Facial nerve electromyography and other cranial nerve monitoring

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence

OBJECTIVE

To make evidence-based recommendations for the indications and complications of Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery in adults and children.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on cochlear implantation were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Evaluation of candidate patients and indications for CI surgery; (2) CI surgery - techniques and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

CI is a safe device for auditory rehabilitation of patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. In recent years, indications for unilateral hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma have been expanded, with encouraging results. However, for a successful surgery, commitment of family members and patients in the hearing rehabilitation process is essential.

An Artificial Neural Network Model for Predicting Postoperative Facial Nerve Outcomes After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The emergence of machine learning models has significantly improved the accuracy of surgical outcome predictions. This study aims to develop and validate an artificial neural network (ANN) model for predicting facial nerve (FN) outcomes after vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery using the proximal-to-distal amplitude ratio (P/D) along with clinical variables.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 71 patients who underwent VS resection between 2018 and 2022. At the end of surgery, the FN was stimulated at the brainstem (proximal) and internal acoustic meatus (distal) and the P/D was calculated. Postoperative FN function was assessed using the House-Brackmann grading system at discharge (short-term) and after 9-12 months (long-term). House-Brackmann grades I-II were considered good outcome, whereas grades III-VI were considered fair/poor. An ANN model was constructed, and the performance of the model was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve for internal validation and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for external validation.

RESULTS

The short-term FN outcome was grades I-II in 57.7% and grades III-VI in 42.3% of patients. Initially, a model using P/D had an area under the curve of 0.906 (internal validation) and an accuracy of 89.1% (95% CI: 68.3%-98.8%) (external validation) for predicting good vs fair/poor short-term FN outcomes. The model was then refined to include only muscles with a P/D with a proximal latency between 6 and 8 ms. This improved the accuracy to 100% (95% CI: 79%-100%). Integrating clinical variables (patient's age, tumor size, and preoperative HB grade) in addition to P/D into the model did not significantly improve the predative value. A model was then created to predict the long-term FN outcome using P/D with latencies between 6 and 8 ms and had an accuracy of 90.9% (95% CI: 58.7%-99.8%).

CONCLUSION

ANN models incorporating P/D can be a valuable tool for predicting FN outcomes after VS surgery. Refining the model to include P/D with latencies between 6 and 8 ms further improves the model's prediction. A user-friendly interface is provided to facilitate the implementation of this model.

Intraoperative Corticobulbar Motor Evoked Potential in Cerebellopontine Angle Surgery: A Clinically Meaningful Tool to Predict Early and Late Facial Nerve Recovery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neuromonitoring is crucial for facial nerve preservation in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgery. Among the available techniques, the role of intraoperative corticobulbar facial motor evoked potentials (FMEPs) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the significance of intraoperative FMEPs as indicators for early and late postoperative facial nerve function (FNF) in CPA tumor resection and the feasibility of their integration with standard monitoring techniques.

METHODS

An institutional series of 83 patients who underwent surgery under intraoperative monitoring for CPA extra-axial tumor resection was reported. A pair of needle electrodes was used to record FMEP from orbicularis oculi (OOc) and orbicularis oris (OOr) muscles at baseline, at the end of surgery and minimum values recorded. From FMEP amplitudes, minimum-to-baseline amplitude ratio (MBR), final-to-baseline amplitude ratio (FBR), and recovery value, intended as FBR minus MBR, were calculated. These indices were correlated with early and late postoperative FNF.

RESULTS

Our analysis demonstrated that higher FBR (both from OOc and OOr) and MBR (from OOr only) were associated with a good early and late FNF; a higher MBR from OOc was significantly associated with a good late FNF. The most accurate index in predicting early FNF was FBR measured from OOr with a cutoff of 35.56%, whereas the most accurate index in predicting late FNF was FBR as measured from OOc with a cutoff of 14.29%.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that FMEPs are reliable predictors of early and late postoperative FNF in CPA surgery and could be easily integrated with standard intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques.

Understanding the Molecular Mechanism of Vestibular Schwannoma for Hearing Preservation Surgery: Otologists’ Perspective from Bedside to Bench

Vestibular schwannoma is a clinically benign schwannoma that arises from the vestibulocochlear nerve that causes sensorineural hearing loss. This tumor is clinically and oncologically regarded as a benign tumor as it does not metastasize or invade surrounding tissues. Despite being a benign tumor, its management is difficult and controversial due to the potential serious complications, such as irreversible sensorineural hearing loss, of current interventions. Therefore, preventing hearing loss due to the natural course of the disease and complications of surgery is a challenging issue for an otologist. Improvements have been reported recently in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. These include advances in intraoperative monitoring systems for vestibular schwannoma surgery where the risk of hearing loss as a complication is decreased. Precise genomic analysis of the tumor would be helpful in determining the characteristics of the tumor for each patient, leading to a better hearing prognosis. These procedures are expected to help improve the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. This review summarizes recent advances in vestibular schwannoma management and treatment, especially in hearing preservation. In addition, recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying vestibular schwannomas and how these advances can be applied in clinical practice are outlined and discussed, respectively. Moreover, the future directions from the bedside to the bench side are presented from the perspective of otologists.

EMG monitoring

While most neurophysiologists are familiar with electromyography (EMG) for the purpose of clinical diagnostics, this technique also has a long tradition for neuro-monitoring. In short, intra-operative use of EMG can be divided into stimulated EMG on the one hand and monitoring of the free-running EMG and its spontaneous activity on the other hand. Methods for utilization of stimulated EMG are covered elsewhere in this book. This chapter focuses on the monitoring of spontaneous, or, more correctly, "surgically evoked" EMG. The history and underlying physiologic principles of intra-operative EMG are covered in this chapter as well as a detailed overview of the methodology. Building up from the basis of this background, we describe examples of how EMG can be used to help in intra-operative detection of adverse events and also in the prediction of postoperative outcomes. In the opinion of the authors, EMG should not be used as a "standalone" technique in contemporary neuro-monitoring. Most of its significant potential may be realized when it is used in a complementary way together with other modalities, mainly motor evoked potentials. Bearing this in mind, we sketch out how such a complementary setup may be used for improved neuro-monitoring.

Value of intraoperative monitoring of the trigeminal nerve in detection of a superiorly displaced facial nerve during surgery for large vestibular schwannomas

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of trigeminal and facial nerve monitoring in the early identification of a superiorly (anterior and superior (AS)) displaced facial nerve. This prospective study included 24 patients operated for removal of large vestibular schwannomas (VS). The latencies of the electromyographic (EMG) events recorded from the trigeminal and facial nerve innervated muscles after mapping the superior surface of the tumor were analyzed. The mean latency of the recorded compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from the masseter muscle was 3.6 ± 0.5 ms and of the peripherally transmitted responses by volume conduction from the frontalis, o. oculi, nasalis, o. oris, and mentalis muscles was 4.6 ± 0.9, 4.1 ± 0.7, 3.9 ± 0.4, 4.3 ± 0.8, and 4.5 ± 0.6 ms, respectively, after trigeminal nerve stimulation in 24 (100%) patients (pattern I response). In 6 (25%) patients, the mean latency of CMAP on the masseter was 3.3 ± 0.3 ms, and the latencies of the CMAP from the frontalis, o. oculi, nasalis, o. oris, and mentalis muscles were 6.5 ± 1.3, 5.0 ± 1.5, 7.5 ± 1.3, 7.4 ± 0.6, and 7.0 ± 1.5 ms, respectively, longer than those of the peripherally transmitted responses (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.015, respectively) indicating simultaneous stimulation of both nerves (pattern II response). All patients with this response were later confirmed to have an AS-displaced facial nerve. Recognizing the response resulting from simultaneous stimulation of both the facial and trigeminal nerves is important to help early identification of an AS-displaced facial nerve before it is visible in the surgical field and to avoid misleading information by confusing this pattern for a pure trigeminal nerve response.

Assessment of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Parameters Associated With Facial Nerve Outcome in Parotidectomy for Benign Disease

Importance

Prior studies suggest that the use of facial nerve monitoring decreases the rate of immediate postoperative facial nerve weakness in parotid surgery, but published data are lacking on normative values for these parameters or cutoff values to prognosticate facial nerve outcomes.

Objective

To identify intraoperative facial nerve monitoring parameters associated with postoperative weakness and to evaluate cutoff values for these parameters under which normal nerve function is more likely.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective case series of 222 adult patients undergoing parotid surgery for benign disease performed with intraoperative nerve monitoring was conducted at an academic medical institution from September 13, 2004, to October 30, 2014. The data analysis was conducted from May 2018 to January 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome measure was facial nerve weakness. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to define optimal cut point to maximize the sensitivity and specificity of the stimulation threshold, mechanical events, and spasm events associated with facial nerve weakness.

Results

Of 222 participants, 121 were women and 101 were men, with a mean (SD) age of 51 (16) years. The rate of temporary facial nerve paresis of any nerve branch was 45%, and the rate of permanent paralysis was 1.3%. The mean predissection threshold was 0.22 milliamperes (mA) (range, 0.1-0.6 mA) and the mean postdissection threshold was 0.24 mA (range, 0.08-1.0 mA). The average number of mechanical events was 9 (range, 0-66), and mean number of spontaneous spasm events was 1 (range, 0-12). Both the postdissection threshold (area under the curve [AUC], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.77) and the number of mechanical events (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.66) were associated with early postoperative facial nerve outcome. The number of spasm events was not associated with facial nerve outcome. The optimal cutoff value for the threshold was 0.25 mA, and the optimal cutoff for number of mechanical events was 8. If a threshold of greater than 0.25 mA was paired with more than 8 mechanical events, there was a 77% chance of postoperative nerve weakness. Conversely, if a threshold was 0.25 mA or less and there were 8 mechanical events or less, there was 69% chance of normal postoperative nerve function. No parameters were associated with permanent facial nerve injury.

Conclusions and Relevance

Postdissection threshold and the number of mechanical events are associated with immediate postoperative facial nerve function. Accurate prediction of facial nerve function may provide anticipatory guidance to patients and may provide surgeons with intraoperative feedback allowing adjustment in operative techniques and perioperative management.

Facial Nerve EMG: Low-Tech Monitoring with a Stopwatch

OBJECTIVE

 The quantity of A-trains, a high-frequency pattern of free-running facial nerve electromyography, is correlated with the risk for postoperative high-grade facial nerve paresis. This correlation has been confirmed by automated analysis with dedicated algorithms and by visual offline analysis but not by audiovisual real-time analysis.

METHODS

 An investigator was presented with 29 complete data sets measured during actual surgeries in real time and without breaks in a random order. Data were presented either strictly via loudspeaker (audio) or simultaneously by loudspeaker and computer screen (audiovisual). Visible and/or audible A-train activity was then quantified by the investigator with the computerized equivalent of a stopwatch. The same data were also analyzed with quantification of A-trains by automated algorithms.

RESULTS

 Automated (auto) traintime (TT), known to be a small, yet highly representative fraction of overall A-train activity, ranged from 0.01 to 10.86 s (median: 0.58 s). In contrast, audio-TT ranged from 0 to 1,357.44 s (median: 29.69 s), and audiovisual-TT ranged from 0 to 786.57 s (median: 46.19 s). All three modalities were correlated to each other in a highly significant way. Likewise, all three modalities correlated significantly with the extent of postoperative facial paresis. As a rule of thumb, patients with visible/audible A-train activity < 1 minute presented with a more favorable clinical outcome than patients with > 1 minute of A-train activity.

CONCLUSION

 Detection and even quantification of A-trains is technically possible not only with intraoperative automated real-time calculation or postoperative visual offline analysis, but also with very basic monitoring equipment and real-time good quality audiovisual analysis. However, the investigator found audiovisual real-time-analysis to be very demanding; thus tools for automated quantification can be very helpful in this respect.

Intraoperative monitoring of the facial nerve during parotid gland surgery in Otolaryngology services - Head and Neck Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Facial nerve injury remains the most severe complication of parotid gland surgery. Due to the increasing evidence about the advantage of the use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, a survey was distributed among members of the Spanish Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery with the objective of determining patterns of its use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire which included 12 separate questions in 3 sections was distributed via email through the official email of the Spanish Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The first section of questions was in relation to demographic characteristics, the second section was related to the pattern of monitoring use and the third section referred to litigation related to facial palsy.

RESULTS

1544 anonymous questionnaires were emailed. 255 surveys were returned, giving an overall response rate of 16.5%. From these, 233 (91.3%) respondents perform parotid gland surgery. Two-hundred nineteen (94%) respondents use intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Of the respondents,94% used intraoperative facial nerve monitoring if in their current practice they performed fewer than 10 parotidectomies per year and 93.8% if they performed more than 10 (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.68-1.45; p=.991). With regard to lawsuits, just 3 (1.2%) of the respondents had a history of a parotid gland surgery-associated lawsuit and in just one case the facial nerve monitor was not used.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that most otolaryngologists in Spain use intraoperative facial nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery. Almost all of them use it to improve patient safety and consider that facial nerve monitoring should be helpful preventing inadvertent injury.

Application of an Intraoperative Neuromonitoring System Using a Surface Pressure Sensor in Parotid Surgery: A Rabbit Model Study

Objectives

Facial nerve monitoring (FNM) can be used to identify the facial nerve, to obtain information regarding its course, and to evaluate its status during parotidectomy. However, there has been disagreement regarding the efficacy of FNM in reducing the incidence of facial nerve palsy during parotid surgery. Therefore, instead of using electromyography (EMG) to identify the location and state of the facial nerve, we applied an intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) system using a surface pressure sensor to detect facial muscle twitching. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the IONM system with a surface pressure sensor to detect facial muscle twitching during parotidectomy.

Methods

We evaluated the stimulus thresholds for the detection of muscle twitching in the orbicularis oris and orbicularis oculi, as well as the amplitude and latency of EMG and the surface pressure sensor in 13 facial nerves of seven rabbits, using the same stimulus intensity.

Results

The surface pressure sensor detected muscle twitching in the orbicularis oris and orbicularis oculi in response to a stimulation of 0.1 mA in all 13 facial nerves. The stimulus threshold did not differ between the surface pressure sensor and EMG.

Conclusion

The application of IONM using a surface pressure sensor during parotidectomy is noninvasive, reliable, and feasible. Therefore, the IONM system with a surface pressure sensor to measure facial muscle twitching may be an alternative to EMG for verifying the status of the facial nerve.

ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.

Impact of Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring on Facial Nerve Outcomes after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

Objectives:

Assess the utility of intraoperative transcranial facial motor-evoked potential (FMEP) monitoring in predicting and improving facial function after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection.

Study Design:

Retrospective chart review.

Methods:

Data were obtained from 82 consecutive VS resections meeting inclusion criteria. Sixty-two cases were performed without FMEP and 20 with FMEP. Degradation of FMEP response was defined as a final-to-baseline amplitude ratio of 0.5 or less. House-Brackmann (HB) grade was assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, at follow-up assessments, and it was compared between pre- and post-FMEP cohorts. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of FMEP degradation in predicting facial weakness were calculated.

Results:

In the pre-FMEP group, at length of follow-up (LOF) ⩾9 months, 83.9% (52/62) of patients exhibited HB 1-2 outcome. In the post-FMEP cohort, 75.0% (15/20) exhibited HB 1-2 function at LOF ⩾9 months. There was no difference in rates of HB 1-2 outcomes between groups in the immediate postoperative period ( P = .35) or at long-term follow-up ( P = 1.0). With respect to predicting immediate postoperative facial function, FMEP demonstrated high specificity (88.9%) and moderate sensitivity (54.5%). The PPV and NPV for immediate postoperative facial function were 85.7% and 61.5%, respectively. With respect to long-term (⩾9 months LOF) facial function, intraoperative FMEP was moderately sensitive (71.4%) and highly specific (84.6%); PPV was moderate (71.4%), and NPV was high (84.6%).

Conclusions:

Intraoperative FMEP is highly specific and moderately sensitive in predicting postoperative facial function for patients undergoing VS resection, but its use may not be associated with improved facial nerve outcomes.

Level of Evidence:

4

Usefulness of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of oculomotor and abducens nerves during skull base surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the extraocular cranial nerve (EOCN) is not commonly performed because of technical difficulty and risk, reliability of the result and predictability of the postoperative function of the EOCN.

METHODS

We performed oculomotor nerve (CN III) and abducens nerve (CN VI) intraoperative monitoring in patients with skull base surgery by recording the spontaneous muscle activity (SMA) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Two types of needle electrodes of different length were percutaneously inserted into the extraocular muscles with the free-hand technique. We studied the relationships between the SMA and CMAP and postoperative function of CN III and CN VI.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were included. Nineteen oculomotor nerves and 22 abducens nerves were monitored during surgery, respectively. Neurotonic discharge had a positive predictive value of less than 50% and negative predictive value of more than 80% for postoperative CN III and CN VI dysfunction. The latency of patients with postoperative CN III dysfunction was 2.79 ± 0.13 ms, longer than that with intact CN III function (1.73 ± 0.11 ms). One patient had transient CN VI dysfunction, whose CMAP latency (2.54 ms) was longer than that of intact CN VI function (2.11 ± 0.38 ms). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with paresis and with intact function.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of intraoperative monitoring of EOCNs described here is safe and useful to record responses of SMA and CMAP. Neurotonic discharge seems to have limited value in predicting the postoperative function of CN III and CN VI. The onset latency of CMAP longer than 2.5 ms after tumor removal is probably relevant to postoperative CN III and CN VI dysfunction. However, a definite quantitative relationship has not been found between the amplitude and stimulation intensity of CMAP and the postoperative outcome of CN III and CN VI.

Role of Facial Nerve Motor-Evoked Potential Ratio in Predicting Facial Nerve Function in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery Both Immediate and at 1 Year

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether transcranial electrical stimulation-induced facial motor-evoked potential (FMEP) monitoring of the facial nerve (FN) during vestibular schwannoma (VS) tumor resection can predict both immediate and 1 year postoperative FN functional outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective consecutive non-comparative observational case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Facial function, immediate post operation and at 1 year using House-Brackmann (HB) grading scale.

METHODS

The study included 367 consecutive patients (men 178; women 189; age 13-81 years) monitored during primary sporadic VS microsurgery between November 2002 and April 2015. Neurofibromatosis type II, revision surgery, previous radiotherapy treatment, preoperative facial nerve weakness, and non-VS cases were excluded retrospectively during analysis of data. Data of facial function were missing from eight patients at 1 year and were excluded. The correlation between the final-to-baseline FMEP ratio and immediate and 1 year facial nerve function was examined.

RESULTS

Using logistic regression model, the cut-off points of FMEP ratio were 0.62 (PPV 0.96) and 0.59 (PPV 0.98) which predicted satisfactory FN function (HB grades 1 or 2) immediately postoperative and at 1 year after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transcranial electrical stimulation FMEP is a valuable tool for monitoring facial nerve function during resection of vestibular schwannoma. Maintaining a FMEP event-to-baseline ratio of 60% or greater is predictive of satisfactory long-term FN function.

Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: Technical case report

Background:

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN) is a rare functional disorder representing around 1% of cases of trigeminal neuralgia. Lancinating throat and ear pain while swallowing are the typical manifestations, and are initially treated using anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine. Medically refractory GN is treated surgically. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is reportedly effective against GN, superseding rhizotomy and tractotomy.

Methods:

We encountered three patients with medically refractory GN who underwent MVD using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). The offending vessels were the posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, which were confirmed intraoperatively via a transcondylar fossa approach to be affecting the root exit zones of the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves. As IONM, facial motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and brainstem auditory-evoked potentials were monitored during microsurgery in all three patients. Pharyngeal and vagal MEPs were added for two patients to avoid postoperative dysphagia.

Results:

GN disappeared immediately after surgery with complete preservation of hearing acuity and facial nerve function. Transient mild swallowing disturbance was observed in 1 patient without pharyngeal or vagal MEPs, whereas the remaining two patients with pharyngeal and vagal MEPs demonstrated no postoperative dysphagia.

Conclusion:

Although control of severe pain is expected in surgical intervention for GN, lower cranial nerves are easily damaged because of their fragility, even in MVD. IONM including pharyngeal and vagal MEPs appears very useful for avoiding postoperative sequelae during MVD for GN.

Facial Nerve Monitoring during Parotidectomy

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (FNM) in preventing immediate and permanent postoperative facial nerve weakness in patients undergoing primary parotidectomy.

Data Sources

PubMed-NCBI database from 1970 to 2014.

Review Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted. Acceptable studies included controlled series that evaluated facial nerve function following primary parotidectomy with or without FNM (intraoperative nerve monitor vs control). Primary and secondary end points were defined as immediate postoperative and permanent facial nerve weakness (House-Brackmann score, ≥2), respectively.

Results

After a review of 1414 potential publications, 7 articles met inclusion criteria, with a total of 546 patients included in the final meta-analysis. The incidence of immediate postoperative weakness following parotidectomy was significantly lower in the FNM group compared to the unmonitored group (22.5% vs 34.9%; P = .001). The incidence of permanent weakness was not statistically different in the long term (3.9% vs 7.1%; P = .18). The number of monitored cases needed to prevent 1 incidence of immediate postoperative facial nerve weakness was 9, given an absolute risk reduction of 11.7% This corresponded to a 47% decrease in the incidence of immediate facial nerve dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.79; P = .002).

Conclusion

In primary cases of parotidectomy, intraoperative FNM decreases the risk of immediate postoperative facial nerve weakness but does not appear to influence the final outcome of permanent facial nerve weakness.

Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring during cochlear implant surgery: an observational study

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury is one of the most severe complications of cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) is used as an adjunctive modality in a variety of neurotologic surgeries. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether the use of IFNM is associated with postoperative facial nerve injury during CI surgery. The medical charts of 645 patients who underwent CI from 1999 to 2014 were reviewed to identify postoperative facial nerve palsy between those who did and did not receive IFNM. Four patients (3 children and 1 adult) were found to have delayed onset facial nerve weakness. IFNM was used in 273 patients, of whom 2 had postoperative facial nerve weakness (incidence of 0.73%). The incidence of facial nerve weakness was 0.54% (2/372) in the patients who did not receive IFNM. IFNM had no significant effect on postoperative delayed facial palsy (P = 1.000). All patients completely recovered within 3 months after surgery. Interestingly, all 4 cases of facial palsy received right CI, which may be because all of the surgeons in this study used their right hand to hold the drill. When right CI surgery is performed by a right-handed surgeon, the shaft of the drill is closer to the inferior angle of the facial recess, and it is easier to place the drilling shaft against the medial boundary (facial nerve) when the facial recess is small. The facial nerve sheaths of another 3 patients were unexpectedly dissected by a diamond burr during the surgery, and the monitor sounded an alarm. None of these 3 patients developed facial palsy postoperatively. This suggests that IFNM could be used as an alarm system for mechanical compression even without current stimulation. Although there appeared to be no relationship between the use of monitoring and delayed facial nerve palsy, IFNM is of great value in the early identification of a dehiscent facial nerve and assisting in the maintenance of its integrity. IFNM can still be used as an additional technique to optimize surgical success.

Intraoperative monitoring of the abducens nerve in extended endonasal endoscopic approach: a pilot study technical report

BACKGROUND

To determine the reliability and usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of the abducens nerve during extended endonasal endoscopic skull base tumor resection.

METHODS

We performed abducens nerve intraoperative monitoring in 8 patients with giant clival lesions recording with needle electrodes sutured directly into the lateral rectus muscles of the eye to evaluate spontaneous electromyographic activity and triggered responses following stimulation of the abducens nerves.

RESULTS

A total of 16 abducens nerves were successfully recorded during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries. Neurotonic discharges were seen in two patients (12% [2/16] abducens nerves). Compound muscle action potentials of the abducens nerves were evoked with 0.1-4mA and maintained without changes during the neurosurgical procedures. No patient had new neurological deficits or ophthalmological complications post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative monitoring of the abducens nerve during the extended endonasal endoscopic approach to skull base tumors appears to be a safe method with the potential to prevent neural injury through the evaluation of neurotonic discharges and triggered responses.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update

The recent developments of new devices and advances in anesthesiology have greatly improved the utility and accuracy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM). Herein, we review the basic principles of the electrophysiological methods employed under IOM in the operating room. These include motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, electroencephalography, electromyography, brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and visual evoked potentials. Most of these techniques have certain limitations and their utility is still being debated. In this review, we also discuss the optimal stimulation/recording method for each of these modalities during individual surgeries as well as the diverse criteria for alarm signs.

Transzygomatic approach with intraoperative neuromonitoring for resection of middle cranial fossa tumors

The authors reviewed the surgical experience and operative technique in a series of 11 patients with middle fossa tumors who underwent surgery using the transzygomatic approach and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) at a single institution. This approach was applied to trigeminal schwannomas (n = 3), cavernous angiomas (n = 3), sphenoid wing meningiomas (n = 3), a petroclival meningioma (n = 1), and a hemangiopericytoma (n = 1). An osteotomy of the zygoma, a low-positioned frontotemporal craniotomy, removal of the remaining squamous temporal bone, and extradural drilling of the sphenoid wing made a flat trajectory to the skull base. Total resection was achieved in 9 of 11 patients. Significant motor pathway damage can be avoided using a change in motor-evoked potentials as an early warning sign. Four patients experienced cranial nerve palsies postoperatively, even though free-running electromyography of cranial nerves showed normal responses during the surgical procedure. A simple transzygomatic approach provides a wide surgical corridor for accessing the cavernous sinus, petrous apex, and subtemporal regions. Knowledge of the middle fossa structures is essential for anatomic orientation and avoiding injuries to neurovascular structures, although a neuronavigation system and IOM helps orient neurosurgeons.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas

Unfavorable outcomes such as facial paralysis and deafness were once unfortunate probable complications following resection of acoustic neuromas. However, the implementation of intraoperative neuromonitoring during acoustic neuroma surgery has demonstrated placing more emphasis on quality of life and preserving neurological function. A modern review demonstrates a great degree of recent success in this regard. In facial nerve monitoring, the use of modern electromyography along with improvements in microneurosurgery has significantly improved preservation. Recent studies have evaluated the use of video monitoring as an adjunctive tool to further improve outcomes for patients undergoing surgery. Vestibulocochlear nerve monitoring has also been extensively studied, with the most popular techniques including brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring, electrocochleography, and direct compound nerve action potential monitoring. Among them, direct recording remains the most promising and preferred monitoring method for functional acoustic preservation. However, when compared with postoperative facial nerve function, the hearing preservation is only maintained at a lower rate. Here, the authors analyze the major intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques available for acoustic neuroma resection.

Neurophysiologic monitoring in neurosurgery

This article focuses on the application of neurophysiologic monitoring in uniquely neurosurgical procedures. Neurophysiologic monitoring provides functional testing and mapping to identify neural structures. Once identified, the functionality of the central and peripheral nervous system areas at risk for neurosurgical injury can be monitored. It discusses the use of motor-evoked potentials, sensory evoked potentials, electromyography and electroencephalography to assess neurologic change.

Quantitative parameters of facial motor evoked potential during vestibular schwannoma surgery predict postoperative facial nerve function

BACKGROUND

Facial motor evoked potential (FMEP) amplitude ratio reduction at the end of the surgery has been identified as a good predictor for postoperative facial nerve outcome. We sought to investigate variations in FMEP amplitude and waveform morphology during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and to correlate these measures with postoperative facial function immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up.

METHODS

Intraoperative orbicularis oculi and oris muscles FMEP data from 35 patients undergoing surgery for VS resection were collected, then analysed by surgical stage: initial, dural opening, tumour dissection (TuDis), tumour resection (TuRes) and final.

FINDINGS

Immediately after surgery, postoperative facial function correlated significantly with the FMEP amplitude ratio during TuDis, TuRes and final stages in both the orbicularis oculi (p = 0.003, 0.055 and 0.028, respectively) and oris muscles (p = 0.002, 0.104 and 0.014, respectively). At the last follow-up, however, facial function correlated significantly with the FMEP amplitude ratio only during the TuDis (p = 0.005) and final (p = 0.102) stages for the orbicularis oris muscle. At both time points, postoperative facial paresis correlated significantly with FMEP waveform deterioration in orbicularis oculi during the final stage (immediate, p = 0.023; follow-up, p = 0.116) and in orbicularis oris during the TuDis, TuRes and final stages (immediate, p = 0.071, 0.000 and 0.001, respectively; follow-up, p = 0.015, 0.001 and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

FMEP amplitude ratio and waveform morphology during VS resection seem to represent independent quantitative parameters that can be used to predict postoperative facial function. Event-to-baseline FMEP monitoring is quite useful to dictate when intraoperative changes in surgical strategy are warranted to reduce the chances of facial nerve injury.

Cranial nerve monitoring during subpial dissection in temporomesial surgery

OBJECTIVE

Cranial nerves (CNs) crossing between the brainstem and skull base at the level of the tentorial hiatus may be at risk in temporomesial surgery involving subpial dissection and/or tumorous growth leading to distorted anatomy. We aimed to identify the surgical steps most likely to result in CN damage in this type of surgery.

METHODS

Electromyographic responses obtained with standard neuromonitoring techniques and a continuous free-running EMG were graded as either contact activity or pathological spontaneous activity (PSA) during subpial resection of temporomesial structures in 16 selective amygdalohippocampectomy cases. Integrity of peripheral motor axons was tested by transpial/transarachnoidal electrical stimulation while recording compound muscle action potentials from distal muscle(s).

RESULTS

Continuous EMG showed pathological activity in five (31.2%) patients. Nine events with PSA (slight activity, n = 8; strong temporary activity, n = 1) were recorded. The oculomotor nerve was involved three times, the trochlear nerve twice, the facial nerve once, and all monitored nerves on three occasions. Surgical maneuvers associated with PSA were the resection of deep parts of the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus (CN IV, twice; CN III, once), lining with or removing cotton patties from the resection cavity (III, twice; all channels, once) and indirect exertion of tension on the intact pia/arachnoid of the uncal region while mobilizing the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus en bloc (all channels, once; III, once). CMAPs were observed at 0.3 mA in two patients and at 0.6 mA in one patient, and without registering the exact amount of intensity in three patients.

CONCLUSION

The most dangerous steps leading to cranial nerve damage during mesial temporal lobe surgery are the final stages of the intervention while the resection is being completed in the deep posterior part and the resection cavity is being lined with patties. Distant traction may act on nerves crossing the tentorial hiatus via the intact arachnoid.

Electrophysiologic monitoring in neurosurgery

Electrophysiologic techniques have become common in the neurosurgical operating room. This article reviews the methods used for mapping neural structures or monitoring during surgery. Mapping methods allow identification of target structures for surgery, or for identifying structures to allow avoidance or plot safe pathways to deeper structures. Monitoring methods allow for surgery on nearby structures to warn of encroachment, thereby reducing unwanted injury.

Continuous intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in predicting postoperative injury during parotidectomy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To assess whether the use of continuous intraoperative facial nerve monitoring correlates to postoperative facial nerve injury during parotidectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Forty-five consecutive parotidectomies were performed using an electromyograph (EMG)-based intraoperative facial nerve monitor. Of those, 37 had complete data for analysis. Intraoperative findings and final interpretation of the EMGs were analyzed by a senior neurologist and neurophysiologist. All patients were analyzed, including those with preoperative weakness and facial nerve sacrifice.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of facial paralysis (House-Brackmann scale > 1) was 43% for temporary and 22% for permanent deficits. This includes an 11% incidence of preoperative weakness and 14% with intraoperative sacrifice. An abnormal EMG occurred in only 16% of cases and was not significantly associated with permanent or temporary facial nerve paralysis (chi, P < 1.0; Fisher's exact P < .68). Of the eight patients with permanent paralysis, only two had abnormalities on the facial nerve monitor. Also, only one of five patients with intraoperative sacrifice of the facial nerve had an abnormal EMG. Factors significantly associated with the incidence of facial paralysis include malignancy, advanced age, extent of parotidectomy, and dissection beyond the parotid gland (chi and Fisher's, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that abnormalities on the intraoperative continuous facial nerve monitor during parotidectomy do not predict facial nerve injury. The incidence of permanent and temporary facial nerve paralysis compare favorably with the literature given that this study includes patients with revision surgery, intraoperative sacrifice, and preoperative paralysis. Standard of care implications will be discussed.

Localized Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials for Monitoring Cranial Nerves in Cranial Base Surgery

OBJECTIVE:

To describe a novel monitoring technique that allows “functional” assessment of cranial nerve continuity during cranial base surgery.

METHODS:

Facial motor evoked potentials (MEP) in 71 consecutive patients were obtained by localized transcranial electrical stimulation in all patients requiring facial nerve monitoring during the period from November 2002 to August 2004. With transcranial electrical stimulation localized to the contralateral cortex, facial nerve MEPs are obtained through stimulation of more proximal intracranial structures.

RESULTS:

Logistic regression revealed that the final-to-baseline facial MEP ratio predicted satisfactory (House-Brackmann Grade 1 and 2 function) immediate postoperative facial function (0.005 &gt; P &gt; 0.0005). Contingency table analysis showed high correlation (χ2, P ≤ 2 × 108) and acceptable test characteristics using a 50% final-to-baseline MEP ratio.

CONCLUSION:

Facial nerve MEPs recorded intraoperatively during cranial base surgery using the proposed technique predicts immediate postoperative facial nerve outcome. This technique can also be used to monitor other motor cranial nerves in cranial base surgery.

Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery

OBJECTIVE

To address the limitations of standard electromyography (EMG) facial nerve monitoring techniques by exploring the novel application of multi-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation (mpTES) to myogenic facial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring.

METHODS

In 76 patients undergoing skull base surgery, mpTES was delivered through electrodes 1cm anterior to C1 and C2 (M1-M2), C3 and C4 (M3-M4) or C3 or C4 and Cz (M3/M4-Mz), with the anode contralateral to the operative side. Facial MEPs were monitored from the orbicularis oris muscle on the operative side. Distal facial nerve excitation was excluded by the absence of single pulse responses and by onset latency consistent with a central origin.

RESULTS

M3/M4-Mz mpTES (n=50) reliably produced facial MEPs while M1-M2 (n=18) or M3-M4 (n=8) stimulation produced 6 technical failures. Facial MEPs could be successfully monitored in 21 of 22 patients whose proximal facial nerves were inaccessible to direct stimulation. Using 50, 35 and 0% of baseline amplitude criteria, significant facial deficits were predicted with a sensitivity/specificity of 1.00/0.88, 0.91/0.97 and 0.64/1.00, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial MEPs can provide an ongoing surgeon-independent assessment of facial nerve function and predict facial nerve outcome with sufficiently useful accuracy.

SIGNIFICANCE

This method substantially improves facial nerve monitoring during skull base surgery.

Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring

The purpose of intraoperative monitoring is to preserve function and prevent injury to the nervous system at a time when clinical examination is not possible. Cranial nerves are delicate structures and are susceptible to damage by mechanical trauma or ischemia during intracranial and extracranial surgery. A number of reliable electrodiagnostic techniques, including nerve conduction studies, electromyography, and the recording of evoked potentials have been adapted to the study of cranial nerve function during surgery. A growing body of evidence supports the utility of intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerve nerves during selected surgical procedures.

Trigeminal schwannomas: removal of dumbbell-shaped tumors through the expanded Meckel cave and outcomes of cranial nerve function

OBJECT

As in patients with vestibular schwannomas, advances in surgical procedures have markedly improved outcomes in patients with trigeminal schwannomas. In this article the authors address the function of cranial nerves in a series of patients with trigeminal schwannomas that were treated with gross-total surgical removal. The authors emphasize a technique they use to remove a dumbbell-shaped tumor through the expanded Meckel cave, and discuss the advantage of the extradural zygomatic middle fossa approach for total removal of tumor and preservation or improvement of cranial nerve function.

METHODS

Within an 11-year period (1989-2000), 25 patients (14 female and 11 male patients with a mean age of 44.4 years) with benign trigeminal schwannomas were surgically treated by the senior author (O.A.) with the aim of total removal of the tumor. Three patients had undergone previous surgery elsewhere. Trigeminal nerve dysfunction was present in all but two patients. Abducent nerve paresis was present in 40%. The approach in each patient was selected according to the location and size of the lesion. Nineteen tumors were dumbbell shaped and extended into both middle and posterior fossae. All 25 tumors involved the cavernous sinus. The zygomatic middle fossa approach was particularly useful and was used in 14 patients. The mean follow-up period was 33.12 months. In patients who had not undergone previous surgery, the preoperative trigeminal sensory deficit improved in 44%, facial pain decreased in 73%, and trigeminal motor deficit improved in 80%. Among patients with preoperative abducent nerve paresis, recovery was attained in 63%. Three patients (12%) experienced a persistent new or worse cranial nerve function postoperatively. Fifth nerve sensory deficit persisted in one of these patients, sensory and motor dysfunction in another, and motor trigeminal weakness in the third patient. In all patients a good surgical outcome was achieved. One patient died 2 years after treatment from an unrelated cause. In three patients the tumors recurred after an average of 22.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation or improvement of cranial nerve function can be achieved through total removal of a trigeminal schwannoma, and skull base approaches are better suited to achieving this goal. The zygomatic middle fossa approach is particularly helpful and safe. It allows extradural tumor removal from the cavernous sinus, the infratemporal fossa, and the posterior fossa through the expanded Meckel cave.

Continuous electromyography monitoring of motor cranial nerves during cerebellopontine angle surgery

OBJECT

Electromyography (EMG) monitoring is expected to reduce the incidence of motor cranial nerve deficits in cerebellopontine angle surgery. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed analysis of intraoperative EMG phenomena with respect to their surgical significance.

METHODS

Using a system that continuously records facial and lower cranial nerve EMG signals during the entire operative procedure, the authors examined 30 patients undergoing surgery on acoustic neuroma (24 patients) or meningioma (six patients). Free-running EMG signals were recorded from muscles targeted by the facial, trigeminal, and lower cranial nerves, and were analyzed off-line with respect to waveform characteristics, frequencies, and amplitudes. Intraoperative measurements were correlated with typical surgical maneuvers and postoperative outcomes. Characteristic EMG discharges were obtained: spikes and bursts were recorded immediately following the direct manipulation of a dissecting instrument near the cranial nerve, but also during periods when the nerve had not yet been exposed. Bursts could be precisely attributed to contact activity. Three distinct types of trains were identified: A, B, and C trains. Whereas B and C trains are irrelevant with respect to postoperative outcome, the A train--a sinusoidal, symmetrical sequence of high-frequency and low-amplitude signals--was observed in 19 patients and could be well correlated with additional postoperative facial nerve paresis (in 18 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

It could be demonstrated that the occurrence of A trains is a highly reliable predictor for postoperative facial palsy. Although some degree of functional worsening is to be expected postoperatively, there is a good chance of avoiding major deficits by warning the surgeon early. Continuous EMG monitoring is superior to electrical nerve stimulation or acoustic loudspeaker monitoring alone. The detailed analysis of EMG-waveform characteristics is able to provide more accurate warning criteria during surgery.