Pharmacokinetics and safety of gadobenate dimeglumine (multihance) in subjects with impaired liver function

Waiting times between examinations with intravascularly administered contrast media: a review of contrast media pharmacokinetics and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines

The pharmacokinetics of contrast media (CM) will determine how long safe waiting intervals between successive CT or MRI examinations should be. The Contrast Media Safety Committee has reviewed the data on pharmacokinetics of contrast media to suggest safe waiting intervals between successive contrast-enhanced imaging studies in relation to the renal function of the patient. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Consider a waiting time between elective contrast-enhanced CT and (coronary) angiography with successive iodine-based contrast media administrations in patients with normal renal function (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) of optimally 12 h (near complete clearance of the previously administered iodine-based contrast media) and minimally 4 h (if clinical indication requires rapid follow-up). KEY POINTS: • Pharmacokinetics of contrast media will guide safe waiting times between successive administrations. • Safe waiting times increase with increasing renal insufficiency. • Iodine-based contrast media influence MRI signal intensities and gadolinium-based contrast agents influence CT attenuation.

Alternatives to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents

Gadolinium-based contrast agents have been used in hundreds of millions of patients in the past 30 years, with an exemplary safety record. However, assumptions made at their inception have been recently challenged, rekindling innovation efforts. This critical review outlines the motivations, technical obstacles, problems, and the most recent published progress toward the creation of alternatives to the existing gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Histological Change in a Chinese Milroy Disease Family With Venous and Skin Abnormities

Background: Milroy disease (MD) is rare and autosomal dominant resulting from mutations of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3 or FLT4), which leads to dysgenesis of the lymphatic system.

Methods: Here we report a Chinese MD family with 2 affected members of two generations. We identified the mutation of c.3075G>A in one allele of FLT4 in Chinese population firstly. The father and child presented lymphedema under knees both. Unfortunately, the child was premature delivered for a car accident of the mother and then died of asphyxia. Then we gathered the tissue of the lower-limb from the child with permission from the parents and ethic committee. We stained the tissue with lymphatic marker D2-40 and hematoxylin-eosin to explore the histological changes. Afterwards, we compared the results with a normal child who unfortunately died of premature delivery also.

Results: It is firstly identified the mutation of FLT4: c.3075G>A in Chinese population, and the mutation Inherited in the lineage. The histological evaluation indicated: (1) The number of lymphatic vessels decreased; (2) The morphology and structure of lymphatic vessels was abnormal. And what is added to our knowledge: (1) Capillary hyperemia and phlebectasia is severe; (2) Vascular malformations; (3) The number of vascular endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells decreased; (4) Large sheets of epidermis desquamated; (5) The numbers of cutaneous appendages reduced in MD.

Conclusions: Based on the new findings, we assume that mutation of FLT4 not only affect the lymphogenesis, but also the angiogenesis, and epidermis structure.

Compensatory biliary and urinary excretion of gadobenate ion after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance(®)) in cases of impaired hepatic or renal function: a mechanism that may aid in the prevention of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?

Objective:

To determine whether increased elimination of gadobenate ion via the hepatobiliary pathway might compensate for reduced/absent elimination via the urinary pathway in the event of compromised renal function, as a possible protective mechanism against nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

Methods:

15 male Crl:CD^® R(SD)Br rats (Charles River Italia, Como, Italy) randomized to three treatment groups: (1) animals with occluded bile ducts, (2) animals with occluded renal vessels and (3) control animals, each received 0.25 mmol kg⁻¹ of bodyweight of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance^®; Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy). Urine and bile were collected from 0−30, 30−60, 60−120, 120−240 and 240−480 min after gadobenate dimeglumine administration prior to exsanguination. Determinations of gadobenate ion in blood, bile and urine were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Gadolinium (Gd³⁺) levels in excised liver and kidneys were determined by X-ray fluorescence.

Results:

The recovery of gadobenate ion in the urine of rats with bile duct occlusion was significantly higher than that in the urine of normal rats (89.1 ± 4.2% vs 60.6 ± 2.8%; p < 0.0001). Conversely, mean recovery in the bile of rats with renal vessel occlusion was significantly higher than that in the bile of normal rats (96.16 ± 0.55% vs 33.5 ± 4.7%; p < 0.0001). Gadobenate ion was not quantifiable in any group 8 h post-injection.

Conclusion:

Compensatory elimination may be an effective means to overcome compromised renal or hepatobiliary elimination.

Advances in knowledge:

The absence of NSF in at-risk patients administered with gadobenate dimeglumine may in part reflect greater Gd³⁺ elimination via the hepatobiliary route.

CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging play critical roles in the diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The first article of this two-part review discusses key concepts of HCC development, growth, and spread, emphasizing those features with imaging correlates and hence most relevant to radiologists; state-of-the-art CT and MR imaging technique with extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents; and the imaging appearance of precursor nodules that eventually may transform into overt HCC.

In silico evaluation of gadofosveset pharmacokinetics in different population groups using the Simcyp® simulator platform

Purpose

Gadofosveset is a Gd-based contrast agent used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Gadolinium kinetic distribution models are implemented in T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI for characterization of lesion sites in the body. Physiology changes in a disease state potentially can influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs and to this respect modify the distribution properties of contrast agents. This work focuses on the in silico modelling of pharmacokinetic properties of gadofosveset in different population groups through the application of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models (PBPK) embedded in Simcyp® population pharmacokinetics platform.

Methods

Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of gadofosveset were introduced into Simcyp® simulator platform and a min-PBPK model was applied. In silico clinical trials were generated simulating the administration of the recommended dose for the contrast agent (i.v., 30 mg/kg) in population cohorts of healthy volunteers, obese, renal and liver impairment, and in a generated virtual oncology population. Results were evaluated regarding basic pharmacokinetic parameters of Cmax, AUC and systemic CL and differences were assessed through ANOVA and estimation of ratio of geometric mean between healthy volunteers and the other population groups.

Results

Simcyp® predicted a mean Cmax = 551.60 mg/l, a mean AUC = 4079.12 mg/L*h and a mean systemic CL = 0.56 L/h for the virtual population of healthy volunteers. Obese population showed a modulation in Cmax and CL, attributed to increased administered dose. In renal and liver impairment cohorts a significant modulation in Cmax, AUC and CL of gadofosveset is predicted. Oncology population exhibited statistical significant differences regarding AUC when compared with healthy volunteers.

Conclusions

This work employed Simcyp® population pharmacokinetics platform in order to compute gadofosveset’s pharmacokinetic profiles through PBPK models and in silico clinical trials and evaluate possible differences between population groups. The approach showed promising results that could provide new insights regarding administration of contrast agents in special population cohorts. In silico pharmacokinetics could further be used for evaluating of possible toxicity, interpretation of MRI PK image maps and development of novel contrast agents.

Pharmacokinetics of gadobenate dimeglumine in children 2 to 5 years of age undergoing MRI of the central nervous system

PURPOSE

To determine the pharmacokinetic profile of gadobenate dimeglumine in children aged between 2 and 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen children scheduled to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI for suspected disease of the central nervous system received a single intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. Children were stratified into three age groups: 2 to <3 years, 3 to <4 years, and 4 to 5 (i.e., <6 years). Serial blood and urine samples collected at prespecified time-points before and after contrast administration were analyzed for gadolinium concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental and compartmental techniques.

RESULTS

Mean values of 65.7 μg/mL for highest blood gadolinium concentration, 0.2 L/h/kg for blood clearance, 0.32 L/kg for steady-state volume of distribution, and 1.2 h for terminal elimination half-life were determined across all age groups combined. On average, more than 80% of the dose was eliminated in the urine during the first 24 h after administration. All pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between age groups and no effects of gender were noted. No adverse events considered related to gadobenate dimeglumine administration were reported.

CONCLUSION

In terms of pharmacokinetic profile no dosage adjustment from the approved adult gadobenate dimeglumine dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight is necessary in children aged between 2 and 5 years.

Removal of the gadolinium interference from the measurement of selenium in human serum by use of collision cell quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Q-ICP-MS)

BACKGROUND

Measurement of selenium in serum is an important clinical biomarker of nutritional status. The presence of gadolinium (Gd) in samples following administration of the contrast agents used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results in a significant positive bias when using quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Q-ICP-MS).

METHODS

Three instrumental set-ups were assessed: standard mode with no collision gas and collision cell mode with either a hydrogen:helium mixture or hydrogen. The effect of Gd on the selenium (Se) signal was assessed using external quality assurance (EQA) specimens and internal quality control (IQC) materials, both unspiked and spiked with Gd. Serum previously shown to contain high concentrations of Gd-containing contrast agents were also analysed.

RESULTS

Recoveries of Se in the spiked compared to the unspiked samples were: between 500% and 1300% using standard mode; 100% and 29,000% using collision cell mode with hydrogen:helium mixture; and between 99% and 103% using hydrogen. The use of H2 in the collision cell provided accurate results, indicating that the charge exchange reaction (CER) of Gd(2+) with H2 removes this interference. Analysis of patient serum known to contain the Gd contrast agent using the method gave results within the selenium reference range (adults 0.89-1.65 µmol/L). The presence of Gd, as low as 0.2 mg/L, in serum samples causes a positive interference on the measurement of Se by ICP-MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a CER mode with pure H2 in the collision cell it was possible to fully remove the interference due to Gd(2+) from the signal for Se.

Advantages of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of post-liver transplant bile leakage

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of magnetic resonance cholangiography with gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) where there is a suspicion of bile leakage in the post-liver transplant patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients who had undergone a liver transplant underwent 14 MR cholangiograms, five of whom presented bile leakage while the other three had no biliary system complications. The results were compared to conventional bile duct opacification (by endoscopy or t-tube cholangiogram). The analysis covered whether there was opacification of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile ducts on T1-weighted sequences after an injection of Gd-BOPTA on delayed biliary excretion phase sequences that were carried out on average 74 min after the injection. Enhancing perihepatic collections were also taken into account.

RESULTS

Opacification of the bile ducts on delayed-phase MR cholangiogram sequences was always seen in the absence of bile leakage, and was never found when leakage was present. Enhancing perihepatic collections pointed to bile leakage every time.

CONCLUSION

Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MR cholangiography is a simple and non-invasive technique for detecting bile leakage in the post-liver transplant patient.

Pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with hepatic and renal impairment

OBJECTIVES

: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics (PKs), imaging properties, and safety of the liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in subjects with various levels of hepatic impairment, renal impairment, or coexisting hepatic and renal impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: In this single-center, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with varying degrees of renal and/or hepatic impairment were compared with healthy subjects matched for age, gender, and weight (control group). All subjects received a single intravenous bolus of Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist, Eovist, EOB-Primovist) 25 μmol/kg body weight. Samples of serum, urine, and feces were collected for PK analysis. MR imaging was performed before dosing and at preset times after dose administration to determine enhancement relative to predose signal intensity values. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs, cardiac rhythm, oxygen saturation, and by physical examination findings.

RESULTS

: Gd-EOB-DTPA was well tolerated by all subjects. Total clearance of Gd-EOB-DTPA did not significantly change in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A and B), compared with the control group. Mean urinary excretion was increased and mean fecal excretion was decreased in patients with hepatic impairment. Renal excretion was increased to between 72% and 96% of the dose administered in patients with very high bilirubin levels (>3 mg/dL), compared with 48% in the control group. Total clearance of Gd-EOB-DTPA was significantly reduced to 140 ± 45 mL/min and terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) was slightly, but not significantly, increased to 2.6 ± 0.9 hours in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C), compared with the control group (209 ± 37 mL/min and 1.8 ± 0.2 hours, respectively). Liver MR signal enhancement (area under the curve of relative enhancement [%] over time) was similar in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment and in those in the control group, but was decreased by 38% in patients with severe hepatic impairment, compared with control. Peak liver enhancement, however, was still at a high level (118% ± 57%). PK and imaging parameters were not significantly affected in patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance, 30-50 mL/min). In patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF), however, the PK profile of Gd-EOB-DTPA was significantly different, with an increased t1/2 (20.0 ± 7.0 hours vs. 1.8 ± 0.2 hours in the control group). During a 3-hour dialysis session that started 1 hour after administration of the intravenous dose, the serum levels in patients with ESRF declined by between 71% and 88% as a result of elimination by hemodialysis and parallel hepatobiliary excretion. This is comparable with the decline observed in healthy subjects (85%) during the 1- to 4-hour interval after injection.

CONCLUSIONS

: The results of the present study show that in humans with moderate renal impairment and mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment, no relevant changes in PK parameters, such as total clearance and t1/2, develop as a result of increased renal excretion to compensate in the case of hepatic impairment (or increased hepatic elimination in the case of renal impairment). The t1/2 of Gd-EOB-DTPA was markedly altered only in patients with ESRF. The high MR signal enhancement profile, observed even in patients with severe hepatic impairment, indicates that there is no need to adjust the dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA.

MR evaluation of biliary-enteric anastomotic stricture: does contrast-enhanced T1W MRC provide additional information?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare T2W-MRCP and T1W contrast-enhanced MRC (CE-MRC) using Gd-BOPTA for evaluation of biliary-enteric anastomotic (BEA) stricture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who were suspected to have BEA stricture underwent T2W-MRCP and CE-MRC on a 1.5T scanner. Images were evaluated for evidence of anastomotic stricture. Composite gold standard was used including the findings on percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram or percutaneous transhepatic biliary dilatation, surgery, alkaline phosphatase level and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of T2W-MRCP for the diagnosis of anastomotic stricture were 94.4%, 80%, 94.4% and 80% respectively. On CE-MRC, biliary excretion was seen in only 60.87% anastomoses and only these were taken for analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CE-MRC for the diagnosis of anastomotic stricture were 40%, 75%, 80% and 33.3%. The combined evaluation of T2W-MRCP and CE-MRC showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 83.3%, 80%, 93.8% and 57.1%.

CONCLUSION

At present, T2W-MRCP is still the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of patients with BEA stricture and the usage of Gd-BOPTA enhanced MRC is inappropriate in this setting.

Interference of gadolinium on the measurement of selenium in human serum by inductively coupled plasma-quadrupole mass spectrometry

Selenium is an important clinical biomarker of nutritional status; however, the occurrence of gadolinium in a patient's serum as a result of the contrast agents used during magnetic resonance imaging investigations, results in a significant positive bias in its measurement by inductively coupled plasma-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

MR contrast agents: Physical and pharmacologic basics

Since approval of the first magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent was granted in 1988, there has been remarkable growth in the utilization of intravenous gadolinium (Gd)-based agents. Currently it is estimated that nearly half of all MR studies performed are contrast-enhanced. Despite containing a toxic heavy metal, these agents have proven to be not only an effective diagnostic adjunct to non-enhanced MRI, but also remarkably well tolerated and safe. As a result, conventional wisdom has been that MR contrast media are "biologically inert," a notion that is clearly false. Ultimately, it is the radiologist's responsibility to understand the potential adverse effects of Gd-based agents and the special situations in which they are likely to occur; however, the basic pharmacology of contrast agents is generally not included in medical school curricula or formally taught in residency. The purpose of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action of MR contrast agents and relevant aspects of their clinical pharmacology, including effects on the cardiovascular and renal systems, potential laboratory errors, and special situations involving women and children. We also briefly discuss the issue of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

Safety of Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance)

OBJECTIVES

Prospective studies and retrospective analyses were undertaken to evaluate the clinical safety of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) and to assess tolerability in special populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 3092 subjects received MultiHance in 79 clinical trials. Data from comparisons with other contrast agents and studies in children, subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, or subjects with coronary artery disease were reviewed. Postmarketing safety surveillance data after more than 1.5 million applications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 413 of 2982 (14%) adult subjects receiving MultiHance reported at least one adverse event (AE) definitely or potentially related to MultiHance, an incidence that was similar to that observed with placebo (21/127, 17%) or active controls (59/723, 8%). In crossover studies, 23 of 287 (8%) subjects receiving MultiHance experienced AE compared with 25 of 295 (9%) receiving gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist). No increased AE rate was observed in children and no worsening of renal or liver function was observed in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment. No detrimental effect on cardiac electrophysiology could be observed from a retrospective analysis of ECG parameters in more than 1000 patients and healthy volunteers. The AE reporting rate from postmarketing safety surveillance of MultiHance was 0.05%. Serious AEs were rarely reported and included dyspnea, nausea, urticaria, hypotension, and anaphylactoid reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

MultiHance appears to be well tolerated in adults and children and in subjects with impaired liver or kidney function or coronary artery disease. In controlled trials, MultiHance demonstrated a similar safety profile to that of Magnevist.

Multinodular focal fatty infiltration of the liver: Atypical imaging findings on delayed T1-weighted Gd-BOPTA-enhanced liver-specific MR images

We report a case of pathologically confirmed multinodular focal fatty infiltration. MRI was performed after bolus injection of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA, MultiHance; Bracco, Milan, Italy), a liver-specific paramagnetic, gadolinium (Gd)-based MR contrast agent that concomitantly enables the acquisition of a standard dynamic phase with timing strategies similar to those used for other extracellular fluid contrast agents, followed by a delayed T1-weighted liver-specific phase (the so-called hepatobiliary phase). In the present case, multiple rounded areas of fatty infiltration, although confidently diagnosed using chemical shift sequences due to a significant signal intensity reduction on out-of-phase images, were unexpectedly hypointense during the delayed liver-specific phase of Gd-BOPTA. Reduced Gd-BOPTA concentration during the liver-specific phase is generally correlated with liver malignancy. Since such lesions can be prospectively mistaken for metastatic disease, we performed a hepatic biopsy to establish a definitive diagnosis. Our empirical observations suggest that Gd-BOPTA uptake may be impaired in fatty infiltrated liver tissue. Because at present there is no report evaluating the kinetics of Gd-BOPTA in fatty liver, further studies are needed to specifically investigate this issue.

Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: safety update

Magnetic resonance contrast agents, particularly the gadolinium-based agents, are extremely safe and lack the nephrotoxicity associated with iodinated contrast media. Currently, seven gadolinium agents are available in one or more countries of the world, of which only four are available for clinical use in the United States. Minor adverse effects associated with each of these agents occur infrequently and include nausea, headache, and taste perversion. Whereas the gadolinium agents cannot be differentiated on the basis of these mild adverse effects, recent studies have brought to light the issue of chelate stability, and in particular, clinical observations associated with the least stable of these agents. This review briefly discusses the most recent safety issues concerning the gadolinium agents. A brief review of safety issues concerning the non-gadolinium agents is also provided.

Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) has a two-fold higher T1 relaxivity compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and can be used for both dynamic and delayed liver MRI. This intraindividual, crossover study was conducted to compare 0.05 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA for liver MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients underwent two identical MR examinations separated by >or= 72 hours. Precontrast T1-FLASH-2D and T2-TSE sequences and postcontrast T1-FLASH-2D sequences were acquired during the dynamic and delayed (1-2 hours) phases after each contrast injection. Images were evaluated on-site by two independent, blinded off-site readers in terms of confidence for lesion detection, lesion number, character and diagnosis, enhancement pattern, lesion-to-liver contrast, and benefit of dynamic and delayed scans. Additional on-site evaluation was performed of the overall diagnostic value of each agent.

RESULTS

Superior diagnostic confidence was noted by on-site investigators and off-site assessors 1 and 2 for 6, 4 and 2 patients with Gd-BOPTA, and for 3, 1 and 2 patients with Gd-DTPA, respectively. No consistent differences were noted for other parameters on dynamic phase images whereas greater lesion-to-liver contrast was noted for more patients on delayed images after Gd-BOPTA. More correct diagnoses of histologically confirmed lesions (n = 26) were made with the complete Gd-BOPTA image set than with the complete Gd-DTPA set (reader 1: 68% vs. 59%; reader 2: 78% vs. 68%). The overall diagnostic value was considered superior after Gd-BOPTA in seven patients and after Gd-DTPA in one patient.

CONCLUSION

The additional diagnostic information on delayed imaging, combined with the possibility to use a lower overall dose to obtain similar diagnostic information on dynamic imaging, offers a distinct clinical advantage for Gd-BOPTA for liver MRI.

Assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance angiography: phase I studies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the vascular contrasting properties of a new MR contrast agent (gadobenate dimeglumine [Gd-BOPTA]), which presents higher relaxivity because of reversible, weak protein interaction, and, to compare these properties with a standard gadolinium agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two phase I trials compared intraindividually: (A) the vascular contrasting properties of Gd-BOPTA at three doses (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.2 mmol/kg body weight) and two flow rates (0.5 and 2.0 mL/s) in 10 volunteers; and (B) 0.1 mmol/kg body weight doses of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 2.0 mL/s using a modified magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence with a temporal resolution of 1 s/f. Quantitative (ROI analysis) and fully blinded qualitative (reader review) assessment of images was performed.

RESULTS

A dose of 0.2 mmol/kg resulted in higher maximum intensities, longer median peak widths, and larger areas under the curve than did the lower doses (0.0125 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg). In the intraindividual comparison, Gd-BOPTA demonstrated significantly better vascular enhancement characteristics in terms of signal peak duration (p < 0.05), maximum signal intensity (p < 0.05), and area under the enhancement curve (p < 0.01). The multireader assessment for overall vascular contrast preferred Gd-BOPTA at p < 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-BOPTA was shown to exhibit preferential and different vascular enhancement properties as compared with Gd-DTPA for MRA.