Biliary pancreatitis: a review. Emphasizing appropriate endoscopic intervention

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for the Management of Pancreatic Duct Leaks and Fistulas

Pancreatic duct (PD) leaks are a common complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, trauma to the pancreas, and pancreatic surgery. Diagnosis of PD leaks and fistulas is often made with contrast-enhanced pancreatic protocol computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with MRCP. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with pancreatic duct stenting in appropriately selected patients is often an effective treatment, helps to avoid surgery, and is considered first-line therapy in cases that fail conservative management.

Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: If a Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, How Many Images Do We Need?

Introduction Accurate diagnosis and prompt definitive management of choledocholithiasis are vital in acute gallstone pancreatitis. The sensitivity of detection of choledocholithiasis varies across imaging modalities. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the most sensitive but may not be necessary, resulting in both delayed definitive management and increased costs. We aimed to evaluate the range of radiological investigations patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis underwent and the clinical appropriateness of MRCP when performed. Methods This was an observational study of patients diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis between January 1, 2019 and November 30, 2021 in a district general hospital in London, UK. A detailed review of patient records, laboratory and radiological results, and endoscopic and/or operative intervention was undertaken. Results One hundred consecutive patients diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis (median age 57 years) were included. Seventy-nine had a transabdominal ultrasound (USS), 46 had CT, and 40 patients had MRCP. The median waiting time for these investigations was 1, 0, and 4 days, respectively. Choledocholithiasis was identified in 21 patients (4 on USS, 5 on CT, and 12 on MRCP). As definitive management, 37% underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 57% underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 19% of patients were readmitted with pancreatitis prior to definitive management. Conclusions First-line imaging investigations such as USS and CT can detect some cases of choledocholithiasis in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, but not all. Despite expenses in terms of cost and length of hospital stay, MRCP remains an essential resource to detect cases of choledocholithiasis not captured by USS or CT. We recommend establishing a guideline to streamline imaging in assessing acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Outcomes of delayed versus early endoscopic intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis with non-severe acute cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Despite previous studies on endoscopic interventions in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), the optimal time to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for ABP with non-severe acute cholangitis (AC) remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with concurrent ABP and non-severe AC. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent ERCP ≤ 72 h after admission (early ERCP group) and those who underwent ERCP > 72 h after admission (delayed ERCP group). The primary outcomes were the technical success rate and ERCP-related complications.

RESULTS

The study involved 164 patients (early ERCP, n = 70; delayed ERCP, n = 94) who were treated from 1 December 2 to 2016 to 12 December 2021. The patients' baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The technical success rate of ERCP was similar between the two groups (94.29% vs. 97.87%, p = 0.43). Morbidity was also similar between the two groups (p = 0.83). There was no significant difference in the total hospital stay (p = 0.13). However, the early ERCP group had a longer post-ERCP hospital stay (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis showed that delayed ERCP performed > 72 h after admission has economic and safety outcomes similar to those of early ERCP for patients with concurrent ABP and non-severe AC.

Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a nationwide inpatient cohort study

Background

The timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis is unclear. We accessed a national database to analyze the outcomes of urgent (<24 h) and early (24-72 h) ERCP in this cohort.

Methods

The cohort was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Hospital ERCP volumes were generated using unique hospital identifiers. Multivariate regression modeling was used to analyze the predictors of urgent vs. early ERCP use, and to determine various outcome variables between the 2 cohorts.

Results

Overall, 105,433 admissions were evaluated. There was a significant rise in urgent ERCP performed over the study period. Older patients, males, patients with comorbidities, African American and Hispanic patient populations were less likely to receive urgent ERCP. High ERCP volume hospitals, teaching hospitals, and hospitals in the Midwest and West were more likely to perform urgent ERCP. There were no differences in mortality rates or complication rates between the 2 cohorts. However, there were significant differences in length of stay and healthcare cost analysis.

Conclusions

The increasing use of urgent ERCP did not result in a clinically significant benefit in terms of mortality, length of stay, or healthcare cost analysis. The use of urgent ERCP is also not uniform across various demographic and hospital cohorts. Urgent ERCP may be over-utilized, and it may be reasonable to perform ERCP in this patient population based on the physician’s suspicion about the severity of disease.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in critically ill patients is safe and effective when performed in the endoscopy suite

Background and study aims  Critically ill patients may require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but performing ERCP in the intensive care unit (ICU) poses logistic and technical challenges. There are no data on ICU patients undergoing ERCP in the endoscopy suite. The primary aim of this study was to report outcomes, including safety, when ERCP in critically ill patients is performed in the endoscopy suite. Patients and methods  We queried our institutional endoscopy database to identify all ICU patients who underwent ERCP at a single academic medical center from 04/01/2010 to 11/30/2017. Only patients admitted to an ICU prior to ERCP were included. Results  Of 7,218 ERCPs performed during the study period, 260 ERCPs (3.6 %) were performed in 231 ICU patients (mean age 61y; 53 % male); nearly all ICU patient ERCPs (n = 258; 99 %) occurred in the endoscopy suite. ERCP indications included cholangitis (50 %), post-liver transplant cholestasis (15 %), and bile leak (10 %). All ERCPs were performed with anesthesiology, most with general anesthesia (60 %) and in the prone position (60 %). Most patients (73 %) had sepsis. Prior to ERCP, 17 % of patients required vasopressors; vasopressors were begun during ERCP in 4 %. The cannulation success rate was 95 % (94 % in native papillae). Adverse events occurred in 9 % (n = 23) of cases with post-ERCP pancreatitis most common. No patients died during or within 24 hours of ERCP. Mortality at 30 days was 16 %, all attributed to underlying disease. Conclusions  When advanced ventilatory and hemodynamic support is available, critically ill patients can safely and effectively undergo ERCP in the endoscopy suite.

Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not superior to early ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis with biliary obstruction without cholangitis

Acute pancreatitis is a common diagnosis worldwide, with gallstone disease being the most prevalent cause (50%). The American College of Gastroenterology recommends urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (within 24 h) for patients with biliary pancreatitis accompanied by cholangitis. Most international guidelines recommend that ERCP be performed within 72 h in patients with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis, but the optimal timing for endoscopy is controversial. We investigated the optimal timing for ERCP in patients with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis, and whether performing endoscopy within 24 h is superior to performing it after 24 h. We analyzed the clinical data of 505 patients with newly diagnosed acute pancreatitis, from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2014. We divided the patients into two groups according to the timing of ERCP: < 24 h (urgent) and 24–72 h (early).Among the 505 patients, 73 were diagnosed with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis. The mean age of the patients was 55 years (range: 26–90 years). Bile duct stones and biliary sludge were identified on endoscopy in 45 (61.6%) and 11 (15.0%) patients, respectively. The timing of ERCP within 72 h was not associated with ERCP-related complications (P = 0.113), and the total length of hospital stay was not different between urgent and early ERCP (5.9 vs. 5.7 days, P = 0.174). No significant differences were found in total length of hospitalization or procedural-related complications, in patients with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis, according to the timing of ERCP (< 24 h vs. 24–72 h).

The Role of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Management of Pancreatic Diseases

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective platform for a variety of therapies in the management of benign and malignant disease of the pancreas. Over the last 50 years, endotherapy has evolved into the first-line therapy in the majority of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases of the pancreas. As this field advances, it is important that gastroenterologists maintain an adequate knowledge of procedure indication, maintain sufficient procedure volume to handle complex pancreatic endotherapy, and understand alternate approaches to pancreatic diseases including medical management, therapy guided by endoscopic ultrasonography, and surgical options.

The efficacy of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for patients with acute biliary pancreatitis

Background. No study investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Method. We retrospectively reviewed the effects of EPBD on patients with ABP from February 2003 to December 2012. The general data, findings of image studies, details of the procedure, and outcomes after EPBD were analyzed. Result. Total 183 patients (male/female: 110/73) were enrolled. The mean age was 65.9 years. Among them, 155 patients had mild pancreatitis. The meantime from admission to EPBD was 3.3 days. Cholangiogram revealed filling defects inside the common bile duct (CBD) in 149 patients. The mean dilating balloon size was 10.5 mm and mean duration of the dilating procedure was 4.3 minutes. Overall, 124 patients had gross stones retrieved from CBD. Four (2.2%) adverse events and 2 (1.1%) intraprocedure bleeding incidents but no procedure-related mortality were noted. Bilirubin and amylase levels significantly decreased after EPBD. On average, patients resumed oral intake within 1.4 days. The clinical parameters and outcomes were similar in patients with different severity of pancreatitis. Conclusion. EPBD can be effective and safe for the treatment of ABP, even in patients presenting with severe disease.

Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae

Pancreatic duct leaks can occur as a result of both acute and chronic pancreatitis or in the setting of pancreatic trauma. Manifestations of leaks include pseudocysts, pancreatic ascites, high amylase pleural effusions, disconnected duct syndrome, and internal and external pancreatic fistulas. Patient presentations are highly variable and range from asymptomatic pancreatic cysts to patients with severe abdominal pain and sepsis from infected fluid collections. The diagnosis can often be made by high-quality cross-sectional imaging or during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Because of their complexity, pancreatic leak patients are best managed by a multidisciplinary team comprised of therapeutic endoscopists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons in the field of pancreatic interventions. Minor leaks will often resolve with conservative management while severe leaks will frequently require interventions. Endoscopic treatments for pancreatic duct leaks have replaced surgical interventions in many situations. Interventional radiologists also have the ability to offer therapeutic interventions for many leak patients. The mainstay of endotherapy for pancreatic leaks is transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting with a stent that bridges the leak if possible, but varies based on the manifestation and clinical presentation. Fluid collections that result from leaks, such as pseudocysts, can often be treated by endoscopic transluminal drainage with or without endoscopic ultrasound or by percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic interventions have been shown to be effective and have an acceptable complication rate.

Treatment strategy for gallstone pancreatitis and the timing of cholecystectomy

AIM: To reviewed the literature and evaluated the scope and timing of the application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and cholecystectomy.

METHODS: A pooled odds ratio (OR) and a pooled mean difference with the 95%CI were used to assess the enumeration data of included studies. A pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and a pooled mean difference with the 95%CI were used to assess the measurement data of included studies. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with the χ² test. According to forest plots, heterogeneity was not significant, so the fixed effect model was adopted. The significance of the pooled OR was determined by the Z test and statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

RESULTS: Data were collected from two studies (353 patients, 142 in the early cholecystectomy group and 211 in the delayed cholecystectomy group) regarding the length of hospital stay [The WMD was -2.87 (95%CI: -3.36--2.39, P < 0.01). Data were collected from four studies (618 patients, 211 in the early cholecystectomy group and 408 in the delayed cholecystectomy group) regarding perioperative complications (OR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.41-2.12, P > 0.05). Data were collected from four studies (618 patients, 211 in the early cholecystectomy group and 408 in the delayed cholecystectomy group) on the number of patients who underwent ERCP± ES postoperatively (OR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.45-1.41, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy offers better protection than ES against further bouts of pancreatitis in patients with gallstone pancreatitis, although ES is an acceptable alternative.

Predicting a biliary aetiology in paediatric acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is a common cause of pancreatitis which may require timely intervention. We aimed to identify routine laboratory parameters for early prediction of biliary aetiology in paediatric acute pancreatitis (AP).

DESIGN

A retrospective review of children with AP (January 2000-July 2011) was performed at two tertiary paediatric hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Predictors of ABP using laboratory parameters (measured within 48 h of presentation) were determined using a multivariate logistic regression model and evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 131 pancreatitis episodes reviewed, 21 (16%) were biliary-related. Raised serum lipase, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase were associated with biliary aetiology (all p<0.0016) on univariate analysis. In multiple logistic regression, serum GGT ≥40 U/L, ALT ≥150 U/L, and lipase ≥15 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) were predictive of ABP. To improve clinical applicability, the predictive performance when at least two of the three ABP predictors (coined the 'biliary pancreatitis triad') were satisfied was evaluated. The triad performed with a specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 95, 89, 76 and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The biliary pancreatitis triad of serum GGT ≥40 U/L, ALT ≥150 U/L and lipase ≥15×ULN within 48 h of presentation may be used as simple clinical predictors of ABP in children. Children with values falling below 2 or 3 of these thresholds are very unlikely to have AP due to a biliary cause.

WITHDRAWN. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Early endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP+/-ES) has been advocated to reduce complications in patients presenting with a severe attack of gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis (GAP). However, a recent trial has reported contradictory results. Importantly, patients with acute cholangitis were excluded suggesting it may be a major confounding factor affecting previous studies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of early ERCP+/-ES compared to conservative management stratified according to severity of disease, concealment of randomisation, acute cholangitis and bilirubin level in the reduction of mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalisation and cost in adults suspected of having GAP.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched - Cochrane Library (Issue 4 2003), Medline (1966-2004), EMBASE (1980-2004) and LILACS. 'Grey literature' was sought by looking at cited references and hand searched to identify further relevant trials. Conference proceedings of United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were also hand searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of adult patients, from 15 years old or greater, presenting with gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis (GAP) comparing ERCP +/- ES versus Conservative management within 72 hours of admission.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were assessed for quality independently by two reviewers. Wherever appropriate, results were pooled together and sub-grouped by predicted severity of disease. Fixed and random effects models were applied. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the fragility of results.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials, involving 511 patients, met inclusion criteria. The test for heterogeneity yielded statistically non-significant results (p-value 0.1 to 0.63) suggesting all comparisons were above the established threshold for combinability (p<0.1). Fixed effect and random effect meta-analyses gave identical results. Early ERCP +/- ES was associated with non-significant effect on reduction of mortality in predicted mild (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.41) and severe GAP (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.41). Reduction in complications was non-significant in predicted mild (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.53 to 1.49), but significant in severe GAP (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.53). There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions about hospital stay and cost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Odds of having complications are reduced in predicted severe disease by early ERCP +/- ES. This effect was however, non-significant in predicted mild disease and for reduction of mortality in either predicted mild or severe disease. These results are controlled for confounding due to associated acute cholangitis and are robust for clinical and statistical heterogeneity.

ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis

The role of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis is for many years a subject for disagreement among physicians. Although the evidence seemed to be in favor of performing ERCP, endoscopists usually hesitate to conform to the guidelines. ERCP is an invasive procedure, with complications which can affect patients’ outcome. Recent evidence suggests that we should probably modify our policy, recruiting less invasive procedures, like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound, before conducting ERCP in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. In this editorial the different aspects regarding the role of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis are discussed.

Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency in patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

Introduction

Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis worldwide. Patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis (SABP) constitute a subgroup of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients in whom systemic inflammation may be triggered and perpetuated by different mechanisms. The aim of this prospective investigation was to examine the adrenal response to corticotropin and the relationship between adrenal function and outcome in patients with SABP.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with SABP were enrolled in this study. A short corticotropin (250 μg) stimulation test (SST) was performed within the first 24 hours of admission to the ICU. Critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) was defined as follows: baseline value less than 10 μg/dL, or cortisol response less than 9 μg/dL.

Results

CIRCI occurred in 34.4% of patients. The patients with CIRCI were more severely ill as evidenced by higher APACHE II and SOFA scores and numbers of organ system dysfunction on the day of SST. The in-hospital mortality for the entire group was 21.9%. The CIRCI group had a higher hospital mortality rate compared to those with normal adrenal function (45.5% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.032). The hospital survivors had a higher cortisol response to corticotropin (17.4 (8.3–27.1) vs. 7.2 (1.7–12) μg/dL, P = 0.019). The cortisol response to corticotropin inversely correlated with SOFA score and the number of organ dysfunction on the day of SST. The rates of pancreatic necrosis and bacteremia were significantly higher in the CIRCI group (100% vs 42.9%, P = 0.002; 81.8% vs 23.8%, P = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions

CIRCI is common in patients with SABP. It is associated with bacteremia, multiple organ dysfunction and increased mortality.

Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be performed in all patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) and coexisting acute cholangitis. In patients without cholangitis and predicted mild ABP it is generally accepted that early ERCP should not be performed. Nevertheless, there is a controversy regarding the role of early ERCP in the treatment of patients with predicted severe ABP without cholangitis. We reviewed randomized trials on early ERCP versus conservative management in patients with ABP without acute cholangitis.

METHODS

Relevant publications in 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven randomized trials on ERCP in acute pancreatitis were found, of which 3 including a total of 450 patients (230 in the invasive arm and 220 in the control arm) qualified for a meta-analysis according to predefined criteria. In all patients with ABP (predicted mild and severe), early ERCP was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in overall complications [risk ratio (RR) 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.04; P = 0.38] and a nonsignificant increase in mortality (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.23-5.63; P = 0.88). Subgroup analysis based on predicted severity did not affect these outcomes (overall complications: predicted mild: RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.62-1.19; P = 0.36; predicted severe: RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.32-2.10; P = 0.68; mortality: predicted mild: RR 1.90; 95% CI 0.25-14.55; P = 0.53; predicted severe: RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.20-8.06; P = 0.80).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, early ERCP in patients with predicted mild and predicted severe ABP without acute cholangitis did not lead to a significant reduction in the risk of overall complications and mortality.

Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute pancreatitis

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a useful tool in the evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis. This review will focus on the role of ERCP in specific causes of acute pancreatitis, including microlithiasis and gallstone disease, pancreas divisum, Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, tumors of the pancreaticobiliary tract, pancreatic pseudocysts, and pancreatic duct injury. Indications for endoscopic techniques such as biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy, stenting, stricture dilation, treatment of duct leaks, drainage of fluid collections and stone extraction will also be discussed in this review. With the advent of less invasive and safer diagnostic modalities including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), ERCP is appropriately becoming a therapeutic rather than diagnostic tool in the management of acute pancreatitis and its complications.

Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute pancreatitis

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a useful tool in the evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis. This review will focus on the role of ERCP in specific causes of acute pancreatitis, including microlithiasis and gallstone disease, pancreas divisum, Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, tumors of the pancreaticobiliary tract, pancreatic pseudocysts, and pancreatic duct injury. Indications for endoscopic techniques such as biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy, stenting, stricture dilation, treatment of duct leaks, drainage of fluid collections and stone extraction will also be discussed in this review. With the advent of less invasive and safer diagnostic modalities including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), ERCP is appropriately becoming a therapeutic rather than diagnostic tool in the management of acute pancreatitis and its complications.

Management of gallstone pancreatitis

Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis in the western world. Most patients with ABP suffer a mild attack and are expected to make a full recovery. They can be managed supportively and undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC during their initial hospitalization to prevent recurrence. If necessary, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration can be performed. Otherwise, postoperative ERCP can be performed to remove common bile duct stones. Patients with severe ABP require ICU admission, close clinical monitoring, and aggressive fluid resuscitation. There is a bimodal mortality in severe ABP with most late deaths caused by septic complications. Antibiotics should be used judiciously and are usually warranted only in the presence of infection or sepsis. ERCP, +/- ES, should be performed when signs of cholangitis are present. Early ERCP should be considered in patients with severe ABP who do not improve clinically. CT scanning should be performed to assess for necrosis or peripancreatic fluid collections. Patients with no fluid collections can undergo cholecystectomy once their clinical condition improves. Patients with peripancreatic fluid collections should be followed with serial CT scans. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed once resolution of the fluid collection is documented. If fluid collections do not resolve after 6 weeks, patients should undergo concurrent cholecystectomy and fluid drainage procedures. Sterile necrosis can be closely monitored and does not require necrosectomy unless the patient's clinical status deteriorates. Patients with infected necrosis should undergo necrosectomy when they are clinically stable. After recovery from an attack of severe ABP, patients require close follow-up because late complications are common. Currently, no single test can establish the diagnosis or predict the severity of ABP. A prompt diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion and clinical acumen. Recognizing patients with severe pancreatitis is an important priority because it affects the type and timing of intervention. The management of these patients requires close clinical observation and a multidisciplinary approach between the surgeon, radiologist, gastroenterologist, and intensivist.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Early endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP+/-ES) has been advocated to reduce complications in patients presenting with a severe attack of gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis (GAP). However, a recent trial has reported contradictory results. Importantly, patients with acute cholangitis were excluded suggesting it may be a major confounding factor affecting previous studies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of early ERCP+/-ES compared to conservative management stratified according to severity of disease, concealment of randomisation, acute cholangitis and bilirubin level in the reduction of mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalisation and cost in adults suspected of having GAP.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched - Cochrane Library (Issue 4 2003), Medline (1966-2004), EMBASE (1980-2004) and LILACS. 'Grey literature' was sought by looking at cited references and hand searched to identify further relevant trials. Conference proceedings of United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were also hand searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of adult patients, from 15 years old or greater, presenting with gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis (GAP) comparing ERCP +/- ES versus Conservative management within 72 hours of admission.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were assessed for quality independently by two reviewers. Wherever appropriate, results were pooled together and sub-grouped by predicted severity of disease. Fixed and random effects models were applied. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the fragility of results.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials, involving 511 patients, met inclusion criteria. The test for heterogeneity yielded statistically non-significant results (p-value 0.1 to 0.63) suggesting all comparisons were above the established threshold for combinability (p<0.1). Fixed effect and random effect meta-analyses gave identical results. Early ERCP +/- ES was associated with non-significant effect on reduction of mortality in predicted mild (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.41) and severe GAP (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.41). Reduction in complications was non-significant in predicted mild (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.53 to 1.49), but significant in severe GAP (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.53). There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions about hospital stay and cost.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Odds of having complications are reduced in predicted severe disease by early ERCP +/- ES. This effect was however, non-significant in predicted mild disease and for reduction of mortality in either predicted mild or severe disease. These results are controlled for confounding due to associated acute cholangitis and are robust for clinical and statistical heterogeneity.

Imaging and Percutaneous Management of Acute Complicated Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis varies from a mild, self-limited disease to one with significant morbidity and mortality in its most severe forms. While clinical criteria abound, imaging has become indispensable to diagnose the extent of the disease and its complications, as well as to guide and monitor therapy. Percutaneous interventional techniques offer options that can be life-saving, surgery-sparing or important adjuncts to operation. Close cooperation and communication between the surgeon, gastroenterologist and interventional radiologist enhance the likelihood of successful patient care.

Endoscopic technique for the management of pancreatitis and its complications

Therapeutic endoscopy is now increasingly used to treat gallstone pancreatitis, acute pancreatitis of other aetiologies, chronic pancreatitis and complications associated with acute or chronic pancreatitis. This chapter is a brief review of the endoscopic interventions currently performed in patients with acute or chronic pancreatitis. These interventions include biliary and pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy at the major or minor papilla, stricture dilatation on the common bile duct or main pancreatic duct, stent placement in the biliary or pancreatic ducts, stone extraction with or without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and transmural or transpapillary drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. As most of the studies reported were uncontrolled and retrospective, uncertainties persist with regard to the best approaches for treating the patients concerned. Appropriate patient selection, adequate expertise, and a supporting multidisciplinary infrastructure are essential prerequisites of a high success rate in improving the clinical condition of these patients.

Emergency complications of acute and chronic pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is a common disease with a relatively high morbidity and mortality. In contrast, chronic pancreatitis is a recurrent disease with multiple potential complications that occasionally require urgent intervention. This article focuses on the emergency complications of acute and chronic pancreatitis that require urgent intervention. Recent developments in the diagnosis and management of such complications are discussed.

Value and safety of ERCP and endoscopic treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis

AIM

To evaluate the value and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic treatment in acute biliary pancreatitis.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients with acute biliary pancreatitis including 13 patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis in the ERCP group underwent ERCP and endoscopic therapy. 15 patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis were not treated by either surgery, endoscopy or early ERCP in the control group. Etiological factors, therapeutic effects and complications were observed in all the patients of the two groups.

RESULTS

In ERCP group, ERCP showed biliary tract disease in 56 cases, common bile duct stones in 26, cholecyst stone in 17, microcholelith in 4, cholangitis in 9, larger diverticula around the papilla in 3, papillitis in 5, pancreatic diverticulum in 2, and normal in 25. 46 cases of biliary tract disease were treated by endoscopy including papillosphincterotomy, endoscopic nasal biliary drainage and endoscopic dilatation of the accessory papilla. There were no significant differences in the recovery days of serum amylase back to normal between ERCP group (3.4±1.6 d) and control group (4.5±2.8 d), but the mean days of disappearance of abdominal pain (4.4±2.0 d), fever (5.0±3.4 d), abnormal white blood cell count (6.5±5.4 d) and hospitalization (21.9±8.4 d) were significantly shorter in the ERCP group than in the control group (8.4±6.1 d, 16.1±19.0 d, 19.1±19.3 d, 41.3±20.0 d, P<0.05). Complication rate (53.9%) and mortality rate (0%) in ERCP group were lower than those of control group (80.0%, 23.1% P<0.05). 17 cases had early complication (18.7%) in ERCP group. Of them, biliary tract infection occurred in 2 cases (2.2%), retroperitoneal pneumatosis in 1 case (1.1%), bleeding of digestive tract in 1 case (1.1%), deterioriation of pancreatitis in 13 cases. 15 patients were cured by medication treatment. Operations were performed in one patient. One patient died.

CONCLUSION

ERCP and endoscopic therapy are safe and effective for patients with acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis associated with biliary disease in children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biliary disease is one of the most common causes of acute pancreatitis in adults; however, this cause and outcome in children have rarely been described in the literature. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the role of biliary disease as a cause of acute pancreatitis in children.

METHODS

The present study included 56 children with acute pancreatitis, of which 16 (29%) cases were associated with biliary disease. The 16 cases consisted of four boys and 12 girls ranging in age from 2 to 13 years. The underlying causes of the biliary disease were evaluated, as well as its clinical presentations, management modalities, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The causes of biliary disease in the 16 children included choledochal cyst in seven, biliary sludge in six, gallstone in two, and anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction in one. Acute pancreatitis with biliary disease showed increased presentation of jaundice and abnormalities in a liver-function test. Therapeutic interventions were performed more frequently in acute pancreatitis associated with biliary disease. All seven children with choledochal cysts needed hepaticojejunostomy. Of eight children with biliary sludge or gallstones, five children remained free of and two suffered from repeated attacks of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillotomy. Mortality did not occur.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that biliary disease can be one of the causes of acute pancreatitis in children and has the clinical characteristics of jaundice and/or abnormalities in a liver-function test. Appropriate therapeutic interventions should be considered as the treatment modality.

[Endoscopic, percutaneous and laparoscopic treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis]

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of acute gallstone pancreatitis treatment and to discuss indications in relation with the different forms of the disease.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From january 1992 to june 2001, 137 patients have been treated for an acute gallstone pancreatitis. Diagnostic criteria were given by the history, clinical examination, biochemical and radiological findings. After exclusion of patients with a systemic disease, a group of 129 patients have been enrolled in a treatment regimen with an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and eventual sphincterotomy, a percutaneous US-guided cholecystostomy (PC) when necessary and an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

ERCP has been successfully performed in 121/129 patients. A PC has been performed in 5/8 patients of the failed endoscopic procedure and in 14 with acute cholecystitis. Retrograde and percutaneous cholangiographies showed main bile duct stones in 89 patients, a dilatation of the main bile duct without stones in 26 patients and a negative finding in 6 patients. An endoscopic sphincterotomy has been performed in 117 patients. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed in 118 patients. Mortality and morbidity rates were 1.6 and 10.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ERCP and sphincterotomy seem to be indicated in all patients observed during the first 72 hours. Endoscopic treatment and percutaneous procedure make it possible to reduce at a very low rate the cases with an unfavourable course of the disease. A definitive treatment may then be performed by the way of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model

OBJECTIVES

The role of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is controversial. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are modalities for bile duct visualization that could lower costs and prevent ERCP-related complications. We analyzed costs and examined the cost-effectiveness of these modalities to define their role in ABP.

METHODS

A decision analysis model of ABP was constructed. The strategies evaluated were 1) ERCP, 2) MRCP followed by ERCP if positive for common bile duct stones (CBDS) or if biliary sepsis ensued, 3) EUS followed by ERCP if positive or if biliary sepsis ensued, and 4) observation with intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy with ERCP only if biliary sepsis ensued. We compared costs and performed cost-effectiveness analysis between strategies at probabilities of CBDS ranging from 0% to 100%. The outcome measures were total costs and costs per ABP death prevented.

RESULTS

At probabilities of CBDS < 15%, observation with intraoperative cholangiography is the least expensive strategy, whereas EUS and ERCP are the least expensive strategies at probabilities of 15-58% and >58%, respectively. In terms of cost-effectiveness, at probabilities of CBDS of 7-45%, EUS is the most cost-effective alternative, and at a probability of >45% ERCP is the most cost-effective option.

CONCLUSIONS

Total costs and cost-effectiveness ratios of these strategies in patients with ABP are highly dependent on the probability of CBDS.

Gallstones and biliary disease

Gallstones are common in the US and western countries. This article describes the pathogenesis of gallstone formation and the clinical manifestations and current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the most common clinical conditions caused by gallstones: biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, and acute gallstone pancreatitis. The role of widely used imaging techniques (transabdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MR imaging, and MRCP) and diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy (endoscopic ultrasound, ERCP) is emphasized. This article is intended mainly for general practitioners, primary care physicians, and other specialists providing medical care to patients with gallstones and their complications.

A comparison of serum trypsinogen-2 and trypsin-2-alpha1-antitrypsin complex with lipase and amylase in the diagnosis and assessment of severity in the early phase of acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the recently introduced laboratory markers trypsinogen-2 and trypsin-2-alpha1 antitrypsin complex (trypsin-2-AAT) in serum with lipase and amylase in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).

METHODS

The analytes were measured on admission in 64 consecutive patients with AP and in 30 controls with acute abdominal disease of extrapancreatic origin. Twenty-one patients had severe and 43 mild AP. As reference methods we used serum amylase and C-reactive protein.

RESULTS

In subjects with AP, elevated trypsinogen-2 values (> or = 90 microg/L) were observed in 63 patients (98%), trypsin-2-AAT values (> or = 12 microg/L) in 64 patients (100%), lipase values (> or = 200 U/L) in 64 patients (100%), and amylase values (> or = 300 IU/L) in 62 patients (97%). The diagnostic accuracy of the markers was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. On admission, trypsinogen-2, trypsin-2-AAT, lipase, and amylase differentiated patients with AP from controls with high accuracy and ROC analyses showed similar areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for trypsinogen-2 (AUC 0.960), trypsin-2-AAT (0.948), lipase (AUC 0.947), and amylase (AUC 0.930). For differentiation between severe and mild AP, trypsin-2-AAT (AUC 0.805) was slightly better than trypsinogen-2 (AUC 0.792), and they were both clearly better than lipase (AUC 0.583), C-reactive protein (AUC 0.519), or amylase (AUC 0.632) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

All the markers studied showed high accuracy for differentiating between AP and extrapancreatic diseases. However, trypsinogen-2 and trypsin-2-AAT displayed the best accuracy for predicting a severe AP already at admission, which makes these markers superior for clinical purposes.