Inhibitory effects of intravenous lansoprazole on gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with postoperative stress

A Review of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

Stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD) is an erosive process of the gastroduodenum that occurs frequently in critically ill patients. Symptomatic lesions may range from overt bleeding (by hematemesis, melena, bloody or coffee ground aspirates, or hematochezia) to clinically significant hemorrhage (hypotension, tachycardia, or acute anemia requiring transfusion). SRMD is caused by mucosal ischemia that produces an imbalance between injurious factors and the protective mechanisms. Common patient risk factors include mechanical ventilation, coagulopathy, shock, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, thermal injury, trauma, kidney or liver transplant, head injury or spinal cord injury, recent gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and pharmacologic interventions. Stress ulcer prophylaxis may be provided by administering one of the following pharmacologic agents: an antacid, a histamine2 receptor antagonist, sucralfate, or a proton pump inhibitor. All agents possess equal efficacies but differ in their mechanisms of action, adverse event profile, drug interactions, monitoring requirements, costs, and personnel requirements for preparation and administration. Implementation of institution-specific protocols for stress ulcer prophylaxis provides cost minimization by maximizing appropriate drug usage.

The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors in comparison with histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials that directly compare proton pump inhibitors with histamine-2 receptor antagonists in prevention of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care unit patients published before May 30, 2008.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data. The primary outcome was the incidence of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and the secondary outcome measures were the incidence of pneumonia and intensive care unit mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The random effect model was used to estimate the pooled risk difference between two treatment arms irrespective of drug, dosage, and route of administration.

RESULTS

We identified seven randomized, controlled trials with a total of 936 patients for planned comparison. The overall pooled risk difference (95% confidence interval; p value; I statistics) of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding comparing proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonists was -0.04 (95% confidence interval, -0.09-0.01; p = .08; I = 66%). In the sensitivity analysis, removing the Levy study significantly reduced the heterogeneity (from I = 66% to I = 26%) and shifted the overall risk difference closer to the null (pooled risk difference, -0.02; 95% confidence interval, -0.05-0.01; p = .19). There was no difference between proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists therapy in the risk of pneumonia and intensive care unit mortality, with pooled risk differences of 0.00 (95% confidence interval, -0.04-0.05; p = .86; I = 0%) and 0.02 (95% confidence interval, -0.04-0.08; p = .50; I = 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not find strong evidence that proton pump inhibitors were different from histamine-2 receptor antagonists in terms of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis, pneumonia, and mortality among patients admitted to intensive care units. Because of limited trial data, future well-designed and powerful randomized, clinical trials are warranted.

Stress ulcer bleeding

Although upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) in critically ill patients is common, significant bleeding with hemodynamic instability is not. Risk factor assessment can assist in identifying patients with a greater likelihood of developing significant SRMD. Prophylaxis against stress ulcer bleeding with luminal agents (eg, antacids and sucralfate) or drugs that inhibit acid secretion (eg, histamine 2-receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors) can reduce major bleeding but has little or no effect on mortality. Currently, the mainstays of prophylactic therapy for SRMD are intravenously administered H2RAs and PPIs. Wider usage of PPIs reflects their enhanced efficacy in suppressing acid secretion as well as lack of tolerance for H2RAs. Guidelines for the prophylactic use of H2RAs or PPIs in treatment of SRMD will require large, randomized studies that also examine cost effectiveness of individual strategies.

Science review: The use of proton pump inhibitors for gastric acid suppression in critical illness

Prophylaxis is routinely provided for critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) who are at high risk for stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD), an erosive process of the gastroduodenum associated with abnormally high physiological demands. Traditionally, treatment options have included sucralfate, antacids and histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H₂RAs). The H₂RAs are currently the most widely used agents in prophylactic acid suppression; however, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have recently replaced H₂RAs in the treatment of many acid-related conditions. PPIs achieve a more rapid and sustained increase in gastric pH and are not associated with the rapid tachyphylaxis seen with H₂RAs. As a result, and after the introduction of intravenous formulations, PPIs are beginning to be used for the prophylaxis of SRMD in critically ill adults. The high prevalence of renal and hepatic impairment among the ICU population, as well as the need for multiple drug therapy in many patients, means that pharmacokinetic characteristics and the potential for drug interactions may be important considerations in the choice of prophylactic agent. This review seeks to present the pharmacological evidence that may inform decision-making about the prescription of drugs for prophylaxis of SRMD.

Maintenance oral pantoprazole therapy is effective for patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and idiopathic hypersecretion

OBJECTIVE

Maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is effective for gastric acid hypersecretory states, although data with pantoprazole are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long term p.o. pantoprazole in individuals with hypersecretion.

METHODS

All subjects had Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or idiopathic hypersecretion. Baseline acid output was measured in the presence of prior maintenance antisecretory therapy before pantoprazole exposure. The starting dose was 40 mg b.i.d. in most cases, and the dose was adjusted to document control within the first 2 wk of therapy. The maximal allowable dose was 240 mg daily. Acid output was measured on day 28 and then quarterly from month 3. The primary efficacy endpoint was documented control of acid secretion at 6 months, i.e., acid output in the last 1 h before the next dose of therapy of <10 mEq/h (<5 mEq/h in subjects with prior acid-reducing surgery).

RESULTS

A total of 26 subjects had Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (six with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1) and nine had idiopathic hypersecretion. Pre-enrollment therapy included omeprazole in 27 subjects and lansoprazole in eight, and 82.4% of subjects were controlled on their prior regimens. With upward dose titration, acid output was controlled in all subjects by day 10 and in all but two (6%) at the 6-month time point. Median acid secretion on therapy at 6 months was <2 mEq/h (mean 2.2 mEq/h; range 0-10.5 mEq/h) at a dose of 40 mg b.i.d. for 24 subjects, 80 mg b.i.d. for seven subjects, and 120 mg b.i.d. for two subjects. During the course of the study, five subjects required doses of 240 mg daily. Pantoprazole was generally well tolerated. No cases of anterior optic ischemic neuropathy occurred. Five subjects died during follow-up, all because of events unrelated to the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance p.o. pantoprazole therapy at a dose of 80-240 mg/day in divided doses was both effective and generally well tolerated for patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and idiopathic hypersecretion.

Proton-pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill adults.

DATA SOURCES

Computerized biomedical literature search of MEDLINE (1966-June 2002) was conducted using the MeSH headings proton-pump inhibitor, ulcer, critical care, and acid. References of selected articles were reviewed. A manual search of critical care, surgery, trauma, gastrointestinal, and pharmacy journals was conducted to identify relevant abstracts.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Traditional medications used for stress ulcer prophylaxis include antacids, histamine(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs), and sucralfate. Few studies have evaluated PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The majority of studies have demonstrated that enteral or intravenous administration of PPIs to critically ill patients elevates intragastric pH and consistently maintains pH > or =4.0. PPIs are safe and seem to be as efficacious as H(2)RAs or sucralfate for prevention of bleeding from stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD) and they may provide cost minimization. The small patient populations limit the results of comparative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data indicate that PPIs are safe and efficacious for elevating intragastric pH in critically ill patients. PPIs should be used only as an alternative to H(2)RAs or sucralfate since the superiority of PPIs over these agents for preventing SRMD-associated gastrointestinal bleeding has not been established. Additional comparative studies with adequate patient numbers and pharmacoeconomic analyses are needed before PPIs are considered the agents of choice for stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Stress Ulceration Requiring Definitive Surgery after Severe Trauma

Despite antiulcer prophylaxis 19 severely injured patients at our institution developed stress ulceration (SU) between 1989 and 1999 requiring surgery for perforation (n = 4) or bleeding (n = 15). A herald bleed (HB) 10.7 ± 1.2 days after admission, 7.2 ± 1.2 days before definitive operative therapy, and requiring 7.1 ± 0.9 units of blood occurred in 93 per cent of patients operated on for bleeding. Bleeding preceded perforation in one patient. Central nervous system damage was part of the injury pattern in 68 per cent of the patients including spinal cord (42%), severe head injury (16%), or both (10%). Forty-two per cent had acalculous cholecystitis found at surgery. Eight patients had vagotomy and antrectomy (VA), and 11 patients had vagotomy and pyloroplasty (VP). VA required more time than VP (255 ± 41 vs 158 ± 13 minutes; P = 0.02). One patient (12.5%) rebled after VA versus two (18%) after VP; one patient in each group required reoperation. There was no difference in mortality, length of stay, or intensive care unit stay. A herald bleed preceded recurrent hemorrhage of SU by one week. Spinal cord or head injury increase the risk of SU. More than 40 per cent of patients with SU had acalculous cholecystitis found at operation. VA provides no benefit on rebleeding or reoperation over VP, so anatomical considerations and not rebleed rates should determine the surgical procedure.

Switching between intravenous and oral pantoprazole

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective antisecretory drugs available for controlling gastric acid acidity and volume. They are the drugs of choice in the treatment of moderate-to-severe gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypersecretory disorders, and peptic ulcers. Currently in the United States, they are only available in an oral formulation. However, pantoprazole will soon be available in an intravenous formulation and will extend the power of PPIs to inpatient hospital settings. Intravenous pantoprazole has been shown to be effective and safe in clinical trials. Intravenous pantoprazole is indicated for the treatment of patients who require PPI therapy but who are unable to take oral medication. Intravenous pantoprazole has been shown to maintain acid suppression in patients switched from oral PPIs, so no change in dosage is required when switching from one formulation to the other. Potential hospital-based uses for intravenous PPI therapy include perioperative use as prophylaxis for acid aspiration syndrome during induction of anesthesia, prophylaxis for stress-related mucosal disease, and management of gastrointestinal bleeding from stress or acid peptic disease.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit. The gastroenterologist's perspective

Although SRES-associated hemorrhage previously constituted a significant cause of bleeding in the ICU, improvements in ICU management and the institution of prophylactic measures in high-risk patients have significantly reduced SRES-associated hemorrhage since the 1980s. Antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, and sucralfate have been shown to be effective in preventing clinically significant bleeding resulting from SRES, particularly when the intragastric pH is maintained at greater than 4. A selective approach should be adopted in SRES prophylaxis: Patients on mechanical ventilation, with coagulopathy, or with two of the other known risk factors should receive prophylaxis. Although the drug of choice depends to some extent on local preferences, an H2-receptor antagonist by continuous intravenous infusion may represent the best option. No pharmacologic therapy is of proven value once hemorrhage begins, but the current interventional techniques are effective in controlling hemorrhage. Gastrointestinal bleeding from NOMV has become less common with improvements in the hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients, but this disease must always be considered when lower gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in the context of relative hypoperfusion. For SRES and NOMV, treatment of the underlying disease or diseases is the optimal route to prevention.

Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are drugs which irreversibly inhibit proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase) function and are the most potent gastric acid-suppressing agents in clinical use. There is now a substantial body of evidence showing improved efficacy of PPIs over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists and other drugs in acid-related disorders. Omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day, pantoprazole 40 mg/day or rabeprazole 20 mg/day for 2 to 4 weeks are more effective than standard doses of H2-receptor antagonists in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers. Patients with gastric ulcers should receive standard doses of PPIs as for duodenal ulcers but for a longer time period (4 to 8 weeks). There is no conclusive evidence to support the use of a particular PPI over another for either duodenal or gastric ulcer healing. For Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulceration, a combination of a PPI and 2 antibacterials will eradicate H. pylori in over 90% of cases and significantly reduce ulcer recurrence. Patients with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcers should be managed similarly. PPIs also have efficacy advantages over ranitidine and misoprostol and are better tolerated than misoprostol in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In endoscopically proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, standard daily doses of the PPIs are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists for healing, and patients should receive a 4 to 8 week course of treatment. For severe reflux, with ulceration and/or stricture formation, a higher dose regimen (omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 60 mg, pantoprazole 80 mg or rabeprazole 40 mg daily) appears to yield better healing rates. There is little evidence that PPIs lead to resolution of Barrett's oesophagus or a reduction of subsequent adenocarcinoma development, but PPIs are indicated in healing of any associated ulceration. In Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, PPIs have become the treatment of choice for the management of gastric acid hypersecretion.

Lansoprazole. An update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. It has proved effective in combination regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and as monotherapy to heal and relieve symptoms of gastric or duodenal ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux. After initial healing, it may be used to prevent recurrence of oesophageal erosions or peptic ulcers in patients in whom H. pylori is not the major cause of ulceration and to reduce basal acid output in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages are 15 to 60 mg/day, although dosages of < or = 180 mg/day have been used in patients with hypersecretory states. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, short term lansoprazole monotherapy was similar to omeprazole and superior to histamine H2 receptor antagonists in achieving healing rates > 90%. Lansoprazole was as effective a component of H. pylori eradication regimens as omeprazole, tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (colloidal bismuth subcitrate) or ranitidine. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in symptom relief and healing of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and tended to relieve symptoms more rapidly than omeprazole, although initial healing was similar. As maintenance treatment, lansoprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in relieving symptoms and preventing relapse. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in healing and relieving symptoms of oesophageal erosions associated with Barrett's oesophagus; healing was maintained for a mean of 2.9 years in > or = 70% of patients. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in prophylaxis of redilatation of oesophageal strictures. After > or = 4 years of use in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole 60 to 180 mg/day effectively controlled basal acid output. Dosages may be reduced in some patients once healing and symptom relief has been achieved. Preliminary studies of lansoprazole in patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia or stress ulcers show promise. Although studies show lansoprazole is potentially effective in treating gastrointestinal bleeding, future studies should assess patients' H. pylori status. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, diarrhoea, dizziness and nausea appearing to be the most common adverse effects. Tolerability of lansoprazole does not deteriorate with age and the drug is well tolerated in long term use (< or = 4 years) in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or reflux disease. Thus, lansoprazole is an important alternative to omeprazole and H2 receptor antagonists in acid-related disorders. In addition to its efficacy in healing or maintenance treatment, it may provide more effective symptom relief than other comparator agents.