Prospective evaluation of newborn soft-tissue hip "clicks" with ultrasound

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Is Not Associated with Breech Presentation in Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to (1) determine the incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in preterm infants born prior to 35 completed weeks' gestation in a breech presentation, and (2) evaluate if the association between breech presentation and DDH in full-term infants holds for premature infants.

STUDY DESIGN

This study design comprises retrospective review of infants born between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017, at <35 weeks' gestation and admitted to the NICU. Infants had hip ultrasounds at 4 to 6 weeks' corrected age if they were born in a breech presentation with a stable hip examination. We excluded infants born in a presentation other than breech or vertex, had no documentation of presentation at birth, or if they died within the first year.

RESULTS

We included 1,533 infants. Preterm infants <35 weeks' gestation born in the breech versus vertex position had an incidence of DDH of 0.47% (2/428) and 0.36% (4/1,105), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of DDH between infants born in the breech versus vertex position (Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of breech presentation in detecting DDH were 33, 72, 0.47, and 99.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no association between breech presentation and DDH in preterm infants <35 weeks' gestation. Obtaining hip ultrasounds on preterm infants <35 weeks' gestation born in the breech presentation with a normal hip examination is not recommended.

KEY POINTS

· Breech position is a risk factor for DDH in term newborns.. · Preterm infants are often in the breech position until 37 weeks' gestation.. · This study shows that breech presentation is not a risk factor for DDH in preterm infants..

The Significance of Isolated Hip Click as a Sign of DDH: Implications on Referral Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of an isolated hip click remains unclear. The rates of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in those referred for hip click vary from 0% to 28%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of DDH in patients prospectively referred for isolated hip click.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients referred to a single pediatric orthopaedic center with concern for DDH secondary to isolated hip click felt by the pediatrician on examination. Patients with known sonographic abnormalities or risk factors for DDH (breech presentation or positive family history) were excluded. Ultrasounds were obtained upon initial presentation and defined as abnormal if alpha angle <60 degrees and/or femoral head coverage (FHC) <50%. Mild dysplasia, analogous to Graf IIa physiological immaturity, was defined as alpha angle 50<α<60 and/or <50% FHC in a patient <3 months age. Severe dysplasia was defined as ≤33% FHC, which has been proposed to be sonographically consistent with a hip dislocation.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-five children were referred for isolated hip click. One hundred eighty-nine patients (74%) had normal ultrasound whereas 66 patients (26%) had sonographic abnormalities (mean age 6.5±6.2 wk at initial ultrasound). Fifty patients (19.6%) demonstrated physiological immaturity, 3 patients (1.2%) demonstrated moderate sonographic dysplasia, and 13 patients (5.1%) had sonographic findings consistent with severe dysplasia or dislocated hip. Hips with severe dysplasia were younger than the remaining population (2.8±2.4 wk vs. 6.6±6.2 wk, P <0.001) with no difference in sex distribution ( P =0.07) or first-born birth order ( P =0.36). For those with sonographic abnormality, 18 (27%) patients were treated with Pavlik harness, 1 (2%) was treated with abduction orthosis, and the remainder (71%) were observed for resolution of physiological immaturity.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with isolated hip click identified by their pediatrician may have higher rates of dysplasia than previously reported. We recommend screening ultrasound and/or orthopaedic referral for all infants with isolated hip click.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-prospective prognostic study.

Surgical procedures in infants with early diagnoses of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A prospective 4-year follow-up study

Background

Dysplastic hips infants may normalize spontaneously without any intervention due to the natural growth. However, some infants need one or more surgical interventions to achieve stable and non-dysplastic hips. The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of infants diagnosed with DDH before the age of 6 months undergoing surgical procedures of the hip(s) before the age of four years and to determine the number and types of surgical procedures in each infant.

Methods

A prospective and consecutive study of all infants aged 0-6 months diagnosed with dysplasia of the hips in the combined paediatric orthopaedic and radiologic examination in the Region of Southern Denmark 2013-2017. From medical records, we obtained information about all surgical procedures in the hips including open or closed reductions, arthrographies, tenotomies, and pelvic osteotomies before the age of 4 years.

Results

Overall, 281 infants with hip dysplasia were included. The median age at first examination was 48 days. In 254 (90%) of the infants, the hips resolved spontaneously, and 27 (10%) needed one or more surgical interventions. Overall, the 27 infants had 47 surgical intervention as 12 infants had more than one intervention. One infants had five surgical interventions. The most frequent surgical procedures were closed reduction and arthrography with or without adductor tenotomy (58%) and pelvic osteotomy (27%). Among infants with surgical interventions, 23 (8.2%) had unstable hips, and four (1.4%) had stable hips. All four infants with stable hips had an arthrography and none required a pelvic osteotomy.

Discussion

This study supports the propensity for spontaneous normalization early dysplasia of the hips in infants. Only a small proportion of the infants needed surgical interventions to achieve stable and non-dysplastic hips.

The Term Newborn: Postnatal Screening and Testing

Prenatal genetic screening, including evaluation for inherited genetic disorders, aneuploidy risk assessment, and sonographic assessment, combined with a thorough newborn examination and standard newborn screening, including blood, hearing, and congenital heart disease screening, can reveal conditions requiring further evaluation after delivery. Abnormal prenatal or newborn screening results should prompt additional diagnostic testing guided by maternal fetal medicine, perinatal genetics, or pediatric specialists.

Current Evidence about Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Pregnancy

In adults, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) represents a spectrum of disorders. It is commonly found in women in routine orthopedic practice. Hip dysplasia is a leading precursor of joint laxity; when untreated, it can contribute to chronic modifications, such as thickening of the pulvinar and ligamentum teres (which can also elongate), hypertrophy of the transverse acetabular ligament, and osteoarthritis. DDH is presumed to be associated with alterations in pelvic morphology that may affect vaginal birth by the reduction in the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet or outlet. Here, we provide an overview of the current knowledge of pregnancy-associated DDH. We primarily focused on how a surgical DDH treatment might influence the pelvic shape and size and the effects on the mechanism of birth. We presented the female pelvis from the standpoint of bone and ligament morphology relative to a pelvic osteotomy. Then, we described whether the pregnancy was impacted by previous surgical DDH treatments, performed from infancy to adulthood. In conclusion, hip dysplasia is not associated with high-risk complications during pregnancy or with increased difficulty in vaginal delivery.

Prevalence of Hip Ultrasound Abnormalities in Newborns With a Hip Click

A hip click on examination of the newborn hip is believed to be the result of a ligament or myofascial structure and thought to be benign. Some studies suggest a link between hip clicks and developmental dysplasia of the hip. The purpose of our study is to estimate the prevalence of ultrasound hip abnormalities in newborns with a hip click and an otherwise normal physical examination. Results. Ninety patients meeting inclusion criteria of a hip click with an otherwise normal physical examination underwent diagnostic ultrasound with a 17.8% prevalence of hip abnormalities found (95% confidence interval ±7.9% [range of 9.9% to 25.7%]). Our study had 64 (71%) females and 26 (29%) males. The prevalence of hip pathology for females was 18.8% (12 of 64 patients) and for males was 15.4% (4 of 26 patients). Thirty-three patients were found to have bilateral hip clicks on presentation, with 21.2% (7 of 33) of those patients found to have hip pathology on ultrasound (3 of the 7 had pathology of both hips). Six patients had a family history of hip dysplasia and 1 of these patients (16.7%) had pathology on ultrasound. The average age to hip sonography was 6.6 weeks. Conclusions. In all, 17.8% of newborns with a hip click were found to have hip abnormalities on ultrasound. The prevalence of hip pathology, on ultrasound, suggests that additional larger, prospective studies are needed to clarify the association between a hip click and abnormal ultrasound found at 6 weeks of age or greater.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Pediatricians are often the first to identify developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and direct subsequent appropriate treatment. The general treatment principle of DDH is to obtain and maintain a concentric reduction of the femoral head in the acetabulum. Achieving this goal can range from less-invasive bracing treatments to more-invasive surgical treatment depending on the age and complexity of the dysplasia. In this review, we summarize the current trends and treatment principles in the diagnosis and treatment of DDH.

Evaluation and Referral for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Infants

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a wide spectrum of clinical severity, from mild developmental abnormalities to frank dislocation. Clinical hip instability occurs in 1% to 2% of full-term infants, and up to 15% have hip instability or hip immaturity detectable by imaging studies. Hip dysplasia is the most common cause of hip arthritis in women younger than 40 years and accounts for 5% to 10% of all total hip replacements in the United States. Newborn and periodic screening have been practiced for decades, because DDH is clinically silent during the first year of life, can be treated more effectively if detected early, and can have severe consequences if left untreated. However, screening programs and techniques are not uniform, and there is little evidence-based literature to support current practice, leading to controversy. Recent literature shows that many mild forms of DDH resolve without treatment, and there is a lack of agreement on ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for DDH as a disease versus developmental variations. The American Academy of Pediatrics has not published any policy statements on DDH since its 2000 clinical practice guideline and accompanying technical report. Developments since then include a controversial US Preventive Services Task Force "inconclusive" determination regarding usefulness of DDH screening, several prospective studies supporting observation over treatment of minor ultrasonographic hip variations, and a recent evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons on the detection and management of DDH in infants 0 to 6 months of age. The purpose of this clinical report was to provide literature-based updated direction for the clinician in screening and referral for DDH, with the primary goal of preventing and/or detecting a dislocated hip by 6 to 12 months of age in an otherwise healthy child, understanding that no screening program has eliminated late development or presentation of a dislocated hip and that the diagnosis and treatment of milder forms of hip dysplasia remain controversial.

Hip Click in the Neonate: Should I Be Concerned?

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requires precise evaluation and rapid treatment/referral to specialists to optimize results. The incidence of DDH ranges between 4/1,000 and 133/1,000 newborns depending on patient risk factors (female gender, breech birth, and family history). Multiple associations have been identified including metatarsus adductus, oligohydramnios, and muscular torticollis. Classic physical examination results are well known by pediatricians, but can be difficult to elicit. Ultrasound screening is a useful test in defining early dysplasia and dislocation, but can generate misleading results if used inappropriately. Early ultrasound is useful for the identification of unstable hips and discerning treatment. High rates of ultrasound abnormalities have been identified in the early neonatal period, most of which have been shown to spontaneously improve. Ortolani/Barlow negative hips are best evaluated at age 6 weeks if continued concern is present. Treatment with the Pavlik harness or an abduction splint is well known to have excellent outcomes, but not without risk.

Evaluation and treatment of developmental hip dysplasia in the newborn and infant

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a spectrum of physical and imaging findings. The child's hip will not develop normally if it remains unstable and anatomically abnormal by walking age. Therefore, careful physical examination of all infants to diagnosis and treat significant DDH is critical to provide the best possible functional outcome. Regardless of the practice setting, all health professionals who care for newborns and infants should be trained to evaluate the infant hip for instability and to provide appropriate and early conservative treatment or referral.

Strategies to improve nonoperative childhood management

Early diagnosis is of paramount importance to favorably alter the natural history of DDH. Most cases of dysplasia can be diagnosed by careful history taking and physical examination. Imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography, have increased our ability to detect subtleties not appreciated by means of physical examination or plain radiography. Although the evaluation of children with risk factors for DDH is important, most dysplasia occurs in girls who have no other risk factors. For all infants, a competent newborn physical examination using the Ortolani maneuver is the most useful procedure to detect hip instability. Early treatment of an unstable hip with a Pavlik harness or similarly effective orthosis is effective, safe, and strongly advised.

Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Uncorrected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with long term morbidity such as gait abnormalities, chronic pain and degenerative arthritis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of different screening programmes for DDH on the incidence of late presentation of congenital hip dislocation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were performed in CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2011) supplemented by searches of clinical trial registries, conference proceedings, cross references and contacting expert informants.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster trials comparing the effectiveness of screening programmes for DDH.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent review authors assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

No study examined the effect of screening (clinical and/or ultrasound) and early treatment versus not screening and later treatment.One study reported universal ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery but was associated with a significant increase in treatment.One study reported targeted ultrasound compared to clinical examination alone did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery, with no significant difference in rate of treatment.Meta-analysis of two studies found universal ultrasound compared to targeted ultrasound did not result in a significant reduction in late diagnosed DDH or surgery. There was heterogeneity between studies reporting the effect on treatment rate.Meta-analysis of two studies found delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with unstable (but not dislocated) hips resulted in no significant difference in the rate of late diagnosed DDH. Both studies reported a significant reduction in treatment with use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting.One study reported delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting compared to immediate splinting of infants with mild hip dysplasia on ultrasound resulted in no significant difference in late diagnosed DDH but a significant reduction in treatment. No infants in either group received surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to give clear recommendations for practice. There is inconsistent evidence that universal ultrasound results in a significant increase in treatment compared to the use of targeted ultrasound or clinical examination alone. Neither of the ultrasound strategies have been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes including late diagnosed DDH and surgery. The studies are substantially underpowered to detect significant differences in the uncommon event of late detected DDH or surgery. For infants with unstable hips or mildly dysplastic hips, use of delayed ultrasound and targeted splinting reduces treatment without significantly increasing the rate of late diagnosed DDH or surgery.

The diagnosis and management of common childhood orthopedic disorders

Musculoskeletal illness represents a significant portion of office visits to primary care physicians. Despite this, little emphasis is placed on learning pediatric orthopedics during medical school or residency. Many articles have been written on selected disorders, or approaches to common conditions, such as the limping child. Sometimes determining where to start and how to move toward a diagnosis prevents prompt evaluation, referral, and treatment. Based on the author's experience as a general pediatrician trained in, and exclusively practicing, nonoperative pediatric orthopedics, approaches to selected complaints related to the musculoskeletal system are presented. Emphasis is placed on conditions resulting in frequent consultation with pediatric orthopedists from pediatricians and other primary care practitioners, either in the office or over the phone. Important features that may not be familiar to the primary care physician are highlighted, including the identification of aspects that require further evaluation and indications for consultation. Guidance regarding in-office management is also provided.

Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: current practices in Ireland

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the current approach to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the Republic of Ireland.

METHODS

Two-pronged prospective and retrospective study. (1) Postal questionnaire to consultant paediatricians responsible for the routine neonatal care of infants in the Irish Republic in June 2006. (2) Retrospective database review to identify infants undergoing radiological follow-up and their outcome.

RESULTS

All maternity units surveyed responded. Most units (84%) were dependent on radiographs at 4-6 months for imaging hips, only two units primarily used ultrasound (10.5%). We estimate that neonatal hip examination is performed by an experienced examiner in less than 30% of routine newborn examinations. On retrospective analysis, 94% of radiographs performed were normal.

CONCLUSIONS

The most effective interventions, selective ultrasound and examination by an experienced clinician are not widely practiced. There is a need for the development of national guidelines based on available resources.

Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasonographic findings in the neonatal period

The relationship between ultrasonographic findings at birth and risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip have not been prospectively evaluated. Since implementing a routine screening programme for all new-born babies in 1989 we have collected 48 000 sets of data, including family history, birth presentation, mode of delivery and birth weight. Of the 92 babies (three per 1000 live births) with persistent ultrasonographic abnormality at 6 weeks only 20% displayed evidence of clinical instability at the original examination. Female babies without the additional risks of breech birth or positive family history were quantitatively the most significant group, accounting for 75% of cases treated. The majority of babies requiring intervention would not have been identified utilizing present criteria for selective ultrasound screening.

Ultrasound in pediatric musculoskeletal disease: techniques and applications

The increased ratio of nonossified cartilage to bone in children makes ultrasound (US) a particularly suitable technique for evaluating pediatric musculoskeletal disorders. US allows the examiner to compare quickly and meticulously an affected to unaffected area of interest in different orthogonal planes without a need for sedation. Developmental dysplasia of the hip is the most common indication for pediatric musculoskeletal US. Sonography is also a cost-effective, useful, and complementary imaging tool for evaluating pediatric musculoskeletal trauma, inflammation-infection, and masses.

Imaging of pediatric hip disorders

Developmental and acquired abnormalities of the hips are common in childhood. Radiographs, MR imaging, CT, and nuclear medicine play an important role in the diagnosis and management of these disorders. Knowledge of the surgical and clinical treatments of these disorders is important to interpret accurately the radiology studies and impact treatment of the children.

Clinical practice guideline: early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. American Academy of Pediatrics

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is the preferred term to describe the condition in which the femoral head has an abnormal relationship to the acetabulum. Developmental dysplasia of the hip includes frank dislocation (luxation), partial dislocation (subluxation), instability wherein the femoral head comes in and out of the socket, and an array of radiographic abnormalities that reflect inadequate formation of the acetabulum. Because many of these findings may not be present at birth, the term developmental more accurately reflects the biologic features than does the term congenital. The disorder is uncommon. The earlier a dislocated hip is detected, the simpler and more effective is the treatment. Despite newborn screening programs, dislocated hips continue to be diagnosed later in infancy and childhood,(1-11) in some instances delaying appropriate therapy and leading to a substantial number of malpractice claims. The objective of this guideline is to reduce the number of dislocated hips detected later in infancy and childhood. The target audience is the primary care provider. The target patient is the healthy newborn up to 18 months of age, excluding those with neuromuscular disorders, myelodysplasia, or arthrogryposis.

Outpatient pediatric orthopedics. Common and important conditions

Many common pediatric orthopedic conditions can be managed by the pediatrician who has a knowledge of the natural history of these conditions. An accurate diagnosis is necessary to provide proper treatment, give advice to patients, or make referrals to the proper specialist. The authors' find that in approximately 95% of cases, a specific diagnosis can be made and that 40% of patient referrals for orthopedic problems could have been managed by the primary care physician. This article discusses some of the more common pediatric orthopedic problems often encountered by primary care physicians.