Expression of Progesterone Receptor A and B Isoforms in Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

EHD1 impaired decidualization of endometrial stromal cells in recurrent implantation failure: role of SENP1 in modulating progesterone receptor signalling†

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients exhibit poor endometrial receptivity and abnormal decidualization with reduced effectiveness and exposure to progesterone, which is an intractable clinical problem. However, the associated molecular mechanisms remain elusive. We found that EH domain containing 1 (EHD1) expression was abnormally elevated in RIF and linked to aberrant endometrial decidualization. Here we show that EHD1 overexpressed in human endometrial stromal cells significantly inhibited progesterone receptor (PGR) transcriptional activity and the responsiveness to progesterone. No significant changes were observed in PGR mRNA levels, while a significant decrease in progesterone receptor B (PRB) protein level. Indeed, EHD1 binds to the PRB protein, with the K388 site crucial for this interaction. Overexpression of EHD1 promotes the SUMOylation and ubiquitination of PRB, leading to the degradation of the PRB protein. Supplementation with the de-SUMOylated protease SENP1 ameliorated EHD1-repressed PRB transcriptional activity. To establish a functional link between EHD1 and the PGR signalling pathway, sg-EHD1 were utilized to suppress EHD1 expression in HESCs from RIF patients. A significant increase in the expression of prolactin and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 was detected by interfering with the EHD1. In conclusion, we demonstrated that abnormally high expression of EHD1 in endometrial stromal cells attenuated the activity of PRB associated with progesterone resistance in a subset of women with RIF.

Ovarian preservation for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of ovarian preservation on oncologic outcomes for women with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, Cohrane, and Web of Science databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Studies including patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma who had hysterectomy were identified. Data on tumor recurrence and death rate were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and reported on 786 patients. Based on available information, ovarian preservation was noted in 190 patients while 501 had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A significantly increased tumor recurrence rate was observed in the ovarian preservation group (89/190, 46.8%) compared with the bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy group (121/501, 24.2%) (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.39 to 5.28). Based on data from 162 patients, no difference in death rate was noted between the ovarian preservation (2/34, 5.9%) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (9/128, 7%) groups (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-quarter of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma were managed with ovarian preservation. These women experienced a higher recurrence rate. Hormone exposure may be responsible for this elevated risk. Given the apparent high salvage rate, however, ovarian preservation may be an option only in a well-informed patient population.

cAMP-Response Element-Binding 3-Like Protein 1 (CREB3L1) is Required for Decidualization and its Expression is Decreased in Women with Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a major cause of infertility and pelvic pain, affecting more than 10% of reproductive-aged women. Progesterone resistance has been observed in the endometrium of women with this disease, as evidenced by alterations in progesterone-responsive gene and protein expression. cAMPResponse Element-Binding 3-like protein 1 (Creb3l1) has previously been identified as a progesterone receptor (PR) target gene in mouse uterus via high density DNA microarray analysis. However, CREB3L1 function has not been studied in the context of endometriosis and uterine biology. In this study, we validated progesterone (P4) regulation of Creb3l1 in the uteri of wild-type and progesterone receptor knockout (PRKO) mice. Furthermore, we observed that CREB3L1 expression was significantly higher in secretory phase human endometrium compared to proliferative phase and that CREB3L1 expression was significantly decreased in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Lastly, by transfecting CREB3L1 siRNA into cultured human endometrial stromal cells (hESCs) prior to hormonal induction of in vitro decidualization, we showed that CREB3L1 is required for the decidualization process. Interestingly, phosphorylation of ERK1/2, critical factor for decidualization, was also significantly reduced in CREB3L1-silenced hESCs. It is known that hESCs from patients with endometriosis show impaired decidualization and that dysregulation of the P4-PR signaling axis is linked to a variety of endometrial diseases including infertility and endometriosis. Therefore, these results suggest that CREB3L1 is required for decidualization in mice and humans and may be linked to the pathogenesis of endometriosis in a P4-dependent manner.

Long-term treatment of residual or recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with aromatase inhibitors: A report of two cases and a review of the literature

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) occurs rarely and accounts for only 0.2% of all uterine malignancies. ESS usually expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors, and is regarded as hormone-sensitive. Due to the rarity of these tumors, there are only few case series on the use of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of low-grade ESS. The present study reports the cases of two patients with residual or recurrent low-grade ESS who experienced long-term disease-free survival following treatment with letrozole. The study also reviews the literature with regard to the data on aromatase inhibitors used in patients with low-grade ESS. In total, 30 patients with recurrent or residual low-grade ESS who were treated with aromatase inhibitors were identified, including the present cases. Among the 30 patients, the overall response rate of advanced low-grade ESS to aromatase inhibitors was 77.4% (complete response, 25.8%; partial response, 51.6%) and the disease control rate was 90.3%. The response rate of first-line treatment was similar to that of second-line therapy or higher (84.6 vs. 72.2%; P=0.453). Duration of aromatase inhibitor treatment ranged from 1.5 to 168 months (median, 26.5 months). The aromatase inhibitors showed minimal adverse effects. In conclusion, aromatase inhibitors, particularly third-generation drugs, are a well-tolerated class of medications that are effective in the treatment of advanced low-grade ESS, with a favorable toxicity profile.

Endometrial stromal tumors: the new WHO classification

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that have intrigued pathologists for years, not only because they commonly pose diagnostic dilemmas, but also because the classification and pathogenesis of these tumors has been widely debated. The current World Health Organization recognizes 4 categories of endometrial stromal tumor: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). uterine sarcoma. These categories are defined by the presence of distinct translocations as well as tumor morphology and prognosis. Specifically, the JAZF1-SUZ12 (formerly JAZF1-JJAZ1) fusion identifies a large proportion of ESN and LG-ESSs, whereas the YWHAE-FAM22 translocation identifies HG-ESSs. The latter tumors appear to have a prognosis intermediate between LG-ESS and UUS, which exhibits no specific translocation pattern. This review (1) presents the clinicopathologic features of endometrial stromal tumors; (2) discusses their immunophenotype; and (3) highlights the recent advances in molecular genetics which explain their pathogenesis and lend support for a new classification system.

Diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in uterine mesenchymal tumors

Immunohistochemistry may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesenchymal uterine tumors. This article reviews the immunoreactions used most frequently in the diagnosis of uterine smooth muscle tumors, endometrial stromal tumors, undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas, UTROSCTs, PEComas, adenomyomas, adenosarcomas and carcinosarcomas.

Recent developments in uterine mesenchymal neoplasms

Smooth muscle and endometrial stromal tumours represent the two most common uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that may present diagnostic dilemmas for the practising surgical pathologist. Recent changes in morphological and staging criteria, as well as the discovery of new immunohistochemical markers, have improved the diagnosis and classification of these tumours. We highlight the difficulty in distinguishing tumour cell necrosis from infarct-type necrosis and the limited utility of p16 immunohistochemical expression in the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. We also discuss the controversial use of mitotic activity and necrosis as prognostic factors in endometrial stromal sarcomas. Emerging genetic information has also greatly expanded our understanding of 'sarcomagenesis' in both tumour types and may provide insight into potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcomas, harboring MED12 (mediator complex subunit 12) mutations and recurrent gene rearrangements, respectively. In this review, we discuss the core updates in the diagnosis and classification of uterine leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas, highlighting new and important molecular genetic findings that may drive pathogenesis.

Endometrial sarcomas: an immunohistochemical and JAZF1 re-arrangement study in low-grade and undifferentiated tumors

The current World Health Organization classification divides endometrial sarcomas into low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Recent studies suggest undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma is a heterogeneous group and a subgroup with uniform nuclei is more akin to low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in terms of morphologic, immunohistochemical and genetic features. We classified endometrial sarcomas treated at our institution from 1998 to 2011 into low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, the latter being further categorized into a group with either uniform or pleomorphic nuclei. Morphological features, immunoprofile and fluorescence in situ hybridization rearrangements of JAZF1 and PHF1 genes were correlated with tumor category and outcome. A total of 40 cases were evaluated comprising 23 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 10 undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas with nuclear uniformity and 7 undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas with nuclear pleomorphism. Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas were more often estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (83%) compared with undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma with nuclear uniformity (10%) or with nuclear pleomorphism (0%) (P<0.001). Positivity for p53 was restricted to undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas with more frequent expression in the group with nuclear pleomorphism (57%) than with nuclear uniformity (10%) (P=0.06). Ki-67 proliferation index in >10% of tumor cells more frequent in undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma than low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (P=<0.001). JAZF1 rearrangement was detected in 32% of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and in none of the undifferentiated sarcomas. Rearrangement of PHF1 was found in two patients, one with JAZF1-PHF1 fusion. There were no significant differences in clinical behavior between undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma with nuclear uniformity versus nuclear pleomorphism. In conclusion, we found undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma subtypes and low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma have distinct immunohistochemical and cytogentic profiles. Our data do not show any difference in clinical behavior between subgroups in undifferentiated sarcomas.

The regulation of embryo implantation and endometrial decidualization by progesterone receptor signaling

During the early stages of pregnancy, fertilized embryos must attach to the uterine epithelium, invade into the underlying uterine stroma, and the stroma must then differentiate in a process termed decidualization in order for a successful pregnancy to be initiated. The steroid hormone progesterone (P4) is an integral mediator of these early pregnancy events, exerting its effects via the progesterone receptor (PR). Insights gained from the use of mouse models and genomic profiling has identified many of the key molecules enlisted by PR to execute the paradigm of early pregnancy. This review describes several of the molecules through which the PR exerts its pleiotropic effects including ligands, receptors, chaperones, signaling proteins and transcription factors. Understanding these molecules and their concatenation is of vital importance to our ability to clinically treat reproductive health problems like infertility and endometriosis.

Recurrence patterns and prognosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma and the potential of tyrosine kinase-inhibiting therapy

OBJECTIVE

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare uterine malignancy. The current treatment approaches yield unsatisfactory results, and potential therapeutic targets need exploration.

METHODS

We reviewed the electronic medical records of 74 patients with low-grade ESS who had been evaluated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1995 and 2006. Using immunohistochemistry, we tested the expression of targets in paraffin-embedded tissue samples taken from 13 of the patients.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (64%) had a recurrence, and 16 (22%) had died of their disease at last follow-up. The 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 43% (median PFS duration, 108months), and the overall survival (OS) rate was 85% (median OS, 288months). Patients who received hormonal therapy had an overall response rate of 27%; another 53% had stable disease, with a median time to progression of 24months. No complete response or partial response was observed among patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy. In the paraffin-embedded specimens we tested, c-abl was expressed universally. Expression of PDGF-α, PDGF-β, VEGF, and c-Kit was detected in 33%, 36%, 54%, and 8%, of specimens, respectively. EGFR and HER-2 were not detectable in any specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that ESS is a hormone-dependent malignancy, with hormonal therapy having activity in recurrent disease. Targeted therapy, specifically targeting c-abl may be a potential treatment for this disease.

Uterine sarcomas--recent progress and future challenges

Uterine sarcomas are a group of rare tumours that provide considerable challenges in their treatment. Radiological diagnosis prior to hysterectomy is difficult, with the diagnosis frequently made post-operatively. Current staging systems have been unsatisfactory, although a new FIGO staging system specifically for uterine sarcomas has now been introduced, and may allow better grouping of patients according to expected prognosis. While the mainstay of treatment of early disease is a total abdominal hysterectomy, it is less clear whether routine oophorectomy or lymphadenectomy is necessary. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy may improve local tumour control in high risk patients, but is not associated with an overall survival benefit. Similarly there is no good evidence for the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy. For advanced leiomyosarcoma, newer chemotherapy agents including gemcitabine and docetaxel, and trabectedin, offer some promise, while hormonal therapies appear to be more useful in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Novel targeted agents are now being introduced for sarcomas, and uterine sarcomas, and show some indications of activity. Non-pharmacological treatments, including surgical metastatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, and CyberKnife(®) radiotherapy, are important additions to systemic therapy for advanced metastatic disease.

Functional differentiation of uterine stromal cells involves cross-regulation between bone morphogenetic protein 2 and Kruppel-like factor (KLF) family members KLF9 and KLF13

The inability of the uterine epithelium to enter a state of receptivity for the embryo to implant is a significant underlying cause of early pregnancy loss. We previously showed that mice null for the progesterone receptor (PGR)-interacting protein Krüppel-like factor (KLF) 9 are subfertile and exhibit reduced uterine progesterone sensitivity. KLF9 expression is high in predecidual stroma, undetectable in decidua, and enhanced in uteri of mice with conditional ablation of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2). Given the individual importance of KLF9 and BMP2 for implantation success, we hypothesized that the establishment of uterine receptivity involves KLF9 and BMP2 functional cross-regulation. To address this, we used early pregnant wild-type and Klf9 null mice and KLF9 small interfering RNA-transfected human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) induced to differentiate under standard conditions. Loss of KLF9 in mice and HESCs enhanced BMP2 expression, whereas recombinant BMP2 treatment of HESCs attenuated KLF9 mRNA levels. IGFBP1 and KLF9-related KLF13 expression were positively associated with BMP2 and inversely associated with KLF9. Prolonged, but not short-term, knockdown of KLF9 in HESCs reduced IGFBP1 expression. Mouse uterine Igfbp1 expression was similarly reduced with Klf9 ablation. PGR-A and PGR-B expression were positively associated with KLF9 in predecidual HESCs but not decidualizing HESCs. KLF13 knockdown attenuated BMP2 and PGR-B and abrogated BMP2-mediated inhibition of KLF9 expression. Results support cross-regulation among BMP2, KLF9, and KLF13 to maintain progesterone sensitivity in stromal cells undergoing differentiation and suggest that loss of this regulatory network compromises establishment of uterine receptivity and implantation success.

Endometrial stromal sarcomas: a review of potential prognostic factors

Endometrial stromal tumors are uncommon mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. The classification of these tumors has evolved and the most current World Health Organization classification (2003) divides these neoplasms into: endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. The salient clinicopathologic features of these tumors are described, and a comprehensive review of literature pertaining to potential prognostic factors in endometrial stromal sarcomas is provided. Clinical factors, including age, race, parity and menopausal status, and pathologic factors, including tumor size, tumor stage, nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, tumor necrosis, lymphovascular space invasion, DNA ploidy and proliferative activity, and expression of hormone receptors, have been explored with varying outcomes. Surgicopathologic stage seems to be the most important prognostic factor in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. The impact of other prognostic factors on survival is unclear or controversial, especially in patients with stage I tumors.

Molecular Genetics of Mesenchymal Tumors of the Female Genital Tract

Mesenchymal tumors of the female genital tract are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can be classified based on cellular differentiation into 3 main groups: smooth muscle tumors, endometrial stromal tumors, and other differentiated and undifferentiated tumors. Genomic analysis techniques have revealed important genetic aberrations such as the t(7;17) translocation, resulting in JAZF1-JJAZ1 gene fusion, characteristic of endometrial stromal tumors. These analyses have demonstrated genetic complexity and heterogeneity in many mesenchymal tumor types. This article focuses on current understanding of the molecular genetics of mesenchymal tumors of the female genital tract, with emphasis on diagnostic and prognostic molecular features.

Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities

Uterine sarcomas are a rare group of neoplasms with aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. They are classified into four main histological subtypes in order of decreasing incidence: carcinosarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, endometrial stromal sarcomas and "other" sarcomas. The pathological subtype demands a tailored approach. Surgical resection is regarded as the mainstay of treatment. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy represents the standard treatment of uterine sarcomas. Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection in carcinosarcomas is recommended, given their high incidence of lymph node metastases, and may have a role in endometrial stromal sarcomas. Adjuvant radiation therapy has historically been of little survival value, but it appears to improve local control and may delay recurrence. Regarding adjuvant chemotherapy, there is little evidence in the literature supporting its use except for carcinosarcomas. However, more trials are needed to address these issues, especially, their sequential application. Patients with uterine sarcomas should be referred to large academic centers for participation in clinical trials.

Pathology of uterine malignancies

This overview covers epithelial, stromal and mesenchymal malignancies of the body of the uterus, excluding the cervix. The distinction of type I and type II endometrial adenocarcinoma with the morphological variants of this tumour is discussed and some molecular aspects are explored. The concept of carcinosarcoma representing a metaplastic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium that behaves more like a carcinoma than a sarcoma is explained. Some types of mixed epithelial and stromal neoplasm are described and contrasted with carcinosarcoma. The concept of stromal sarcoma and high-grade uterine sarcoma is described and an outline of malignant smooth muscle tumours of the uterus includes a description of smooth muscle tumours of uncertain malignant potential and worrying benign smooth muscle lesions.

The management of patients with uterine sarcoma: a debated clinical challenge

Uterine sarcomas include a heterogeneous group of rare tumours that usually have an aggressive clinical behaviour and a poor prognosis. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy represents the standard surgical treatment. Pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy is indicated for carcinosarcoma, but not for leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Some recent data on low numbers of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma appear to show an incidence of nodal involvement higher than previously expected, thus suggesting a role for lymphadenectomy in this malignancy. Carcinosarcoma also requires a comprehensive surgical peritoneal staging. Postoperative treatment of uterine sarcomas has been long debated. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy appears to improve local control without any significant impact on overall survival. There is little evidence in the literature supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in any gynaecological sarcomas except for carcinosarcomas. However, uterine sarcomas have a high tendency to develop distant recurrences, and recent data on adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas are promising. As for the drugs to be used, it is worth noting that in a Swiss study, the combination of ifosfamide (IFO) and doxorubicin (DOX) obtained similar response rates in advanced gynaecological sarcomas and in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of other sites. In our decision-making scheme for early-stage disease, patients with leiomyosarcoma or undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma should receive adjuvant doxorubicin/epidoxorubicin (EPIDX)+ifosfamide, and those with carcinosarcoma should be treated with adjuvant cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. The same drug regimens are used for the treatment of advanced disease. Sequential pelvic radiotherapy following chemotherapy could be delivered to selected cases. Recurrent disease often requires the integration of different therapeutic modalities, but no curative option is currently available with the possible exception of surgery for lung metastases and hormone therapy with or without debulking surgery for recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Patients should be encouraged to enter clinical trials designed to identify new active drugs for these malignancies.

Hormonal therapy of endometrial stromal sarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are steroid receptor positive tumors with slow tumor progression and high recurrence rates, which lack established treatment protocols. We present an update on hormonal therapy options.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past, hormonal therapy consisted of progestins for advanced/recurrent/metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. Aromatase inhibitors and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues have become new effective alternatives for first and second line treatment. The high recurrence rates after short disease free intervals in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma patients were partly due to inadvertent growth stimulation during estrogen-containing hormone replacement therapy and tamoxifen treatment, which - according to current knowledge - are contraindicated. Recently, hormonal therapy has been introduced for the prevention of recurrences. Aromatase inhibitors are becoming the treatment of choice, since progestins are poorly tolerated due to side effects. The effective duration of preventive hormonal therapy is still undetermined.

SUMMARY

Hormonal therapy with progestins, aromatase inhibitors and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues has become an effective treatment alternative to radiation and chemotherapy for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma patients. Preventive hormonal therapy is of particular interest in the setting of concomitant endometriosis.

Ovarian Preservation in Stage I Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of ovarian preservation in a case-control study of women with stage I low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas.

METHODS

Patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas were identified at 5 institutions from 1976 to 2002. Cases were defined as patients who retained ovarian function; each case was matched to 2 control patients who underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Immunostaining for estrogen and progesterone receptors was performed. Data were examined with Student t, chi(2), Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve premenopausal patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas who did not undergo BSO were matched to 24 controls. Of the 36 patients in the entire cohort, disease recurred in 14 (39%). Recurrences were identified in the pelvis, abdomen, lung, or lymphatics in both cases and controls. Disease recurred in 4/12 (33%) case patients, compared with 10/24 (42%) control patients (P = .63). When case patients were compared with controls, no differences in progression-free (91.3 months versus 68.6 months, P = .44) or overall survival (median survival not yet reached versus 406 months, P = .82) were identified. This study had 13% power to detect the observed difference in median disease-free survival. After controlling for use of adjuvant therapy and BSO, older age remained the only independent poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (P = .008). Twenty-two available tumors demonstrated positivity for both estrogen and progesterone receptors.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy did not appear to affect time to recurrence or overall survival. Retention of ovarian function may be an option for premenopausal women with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas.