Adverse events and tolerability of the combination of fluoxetine/lithium compared with fluoxetine

Fluoxetine plus lithium for treatment of mental health impairment in Long Covid

Purposes

(1) To summarize the mental conditions that may accompany persistent symptoms following acute infection by SARS-CoV-2, often termed Long Covid; (2) to formulate treatment based upon the brain cells that are dominantly affected.

Methods

(1) Review the reports relating to the mental symptoms occurring in Long Covid. (2) Review the drugs that address the brain cells affected in Long Covid, and suggest pharmacotherapy for those patients whose response to psychotherapy is suboptimal.

Results

Long Covid affects ~ 10% of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, and mental symptoms affect ~ 20% of persons with Long Covid. The brain cell-types that have been demonstrated as dominantly affected in Long Covid are astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, neurons, endothelial cells/pericytes, and microglia. Lithium and fluoxetine each address all of those four cell-types. Low dosage of each is likely to be well-tolerated and to cause neither clinically important adverse events (AE) nor serious adverse events (SAE).

Conclusion

For those patients whose response to psychotherapy is suboptimal, lithium and fluoxetine should be administered in combination for both depth of benefit and reduction of dosages.

Drug Interactions with Lithium: An Update

Lithium has been used for the management of psychiatric illnesses for over 50 years and it continues to be regarded as a first-line agent for the treatment and prevention of bipolar disorder. Lithium possesses a narrow therapeutic index and comparatively minor alterations in plasma concentrations can have significant clinical sequelae. Several drug classes have been implicated in the development of lithium toxicity over the years, including diuretics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds, but much of the anecdotal and experimental evidence supporting these interactions is dated, and many newer medications and medication classes have been introduced during the intervening years. This review is intended to provide an update on the accumulated evidence documenting potential interactions with lithium, with a focus on pharmacokinetic insights gained within the last two decades. The clinical relevance and ramifications of these interactions are discussed.

Changes in quantitatively assessed tremor during treatment of major depression with lithium augmented by paroxetine or amitriptyline

Tremor is a relatively frequent side effect of lithium and of antidepressants with serotonergic properties. It can be expected that combinations of lithium (which is itself serotonergic) with such antidepressants will enhance not only efficacy, but also the incidence of side effects, including tremor. To quantitatively monitor the effect of antidepressant augmentation of ongoing lithium therapy on tremor, lithium-maintained patients with a breakthrough episode of major depression were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day (N = 14) or amitriptyline 75 mg/day (N = 17). The initial dosages could be increased after 2 weeks to 40 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively, and the patients were treated for 6 weeks. Tremor activity was assessed weekly, quantitatively by accelerometry and qualitatively with the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. Statistical analysis detected no significant difference between the treatment groups with respect to changes in mean tremor activity relative to baseline. However, analysis of the pooled data showed that tremor increased significantly during the course of combined lithium and antidepressant therapy, with the greatest increments occurring independent of dosage approximately 3 weeks after initiation of combination treatment. Although the mean tremor activity subsided toward the end of treatment, tremor activity on the whole was still significantly greater after 6 weeks of combined lithium and antidepressant treatment than at the start of combination therapy. Increased tremor was not associated with decreased medication compliance, and no patient discontinued treatment because of increased tremor. Tremor frequency was not affected by the study treatments.

Differential pharmacokinetics of lithium in elderly patients

The pharmacotherapeutic use of lithium in the elderly as acute and maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder and augmentation therapy for major depression is well documented. Differences in the response to lithium are explained, in part, by the effect of age-related physiological changes, comorbid conditions, and concurrent medications on the pharmacokinetics of lithium in the elderly. The pharmacokinetic profile of lithium has been studied for many years, primarily in younger adult populations. Lithium pharmacokinetics may be influenced by a number of factors including age. It was first noted several years ago that elderly individuals required lower doses of lithium to achieve serum concentrations similar to those observed in younger adults. This is due to the combination of a reduced volume of distribution and reduced renal clearance. The composition of the human body changes with aging producing an increase in body fat, a decrease in fat-free mass and a decrease in total body water. Lithium clearance decreases as the glomerular filtration rate decreases with increasing age. The effects of other medical conditions in the elderly on the pharmacokinetics of lithium are less well delineated. Reduced lithium clearance is expected in patients with hypertension, congestive heart failure or renal dysfunction. Larger lithium maintenance doses are required in obese compared with non-obese patients. The most clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions associated with lithium involve drugs which are commonly used in the elderly. Thiazide diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can increase serum lithium concentrations. The tolerability of lithium is lower in the elderly. Neurotoxicity clearly occurs in the elderly at concentrations considered 'therapeutic' in general adult populations. There are no placebo-controlled randomised trials of lithium in old age and recommendations for clinical use are based on extrapolations from pharmacokinetic studies, anecdotal reports from mixed age populations and clinical experience in old age psychiatry. Serum concentrations of lithium need to be markedly reduced in the elderly population and particularly so in the very old and frail elderly.

Paroxetine and amitriptyline augmentation of lithium in the treatment of major depression: a double-blind study

To study the efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation of ongoing lithium therapy, lithium-maintained patients suffering from an breakthrough episode of major depression were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day (N = 19) or amitriptyline 75 mg/day (N = 23). The initial dosages could be increased after 2 weeks to 40 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively, and the patients were treated for a total of 6 weeks. Efficacy was assessed weekly with the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), and safety was assessed with the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. After 4 weeks, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the paroxetine group had achieved a 50% reduction in baseline HAM-D scores, and the mean improvement in CGI severity of illness was significantly greater in the paroxetine group at weeks 3 and 5. The type and number of emergent events occurring during study treatment corresponded to the known side effect profiles of paroxetine and amitriptyline. Serum lithium levels were not affected by either antidepressant. The authors proposed that the more rapid improvement demonstrated by the group receiving the combination of lithium and paroxetine may be due to the synergistic serotonergic effects of these two medications.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of affective disorders--III. Tolerability, safety and pharmacoeconomics

The clinical use of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) is often complicated by toxicity and safety problems due to their effects on multiple mechanisms of action, many of which are unnecessary for therapeutic effect. The development of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), with their selective mode of action, has resulted in a class of antidepressant drugs possessing an improved side-effect profile, while retaining good clinical efficacy. Their introduction into clinical practice has led to enhanced patient compliance with antidepressant therapy and the ability to maintain treatment over longer periods of time at an adequate therapeutic dose. Although, as a result of their selective action, side-effects associated with SSRI therapy are minimised, distinct variations between individual SSRIs in terms of their tolerability profiles have been observed. The wealth of clinical data now available has revealed differences in their potential to cause psychiatric and neurological side-effects, dermatological reactions, anticholinergic side-effects, changes in body weight, sexual dysfunction, cognitive impairment, discontinuation reactions and drug-drug interactions. Patients who suffer from concomitant depression and physical illness may experience different tolerability profiles, in addition to the greater likelihood that they will be receiving concomitant medications with the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with coadministered SSRI therapy. In addition, the safety margin of SSRIs in overdose may vary within the group. Knowledge of the differences that exist among the SSRIs in respect of tolerability and safety will aid physicians in the selection of the most beneficial treatment strategy for their patients. A successful clinical outcome leads to a reduced economic burden for the patient, their family and the healthcare services. Thus, pharmacoeconomic considerations are also important in choosing antidepressant therapy. The SSRIs, despite relatively higher prescription costs, have been demonstrated to be a more cost-effective option than the TCAs. Furthermore, there is evidence that the emerging clinical differences between SSRIs may translate into significantly different economic outcomes within the group.

Fluoxetine tenth anniversary update: the progress continues

This tenth anniversary review/update of fluoxetine concentrates on the past 5 years of its clinical application. The mechanism of action of fluoxetine; its metabolism; its efficacy in patients with various diagnostic subgroups of depression, patients with coincident medical disease, children and adolescents with depression, patients with eating disorders, and patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD); its long-term (maintenance) efficacy; its side effects and toxicity; and pharmacoeconomic considerations are reviewed. Pharmacotherapy is currently the only proven method for treating major depressive disorder that is applicable to all levels of severity of major depressive illness. Since its introduction 10 years ago, fluoxetine has been available to psychiatrists, primary care physicians, and other nonpsychiatric physicians as full-dose effective pharmacotherapy for patients with depression. Fluoxetine has been widely prescribed by physicians knowledgeable in pharmacology and in the treatment of depression because of its proven efficacy (ie, equal to that of tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs]), its ease of administration (with full therapeutic dosing usually starting from day 1), its generally benign side-effect profile, its remarkable safety in over-dose, and its proven effectiveness in the most common depressed patient population--anxious, agitated, depressed patients--as well as in patients with various subtypes and severities of depression. In more recent years it has also proved effective in the treatment of bulimia, an entity for which only limited or inadequate treatment options had been previously available. In OCD, fluoxetine, with its more acceptable side-effect profile and greater ease of dosing, presents a favorable alternative to previous drug therapy and is useful in treating both obsessions and compulsions. Fluoxetine is currently recognized among clinicians as efficacious in treating anxiety disorders and is being used successfully in special depressed populations such as patients with medical comorbidity, elderly patients, adolescents, and children. Rapid discontinuation or missed doses of short-half-life selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, TCAs, and heterocyclic antidepressants are associated with withdrawal symptoms of a somatic and psychological nature, which cannot only be disruptive, but can also be suggestive of relapse or recurrence of depression. In striking contrast to these short-half-life antidepressants, fluoxetine is rarely associated with such sequelae on sudden discontinuation or missed doses. This preventive effect against withdrawal symptoms on discontinuation of fluoxetine is attributed to the unique extended half-life of this antidepressant. Current studies show that the overall increased effectiveness of fluoxetine in treating depression compensates for its higher cost, compared with older drugs, by reducing the need for physician contact because of increased compliance and less need of titration, and by reducing premature patient discontinuation, thereby yielding fewer relapses, less recurrence, and less reutilization of mental health services.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced serotonin syndrome: review

The selective pharmacology of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) results in a lower potential for pharmacodynamic drug interactions relative to other antidepressants such as the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). However, the SSRIs have been implicated in the development of the serotonin syndrome--a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment with psychotropic drugs. The syndrome is produced most often by the concurrent use of two or more drugs that enhance central nervous system serotonin activity and often goes unrecognized because of the varied and nonspecific nature of its clinical features. The serotonin syndrome is characterized by alterations in cognition (disorientation, confusion), behavior (agitation, restlessness), autonomic nervous system function (fever, shivering, diaphoresis, diarrhea), and neuromuscular (ataxia, hyperreflexia, myoclonus) activity. The difference between this syndrome and the occurrence of adverse effects caused by serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone is the clustering of the signs and symptoms, their severity, and their duration. There are important pharmacokinetic interactions between SSRIs and other serotonergic drugs due principally to their effects on the cytochrome P450(CYP) isoenzymes, the potential for which varies widely amongst the SSRI group, which may increase the likelihood of a pharmacodynamic interaction. The exceptionally long washout period required after fluoxetine discontinuation may cause additional problems and/or inconvenience. Patients with serotonin syndrome usually respond to discontinuation of drug therapy and supportive care alone, but they may also require treatment with antiserotonergic agent such as cyproheptadine, methysergide, and/or propranolol. To reduce the occurrence, morbidity, and mortality of the serotonin syndrome, it must be both prevented by prudent pharmacotherapy and given prompt recognition when it is present.

Fluoxetine augmentation in bipolar disorder patients on maintenance lithium treatment

Lithium augmentation during long-term treatment with antidepressants has long been considered an effective therapeutic strategy in the treatment of depressive syndromes. This paper deals with an 'opposite' strategy, i.e. the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) during maintenance lithium treatment in bipolar disorder (BP) patients who may present a breakthrough depressive syndrome. The study involved 26 patients on maintenance lithium treatment for a mean of 38 months (mean serum lithium level=0.57 mEq/l). Mean fluoxetine dose was 29.3 mg/day for a mean period of 7.36 weeks. Median HDRS scores before and after fluoxetine augmentation were 14 and 6, respectively. The results provide evidence for the efficacy of fluoxetine augmentation in the treatment of breakthrough depressions occurring in bipolar disorder patients during maintenance lithium treatment. The neuropharmacological explanation of the augmentation is not yet well understood, but it is conceivable that the improvement of the depressive symptoms may be related to the increase in serotonergic function provided by combination of the two treatments.