Effect of ranitidine on the urea breath test: a controlled trial

13C-urea breath test during hospitalization for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of (13)C-urea breath test (UBT) to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding and treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding, and treated with omeprazole, had a first UBT performed the day after resuming oral feeding. Patients with a negative UBT during hospitalization underwent a repeated UBT 15 days after stopping PPIs.

RESULTS

The first UBT during hospitalization was positive in 86% of 131 patients. Time between admission and performance of the test was longer in patients with negative versus positive UBT (5.2 +/- 0.7 versus 4.3 +/- 0.5 days; p < .001). The repeated UBT became positive in 15 of 18 (83%) patients with a negative first UBT. In the multivariate analysis, the only variable associated with a negative first UBT was the time elapsed between admission and performance of the test (odds ratio = 6.6; 95%CI = 2.9-15.1).

CONCLUSION

Most H. pylori-positive patients with ulcer bleeding have a positive UBT (performed just after resuming oral feeding) despite previous treatment with high-dose PPIs. Nevertheless, to preclude false-negative results due to PPI therapy, the UBT should be performed as early as possible. If the infection cannot be demonstrated with this first UBT, H. pylori still needs to be definitively excluded with a second UBT performed after stopping PPIs.

13C-urea breath test in the management of Helicobacterpylori infection

The urea breath test is a noninvasive and very accurate test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, false negative urea breath test results have been reported to occur in a considerable percentage of the individuals taking proton pump inhibitors; the interval needed to be completely confident that false negative tests had been excluded has varied among the different studies between 6 and 14 days. The impact of H(2)-receptor antagonists on the accuracy of urea breath test remains controversial, although, in contrast with proton pump inhibitors, the data suggest that H(2)-receptor antagonists, for the most part, have little effect on the result of the urea breath test. The urea breath test does not represent a suitable tool for estimating the density of H. pylori colonization. The only quantitative information to be obtained from the urea breath test is that the higher the delta value, the lower the probability of a false-positive urea breath test result. Although some authors have demonstrated a correlation between urea breath test values and histological lesions of the gastric mucosa, the practical utility of this relationship remains unclear. It has been suggested that the pretreatment urea breath test has the potential to identify patients who require modification of the standard therapeutic regimen (for example, prolonging the duration of treatment or increasing the pharmacological dose when bacterial density is high), but other studies could not confirm this relationship. Some studies have shown that the urea breath test is less accurate in patients who have undergone partial gastrectomy. Finally, in contrast with biopsy-based methods, which are responsible for a high number of false-negative results when used to diagnose H. pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, urea breath test seems not to be negatively influenced by the presence of this complication.

False negative urea breath tests with H2-receptor antagonists: interactions between Helicobacter pylori density and pH

BACKGROUND

We studied the effects of famotidine, sodium bicarbonate, and citric acid on the 13C-urea breath test (UBT).

METHODS

Helicobacter pylori-infected volunteers received a UBT, 40 mg of famotidine at bedtime, and a second UBT (pudding test meal, 648 mg NaHCO3 tablet then 125 mg of urea in 200 ml of water containing 650 mg of NaHCO3). Experiment 2 consisted of four UBTs. Two were standard citric acid UBTs with 75 mg of urea and 2 g citric acid and two were sequential bicarbonate-citric acid UBTs. Sequential UBTs consisted of administration of a 648 mg bicarbonate tablet with 50 g of Polycose in 200 ml of water. Five minutes later, 125 mg of 13C-urea was given in 75 ml of water containing 650 mg of NaHCO3. Breath samples were collected after 15 minutes. Then, to acutely acidify the stomach, 4 g of citric acid was given in 200 ml of water. A second breath sample was collected 15 minutes after the citric acid. The standard UBTs were done before and after 6 days of famotidine (40 mg b.i.d.). Sequential UBTs were done after 1 and 6 days of famotidine therapy. Gastric biopsies for histology, culture, and mucosal cytokines were assessed before and after 6 days of famotidine.

RESULTS

Eighteen subjects participated, 10 in each experiment; seven had endoscopy with biopsy. Famotidine/ bicarbonate resulted an approximately 50% fall in UBT values (p = .021) with 10% becoming negative. The gastric pH increased from 5.1 +/- 0.5 to 6.7 +/- 0.2 (p = .03) although no pH value predicted the occurrence of false negative results. Under famotidine acid suppression, NaHCO3 reduced the delta over baseline (DOB) by 63% (p = .021). This was reversed with citric acid. Histology showed a H2-receptor antagonist-associated increase in the depth of gastric corpus inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

H2-receptor antagonists differ from proton pump inhibitors as high intragastric pH may cause a reduction in urease activity, unrelated to a reduced bacterial load and reversed by citric acid.

Studies regarding the mechanism of false negative urea breath tests with proton pump inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

The mechanism of false negative urea breath tests (UBTs) results among proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users is unknown. We studied the time course of PPI-associated negative UBT, the relation to Helicobacter pylori density, and whether gastric acidification would prevent false negative UBT results.

METHOD

In the UBT experiment, H. pylori-infected volunteers received omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. for 13.5 days. UBTs with citric acid were done before, after 6.5 days of PPI, and 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 days after therapy. In the culture and histology experiment, after a wash-out of >5 months, nine of the original subjects were rechallenged with omeprazole for 6.5 days. Antral and corpus biopsies for histology and culture were done before and 1 day after PPI administration.

RESULTS

Thirty subjects (mean age 42 yr) were enrolled. UBTs were significantly reduced on day 6.5 (p = 0.031); 10 subjects (33%) developed transient negative UBTs. The UBT recovered in all but one subject by the fourth day post-PPI and in all subjects by day 14. In the culture and histology experiment, upon PPI rechallenge, three of nine subjects (33%) had negative UBTs. H. pylori density, whether measured by culture or histology, decreased with PPI therapy; antral biopsies became histologically negative in five subjects and corpus biopsies in three subjects.

CONCLUSION

PPI-induced negative UBT results were related to the anti-H. pylori effect of the PPI. Acidification of the stomach did not prevent false negative UBT results. Three days is likely the minimum delay from stopping PPI until one should perform a test for active infection. A delay of 14 days is preferred.

Negative effect of ranitidine on the results of urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori

OBJECTIVES

In analogy with proton pump inhibitors, H2-antagonists may also be responsible for false-negative results on urea breath test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori. In this study we assessed the frequency and duration of false-negative urea breath tests in patients given different doses of ranitidine.

METHODS

A total of 120 consecutive dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori on the basis of concomitant positive results of CLO-test, histology and urea breath test were recruited for this prospective, open, parallel-group study performed in an urban university gastroenterological clinic. They were randomized to receive an acute treatment with either ranitidine 300 mg once a day in the evening, ranitidine 300 mg once a day in the morning, ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d., or ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. The urea breath test was performed on day 14 while patients were still taking ranitidine, and on day 21, 1 wk after completion of therapy. The test was repeated on day 28 in those patients who were still negative on day 21. Duplicate breath samples were collected after ingestion of 75 mg 13C-urea plus citric acid. A delta value >5/1000 was considered positive.

RESULTS

Of 118 patients infected with H. pylori, 15 (13%) had a negative urea breath test on day 14. The false-negative results were equally distributed among the four groups of ranitidine dosage. Nine of these patients reverted to positive at 7 days and the remaining six at 14 days after completion of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that ranitidine negatively affects the results of urea breath testing, independent of the given dosage. Patients undergoing this examination for H. pylori diagnosis should discontinue use of H2-antagonists 2 wk before testing.

Effect of whey-based culture supernatant of Lactobacillus acidophilus (johnsonii) La1 on Helicobacter pylori infection in humans

BACKGROUND

Specific strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus are known to inhibit intestinal cell adhesion and invasion by enterovirulent bacteria. As L. acidophilus can survive transiently in the human stomach, it may downregulate Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

The ability of L. acidophilus (johnsonii) La1 supernatant to interfere with H. pylori bacterial growth, urease activity, and adhesion to epithelial cells was tested in vitro. Its effect on H. pylori infection in volunteers was monitored in a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, using a drinkable, whey-based, La1 culture supernatant. H. pylori infected volunteers were treated 14 days with 50 ml of La1 supernatant four times a day combined with either omeprazole 20 mg four times a day or with placebo. Infection was assessed by breath test, endoscopy, and biopsy sampling, performed at inclusion, immediately at the end of the treatment (breath test only), and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment.

RESULTS

La1 supernatant inhibited H. pylori growth in vitro, regardless of previous binding of H. pylori to epithelial cells. In 20 subjects (8 females, 12 males, mean age 33.1 years) a marked decrease in breath test values was observed immediately after treatment with La1 supernatant, both in the omeprazole and in the placebo group (median 12.3 vs. 28.8 and 9.4 vs. 20.4, respectively; p < 0.03). In both treatment groups, breath test values remained low 6 weeks after treatment (omeprazole treated 19.2, placebo treated 8. 3; p < 0.03 vs. pretreatment), but the persistence of H. pylori infection was confirmed in gastric biopsies.

CONCLUSION

La1 culture supernatant shown to be effective in vitro has a partial, acid-independent long-term suppressive effect on H. pylori in humans.

Effect of gastric acid suppression on 13C-urea breath test: comparison of ranitidine with omeprazole

BACKGROUND

The assessment of the effect of H2 antagonists on the results of the urea breath test has produced controversial results.

AIM

To assess whether standard doses of both omeprazole and H2 blockers can adversely influence the accuracy of the urea breath test.

METHODS

Sixty dyspeptic patients with ascertained Helicobacter pylori infection were recruited for this prospective, open study. They were randomized to receive either omeprazole 20 mg at 08:00 hours (n = 30) or ranitidine 300 mg at 22:00 hours (n = 30) for 14 days. The urea breath test was performed at baseline, on day 14, while patients were still taking the antisecretory drugs, and on day 21, 1 week after their cessation. Duplicate breath samples were collected after ingestion of 75 mg 13C-urea + citric acid. A delta value > 5 per thousand was considered positive.

RESULTS

On day 14 the median delta values had declined, but not significantly (P = 0. 07) compared to baseline (13.79 vs. 22.39) with omeprazole, while they had increased (P = 0.27) with ranitidine (27.21 vs. 19.46). On the same day there were five out of 30 (17%) and five out of 28 (18%) false-negative results in the omeprazole and ranitidine groups, respectively. All these cases became positive again on day 21. However, in eight cases treated with omeprazole and 13 treated with ranitidine, there was an increase of 14-day delta values compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that both omeprazole and ranitidine at standard doses are able to negatively affect the results of the urea breath test. Their adverse effect resolves within 7 days of drug cessation and therefore the withdrawal of these drugs 7 days before testing seems to be sufficient to avoid false-negative results. The surprising finding that both antisecretory drugs reduce delta values in one group and increase them in another group of patients deserves further study.

How useful is the detection kit for antibody to Helicobacter pylori in urine (URINELISA) in clinical practice?

OBJECTIVE

Increased knowledge of the significance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in gastric disorders has accelerated the trend of screening patients with dyspepsia for its infection. Serological examination of antibody for H. pylori has been widely performed. Recently, a urine-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (URINELISA) kit for detection of antibody for H. pylori has been developed. Accordingly, we evaluated its diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.

METHODS

Subjects of this study were 132 patients who presented at our university hospital because of dyspeptic symptoms (81 men, 51 women; age, 41.5+/-1.4 yr). 13C urea breath test, blood drawing for serological antibody for H. pylori infection by four different kits, and urine collection for the URINELISA test for detection of the antibody were performed. Diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available antibodies in serum and in urine were investigated using the results of the 13C urea breath test as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of URINELISA were 86.3% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 76-93%), 91.5% (95% CI, 81-97%), and 88.6% (95% CI, 82-93%), respectively, which were comparable to those of imported serological kits.

CONCLUSIONS

The URINELISA kit for detecting anti-H. pylori antibody in urine provides diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of imported kits for detecting antibodies in serum and is considered to be clinically useful for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Effects of acid suppression and bismuth medications on the performance of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate whether acid suppression and bismuth medications interfere with the performance of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS

Sixty patients with previous diagnoses of atrophic gastritis and H. pylori infection made in gastric biopsies taken at Hospital Departmental, Pasto, Colombia, were enrolled in the study. 13C breath urea test (UBT) and stool antigen test (HpSA) were performed simultaneously. Two baseline tests were performed: one 7 days before and another the day before starting medications. A total of 20 patients received for 2 wk one of the following treatments: a) ranitidine; b) lansoprazole; or c) bismuth subsalicylate. The tests were repeated while the patients were on the prescribed medication on days 7 and 14 and then 2 wk after finishing the medication.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing standard cut-off values for the tests, our results indicate that in the case of the 13C UBT test, ranitidine does not interfere with the results, whereas lansoprazole and bismuth may be expected to yield a significant proportion of false negative results (30-40% for lansoprazole and 45-55% for bismuth). In the case of the HpSA test, ranitidine does not interfere, whereas lansoprazole and bismuth may be expected to yield a nonsignificant proportion of false negative results (15-25% for lansoprazole and 10-15% for bismuth). Absolute values for both tests may be used to study the effects of the pharmacological agents on the characteristics of the infection.

Omeprazole. A review of its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Omeprazole is a well studied proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. This review examines its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) with or without oesophagitis and gastrointestinal damage caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Optimal omeprazole regimens for anti-H. pylori therapy are those that administer the drug at a dosage of 40 mg/day (in 1 or 2 divided doses) for 7, 10 or 14 days in combination with 2 antibacterial agents. As a component of 3-drug regimens in direct comparative studies, omeprazole was at least as effective as lansoprazole, pantoprazole, bismuth compounds and ranitidine. However, a meta-analysis suggests that triple therapies with omeprazole are more effective than comparable regimens containing ranitidine, lansoprazole or bismuth. Omeprazole also appears to be successful in triple therapy regimens used in children with H. pylori infection. In patients with acute GORD with oesophagitis, omeprazole is at least as effective as lansoprazole or pantoprazole in promoting healing, and superior to ranitidine, cimetidine or cisapride in oesophagitis healing and symptom relief. Omeprazole was similar to lansoprazole and superior to ranitidine in preventing oesophagitis relapse in patients with all grades of oesophagitis, but may be superior to lansoprazole or pantoprazole in patients with more severe disease. More patients with symptomatic GORD without oesophagitis experienced symptom relief after short term treatment with omeprazole than with ranitidine, cisapride or placebo, and symptoms were more readily prevented by omeprazole than by cimetidine or placebo. Omeprazole was effective in healing and relieving symptoms of reflux oesophagitis in children with oesophagitis refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is superior to placebo in preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage in patients who must continue to take NSAIDs. It is also similar to misoprostol and superior to ranitidine in its ability to heal NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and erosions, and superior to misoprostol, ranitidine or placebo in its ability to prevent relapse. In long and short term studies, omeprazole was well tolerated, with diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, flatulence, abdominal pain and constipation being the most commonly reported adverse events. Usual omeprazole dosages, alone or combined with other agents, are 10 to 40 mg/day for adults and 10 to 20 mg/day for children.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole is a well studied and well tolerated agent effective in adults or children as a component in regimens aimed at eradicating H. pylori infections or as monotherapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of GORD with or without oesophagitis or NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage.

Effect of standard and high dose ranitidine on [13C]urea breath test results

OBJECTIVE

It has been suggested that standard dose H2 blockers will affect the [14-C]urea breath test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of standard and high dose ranitidine on the [13C]urea breath test in a prospective cross-over study.

METHODS

Volunteers found to be positive for H. pylori by IgG serology and [13C]urea breath test were given either ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. or 300 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. Repeat breath tests were completed on the last day of antisecretory dosing and study patients were immediately crossed over to the other ranitidine dose. The third breath test was performed at 14 days after initiation of the new dose.

RESULTS

A total of 20 volunteers were enrolled. Using the established cut-off of 2.4% for the commercial breath test, only one patient developed negative results on H2 blockers. This patient had negative breath tests on both ranitidine doses and remained test-negative off all medications 6 wk after study completion, suggesting either a false positive baseline test or an unexpected bacterial eradication. No specific trend in breath test results was observed for the group (p=NS). On ranitidine 300 mg, six of 19 patients elevated their breath results from 23% to 112% (mean 76%) above baseline.

CONCLUSION

Ranitidine at standard or high doses did not generate a reproducible decline in breath test results. Histamine 2 blockers do not need to be discontinued before urea breath testing.