Symposium part 4: Should pathologists diagnose endocervical preneoplastic lesions "less than" adenocarcinoma in situ?: Counterpoint

The spectrum of cervical glandular neoplasia and issues in differential diagnosis

CONTEXT

Premalignant and malignant glandular lesions of the cervix are known to often cause diagnostic problems with a variety of benign (more common) as well as other malignant mimics, the latter setting often being represented by secondary involvement by endometrioid endometrial carcinoma especially in small samplings.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight key histologic features and immunohistochemical markers that may be helpful in the distinction of in situ endocervical carcinoma from benign glandular proliferations, and those that separate different subtypes of invasive endocervical carcinoma, as well as invasive carcinoma from other carcinomas secondarily involving the cervix and nonneoplastic proliferations of the cervix.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and morphologic features as well as immunohistochemistry results should be used in conjunction in the differential diagnosis of glandular proliferations of the cervix, as correct interpretation has major clinical consequences for the patient in most instances (especially benign versus malignant). Immunohistochemical markers should be used as part of a panel of antibodies, as exceptions may occur to the usual pattern of staining, and if used singly, they may mislead the pathologist to establish a wrong diagnosis.

Premalignant lesions of the lower female genital tract: cervix, vagina and vulva

Premalignant lesions of the lower female genital tract encompassing the cervix, vagina and vulva are variably common and many, but by no means all, are related to infection by human papillomavirus (HPV). In this review, pathological aspects of the various premalignant lesions are discussed, mainly concentrating on new developments. The value of ancillary studies, mainly immunohistochemical, is discussed at the appropriate points. In the cervix, the terminology and morphological features of premalignant glandular lesions is covered, as is the distinction between adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and early invasive adenocarcinoma, which may be very problematic. A spectrum of benign, premalignant and malignant cervical glandular lesions exhibiting gastric differentiation is emerging with lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH), including so-called atypical LEGH, representing a possible precursor of non HPV-related cervical adenocarcinomas exhibiting gastric differentiation; these include the cytologically bland adenoma malignum and the morphologically malignant gastric type adenocarcinoma. Stratified mucin producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE) is a premalignant cervical lesion with morphological overlap between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and AIS and which is variably regarded as a form of reserve cell dysplasia or stratified AIS. It is now firmly established that there are two distinct types of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) with a different pathogenesis, molecular events, morphological features and risk of progression to squamous carcinoma. These comprise a more common HPV-related usual type VIN (also referred to as classic, undifferentiated, basaloid, warty, Bowenoid type) and a more uncommon differentiated (simplex) type which is non-HPV related and which is sometimes associated with lichen sclerosus. The former has a relatively low risk of progression to HPV-related vulval squamous carcinoma and the latter a high risk of progression to non-HPV related vulval squamous carcinoma. Various aspects of vulval Paget's disease are also discussed.

New developments in endocervical glandular lesions

McCluggage W G (2012) Histopathology New developments in endocervical glandular lesions There is evidence that the prevalence of premalignant and malignant endocervical glandular lesions is increasing in real as well as in apparent terms. In this review, new developments and selected controversial aspects of endocervical glandular lesions are covered, concentrating mainly on premalignant and malignant lesions. The terminology of premalignant endocervical glandular lesions is discussed with a comparison of the World Health Organization classification and the cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) system, which is in widespread use in the United Kingdom. Primary cervical adenocarcinomas comprise a heterogeneous group of different morphological types, and while it is known that the majority of these are associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), it has become clear in recent years that most of the more uncommon morphological types are unassociated with HPV, although they may sometimes be p16-positive. A spectrum of benign, premalignant and malignant cervical glandular lesions exhibiting gastric differentiation is now recognized; these include type A tunnel clusters, typical and atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, adenoma malignum and gastric-type adenocarcinoma. The latter is a recently described variant of primary cervical adenocarcinoma which has a different morphological appearance to the usual endocervical type and which is probably associated with different patterns of spread and a worse prognosis. There is accumulating evidence that 'early invasive' cervical adenocarcinomas have an excellent prognosis and are suitable for conservative management. Immunohistochemical markers of value in the distinction between a primary cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma are discussed. While it is well known that a panel of markers comprising oestrogen receptor (ER), vimentin, p16 and monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is useful, several major pitfalls are pointed out and this panel of markers is predominantly of value in 'low-grade' adenocarcinomas. A related group of lesions, including cervical ectopic prostatic tissue and vaginal tubulosquamous polyp, are probably derived from para-urethral Skene's glands and may be positive with prostatic markers. Recent developments in cervical neuroendocrine neoplasms are discussed, as these are associated not uncommonly with a premalignant or malignant endocervical glandular lesion.

[Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma]

This overview summarizes pathogenetic and practical aspects of (sub-)classification of cervical glandular (pre-)neoplasias and, inter alia, calls into question the usefulness of grading. In the context of the differential diagnosis of benign "imitations", the phenotypic variability of glandular precancerous lesions and carcinomas is described as well as the use of special tests to distinguish them. With regard to carcinomas, the differential diagnosis of well-differentiated neoplasias is addressed including "minimal deviation" adenocarcinoma (MDA, malignant adenoma), carcinomas with endometrioid or villoglandular morphology, and mesonephric hyper- and neoplasias. Furthermore, knowledge of HPV-negative glandular (pre-)neoplasias is covered including "gastric-type" adenocarcinomas and diagnostic algorithms for discriminating between primary and secondary cervical adenocarcinomas. Finally, comments are offered on the difficulties in recognizing early invasive adenocarcinomas, especially also the pitfalls inherent in determining the depth of invasion.

Superficial (early) endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: a study of 12 cases and comparison to conventional AIS

Although established histologic criteria for the diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) have been published, some lesions are not readily classified or present with more subtle degrees of epithelial atypia. Lesions confined to the surface mucosa may be particularly challenging, possibly because they represent early disease. Twelve cases of superficial AIS (SAIS) confined to the surface mucosa or crypt openings culled from the in-house and consultation practices were examined histologically, immunostained for MIB-1 and p16, and analyzed (when possible) for HPV nucleic acids by DNA-DNA in situ hybridization (INFORM). The mean age was 26.7 years for SAIS versus 37.0 years for 42 consecutive cases of conventional AIS from the same practice (P < 0.001). Seven and five were biopsies and conization specimens, respectively. Five coexisted with CIN, four arose in endocervical papillae, and two arose in endocervical polyps. Nuclear hyperchromasia was conspicuous in 10 and mitoses were present in all; however, apoptosis was rare or absent in four, and six exhibited only mild nuclear atypia. Mib-1 staining exceeded 40% in 5 of 7 cases tested, and all (8 of 8) were strongly positive for p16(ink4). Five of five were positive for HPV by ISH with an "integrated" dot-like pattern. SAIS is an early variant of AIS that 1) occurs at a younger mean age, 2) exhibits variable atypia, and 3) arises adjacent to morphologically normal columnar epithelium. Diffuse p16 expression and integrated HPV pattern are identical to that seen in more extensive forms of the disease. Superficial AIS should be suspected in endocervical columnar epithelium with segmental nuclear hyperchromasia with mitotic activity, and confirmed by biomarker staining (p16 and Mib-1) if the pathologist is uncertain of the diagnosis.

Follow-up of Cytologic Predictions of Endocervical Glandular Abnormalities: Histologic Outcomes in 123 Cases

OBJECTIVES

To determine histologic positive predictive values (PPVs) for three categories of cytologic reports of endocervical glandular abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained histologic follow-up for 100% of 67 cytologic predictions of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 82% of 39 predictions of possible AIS (?AIS) made over a 4-year period (1999-2002) and for 25% of 105 atypical endocervical cells (AEC) predictions over a 12-month period (2000). For each category of cytologic report, we determined the histologic yields of high-grade lesions overall and of high-grade glandular lesions.

RESULTS

PPVs for predictions of AIS and ?AIS for high-grade lesions overall were 91% and 75% (p = .032), respectively, and those for high-grade glandular lesions were 88% and 72% (p = .046), respectively. For a cytologic report of AEC, of those with histologic follow-up, 9% had a high-grade lesion and 7% had a high-grade glandular lesion.

CONCLUSION

Cytology can accurately predict AIS.

The pathology of cervical tumours

Carcinomas of the cervix may be categorized on morphological grounds into four main groups: squamous carcinomas; adenocarcinomas; neuro-endocrine tumours; and others including adenosquamous carcinomas. Each group contains several morphological subvariants. Invasive squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas are preceded by cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cervical glandular intra-epithelial neoplasia, respectively. Each is graded into low and high grade. Micro-invasive carcinomas with stromal invasion less than 3mm in depth have a minimal chance of lymph node metastasis. When there is lymph node involvement, the obturator node may be the most common. Presence or absence of lymph node involvement, tumour size and depth of invasion are the important independent histopathological indicators of prognosis. The presence or absence of vascular space invasion is a valuable prognostic indicator. Small cell carcinomas, large cell neuro-endocrine carcinomas and possibly adenoid cystic carcinomas are aggressive. With these exceptions, it is doubtful whether tumour type is of much clinical significance. Tumour grade, as currently assessed, is of no significant value.