Virtual CT endoscopy in determining safe surgical entrance points for paranasal mucoceles

Frontoethmoidal Mucoceles: CT and MRI Evaluation

Paranasal sinus mucocele is an expanded, airless, mucus-filled sinus caused by obstruction of the sinus ostium. It is a benign slow growing epithelial lined lesion, bulging against adjacent anatomical structures, without infiltrating them. The purpose of our study is to describe the CT and MR findings in 19 patients (ten women, nine men, 18–72 years, mean age: 48.1) with surgically confirmed frontoethmoidal mucoceles between 1999–2005. CT scans displayed mucoceles as non enhancing soft tissue density lesions, generally isodense to the brain parenchyma, expanding the sinuses in most cases, eroding adjacent bones and extending intraorbitally or intracranially. Signal intensity in T2WI and T1WI MR images varied, but generally lesions had high signal intensity in T2WI and low to intermediate signal intensity in T1WI. Some of the lesions demonstrated regular linear peripheral enhancement after administration of contrast medium. The causes of mucoceles included mucosal thickening from chronic sinusitis, adhesions from previous operation in the nasal cavity, previous trauma, small nasal polyps and a small osteoma, while in six patients (31.5%) the cause of the mucocele remained unrecognized even after surgery. No underlying malignant tumor was found in any of the cases as the cause of obstruction. CT and MRI established the correct diagnosis in all patients. CT was more sensitive in determining bone erosions, while MRI had the advantage of multiplanar imaging and was much more sensitive for differentiating mucocele from a tumor on the basis of MR signal intensity characteristics. In conclusion, CT and MRI are the methods of choice for diagnosing mucoceles of the paranasal sinuses and are of major importance for the treatment plan. Each method seems to have its own advantages and should be used as complementary investigations of sinonasal pathology. Enhanced CT scan should only be performed in the absence or contraindication for enhanced MR imaging.

Clinical application of virtual endoscopy as a support system for endoscopic sinus surgery

CONCLUSIONS

Computer processing of conventional CT images can provide virtual endoscopic images (VEIs). Surgeons observing these images feel as if they are observing the lesion using an endoscope. Simulation based on animated VEIs before endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is useful for the improvement of surgical safety and surgeons' education. Although the production of VEIs requires certain surgical experience, after the production of VEIs, surgeons can repeat simulation of a surgical procedure and have confidence in the actual operation.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the clinical application of CT-reconstructed VEIs as a support system for ESS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A GE Light Speed Ultra 16 as a 16-slice CT scanner and Advantage Workstation 4.2 were used. Software called Navigator in this workstation allows the production of CT-reconstructed VEIs. We applied simulation based on VEIs to endoscopic operations for mucocele or sinusitis.

RESULTS

In nine cases of mucoceles and sinusitis, simulation based on animated VEIs was applied. According to the simulation, surgeries were performed, and the mucoceles and obstructed sinuses could be opened readily and safely. This system was more effective when there were landmarks such as polyps or irregular mucosal surfaces allowing macroscopic confirmation ahead of the viewpoint.

Advances in imaging in oculoplastics

Color Doppler imaging, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are the most precious imaging tools for the clinician in the field of oculoplastics. Orbital and facial vasculature, with its dynamic changes and flow velocities seen in orbital varices, carotid-cavernous fistulas, and dural cavernous arteriovenous malformations, is best detected by Color Doppler imaging. Computed tomography remains the dominant imaging modality in the evaluation of orbital trauma. Helical CT axial scanning with multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional CT imaging are most helpful in assessing iatrogenic, traumatogenic, and teratogenic orbital abnormalities. Despite its poor histologic specificity, MR imaging provides superior soft tissue contrast, and contrast-enhanced MR imaging has an established role regarding soft tissue tumor infiltration. The greatest value of MR studies in the evaluation of orbital and palpebral tumors is that it has the capacity to show the precise relation between lesions and adjacent structures before the clinician contemplates a surgical approach. Finally, contrast-enhanced MR imaging proved to be a valuable vascularization indicator based upon the extent of relative enhancement within porous orbital implant in anophthalmic socket.