Methods to encourage screening sigmoidoscopy examination

Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature on adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy. Specifically, the review addresses the following: 1) prevalence of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 2) interventions to increase adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 3) correlates or predictors of adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; and 4) reasons for nonadherence. Other objectives are to put the literature on CRC screening adherence in the context of recently reported findings from experimental interventions to change prevention and early detection behaviors and to suggest directions for future research on CRC screening adherence. CRC screening offers the potential both for primary and for secondary prevention. Data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey show that 26% of the population more than 49 years of age report FOBT within the past 3 years and 33% report ever having had sigmoidoscopy. The Year 2000 goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 are for 50% of the population more than 49 years of age to report FOBT within the past 2 years and for 40% to report that they ever had sigmoidoscopy. Thus, systematic efforts to increase CRC screening are warranted. To date, attempts to promote CRC screening have used both a public health model that targets entire communities, e.g., mass media campaigns, and a medical model that targets individuals, e.g., general practice patients. Most of these efforts, however, did not include systematic evaluation of strategies to increase adherence. The data on FOBT show that the median adherence rate to programmatic offers of FOBT is between 40% and 50%, depending on the type of population offered the test, e.g., patients or employees. Approximately, 50% of those initially offered testing in unselected populations will respond to minimal prompts or interventions. A salient issue for FOBT, however, is whether or not the behavior can be sustained over time. Fewer studies examined adherence to sigmoidoscopy. Adherence was highest in relatives of CRC cases and in employer-sponsored programs offered to workers at increased risk of CRC. At present, we know very little about the determinants of CRC screening behaviors, particularly as they relate to rescreening.

Participation of high-risk subjects in colon cancer screening

Siblings of colorectal cancer patients are estimated to be three times more likely to develop colorectal cancer. Although these high-risk siblings are appropriate candidates for colon cancer screening, the factors that affect their participation in screening programs are not known. A study was conducted to examine the factors that might influence participation in fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening by high-risk siblings of recently diagnosed colon cancer patients and nonhigh-risk control siblings. Siblings were mailed a sample FOBT card, a letter informing them of their risk status, and an invitation to participate in the FOBT screening program. They were later interviewed by telephone about their intention to participate in FOBT screening. FOBT cards were returned by 52.2% of high-risk siblings compared with 37.7% of control siblings (P less than 0.005). Only 24.8% of the cancer siblings thought they were more likely to get colon cancer compared with others their own age, and 27.8% thought they were less likely. Perceived risk of cancer and demographic and health-related factors did not predict compliance beyond membership in the high-risk group. Siblings of colon cancer patients are more likely to participate in screening, and efforts to screen them could have a substantial impact on colorectal cancer. More work is needed to identify the factors responsible for compliance so that effective interventions can be developed.