pathology. As in any other system, immunohistochemical findings need to be interpreted in light of the clinical history and morphologic findings.

Immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic aid in cervical pathology

As with biopsies from other sites in the female genital tract, immunohistochemistry is now being increasingly used in cervical pathology as an aid to diagnosis. In this review, I discuss applications of immunohistochemistry in diagnostic cervical pathology with a particular focus on recent developments. It is emphasised that immunohistochemistry is to be used as an adjunct to routine morphological examination and that no marker is totally specific or sensitive for a given lesion. Although much of this review focuses on glandular lesions, the value of markers, such as MIB1 and p16, in the assessment of pre-invasive cervical squamous lesions is discussed. In the broad field of cervical glandular lesions, topics covered include: the value of markers such as MIB1, p16 and bcl-2 in distinguishing adenocarcinoma in situ and glandular dysplasia from benign mimics; markers of mesonephric lesions, including CD10; markers of value in the diagnosis of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma, such as HIK1083; markers of value in distinguishing metastatic cervical adenocarcinoma in the ovary from primary ovarian endometrioid or mucinous adenocarcinoma. Rarely ectopic prostatic tissue occurs in the cervix, which can be confirmed by positive staining with prostatic markers. A panel of markers, comprising oestrogen receptor, vimentin, monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen and p16, is of value in distinguishing between a cervical adenocarcinoma and an endometrial adenocarcinoma of endometrioid type. Markers of use in the diagnosis of cervical neuroendocrine neoplasms, including small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, are discussed. It is stressed that small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas may be negative with most of the commonly used neuroendocrine markers and this does not preclude the diagnosis. p63, a useful marker of squamous neoplasms within the cervix, is of value in distinguishing small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (p63 negative) from small cell squamous carcinoma (p63 positive) and in confirming that a poorly differentiated carcinoma is squamous in type.

Proliferation patterns of cervical cells as visualized in Leiden liquid cytology slides

The Leiden liquid-based cytology method for the preparation of optimal cytological slides is reported. In such slides, the proliferation pattern of cervical cells can be visualized in detail. Cervical smears and suspension preparations of 665 consecutive unselected patients received in 2003 were studied. Of the 665 patients, 26 (10 normal, 10 with cervical atrophy, 5 with mild dysplasia, and 1 carcinoma in situ) were selected. After using the Thermo Shandon Papspin, the wet slides were placed on a hot plate and dried for 30 min. Proliferation of the cervical cells was visualized in brown by staining the cells for MiB-1 antigen, and nuclear DNA in blue by a standardized short staining with hematoxylin. We found excellent high-resolution demonstrability of cell cycle-related MiB-1 distribution in the well-flattened nuclei. The phase of the cell cycle could be deduced from brown-blue staining patterns. There was a significant increase of MiB-1-positive cell yield related to progression in the degree of pathology.

Molecular markers in cervical cytology

It is expected that in the near future, the high sensitivity of array-based technologies and identification of panels of molecular fingerprints that are specific for each disease process will allow the pathologist to analyze cytologic samples and tissue biopsies by these technologies in conjunction with morphologic evaluation. This approach could lead to a new era in diagnosis and patient management, where each patient may receive individualized treatment according to the molecular characteristics of the disease that are obtained from a minute amount of tissue. Therefore, it is important for pathologists and other clinical specialists to have an understanding of these molecular technologies. It is hoped that this article will allow practitioners to incorporate these concepts into their training, and, eventually, into their daily practice.

Low-grade vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation of histologic features with human papillomavirus DNA detection and MIB-1 immunostaining

Histologic criteria of low-grade vulvar/vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN1/VAIN1) are well established; however, a significant interobserver variability in diagnosing VIN1/VAIN1 has been reported. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of MIB-1 immunostaining as an adjunct test to increase the diagnostic accuracy in equivocal cases of VIN1/VAIN1. The second goal was to examine the distribution of low- and high-oncogenic risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in VIN1/VAIN1 lesions. Consecutive vulvar/vaginal biopsies originally diagnosed as VIN1/VAIN1 (n = 43) or benign (n = 20) were reviewed by two pathologists to obtain a consensus diagnosis. The diagnosis was further confirmed with HPV testing using Short PCR Fragment 10 and Line Probe Assay. MIB-1 immunostaining was performed, and positive staining was defined as a cluster of two or more stained nuclei in the upper two thirds of the epithelial thickness. After verification of the diagnosis using the consensus histologic review and HPV detection as an objective confirmatory test, 31% of cases originally diagnosed as VIN1/VAIN1 were identified as being overdiagnosed. The sensitivity and the specificity of MIB-1 staining for identifying VIN1/VAIN1 were 0.96 and 0.90, respectively. Seventy percent of VIN1 cases were associated with low-risk viral types. In contrast, the majority (84%) of VAIN1 cases were associated with high-risk HPVs. In conclusion, MIB-1 staining is sensitive and specific for identifying VIN1/VAIN1, helpful in verifying the diagnosis in equivocal cases.

Immunohistochemical staining with MIB1, bcl2 and p16 assists in the distinction of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia from tubo-endometrial metaplasia, endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia

AIMS

Preinvasive endocervical glandular lesions, termed cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia, are increasing in incidence. The distinction of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia from benign mimics, especially tubo-endometrial metaplasia, endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia, can be difficult. This study investigates the value of immunohistochemical staining with MIB1, bcl2 and p16 in the distinction of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia from these benign mimics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunohistochemical staining using the monoclonal antibodies MIB1, bcl2 and p16 was performed on cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 21), tubo-endometrial metaplasia (n = 13), endometriosis (n = 7) and microglandular hyperplasia (n = 14). With tubo-endometrial metaplasia and microglandular hyperplasia staining with MIB1 was either negative or involved <10% of cells, while with cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia the majority of cases (86%) exhibited >10% positive cells. Two cases of endometriosis exhibited a MIB1 index of 10-30% while in the other cases <10% cells stained. With bcl2 the cells of microglandular hyperplasia were negative although there was staining of associated reserve cells in 43% of cases. All cases of tubo-endometrial metaplasia except one and all cases of endometriosis stained diffusely positive with bcl2. Cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia were negative or exhibited focal staining. With p16 all cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia exhibited diffuse strong positivity, generally involving 100% of cells, while all cases of microglandular hyperplasia were negative. Sixty-two percent of cases of tubo-endometrial metaplasia showed focal positivity, the remainder being negative. Cases of tubo-endometrial metaplasia were never diffusely positive with p16. In three cases of endometriosis there was staining of >50% of cells while the other cases were either focally positive or negative.

CONCLUSIONS

A panel of antibodies, comprising MIB1, bcl2 and p16, is a useful adjunct to histology in distinguishing cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia from tubo-endometrial metaplasia, endometriosis and microglandular hyperplasia. Cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia are diffusely positive for p16 and generally exhibit a high proliferation index with MIB1, while bcl2 is negative or, at most, focally positive. Tubo-endometrial metaplasia and endometriosis are characterized by strong diffuse positivity with bcl2 and a low proliferation index with MIB1 (although occasional cases of endometriosis show moderate proliferative activity). p16 is negative or exhibits focal positivity in tubo-endometrial metaplasia but in endometriosis there may be quite widespread positivity. Microglandular hyperplasia shows a low proliferation index with MIB1 and is negative for bcl2 and p16.

Recent advances in immunohistochemistry in gynaecological pathology

Recent years have witnessed significant developments in the use of immunohistochemistry in diagnostic gynaecological pathology. This review details the most significant of these. In ovarian pathology, differential cytokeratin staining (CK7 and 20) assists in distinguishing between a primary ovarian adenocarcinoma and a metastatic adenocarcinoma, especially of colorectal origin. The development of markers characteristic of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours (especially alpha-inhibin) facilitates diagnosis of these neoplasms which is often difficult by morphology alone due to the wide differential diagnosis. In the uterus, the distinction between a primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma may be facilitated by use of a small panel of antibodies, including CEA, ER and vimentin. Newly developed antibodies such as CD10 and h-caldesmon may be of use in the diagnosis of uterine mesenchymal lesions, especially in the distinction between endometrial stromal and smooth muscle lesions. Proliferation markers, such as MIB1, are of value in the cervix in the diagnosis of preinvasive squamous and glandular lesions. Recent studies have shown that cervical adenoma malignum exhibits a gastric phenotype. Advances have also been made in trophoblastic disease with the development of antibodies reactive against trophoblast such as alpha-inhibin, mel-Cam and p57. A newly developed monoclonal antibody HMGIC which is expressed in vulvovaginal aggressive angiomyxoma may prove to be of value in the often difficult distinction of this lesion from its histological mimics.

MIB-1 expression in cervical Papanicolaou tests correlates with dysplasia in subsequent cervical biopsies

Ki-67 nuclear antigen is present in proliferating cells. MIB-1 antibody, raised to the recombinant part of the Ki-67 antigen, is a widely used biologic marker to assess cell proliferation. Ki-67 expression is normally observed in parabasal and basal cells in the cervix. With increasing severity of dysplasia, MIB-1 labeling is seen in cells of the superficial layers of cervical epithelium, which are exfoliated. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of presence of MIB-1-positive cells in Papanicolaou tests for predicting cervical neoplasia, condyloma, or both, on follow up. Using microwave antigen retrieval method, 49 air-dried cervical smears in two-smear cases were evaluated with immunostaining with MIB-1 monoclonal antibody. Presence of MIB-1 positivity was arbitrarily set at > or = 4 MIB-1 immunoreactive cells in each smear. The degree of positive staining was correlated with the cytologic diagnoses, subsequent colposcopy-directed biopsies, endocervical curettage, and/or cytologic follow ups. Follow-up findings correlated with cytology in 33 cases (67%), with MIB-1 positivity in 35 cases (71%). Three cases with positive follow ups were missed by cytology but detected by MIB-1 staining, and three cases were missed by MIB-1 but detected by cytology. Both cytology and MIB-1 staining failed to detect a subsequent cervical lesion in two cases, and in six cases each, an abnormal finding was not substantiated on follow ups. MIB-1 immunostaining is a powerful technique for evaluating gynecologic smears and is as equally sensitive and specific as cervical cytology. It is able to identify cervical disease overlooked by cytologic screening; therefore, it may serve as an adjunct and complimentary tool to cervical cytology.

Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16INK4 are complimentary surrogate biomarkers for human papilloma virus-related cervical neoplasia

Prior studies of Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16 expression have suggested that these biomarkers may be preferentially expressed in cervical neoplasia. This study examined and compared the distribution of staining for these three antigens in 1) normal and reactive epithelial changes, 2) diagnostically challenging cases (atypical metaplasia and atypical atrophy), 3) squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), and 4) high-and low-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) type-specific SIL. One hundred four epithelial foci from 99 biopsies were studied, including low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL; 24), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL; 36), mature or immature (metaplastic) squamous epithelium (29), and atrophic or metaplastic epithelium with atypia (15). Cases were scored positive for Ki-67 expression if expression extended above the basal one third of the epithelium, for cyclin E if moderate to strong staining was present, and for p16 if moderate to strong diffuse or focal staining was present. HPV status was scored by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis of extracted DNA. Immunohistochemical findings were correlated with histologic and viral data. Overall, a histologic diagnosis of SIL correlated strongly with all of the biomarkers used (p <0.001). Positive scores for Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16 were seen in 68.4%, 96.7%, and 100% of LSILs and 94.7%, 91.6%, and 100% of HSILs, respectively. Positive predictive values of these three biomarkers for HPV were 82.4%, 89.5%, and 91.4%, respectively. The positive predictive value for HPV of either cyclin E or p16 was 88.7%. Strong diffuse staining for p16 was significantly associated with high-risk HPV-associated lesions. Normal or reactive epithelial changes scored positive for the three biomarkers in 7.7%, 8.0%, and 12%, respectively. Limitations in specificity included minimal or no suprabasal staining for Ki-67 in immature condylomas and occasional suprabasal staining of reactive epithelial changes (10%), diffuse weak nuclear cyclin E staining in some normal or metaplastic epithelia, and diffuse weak basal p16 staining and occasional stronger focal positivity in normal epithelia. Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16 are complementary surrogate biomarkers for HPV-related preinvasive squamous cervical disease. (Because cyclin E and p16 are most sensitive for LSIL and HSIL [including high-risk HPV], respectively, use of these biomarkers in combination for resolving diagnostic problems, with an appreciation of potential background staining, is recommended.)

Surrogate biomarkers of HPV infection in cervical neoplasia screening and diagnosis

The current prevention of cervical cancer and elimination of its precursors is predicated on the identification of cervical cytologic abnormalities and their histologic confirmation. This strategy, although effective, depends on both sensitivity and specificity of cytology and precise histologic distinction between precursor lesions and their mimics during biopsy interpretation. The effective application of diagnostic criteria is operator dependent and varies as a function of experience and training. However, because human papilloma viruses (HPV) are causative agents and alter the cell cycle in cervical neoplasms, host genes interacting directly or indirectly with HPV oncoproteins have been identified in vitro. Recent research has centered on identifying the host genes upregulated in association with HPV infection, determining their suitability as "surrogate markers" for HPV infection, and using these markers to identify HPV-associated epithelial lesions in tissue or cytologic specimens. This review surveys recent advances in this field, summarizing the advantages and limitations of several candidate biomarkers, including PCNA, Ki-67, cyclin E, p16ink4, MN antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and telomerase in the recognition of preinvasive cervical neoplasia, and discusses their future potential in cervical cancer screening. Based on current studies, the strongest candidates for diagnosis and screening are p16 and cyclin E (squamous) and MN (glandular) biomarkers. As new genes are identified and tested, the concept of biomarkers as tools in primary screening and lesion recognition will continue to mature.

Decreased expression of Ki-67 in atrophic cervical epithelium of post-menopausal women

Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears (Pap smears) of post-menopausal women often present difficulties in distinguishing atrophic cervical epithelium from high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3). The aim of this study was to disclose differences in proliferative activity in normal cervical epithelium, cervical atrophy, and high-grade CIN lesions, in order to develop specific and sensitive classifiers to discriminate between cervical atrophy and high-grade CIN, both in cervical smears and in tissue sections. A case-control study was done on 83 patients. Proliferative activity was assessed in histological sections using the monoclonal antibody MIB1. An image analysis system was used to characterize different proliferation-associated features. Preceding Pap smears were restained with MIB1 and proliferative activity was measured by a point-counting procedure, carried out on a training set of 32 cases and a test set of 51 cases. In cervical atrophy, proliferative activity was significantly lower than in normal epithelium (p<0.001). Proliferative activity measured in both biopsies and cervical smears was considerably higher in high-grade CIN than in normal epithelium (p<0.001). Discriminant analyses resulted in four classifiers, based on proliferation parameters, to discriminate between cervical atrophy and high-grade CIN, and between CIN2 and CIN3, in biopsy specimens and cervical smears, respectively. The two classifiers for biopsy specimens resulted in 100% correct classification. Application of the classifier obtained from the training set of Pap smears resulted in 100% correct classification of the Pap smears in the test set. The classifier to discriminate between CIN2 and CIN3 in Pap smears, obtained from 36 patients, resulted in 87% and 90% correct classification, respectively.