Endovascular Doppler guide wire in renal arteries. Correlation with angiography in 20 patients

Womersley number-based estimates of blood flow rate in Doppler analysis: in vivo validation by means of phase-contrast MRI

A common clinical practice during single-point Doppler analysis is to measure the centerline maximum velocity and to recover the time-averaged flow rate by exploiting an assumption on the shape of velocity profile (a priori formula), either a parabolic or a flat one. In a previous study, we proposed a new formula valid for the peak instant linking the maximum velocity and the flow rate by including a well-established dimensionless fluid-dynamics parameter (the Womersley number), in order to account for the hemodynamics conditions (Womersley number-based formula). Several in silico tests confirmed the reliability of the new formula. Nevertheless, an in vivo confirmation is missing limiting the clinical applicability of the formula. An experimental in vivo protocol using cine phase-contrast MRI (2-D PCMRI) technique has been designed and applied to ten healthy young volunteers in three different arterial districts: the abdominal aorta, the common carotid artery, and the brachial artery. Each PCMRI dataset has been used twice: 1) to compute the value of the blood flow rate used as a gold standard and 2) to estimate the flow rate by measuring directly the maximum velocity and the diameter (i.e., emulating the intravascular Doppler data acquisition) and by applying to these data the a priori and the Womersley number-based formulae. All the in vivo results have confirmed that the Womersley number-based formula provides better estimates of the flow rate at the peak instant with respect to the a priori formula. More precisely, mean performances of the Womersley number-based formula are about three times better than the a priori results in the abdominal aorta, five times better in the common carotid artery, and two times better in the brachial artery.

Womersley number-based estimation of flow rate with Doppler ultrasound: sensitivity analysis and first clinical application

In this paper we continue in investigating the approach we have proposed in a paper recently published, for a reliable estimate of (peak systolic) blood flow rate from velocity Doppler measurements. Basic features of this approach together with some in silico test cases were discussed in that work. Here, we provide more insights of this approach by performing a sensitivity analysis of the formulas relating blood flow rate to velocity. In particular we analyze how our estimates are affected by perturbation or errors in measurements in comparison with a standard method for catheter based estimates based on the assumption of a parabolic velocity profile. A first glance to in vivo clinical applications is given as well.

Correlation of invasive Doppler flow wire with renal duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis: The Renal Artery Stenosis Invasive Doppler (RAIDER) study

OBJECTIVE

Determining renal resistive index (RI) in the setting of renal artery stenosis may predict which patients benefit from revascularization. Renal duplex ultrasonography (RDUS) is the traditional method of assessing RI, but it is not available in most invasive endovascular laboratories. Conversely, endovascular techniques to assess RI are available but not well validated. The primary goal was to determine if an invasive approach using an endovascular Doppler flow wire correlates with RI assessment using traditional noninvasive RDUS.

METHODS

In a single-center prospective trial, patients were enrolled if they had known or suspected renovascular disease. A Doppler flow wire was placed in multiple segments of the renal artery, and peak (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) were measured. RI was calculated using the formula: RI = [1 - (EDV/PSV)] x 100. Similarly, RI was also derived using standard RDUS. All patients underwent both RI techniques before any revascularization procedure. Secondary end points included assessing the correlation for pole-to-pole renal length assessment and PSV and EDV velocities using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Pearson correlation coefficient calculations were used to determine degree of correlation.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 20 patients, and 35 renal arteries were studied. Overall, Pearson correlation coefficient for invasive vs noninvasive RI assessment was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.93). The r values were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.67) for pole-to-pole renal length, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.76) for PSV, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.72) for EDV determination. No major complications occurred during this study. Average time to perform invasive Doppler assessment was 10.4 +/- 7.4 minutes per artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive RI assessment using an endovascular flow wire technique correlates well with traditional noninvasive RDUS. A moderate statistical correlation also exists for pole-to-pole renal length, PSV, and EDV determinations. The procedure is safe and can be performed rapidly.

Correlation between noninvasive and endovascular Doppler in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A pilot study

Considerable interest exists in using endovascular techniques for assessing the renal circulation. The vasomotor response of the renal circulation in patients with hypertension and severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis was evaluated. Sixteen patients (5 men and 11 women) with a mean age of 73.2+/-7.1 years (range, 59-82 years) underwent noninvasive renal duplex ultrasonography and endovascular flow wire evaluation. The flow wire was positioned in the main renal artery distal to the stenosis and used to examine the reactivity of the renal circulation in response to intra-arterial papaverine before and after percutaneous revascularization. Resistive index was computed as (MPV - EDV)/MPV, where MPV is the maximum peak velocity and EDV is the end-diastolic velocity. Renal flow reserve was defined as the ratio of peak hyperemic response to baseline flow. Intervention was technically successful in 18/18 arteries. Heart rate (69+/-11 vs. 65+/-10 beats/min; P=NS) and systolic blood pressure (168+/-19 vs. 163+/-24 mm Hg; P=NS) remained constant following injection of intrarenal papaverine, while diastolic blood pressure decreased (77+/-13 vs. 65+/-11 mm Hg; P<0.006). Papaverine injection resulted in significant increases in average peak velocity (APV; 148% of baseline; P=0.0003), MPV (146% of baseline; P=0.001), and EDV (161% of baseline; P=0.0026), but had no effect on the endovascular resistive index (0.81+/-0.12 vs. 0.84+/-0.08; P=NS). Renal artery stenting produced no effect on APV or EDV, but a small increase in MPV (123% of baseline; P<0.05). In contrast, renal stenting resulted in a significant increase in the endovascular resistive index (0.77+/-012 vs. 0.84+/-0.08; P=0.003), pulsatility index (1.84+/-0.61 vs. 2.23+/-0.70; P<0.014), and renal flow reserve (1.49+/-0.44 vs. 1.86+/-0.73; P<0.0071). A correlation was found between the noninvasive and endovascular measures diastolic/systolic ratio (r=0.73; P<0.0009) and resistive index (r=0.63; P<0.0053). Patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis have preserved vasomotor response to papaverine, as well as marked increases in renal flow and resistive index following successful renal artery stenting. Endovascular flow wire measurements are safe, easy to perform, and correlate well with noninvasive Doppler measurements.

Validation of a New Method for the Detection of Pathlines in Vascular X-ray Images

This article presents the validation of a new pathline approach, based on the wavefront propagation principle, on a large variety of vascular images. The purpose of the novel approach, called wavepath, was to minimize the variability of the measurements in the quantitative vascular analysis by reducing the variability that is introduced by manually placing the start and end points of the vessel segment. This results in a robust and reproducible pathline detection that is subsequently used in the analysis and lesion quantification. The validation study that was performed concerned a large variety of vessel segments and showed that the approach results in a pathline that is totally constant in its middle part. This holds not only for the straight segment version but also for the bifurcation version and ostial version of the algorithm. Moreover, the average number of additional points per pathline needed to guide the wavepath through the correct vessel is minimized to 0 for the straight segments, 0.06 for aortic bifurcations, 0.25 for carotid bifurcations, and 0.08 for the ostial segments. In conclusion, our new approach performs very well in all types of vascular x-ray images, resulting in a stable and robust pathline detection.

Changes in renal blood flow reserve after angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Intra-arterial Doppler is a recent technique which allows assessment of distal vascular disease using measurements of intrarenal blood flow velocities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intrarenal hemodynamics and renal blood flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in hypertensive patients with unilateral atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis using intra-arterial Doppler.

METHODS

Intra-arterial Doppler was performed during arteriography in 19 hypertensive patients (12 men; mean age, 64 +/- 8 years) in "normal" and in "stenotic" kidneys at baseline, on isosorbide dinitrate, and after selective intra-renal papaverine injection, before, and after PTA. Doppler parameters analyzed were average peak velocity, maximum peak velocity, end diastolic velocity, and renal blood flow (RBF). Changes in Doppler parameters after papaverine injection were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The major results were (1) the significant reduction in RBF distal to the stenosis, (2) the lack of arteriolar reactivity in response to papaverine distal to the stenosis, (3) the immediate recovery of arteriolar reactivity after PTA, associated with restoration of RBF in the revascularized kidneys, and (4) no change in arteriolar reactivity in response to papaverine in the "normal" kidneys following PTA.

CONCLUSION

Ours results highlighted the benefit of endovascular Doppler to evaluate (1) RBF reserve, and (2) the repercussion of the stenosis on the distal vascularization.

Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter

PURPOSE

To determine the hemodynamic significance of arteriographically detected renal arterial stenosis by obtaining pressure gradients with a miniaturized pressure guide wire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six renal arterial stenoses in 38 patients were assessed in terms of severity and then subjected to gradient determination before and after angioplasty. The patients (mean age, 63 years) had a mean serum creatinine value of 1.3 mg/dL +/- 0.4 (114.9 micromol/L +/- 35.4 [SD]) and required on average three medications for blood pressure control. The mean degree of stenosis diameter was 51% +/- 17 (range, 12%-85%).

RESULTS

The systolic and mean arterial pressure gradients with and those without vasodilatation were highly correlated with stenosis severity, systolic blood pressure, and serum creatinine as a curvilinear fit (r = 0.9, P <.01). At 50% stenosis severity, the mean pressure gradient was 22 mm Hg.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a pressure gradient greater than 20 mm Hg should be good candidates for renal arterial dilatation, and use of the pressure guide wire will facilitate interventional decisions.