MRI for staging of gastric carcinoma: first results of an experimental prospective study

Gastric cancer: The role of diffusion weighted imaging in the preoperative staging

PURPOSE

Evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 31 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, which underwent preoperative staging with 3Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), were enrolled. Two radiologists evaluated the tumor staging in DWI. Results were compared to postsurgical pathologic findings.

RESULTS

The T factor accuracy of conventional MRI and DWI was 73% and 80% respectively; while the N staging accuracy of conventional MRI and DWI was 80% and 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values showed to be useful in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (64-MDCT) in the T staging of gastric carcinoma in comparison with histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of gastric carcinoma underwent preoperative MR imaging and 64-MDCT, both of which were performed after i.v. injection of scopolamine and water distension of the stomach. In the MR imaging protocol, we acquired T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences, true fast imaging steady-state free precession (true-FISP) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) 3D sequences. Contrastenhanced CT scans were obtained in the arterial and venous phases. Two groups of radiologists independently reviewed the MR and 64-MDCT images. The results were compared with pathology findings.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of T stage, 64-MDCT had 82.5% and MR imaging had 80% sensitivity. Accuracy of MR imaging was slightly higher than that of 64-MDCT in identifying T1 lesions (50% vs 37.5%), whereas the accuracy of 64-MDCT was higher in differentiating T2 lesions (81.2% vs 68.7%). The accuracy of MR imaging and 64-MDCT did not differ significantly in the evaluation of T3-T4 lesions (p>0.05). Understaging was observed in 20% of cases with MR imaging and in 17.5% with 64-MDCT.

CONCLUSIONS

MR imaging and 64-MDCT accuracy levels did not differ in advanced stages of disease, whereas MR imaging was superior in identifying early stages of gastric cancer and can be considered a valid alternative to MDCT in clinical practice.

MRI of gastric carcinoma: Results of T and N-staging in an in vitro study

AIM: To determine the accuracy of 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of gastric wall invasion and perigastric lymph node metastasis in gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS: Twenty resected gastric specimens containing 20 tumors were studied with a 1.5-T MR system using a commercial head surface coil. MR scanning was performed with a T1 weighted image (TR/TE = 500/20), and a T2 weighted image (TR/TE = 2500/90). MR findings were compared with pathologic findings.

RESULTS: A T1-weighted image demonstrated three layers in the normal gastric wall. All of the gastric tumors were well demonstrated by lesions and location. In a MRI findings of gastric wall invasion, there was 1 case of T1, 7 of T2, 11 of T3. Pathologic results of resected specimens included 3 cases of pT1, 4 of pT2, and 12 of pT3. The accuracy of T staging with MRI was 74% (14 of 19). MRI findings of lymph node metastasis included 6 cases of N0, 13 cases of N1. The accuracy of the N staging with MRI was 47% (9 of 19).

CONCLUSION: MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of the T staging of gastric cancer in vitro and thus potentially enables preoperative histopathologic staging.

MRI: imaging of stomach

The study is to determine the optimal MRI bowel preparation regime for visualization of the stomach anatomy. Eight healthy volunteers were asked to take water, 75% barium and blueberry juice. The image quality and tolerance of different stomach distension regime were evaluated. Blueberry juice gave the best distension, but the signal intensity was not very homogeneous. Taking into account the image quality, tolerability and adverse effects, it is concluded that water is the most desirable oral contrast for MR stomach imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of gastric carcinoma: results of an in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma is limited by the fact that available imaging modalities do not enable accurate evaluation of the depth of infiltration of the gastric wall. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in local staging of gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

Sixty-five specimens of patients with proven gastric carcinoma were examined immediately after gastrectomy. Examination was performed with a 1-T MRI and included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and opposed phase images. Images were analyzed for the number of visible wall layers and their signal intensity characteristics, for tumor localization and depth of infiltration. T-stage was classified according to the TNM system. Finally, the staging by MRI was compared with the histopathological staging of the specimens.

RESULTS

The mucosal, submucosal, and proper muscle layers could be differentiated by the typical signal intensities. Depiction of the subserosa or serosa was not possible. In 65 specimens, 67 carcinomas were found by the pathologist. Sixty-four of 67 (96%) histologically proven carcinomas were correctly localized by MRI; T-staging accuracy was 50% only, mainly because of overstaging pT2 tumors as T3.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI enables differentiation of gastric wall layers and, therefore, technically allows the evaluation of the local tumor stage of gastric carcinomas. However, infiltration of the subserosal and serosal layer cannot be proved accurately. Overstaging pT2 tumors is one of the most predominant problems. Yet further technical developments in high-resolution imaging of the gastric wall may improve T-staging in the near future and overcome today's staging limitations.

New coil concept for endoluminal MR imaging: initial results in staging of gastric carcinoma in correlation with histopathology

Our aim was to conduct a prospective study to evaluate staging accuracy of a new coil concept for endoluminal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on ex vivo gastric carcinomas. Twenty-eight consecutive patients referred to surgery with a clinically proven primary gastric malignancy were included. Surgical specimens were examined with a foldable and self-expanding loop coil (8-cm diameter) at 1.5 Tesla immediately after total gastrectomy. T1- and T2-weighted and opposed-phase sequences (axial, frontal sections; 3- to 4-mm slice thickness) were acquired. Investigators blinded to any patient information analyzed signal intensity of normal gastric wall, gastric tumor, and lymph nodes. Findings were compared with histopathological staging. On surgical specimens, 2-5 gastric wall layers could be visualized. All gastric tumors (26 carcinomas, two lymphomas) were identified on endoluminal MR data (100%). Overall accuracy for T staging was 75% (18/24); sensitivity to detect serosal involvement was 80% and specificity 89%. N staging correlated in 58% (14/24) with histopathology (N+ versus N-). The endoluminal coil concept is feasible and applicable for an ex vivo setting. Endoluminal MR data provided sufficient detail for gastric wall layer differentiation, and therefore, identification of T stages in gastric carcinoma is possible. Further investigations in in vivo settings should explore the potential of our coil concept for endoluminal MR imaging.

Preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer using 2-D magnetic resonance imaging with 3-D reconstruction techniques

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical value of 2-D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 3-D reconstruction techniques for the preoperative diagnosis and TNM-staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Using a Philips Gyroscan NT 1.0T superconductive unit, MRI using the water-filling method was performed in 15 patients with suspected gastric cancers. The 2-D MRI sequences included TSE-T1WI, TSE-T2WI and fat suppression (SPIR). The source images of magnetic resonance hydrography (heavily TSE-T2WI sequence) were reconstructed using the Philips EasyVision viewing workstation. Four 3-D postprocessing algorithms, including maximum intensity projection, surface shaded viewing, volume rendering and virtual endoscopy, were performed and compared with the results of a barium study and endoscopy. All 15 patients with 16 gastric cancers had their diagnosis confirmed by postoperative pathological findings.

RESULTS

2-D MRI and 3-D reconstruction images were successfully obtained for all 15 patients. The maximum intensity projection, surface shaded viewing, and volume rendering images corresponded to the upper gastrointestinal series findings, and the virtual endoscopy images corresponded to the gastroscopic views. In 16 gastric lesions, MRI correctly diagnosed 14 (87.5%) advanced gastric cancers, and the tumor location, size and classification were also accurately identified. The accuracy of MRI for determining the preoperative TNM stage was 64.3% (9/14), and there was significant correlation between these results and those from the histopathological studies (P < 0.01). Based on T, N and M factors, the staging accuracy of MRI was 71.4% (10/14), 57.1% (8/14) and 85.7% (12/14), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

2-D MRI with 3-D reconstruction is an effective method for the preoperative diagnosis and TNM staging of gastric cancer. However, the detection of early cancers or benign lesions and N-staging should be further studied.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Gastrography

OBJECTIVES

We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of depicting gastric tumors using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while applying the dark lumen technique. The findings were correlated with conventional gastroscopy. In addition, we evaluated the screening for lymph nodes and liver metastases during the same session to identify potential tumor spread.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 15 patients with known malignant gastric disease. Conventional gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in all patients as gold standard. All patients were examined with computed tomography for tumor staging. MRI was performed using 1 L of tap water as oral contrast agent for all protocols. The MRI program included an axial T1-weighted (T1w; 2D-FLASH) sequence, an axial STIR and T2w (TSE) sequence, and 2 postcontrast T1w (3D coronal /2D axial FLASH) sequences using 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid as intravenously injected contrast agent. Qualitative analysis and comparison with conventional gastroscopy were performed.

RESULTS

The images obtained with the postcontrast 3D coronal T1w-FLASH sequence were the most suitable in identifying gastric tumors. Complete correlation with conventional gastroscopy was achieved in 80% of the cases and partial correlation in 13% of the cases. The same imaging sequence was also appropriate for the evaluation of lymph nodes. For the identification of liver metastases, the images obtained with the axial postcontrast T1w 2D-FLASH sequence provided a higher diagnostic confidence as compared with other imaging protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the dark lumen technique through MRI is suitable for imaging gastric tumors and has the potential to become a "one-stop shopping" method because of the possibility for lymph node evaluation and screening for metastases during the same session based on the same images.

Ex vivo proton MR spectroscopy (1H-MRS) for evaluation of human gastric carcinoma

The present study was performed to determine the characteristics of the biochemical metabolites related to gastric cancer using ex vivo (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and to assess the clinical usefulness. A total of 35 gastric specimens resected during surgery for gastric cancer were used to compare MR spectra. A 1.5-T (64-MHz) clinical MR imager equipped with facilities for spectroscopy was used to obtain MR spectra from 33 gastric specimens. High-resolution (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the remains of two specimens were also examined with a 9.4-T (400-MHz) NMR spectrometer. Localized spectroscopic measurements were performed in two layers of gastric tissue, the proper muscle layer and the composite mucosa/submucosa layer. T(2) FSE and 3D SPGR images were used to determine the voxel size and the location for MRS data collection. MR spectra were obtained using the single-voxel PRESS technique with parameters of TR/TE = 2000/30 ms, NA = 256, and voxel size = 3 x 3 x 3 mm(3) (27 microL). Cancerous and noncancerous gastric tissues in the voxel were determined by histopathological analysis. On 9.4-T ex vivo NMR spectroscopy, the following metabolite peaks were found: lipids at 0.9 ppm (CH(3)) and 1.3 ppm (CH(2)); alanine (beta-CH(3)) at 1.58 ppm; N-Acetyl neuraminic acid (NANA: sialic acid) at 2.03 ppm; and glutathione at 2.25 ppm in normal gastric tissue layers. In the 1.5-T MR system, broad and featureless spectral peaks of the various metabolites in normal human gastric tissue were observed at 0.9 ppm, 1.3 ppm, 2.0 ppm, and 2.2 ppm regardless of gastric tissue layer. In specimens (Borrmann type III) with tubular adenocarcinoma, resonance peaks were observed at 1.26 ppm, 1.36 ppm (doublet of lactate), and 3.22 ppm (choline). Cancer lesions showed decreased levels of lipid peaks, showing the significant lactate doublet peaks, and increased intensity of the choline peak as compared with noncancerous gastric tissue. We found that decreased levels of lipids and increases in lactate and choline peaks in gastric tissue were markers for malignancy in gastric lesions. Information provided by ex vivo (1)H MRS, together with the development of in vivo (1)H MRS with high field strength and high resolution, may be very useful for the diagnosis of gastric cancer in clinical situation.

N/A

N/A

Carcinoma of stomach and duodenum: radiologic diagnosis and staging

Gastric carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide. Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer is important in planning the most effective therapy toward cure or palliation. This article reviews the radiologic diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer.

Two cases of histopathologically advanced (stage IV) early gastric cancers

We report two cases of early gastric cancer with distant metastases (stage IV). At our institute 1428 cases of primary gastric cancer were resected between 1980 and 1997; 536 were diagnosed as early gastric cancer based on the resected specimens (304 cases of mucosal cancer, Tis--TNM classification--and 232 of submucosal cancer, T1). 528 of these 536 cases were classified as histological stage I, six as stage II, none as stage III and two as stage IV. The incidence of stage IV early gastric cancer was 0.14% of all gastric cancers and 0.37% of the early gastric cancers. The two patients with stage IV early gastric cancer were women. Both tumors were defined as early cancer because they were confined to the submucosa. One was a type 0 IIc + III early cancer, histologically classifiable as a small, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (tub2 according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, G2; TNM classification: ICD-O C16), size 10 x 8 mm; the other was a surface spreading type 0 IIc, classifiable as a signet-ring cell carcinoma (sig, G3), size 50 x 35 mm. Stage IV factors were N3 in the first and ovarian metastasis (Krukenberg tumor) in the second case.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction and delayed MRI of gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation

PURPOSE

Our goal was to determine whether dynamic MR subtraction images could be used to detect and stage gastric tumors.

METHOD

Dynamic MR subtraction images were prospectively performed in 20 patients without gastric lesions and in 39 patients with gastric tumors. The flat- or depressed-type early gastric cancers were excluded. The MR findings were assessed for layered pattern of the normal gastric wall, detectability of tumors, enhanced pattern of tumor, and depth of the tumor invasion. Surgical specimens were obtained from 30 of the patients with tumors, and histopathologic sections were made in the dynamic MR scanning direction.

RESULTS

The three-layered structure of the normal gastric wall was apparent in more of the dynamic MR subtraction images (60%) than of the nonsubtraction images (30%) in the control group. All 39 gastric tumors were detected by MRI. The intact inner layers overlying stromal tumors and outer layers interrupted by advanced gastric cancers were clear on the subtracted images. MRI accurately T-staged 88% of the gastric cancers.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic MR subtraction images can be used to identify gastric tumors and to stage gastric cancers.

Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of breath-hold two-dimensional (2D) fast low-angle shot (FLASH) and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo fast MR imaging compared with helical CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with gastric carcinoma underwent preoperative MR imaging and helical CT. MR imaging at 1.5 T was performed immediately after the intramuscular injection of scopolamine and the oral administration of water or effervescent granules. Breath-hold 2D FLASH T1-weighted images in all three planes, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted axial images, and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed 2D FLASH axial images were included. Helical CT was performed 60 sec after initiation of i.v. contrast medium injection (2.5-3 ml/sec). Two groups of two radiologists each independently analyzed the MR and helical CT findings, and these results were compared with the pathologic findings.

RESULTS

For T staging, MR imaging accuracy was higher than that of helical CT (73.3% and 66.7%, respectively); however, the accuracies of the two methods were not significantly different from each other (McNemar test, p > 0.05). Overstaging was noted in 6.7% of cases with MR imaging and 10% with helical CT. Understaging was noted in 20% of cases with MR imaging and 23.3% with helical CT. For N staging, the accuracies of MR imaging and helical CT were 55% and 58.6%, respectively, with no statistical significance (overstaging, 10% and 6.9%; understaging, 34.5% and 34.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

MR imaging was comparable to helical CT in the T and N staging of gastric cancer.

MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT?

PURPOSE

During the last decade, rapid progress has been made in MR technology. Our objective was to evaluate the role of MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer (AGC; gastric cancer invading the muscularis propria) and to compare it with that of spiral CT.

METHOD

We prospectively performed both MR and CT examinations on 26 patients with AGC proven by endoscopic biopsy. Contrast-enhanced CT and nonenhanced MRI with a 1.0 T scanner using FLASH, HASTE, and true-FISP sequences were obtained in each patient after injection of antiperistaltic drug and ingestion of 1 L of tap water. Fifty-two sets of CT and MR images were analyzed by two radiologists in consensus without any information from other images. T and N staging of AGC was determined according to the TNM classification. All patients underwent surgery within 1 week after both examinations. Diagnostic accuracy of each staging of AGC on CT or MRI was evaluated by comparison with the pathologic results.

RESULTS

MRI was slightly superior to CT in T staging (81 vs. 73%, respectively; p < 0.05). Although MRI had a tendency to overstage the pathologic T2 cancer, positive predictability of T2 stage and sensitivity of T3 stage were high (100%, respectively). Regarding the N staging, CT was slightly superior to MRI (73 vs. 65%; p > 0.05). However, both CT and MRI demonstrated the tendency of understaging in N staging.

CONCLUSION

Although MRI was superior to spiral CT in T staging, MRI cannot completely replace spiral CT in staging AGC because of its limitation in N staging.

Stomach diseases: MR evaluation using combined t2-weighted single-shot echo train spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequences

The aim of this study was to describe the magnetic resonance (MR) appearances of diseases of the stomach using combined T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo, T2-weighted single-shot echo train spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequences. All patients with gastric diseases who underwent combined T2-weighted single-shot echo train spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced conventional and fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo imaging between October 1, 1996 and March 1, 1999, and who had histological or other imaging proof of disease, were included in this study. This patient population was comprised of 40 patients with subsequently proven gastric abnormalities, including malignant tumors (25) or benign disease (15). The MRI sequences included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and early and late gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo (SGE) images. Evaluation was made of the following parameters: a) the ability to detect the disease process on MRI, by comparing the original prospective MR reports with the records of the pathology department; b) the MR appearance of a variety of gastric diseases; and c) the sequences that most clearly demonstrated abnormalities by retrospective review of the MR studies. MR images demonstrated 22 of 25 malignant tumors. Evaluation of the extent of the tumor was correctly shown in 22 of 25 tumors. Small-volume tumor (one patient with gastric adenocarcinoma, and one patient with lymphoma) and coexistent infiltrative adenocarcinoma and gastritis (one patient) rendered demonstration of tumor poor on MR images in three patients. Tumors were mildly hypointense on T1-weighted images and mildly hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Tumors enhanced in a heterogeneous fashion compared with background stomach wall, but they ranged from hypointense to hyperintense on early and late post-gadolinium SGE images. Regarding benign diseases, the changes of gastritis were evident in three of four cases. Gastritis appeared as increased mucosal enhancement that ranged from moderate to intense on early and late post-gadolinium SGE images. Imaging findings of the various entities are described in greater detail in the text. MR findings in a variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases of the stomach are described. Neoplastic diseases were consistently observed in most cases; however, small tumors and tumors coexistent with inflammatory changes were poorly evaluated. The changes of gastritis were demonstrated as increased enhancement of the gastric wall. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10:950-960, 1999.