1
|
Kucharzik T, Dignass A, Atreya R, Bokemeyer B, Esters P, Herrlinger K, Kannengiesser K, Kienle P, Langhorst J, Lügering A, Schreiber S, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Teich N, Siegmund B. Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie Colitis ulcerosa (Version 6.2). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:769-858. [PMID: 38718808 DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-0994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- T Kucharzik
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - A Dignass
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - R Atreya
- Medizinische Klinik 1 Gastroent., Pneumologie, Endokrin., Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Bokemeyer
- Interdisziplinäres Crohn Colitis Centrum Minden - ICCCM, Minden, Deutschland
| | - P Esters
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - K Herrlinger
- Innere Medizin I, Asklepios Klinik Nord, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - K Kannengiesser
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - P Kienle
- Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - J Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Lügering
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10, Münster, Deutschland
| | - S Schreiber
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - A Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - J Stein
- Abteilung Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - A Sturm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - N Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - B Siegmund
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kucharzik T, Dignass A, Atreya R, Bokemeyer B, Esters P, Herrlinger K, Kannengiesser K, Kienle P, Langhorst J, Lügering A, Schreiber S, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Teich N, Siegmund B. Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie Colitis ulcerosa (Version 6.1) – Februar 2023 – AWMF-Registriernummer: 021-009. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:1046-1134. [PMID: 37579791 DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-0935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Kucharzik
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - A Dignass
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - R Atreya
- Medizinische Klinik 1 Gastroent., Pneumologie, Endokrin., Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Bokemeyer
- Interdisziplinäres Crohn Colitis Centrum Minden - ICCCM, Minden, Deutschland
| | - P Esters
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - K Herrlinger
- Innere Medizin I, Asklepios Klinik Nord, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - K Kannengiesser
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - P Kienle
- Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - J Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Lügering
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10, Münster, Deutschland
| | - S Schreiber
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - A Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - J Stein
- Abteilung Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - A Sturm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - N Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - B Siegmund
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levy AD, Liu PS, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Bharucha AE, Chang KJ, Cilenti E, Gage KL, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Korngold EK, Marin D, Moreno C, Pietryga JA, Santillan CS, Weinstein S, Wexner SD, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Anorectal Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:S268-S282. [PMID: 34794588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This review summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of the initial imaging in 4 clinical scenarios in patients with suspected inflammatory disease or postoperative complication of the anorectum. These clinical scenarios include suspected perianal fistula or abscess; rectovesicular or rectovaginal fistula; proctitis or pouchitis; and suspected complication following proctectomy, coloproctectomy, or colectomy with a pouch or other anastomosis. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios of anorectal disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
| | - Peter S Liu
- Section Head, Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; and Founder, Advisory Board Quantix Bio
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Chair of the Neurogastroenterology Section, Chair of Research Compliance Subcommittee, and Medical Director, Office of Clinical Trials, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota; and American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Kevin J Chang
- Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Cilenti
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, Primary care physician
| | - Kenneth L Gage
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; SECJNMMI Member-at-Large
| | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Taubman Museum of Art Board Member; and Past-President VA Rad Society
| | - Elena K Korngold
- Section Chief, Abdominal Imaging, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Courtney Moreno
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Chair ACR CTC Registry Committee; and Executive Council American Roentgen Ray Society
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Associate Editor Hollow Organ GI
| | - Cynthia S Santillan
- Chief, Body Imaging Division and Vice-Chair, Clinical Operations for Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Steven D Wexner
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida; Editor-in-Chief, Surgery Journal; American College of Surgeons PAC Board; and Managing Member, Unique Surgical Innovations
| | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia; Director of CT and MRI at VCU, Section Chief, Abdominal Imaging at VCU
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kucharzik T, Dignass AU, Atreya R, Bokemeyer B, Esters P, Herrlinger K, Kannengießer K, Kienle P, Langhorst J, Lügering A, Schreiber S, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Teich N, Siegmund B. Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie Colitis ulcerosa – Living Guideline. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2020; 58:e241-e326. [PMID: 33260237 DOI: 10.1055/a-1296-3444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Kucharzik
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - Axel U Dignass
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Raja Atreya
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Bernd Bokemeyer
- Gastroenterologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Minden, Deutschland
| | - Philip Esters
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | | | - Klaus Kannengießer
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - Peter Kienle
- Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus und Sankt Hedwig-Klinik GmbH, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Jost Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Lügering
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10, Münster, Deutschland
| | | | - Andreas Stallmach
- Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Friedrich Schiller Universität, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen Stein
- Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Sturm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Niels Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Britta Siegmund
- Medizinische Klinik I, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Perianal fistula is a clinical entity with multiple surgical treatment options. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as an important imaging modality in the management of perianal fistulas. It provides accurate description of the fistula within the anal canal in relation to the sphincter complex and other pelvic floor structures as well as the associated complications such as abscess. By understanding the surgical viewpoint, the appearance of perianal fistulas, associated complications, and post-treatment findings of commonly used surgical interventions can more accurately be interpreted to aid clinicians. The objective of the article is to review MRI indications and findings, radiological versus surgical classification schemes, and surgical treatment options for perianal fistulas.
Collapse
|
6
|
Maslekar S, Sagar PM, Harji D, Bruce C, Griffiths B. The challenge of pouch-vaginal fistulas: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 16:405-14. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0885-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2011] [Accepted: 08/12/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Abstract
IPAA is a technically demanding procedure that requires appropriate skills and expertise. Adverse sequelae of IPAA are common. Accurate diagnosis and classification of pouch disorders and associated complications are important for proper management and prognosis. Based on presenting symptoms, appropriate and combined diagnostic modalities should apply. A multidisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons, gastrointestinal pathologists, and gastrointestinal radiologists is advocated for diagnosis and treatment of pouch disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang L, Cai H, Moore L, Shen B. Evaluation of endoscopic and imaging modalities in the diagnosis of structural disorders of the ileal pouch. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010; 16:1526-31. [PMID: 20049948 DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized tomography enterography (CTE), gastrograffin enema (GGE), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and pouch endoscopy (PES) have commonly been used to assess ileal pouch disorders. However, their diagnostic utility has not been systematically evaluated. The aims of this study were to compare these imaging techniques to each other and to optimize diagnosis of pouch disorders by using a combination of these diagnostic modalities. METHODS Clinical data of patients from the Pouchitis Clinic from 2003 to 2008 who had a PES and at least 1 additional imaging modalities (CTE, GGE, or MRI) used for evaluation of ileal pouch disorders were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) with which these tests were able diagnose pouch inlet and distal small bowel and pouch outlet strictures, pouch fistulas, sinuses, and leaks. Subsequently, accuracy was recalculated by combining 2 imaging modalities to see if this could enhance accuracy. RESULTS A total of 66 patients underwent evaluation with PES and 1 other imaging modality as follows: PES + CTE (n = 23), PES + GGE (n = 34), and PES + MRI (n = 26). The mean age was 41.5 +/- 14.5 years, with 28 being female (42.4%). Sixty patients (90.9%) had J pouches and 59 (89.4%) had a preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Overall, CTE, GGE, MRI, and PES all had reasonable accuracy for the diagnosis of small bowel and inlet strictures (73.9%-95.4%), outlet strictures (87.9%-92.3%), fistula (76.9%-84.8%), sinus (68.0%-93.9%), and pouch leak (83-93.9%). CTE had the lowest accuracy for small bowel and inlet strictures (73.9%) and MRI had the lowest accuracy for pouch sinus (68.0%). Combining 2 imaging tests can increase the accuracy of diagnosis to 100% for strictures, fistulas, sinus, and pouch leaks. CONCLUSIONS CTE, GGE, MRI, and PES offer complementary information on disorders of the pouch and the combination of these tests increases diagnostic accuracy for complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Tang
- Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scheirey CD, Scholz FJ. Radiographic Evaluation of the Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2007. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2007.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Nadgir RN, Soto JA, Dendrinos K, Lucey BC, Becker JM, Farraye FA. MRI of complicated pouchitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187:W386-91. [PMID: 16985109 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.05.1019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of MRI to identify the presence of inflammation related to the pouch reservoir in symptomatic patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis who present with clinically suspected complicated pouchitis. CONCLUSION Initial results suggest that MRI should be considered in patients who have undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and present a clinical impression of complicated pouchitis. MRI showed abnormalities consistent with complicated pouchitis in seven of nine examinations, with findings including pouch wall thickening, abnormal wall enhancement, peripouch fluid collection, sinus and fistula tract formation, lymphadenopathy, and peripouch stranding and fatty proliferation. MRI findings of complicated pouchitis should raise the suspicion of Crohn's disease and should prompt further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini N Nadgir
- Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, 88 E Newton St., 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Pouchitis is the most common complication following proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. We aim at discussing relevant information on epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors, diagnostic testing, differential diagnosis and treatment of this idiopathic inflammatory condition. A computerized search of PubMed was performed with the search term 'pouchitis', limited to English papers on humans. This strategy identified 514 references. Relevant articles were selected from this list. In addition, the reference list for each of the selected articles was reviewed to identify any additional references. Pouchitis occurs in up to 60% of patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis, and has characteristic clinical, endoscopic and histological features. The most important test for diagnosis is pouch endoscopy with biopsy. Antibiotics remain the mainstay of treatment, and other options are discussed for those patients who are refractory to antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fistula between an ileal pouch and the vagina is an uncommon complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Its optimal management has not been determined because of its low incidence. METHODS The literature describing such fistulas was reviewed to determine the incidence, cause, and appropriate investigation and repair of these lesions. A literature search was performed with the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. Through this search we located English-language articles from 1970 to 2003 on pouch-vaginal fistulas following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. References from these articles were searched manually for further references. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Pouch-vaginal fistula occurs in 6.3 (range, 3.3-15.8) percent of female patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Sepsis and technical factors are the most common contributors. It is the cause of considerable morbidity. Management depends on the level of the fistula, the amount of pelvic scar tissue, and previous treatments. An algorithm for surgical treatment is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lolohea
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heuschen UA, Autschbach F, Allemeyer EH, Zöllinger AM, Heuschen G, Uehlein T, Herfarth C, Stern J. Long-term follow-up after ileoanal pouch procedure: algorithm for diagnosis, classification, and management of pouchitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:487-99. [PMID: 11330575 DOI: 10.1007/bf02234320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inflammation of the ileoanal pouch (pouchitis) is one of the main complications after restorative proctocolectomy, yet its cause remains poorly understood. A standardized definition and diagnostic procedures in pouchitis are lacking. METHOD We analyzed all cases of pouchitis occurring in a group of 308 patients (210 with ulcerative colitis, 98 with familial adenomatous polyposis) who took part in a prospective long-term follow-up program. The severity of pouchitis was measured using a pouchitis activity score (Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score). An algorithm for the classification and management of pouchitis was established which enables the clinician: 1) to determine the severity of pouchitis, 2) to differentiate between primary pouchitis and pouchitis caused by surgical complications (secondary pouchitis), and 3) to evaluate the course (acute vs. chronic (> 3 months)). RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 48 (range, 13-119) months. At least one episode of pouchitis was diagnosed in 29 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis and in 2 percent of familial adenomatous polyposis patients. Secondary pouchitis occurred in 6 percent of ulcerative colitis patients and was cured by surgical treatment in 13 (87 percent) of 15 cases. Primary pouchitis was diagnosed in 23 percent of ulcerative colitis patients, including 6 percent of all ulcerative colitis patients with chronic primary pouchitis. The latter showed poor response to medical treatment. In one case multifocal high-grade dysplasia occurred. Histologic examination of the excised pouch identified a carcinoma originating from the ileal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS Ulcerative colitis patients after restorative proctocolectomy face a high risk of developing pouchitis. The algorithm used in this study was highly efficient in identifying patients with a secondary pouchitis who require surgical treatment and patients with chronic primary pouchitis. For the latter, long-term surveillance seems mandatory because of the risk of malignant transformation of the pouch mucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U A Heuschen
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|