Origin of the "N10" stationary-field potential after median nerve stimulation

N10 component in median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) is not an antidromic motor potential

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the N10 far-field potential in median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials is generated by the motor axons by examining patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS

Subjects were 5 ALS patients showing pronounced or complete denervation of median-innervated small hand muscles. We evaluated N10 over scalp, and proximal plexus volleys (PPVs) at lateral or anterior cervical electrode.

RESULTS

N10 and PPVs were definitely preserved for every ALS subject. N10 amplitudes of ALS subjects were even significantly larger than control subjects. In one ALS patient completely lacking motor axons, N10 was larger than the largest one among control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Present results clearly indicate that N10 is not predominantly generated by motor axons but by the whole median nerve dominated by sensory axons. We propose a theory that N10 is a junctional potential generated by the entrance of the median nerve into bone at the intervertebral foramen, producing a positive pole at the non-cephalic reference electrode. Significantly larger N10 in ALS subjects may be due to the lack of cancellation by slower motor axons.

SIGNIFICANCE

The hypothesis that N10 is generated by motor axons is refuted, and a new theory of its generation is presented.

N10 potential as an antidromic motor evoked potential in a median nerve short-latency somatosensory evoked potential study

When stimulating the mixed nerve to record evoked potential, both sensory and motor fibers are activated before entering the spinal cord. The N10 potential has been described as an antidromic motor evoked potential based on results obtained by recording at the anterior midneck. In the present study, we examined the changes in latencies of Erb's potential, N10, and N13 by stimulating the median nerve distally at the wrist and proximally at the elbow. The conduction velocity of N10 calculated by the difference between N10 latencies at the two stimulation points was consistent with motor conduction velocity, although N13 conduction velocity estimated by the same method reflected a sensory conduction velocity. A positive relation was also observed between the indirect latency from the stimulation point to the anterior root as calculated using the equation (F - M - 1) / 2 (ms) and the direct latency to the negative peak of the N10 potential. Our data support the notion that N10 represents antidromic motor potential originating in the spinal entry zone of the anterior root.