Hepatic resection and percutaneous ethanol injection as treatments of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP 08) retrospective case-control study

Liver-Directed Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) are primary liver cancers where all or most of the tumor burden is usually confined to the liver. Therefore, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease with minimal systemic side effects. The English medical literature and clinical trials were reviewed to provide a synopsis on the available liver-directed percutaneous therapies for HCC and IHC. Locoregional liver-directed therapies provide survival benefit for patients with HCC and IHC compared to best medical treatment and have lower comorbid risks compared to surgical resection. These treatment options should be considered, especially in patients with unresectable disease.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second cause of death due to malignancy in the world, following lung cancer. The geographic distribution of this disease accompanies its principal risk factors: Chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, alcoholism, aflatoxin B1 intoxication, liver cirrhosis, and some genetic attributes. Recently, type II diabetes has been shown to be a risk factor for HCC together with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Although the risk factors are quite well known and it is possible to diagnose HCC when the tumor is less than 1 cm diameter, it remains elusive at the beginning and treatment is often unsuccessful. Liver transplantation is thus far considered the best treatment for HCC as it cures HCC and the underlying liver disease. Using the Milan criteria, overall survival after liver transplantation for HCC is about 70% after 5 years. Many attempts have been made to go beyond the Milan Criteria and according to recent works reasonably good results have been achieved by using a histochemical marker such as cytokeratine 19 and the so-called "up to seven criteria" to divide patients into categories according to their risk of relapse. In addition to liver transplantation other therapies have been proposed such as resection, tumor ablation by different means, embolization and chemotherapy. An important step in the treatment of advanced HCC has been the introduction of sorafenib, the first oral, systemic drug that has provided significant improvement in survival. Treatment of HCC patients must be multidisciplinary and by using the different approaches discussed in this review it is possible to offer prolonged survival and quite good and sometimes even excellent quality of life to many patients.

2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was first developed in 2003 and revised in 2009 by the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group and the National Cancer Center, Korea. Since then, many studies on HCC have been carried out in Korea and other countries. In particular, a substantial body of knowledge has been accumulated on diagnosis, staging, and treatment specific to Asian characteristics, especially Koreans, prompting the proposal of new strategies. Accordingly, the new guideline presented herein was developed on the basis of recent evidence and expert opinions. The primary targets of this guideline are patients with suspicious or newly diagnosed HCC. This guideline provides recommendations for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed HCC.

2014 Korean Liver Cancer Study Group-National Cancer Center Korea practice guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

The guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was first developed in 2003 and revised in 2009 by the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group and the National Cancer Center, Korea. Since then, many studies on HCC have been carried out in Korea and other countries. In particular, a substantial body of knowledge has been accumulated on diagnosis, staging, and treatment specific to Asian characteristics, especially Koreans, prompting the proposal of new strategies. Accordingly, the new guideline presented herein was developed on the basis of recent evidence and expert opinions. The primary targets of this guideline are patients with suspicious or newly diagnosed HCC. This guideline provides recommendations for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed HCC.

Percutaneous ablation of hepatic tumors

The liver is a common site of both primary and secondary malignancy resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Careful patient evaluation and triage allows for optimal utilization of all oncologic therapies, including radiation, systemic chemotherapy, surgery, transarterial therapies, and ablation. Although the role of interventional oncologists in the management of hepatic malignancies continues to evolve, the use of percutaneous ablation therapies has proven to be an effective and minimally invasive modality for treatment. Percutaneous ablation therapies have diversified from direct ethanol injection to multiple modalities including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, acetic acid injection, laser ablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and irreversible electroporation. RFA is the most commonly utilized modality for hepatic interventions and has proven efficacy in both hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma metastases. Although tumor size remains a challenge, combination therapies and new device innovations continue to allow for improved ablation zones and more durable results.

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), usually performed under percutaneous ultrasound guidance, is considered the gold standard among minimally invasive therapies. On the strength of some recent randomized trials, its indications include operable patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma and inoperable patients with more advanced disease also in combination with other therapies. RFA has lower complication rates and costs less than surgery.

Is it time to reconsider the BCLC/AASLD therapeutic flow-chart?

PURPOSE

Recommendations of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) therapeutic flow-chart, endorsed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), are the most applied worldwide. Over recent years, however, several referral centers have questioned some of the BCLC treatment allocations and proposed alternative strategies. The present study plans to review and discuss these suggestions, with the aim to evaluate whether there are well-grounded reasons to reconsider some of the BCLC/AASLD recommendations.

METHODS

A search was made into the MEDLINE database, focusing on randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis reviews, case-control studies, concordant clinical trials on novel therapies and studies reporting the opinion of respected experts. Their results and conclusions were compared stage by stage with BCLC/AASLD recommendations.

RESULTS

In stage 0 (very early, or single <2  cm, or carcinoma in situ, Child A) radiofrequency should replace resection. In stage A (early, or single or three nodules up to 3  cm, Child A-B) radiofrequency and resection should expand their indications. In stage B (intermediate, or multinodular, Child A-B) resection and transplantation should expand their indications, while intra-arterial therapies are changing from conventional to selective treatments. In stage C (advanced, portal invasion or extrahepatic disease, Child A-B) systemic therapies should offer previously unknown promising options.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, so much evidence leads to suggest it is time to reconsider several BCLC/AASLD recommendations. Some treatments are comparable in results but vary in costs, local availability, or complication rates.

Optimal treatment increased survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients detected with community-based screening

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and opportunity to select appropriate treatment are important benefits of HCC screening. Our aim in the present study was to investigate the survival rate, prognostic factors and treatment effects in HCC patients of community-based screening.

METHODS

Community-based ultrasound (US) screening for HCC in adults with platelet counts (< 150 x 10(3)/mm(3)) and/or alpha fetoprotein (AFP) > 20 ng/mL was conducted in 2002 and 2004. As per the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, 90 cases of intermediate or earlier stage HCC were detected and 88 cases had sufficient information for analysis (49 men and 39 women, aged 65.8 +/- 9.6 years). The tumor diameter was mostly less than 5 cm (76.1%). The follow up was continued until June 2008.

RESULTS

The 4-year overall survival rate was 46.8%. Old age (> or = 70 years) (P = 0.046), later stage of HCC (intermediate vs earlier) (P = 0.012), low platelet count (< 100 x 10(3)/mm(3)) (P = 0.013) and refusal of modern treatment (P = 0.026) were independent poor prognostic factors. Curative treatment increased survival in patients of all ages. Both curative treatment and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) increased survival in cases of intermediate HCC. However, treatment benefits were not found for patients with (very) early stage HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and prompt treatment of HCC leads to increased survival. For elderly patients this benefit was seen only for early stage cases receiving curative treatment. Differences between treatment types for patients with (very) early stage HCC might emerge with a longer follow-up period.

Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: irreversible electroporation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in hepatic tissue ablation and the radiologic-pathologic correlation of IRE-induced cell death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On approval of the animal research committee, 16 Yorkshire pigs underwent ultrasonography (US)-guided IRE of normal liver. A total of 55 ablation zones were created, which were imaged with US, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and computed tomography (CT) and evaluated with immunohistochemical analysis, including hematoxylin-eosin (H-E), Von Kossa, and von Willibrand factor (vWF) staining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay.

RESULTS

At gross section examination, the mean diameter of the ablation zones was 33.5 mm + or - 3.0 (standard deviation) and was achieved in 6.9 minutes (mean total procedure time per ablation), with a mean difference of 2.5 mm + or - 3.6 between US and gross section measurements (r = 0.804). No complications were seen in any of the 16 animals. IRE ablation zones were well characterized with US, CT, and MR imaging, and real-time monitoring was feasible with US. H-E, Von Kossa, and vWF staining showed complete cell death, with a sharply demarcated treatment area. Bile ducts and vessels were completely preserved. Areas of complete cell death were stained positive for apoptotic markers (TUNEL, BCL-2 oncoprotein), suggesting involvement of the apoptotic process in the pathophysiology of cell death caused by IRE.

CONCLUSION

In an animal model, IRE proved to be a fast, safe, and potent ablative method, causing complete tissue death by means of apoptosis. Cell death is seen with full preservation of periablative zone structures, including blood vessels, bile ducts, and neighboring nonablated tissues.

[Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cancer in Korea, typically has a poor prognosis, and constitutes the majority of primary hepatic malignancies. It is the number one cause of death among people in their 50s in Korea. The five-year survival rate of liver cancer is poor; at 18.9%. Efforts to increase the survival rate through early diagnosis of HCC and optimal treatments are keenly needed. Western guideline for the management of HCC were developed, but these guidelines are somewhat unsuitable for Korean patients. Thus, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) and the National Cancer Center (NCC), Korea jointly produced the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC for the first time in Korea in 2003. Owing to medical advances over the following six years, diagnosis and treatment of HCC has changed considerably. As more national and foreign data are accumulated, KLCSG and NCC, Korea recently revised the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC. Forty or more specialists in the field of hepatology, general surgery, radiology and radiation oncology participated, and meticulously reviewed national and foreign papers, and collected opinions through advisory committee conferences. These multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines summarized diagnosis, surgical resection, liver transplantation, local treatments, transarterial chemoembolization, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, preemptive antiviral treatments, and response evaluation of HCC. These Korean guidelines are expected to be useful for clinical management of and research on HCC.

Single HCC smaller than 2 cm: surgery or ablation: interventional oncologist's perspective

In the EASL and AASLD guidelines, hepatic resection (HR) is considered the first option for patients in stage 0 (very early HCC). This statement was not based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) versus other therapies, but on the oncological assumption that HR is the better procedure for obtaining complete tumor ablation including a safety margin. Subsequently, three RCTs compared percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus HR in patients with early HCC. All failed to demonstrate better survival in favor of HR, even though the larger size of the early stage needs a larger area of necrosis. A recent study focused on stage 0 demonstrated a sustained local complete response after RFA comparable with that of HR. All these trials established that RFA is less invasive and associated with lower complication rates and lower costs. These data suggest that RFA can be considered the first option for operable patients with very early HCC. Other options (HR, PEI, selective TAE/TACE) can be used as salvage therapy for the few cases in which RFA is unsuccessful or unfeasible.

Progress in non-surgical treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma

At present, surgery-based comprehensive therapy plays a dominant role in the treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma. But the majority of patients had lost their opportunities of surgical treatment when diagnosis was confirmed. Moreover, only 15% patients may benefit from surgical excision. Therefore, non-surgical approaches still hold an important position in primary hepatic carcinoma treatment. The purpose of this article is to review the progress in non-surgical treatments of primary hepatic carcinoma such as micro-invasive therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and biotherapy.

Nodules less than 20 mm and vascular invasion are predictors of survival in small hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to analyze the overall survival of patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and identify independent pretreatment predictors of survival in Brazil.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2003, 74 patients with cirrhosis and small HCC were evaluated. Predictors of survival were identified using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the Cox model.

RESULTS

The overall survival rates were 80%, 41%, and 17% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively. The mean length of follow-up after HCC diagnosis was 23 months (median 22 mo, range: 1 to 86 mo) for the entire group. Univariate analysis showed that model for endstage liver disease (MELD) score (P=0.016), Child-Pugh classification (P=0.007), alpha-fetoprotein level (P=0.006), number of nodules (P=0.041), tumor diameter (P=0.009), and vascular invasion (P<0.0001) were significant predictors of survival. Cox regression analysis identified vascular invasion (relative risk=14.60, confidence interval 95%=3.3-64.56, P<0.001) and tumor size >20 mm (relative risk=2.14, confidence interval 95%=1.07-4.2, P=0.030) as independent predictors of decreased survival. Treatment of HCC was related to increased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of HCC smaller than 20 mm is associated with longer survival. Presence of vascular invasion, even in small tumors, maybe associated with poor prognosis. Treatment of small tumors of up to 20 mm diameter is related to increased survival.

Evidence-based diagnosis and locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Early identification of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucial to improving the results of therapy and for patients to be eligible for liver transplantation. Recent advances in noninvasive imaging technology include various techniques of harmonic ultrasound, new ultrasound contrast agents, multislice helical computed tomography and rapid high-quality magnetic resonance. The imaging diagnosis relies on the hallmark of arterial hypervascularity with portal venous washout. Since the use of better radiological techniques has improved the accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis, the role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of HCC has declined. With recent advances in genomics and proteomics, a great number of potential markers have been identified and developed as new candidate markers for HCC. Locoregional therapies currently constitute the best options for early nonsurgical treatment of HCC. Percutaneous ethanol injection shows similar results to resection surgery for single tumors less than 3 cm in diameter. Radiofrequency ablation is superior to percutaneous ethanol injection in terms of local recurrence. Transarterial chemoembolization is currently the most common approach for the management of HCC without curative options since it improves patient survival, but the optimal embolizing agent, length of interval between sessions and whether the chemotherapeutic agent has any effect have not yet been determined. Combining transarterial chemoembolization with antiangiogenic agents, as well as with other techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation, may improve the results. Injection of radioisotopes such as yttrium-90, via the hepatic artery, may be particularly useful in patients with portal vein thrombosis. Comparisons with other transarterial techniques are needed.

Clinical trial: percutaneous acetic acid injection vs. percutaneous ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma--a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome of percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.

AIM

To compare the long-term outcome of PAI vs. PEI for treating small HCC.

METHODS

From July 1998 to July 2004, 125 patients with small HCC were enrolled. Seventy patients receiving PAI and 55 patients receiving PEI were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Tumour recurrence and survival rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 43 months. The local recurrence rate and new tumour recurrence rate were similar between the PAI and PEI groups. The PAI group had significantly better survival than the PEI group (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that PAI was the significant factor associated with overall survival [PAI vs. PEI, RR: 0.639, 95% CI: (0.419-1.975), P = 0.038]. The treatment sessions required to achieve complete tumour necrosis were significantly fewer in the PAI group than in the PEI group (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.3, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous acetic acid injection required fewer treatment sessions than PEI and provided better survival after long-term follow-up.

Survival rates according to the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scores of 345 hepatocellular carcinoma patients after multimodality treatments during a 10-year period in a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score has been demonstrated to have superior prognostic ability in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients worldwide, but there has never been sufficient assessment of the efficacy of treatment modalities according to the CLIP score. This retrospective cohort study of HCC patients was conducted to assess the efficacy of treatment modalities according to the CLIP score.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) (n = 101), radiofrequency ablation with prior transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (RFA + TACE) (n = 115), percutaneous ethanol injection with prior TACE (PEI + TACE) (n = 43), and TACE (n = 86) as a primary treatment in terms of survival among 345 patients treated at Mie University Hospital between 1995 and 2004, according to CLIP score.

RESULTS

The overall survival rates in the RFA + TACE group were significantly higher in the patients with CLIP scores of 1, 2, and 3 or more (5-year, 70.9%; 3-year, 73.7%; and 3-year, 100%, respectively), but they were not significantly different from the 5-year survival rates of the HR group with a CLIP score of 0 (83.7%). Among the patients with a CLIP score of 0, a significantly higher disease-free survival rate (5-year: 33.7%) was obtained in the HR subgroup (n = 35) than in the RFA + TACE subgroup (n = 35), both of which were followed since 2000, but morbidity (21.8%) was highest in the HR group.

CONCLUSION

RFA + TACE is concluded to be a safe treatment modality with better overall survival (5-year, > 60%) in HCC patients regardless of their CLIP score.

Thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer, and its incidence is increasing worldwide because of the dissemination of hepatitis B and C virus infection. Patients with cirrhosis are at the highest risk of developing HCC and should be monitored every 6 months to diagnose the tumour at an early, asymptomatic stage. Patients with early-stage HCC should be considered for any of the available curative therapies, including surgical resection, liver transplantation and percutaneous image-guided ablation. Liver transplantation is the only option that provides cure of both the tumour and the underlying chronic liver disease. However, the lack of sufficient liver donation greatly limits its applicability. Resection is the treatment of choice for HCC in non-cirrhotic patients, who account for about 5% of the cases in western countries. However, in patients with cirrhosis, candidates for resection have to be carefully selected to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure. It has been shown that a normal bilirubin concentration and the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension are the best predictors of excellent outcomes after surgery. However, less than 5% of cirrhotic patients with HCC fit these criteria. Image-guided percutaneous ablation is the best therapeutic choice for non-surgical patients with early-stage HCC. While ethanol injection has been the seminal percutaneous technique, radiofrequency ablation has emerged as the most effective method for local tumour destruction and is currently used as the primary ablative modality at most institutions.

Phase 2 study of erlotinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Growth factor overexpression, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, is common in hepatocellular cancers. Erlotinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specificity for EGFR. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with erlotinib who were alive and progression-free (PFS) at 16 weeks of continuous treatment.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable HCC, no prior systemic therapy, performance status (PS) of 0, 1, or 2, and Childs-Pugh (CP) cirrhosis A or B received oral erlotinib 150 mg daily for 28-day cycles. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Md) criteria. Patients accrued to either "low" or "high" EGFR expression cohorts; each cohort had stopping rules applied when there was a lack of efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty HCC patients were enrolled. Median age was 64 years (range, 33-83 years), sex distribution was 32 males and 8 females, performance scores were 40% PS 0, 55% PS 1, Childs-Pugh distribution was 75% A and 20% B. There were no complete or partial responses; however, 17 of 40 patients achieved stable disease at 16 weeks of continuous therapy. The PFS at 16 weeks was 43%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 43 weeks (10.75 months). No patients required dose reductions of erlotinib. No correlation between EGFR expression and outcome was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study indicated that single-agent erlotinib is well tolerated and has modest disease-control benefit in HCC, manifested as modestly prolonged PFS and OS when compared with historical controls.

Imaging guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation: ultrasound and immunohistological correlation

Preliminary results of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (PIE) on swine liver as a novel non-thermal ablation are presented. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using irreversible electroporation in more clinically applicable manner, a percutaneous method, and to investigate a possible role of apoptosis in PIE-induced cell death. We performed PIE on four swine livers under real-time ultrasound guidance. The lesions created by PIE were imaged with ultrasound and were correlated with histology data, including pro-apoptotic marker. A total of 11 lesions were created with a mean size of 16.8 cm(3) in 8.4 +/- 1.8 minutes. Real-time monitoring was performed and a correlation of (+) 2 +/- 3.2 mm in measurement comparison between ultrasound and gross pathologic measurements was demonstrated. Complete hepatic cell death without structural destruction, unaffected by heat-sink effect, and with a sharp demarcation between the ablated zone and the non-ablated zone were observed. Immunohistological analysis confirmed complete apoptotic cell death by PIE on Von Kossa, BAX, and H&E staining. In summary, PIE can provide a novel and unique ablative method with real-time monitoring capability, ultra-short procedure time, non-thermal ablation, and well-controlled and focused apoptotic cell death.

Hepatic resection compared to percutaneous ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Several surgical and non-surgical therapeutic modalities have been used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There have been several studies comparing hepatic resection (HR) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for the treatment of HCC. However, there is still disagreement about the best treatment modality.

METHODS

From 130 patients undergoing HR, 116 patients were individually matched to 116 controls from 249 patients undergoing PEI using propensity score matching to overcome possible biases in non-randomized study. Survival analyses were undertaken to compare these propensity score-matched groups.

RESULTS

After matching by propensity score, the major clinical outcomes in the HR (n = 116) and the PEI (n = 116) groups were found to be similar. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were higher in the HR group (94.8%, 76.5% and 65.6%) compared to the PEI group (95.7%, 73.5% and 49.3%) (P = 0.059). The cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates showed the same trend (HR: 76.1%, 50.6% and 40.6%; PEI: 62.6%, 25.5% and 19.1%) (P < 0.001). However, when stratified by Child-Pugh classification, it was no longer the case in the Child B patients. Single intrahepatic recurrence was the most common pattern of tumor recurrence after both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing HR had a better survival profile than those undergoing PEI. However, when considering which technique to use for optimal HCC management, the individual patient's hepatic function must be considered.

A primer on transarterial, chemical, and thermal ablative therapies for hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative approach for patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors. Unfortunately, most patients with hepatic malignancy are precluded from resection due to multifocal disease, anatomic limitations, inadequate functional liver reserve, extrahepatic metastases, or medical comorbidities. Consequently, several methods of tumor ablation have been developed as alternate treatment strategies for patients with unresectable hepatic tumors or as adjuncts in total cancer therapy. The purpose of this review is to inclusively define the various ablation modalities available (transarterial, chemical, and thermal ablative), and to describe the procedures, general applications, and reported outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE and CINAHL search of the English-language literature was performed on transarterial, chemical, and thermal ablative therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Presently, radiofrequency thermal ablation is the most widely applicable liver-directed modality for hepatic tumor ablation, enabling treatment of primary and metastatic tumors. However, other transarterial and thermoablative techniques are available with accumulating data for their use. Lacking at present are studies that define the role and potential benefit of the various liver-directed modalities in the treatment algorithm for hepatic tumors.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): an update

In the absence of large randomized trials, the current treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a matter of choice depending mostly on retrospective studies, experience of centers, and the technical therapeutic possibilities. In fact, treatment decisions must be based on HCC extension and liver function, which is dependent on underlying liver disease. Cirrhosis limits therapeutic choices, life expectancy, and tolerance to therapy. Surgical resection and/or local destruction are the most common curative treatments. Orthotopic liver transplantation is probably the best treatment for small HCC developed in cirrhosis because it treats tumor, cirrhosis, and preneoplastic lesions at the same time. However, this treatment method is feasible in fewer than 5% of cases. Adjuvant treatments include transarterial chemoembolization, chemotherapy, polyprenoic acid, interferon, adoptive immunotherapy, and intra-arterial radioactive lipiodol. Results from trials warrant confirmation in larger randomized trials to show a clear survival benefit on recurrence rate, secondary prevention, and overall survival. Chemoembolization is the only palliative treatment that has been proven to be active, unlike systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and hormone therapy, whose activity is largely questionable and must all be restricted to clinical trials. Possible future therapeutic strategies include epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, antivascular endothelial growth factor therapies, cyclin D inhibitors, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Some design issues of strata-matched non-randomized studies with survival outcomes

Non-randomized studies for the evaluation of a medical intervention are useful for quantitative hypothesis generation before the initiation of a randomized trial and also when randomized clinical trials are difficult to conduct. A strata-matched non-randomized design is often utilized where subjects treated by a test intervention are matched to a fixed number of subjects treated by a standard intervention within covariate based strata. In this paper, we consider the issue of sample size calculation for this design. Based on the asymptotic formula for the power of a stratified log-rank test, we derive a formula to calculate the minimum number of subjects in the test intervention group that is required to detect a given relative risk between the test and standard interventions. When this minimum number of subjects in the test intervention group is available, an equation is also derived to find the multiple that determines the number of subjects in the standard intervention group within each stratum. The methodology developed is applied to two illustrative examples in gastric cancer and sarcoma.

Percutaneous Ethanol Injection of Unresectable Medium-to-Large-Sized Hepatomas Using a Multipronged Needle: Efficacy and Safety

Fine needles with an end hole or multiple side holes have traditionally been used for percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) of hepatomas. This study retrospectively evaluates the safety and efficacy of PEI of unresectable medium-to-large (3.5-9 cm) hepatomas using a multipronged needle and with conscious sedation. Twelve patients, eight men and four women (age 51-77 years; mean: 69) received PEI for hepatomas, mostly subcapsular or exophytic in location with average tumor size of 5.6 cm (range: 3.5-9.0 cm). Patients were consciously sedated and an 18G retractable multipronged needle (Quadrafuse needle; Rex Medical, Philadelphia, PA) was used for injection under real-time ultrasound guidance. By varying the length of the prongs and rotating the needle, the alcohol was widely distributed within the tumor. The progress of ablation was monitored by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after each weekly injection and within a month after the final (third) injection and 3 months thereafter. An average total of 63 mL (range: 20-154 ml) of alcohol was injected per patient in an average of 2.3 sessions. Contrast-enhanced CT, ultrasound, or MRI was used to determine the degree of necrosis. Complete necrosis was noted in eight patients (67%), near-complete necrosis (90-99%) in two (16.7%), and partial success (50-89%) in two (16.7%). Follow-up in the first 9 months showed local recurrence in two patients and new lesions in another. There was no mortality. One patient developed renal failure, liver failure, and localized perforation of the stomach. He responded to medical treatment and surgery was not required for the perforation. One patient had severe postprocedural abdominal pain and fever, and another had transient hyperbilirubinemia; both recovered with conservative treatment. PEI with a multipronged needle is a new, safe, and efficacious method in treating medium-to-large-sized hepatocellular carcinoma under conscious sedation. Its survival benefits require further investigations.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors globally, with varying prevalence based on endemic risk factors. In high-risk populations, including those with hepatitis B or C or with cirrhosis, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and screening ultrasound have improved detection of resectable HCC. Treatment options, including surgical resection, for patients with HCC must be selected based on the number and size of hepatic tumors, underlying hepatic function, patient condition, and available resources. An approach, which has been summarized shows the corresponding treatment choices under given clinical circumstances. For cirrhotic patients with less than three tumor nodules of a size less than 3 cm or a solitary HCC less than 5 cm, liver transplantation offers long-term survival similar to that observed in patients transplanted for nonmalignant disease. Ablative treatment using either chemical or thermal techniques provides locally effective tumor destruction. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is commonly used for palliation of unresectable tumors as well as an adjunct to surgical resection, treatment of tumors before transplant, and in conjunction with other ablative therapies in a multimodality approach. Regional approaches to chemotherapy have produced more encouraging results than systemic chemotherapy, although both remain ineffective for long-term tumor control. Several newer treatment modalities are under investigation, including gene therapy, tagged antibodies, isolated perfusion, and novel radiotherapy techniques.

Local recurrence is an important prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To clarify the importance of complete treatment by PEIT.

METHODS: A total of 140 previously untreated cases of HCC were enrolled in this study from 1988 to 2002. The inclusion criteria were: a solitary tumor less than 4 cm in diameter or multiple tumors, fewer than four in number and less than 3 cm in diameter, without extrahepatic metastasis or vessel invasion. As general principles for the treatment of HCC, the patients underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) prior to PEIT. After the initial treatment of the patients, ultrasonography and computed tomography were performed, and measurement of serum levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP) was determined. When tumor recurrences were detected, PEIT and/or TACE were repeated whenever the hepatic functional reserve of the patient permitted. We then analyzed the variables that could influence prognosis, including tumor size and number, the serum levels of AFP, the parameters of hepatic function (albumin, bilirubin, ALT, hepaplastin test, platelet number, and indocyanine green retention at 15 min [ICG-R15]), combined therapy with TACE, distant recurrence, and local recurrence.

RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified the ICG test, serum levels of AFP and albumin, tumor size and number, and local recurrence, but not distant recurrence, as significant prognostic variables. In multivariate analysis using those five parameters, the ICG test, tumor size, tumor number, and local recurrence were identified as significant prognostic factors. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the relative risk for the ICG test was the highest, followed by local recurrence.

CONCLUSION: We found that local recurrence is an independent prognostic factor of HCC, indicating that achieving complete treatment for HCC on first treatment is important for improving the prognosis of patients with HCC.

Percutaneous ethanol injection versus surgical resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare disease recurrence and survival among patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, 2 treatments that have not been evaluated with a prospective study.

METHODS

A total of 76 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups based on treatment; all had one or 2 tumors with diameter </=3 cm, with hepatitis without cirrhosis or Child class A or B cirrhosis without evident ascites or bleeding tendency.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 12 to 59 months. Among percutaneous injection patients, 18 had recurrence 1 to 37 months after treatment (true recurrence, 11; original safety margin inadequate, 3; limitation of imaging technology to detect tiny tumors, 4). Three injection therapy patients died of cancer 25, 37, and 57 months after treatment. For the surgical resection group, 15 had recurrence 2 to 54 months after treatment (true recurrence, 12; limitation of imaging, 2; neck metastasis, 1). Five resection patients died of cancer at 11, 20, 23, 26, and 52 months, respectively. By Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there is no statistical significance for recurrence and survival between treatment groups. However, tumor size larger than 2 cm and alpha-fetoprotein over 200 ng/mL correlated with higher recurrence rate, and Child class B liver cirrhosis correlated with shorter survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy appears to be as safe and effective as resection, and both treatments can be considered first-line options for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Percutaneous ethanol injection versus surgical resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare disease recurrence and survival among patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, 2 treatments that have not been evaluated with a prospective study.

METHODS

A total of 76 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups based on treatment; all had one or 2 tumors with diameter </=3 cm, with hepatitis without cirrhosis or Child class A or B cirrhosis without evident ascites or bleeding tendency.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 12 to 59 months. Among percutaneous injection patients, 18 had recurrence 1 to 37 months after treatment (true recurrence, 11; original safety margin inadequate, 3; limitation of imaging technology to detect tiny tumors, 4). Three injection therapy patients died of cancer 25, 37, and 57 months after treatment. For the surgical resection group, 15 had recurrence 2 to 54 months after treatment (true recurrence, 12; limitation of imaging, 2; neck metastasis, 1). Five resection patients died of cancer at 11, 20, 23, 26, and 52 months, respectively. By Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there is no statistical significance for recurrence and survival between treatment groups. However, tumor size larger than 2 cm and alpha-fetoprotein over 200 ng/mL correlated with higher recurrence rate, and Child class B liver cirrhosis correlated with shorter survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy appears to be as safe and effective as resection, and both treatments can be considered first-line options for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

A critical appraisal of the literature on local ablative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Image-guided percutaneous ablation is currently accepted as the best therapeutic option for nonsurgical patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Ethanol injection is the seminal technique for local tumor treatment, and may achieve 50% 5-year survival in selected Child A patients. Radiofrequency ablation constitutes the most assessed alternative technique. On the basis of the identified evidence, radiofrequency ablation seems to reach higher recurrence-free survival rates compared with ethanol injection. Further randomized trials are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of radiofrequency ablation with respect to other percutaneous treatments and to devise an unbiased therapeutic strategy.

Experimental and clinical assessment of percutaneous hepatic quantified ethanol injection in treatment of hepatic carcinoma

AIM: To detect the relationship between absolute ethanol injection quantity, the interval and formation of fibreboard, the curative effect in treatment of hepatocarcinoma and to evaluate the clinical application of percutaneous hepatic quantified ethanol injection (PHQEI) in treatment of hepatic carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS: (1) Experimental study: Twenty-four human hepatic carcinoma SMMC-7721 xenografted nude mice were randomly divided into three groups: Group A injected with quantified ethanol at short intervals (QESI), group B with quantified ethanol at long intervals (QELI) and group C with a small quantity of ethanol at long intervals (SQLI). The tumor tissues were sent for patho-histology and electron microscopic examinations. The diameters of tumors were measured with high frequency ultrasound before and after therapies and tumor growth index (TGI) was calculated. (2) Clinical study: Tumors of 122 cases of pathologically proved HCC were injected with quantified ethanol guided by ultrasound every 3-5 d 4-10 times per period of treatment. The quantity of ethanol was calculated according to the regressive equations where Y = 2.885X when the mass was ≤ 5 cm in diameter and Y = 1.805X when the mass was > 5 cm in diameter (X is the maximal diameter of the mass with the unit cm, Y is the ethanol quantity with the unit mL). The survival rates of 1, 2, 3 and 4 years and recurrent rates in situ as well as dystopia in the liver were calculated.

RESULTS: (1) Experimental study: TGI of QESI group (0.072 ± 0.018) and QELI group (0.094 ± 0.028) was apparently lower than that of SQLI group (1.982 ± 0.482) (P < 0.01). TGI of QESI group seemed to be lower than that of QELI group, but it was not markedly different (P > 0.05) between two groups. Severe degeneration and necrosis could be seen in QESI group by patho-histology examination. Coagulative necrosis could be seen in most tumors of QESI group and there were no residual cancer cells under electronic microscope, while the residual cancer and inflammatory cells and fibre tissues could be seen around the tumors of QELI group. Infiltration of inflammatory cells could be seen and fibre tissues were formed. (2) Clinical study: B mode ultrasound showed that 62.5% of tumors shrank after PHQEI. The survival rates of 1, 2, 3 and 4 years of the group with tumors ≤ 3 cm in diameter were higher than those of the group with tumors > 3 cm in diameter. The recurrent rates of tumors in situ of the former group were apparently lower than those of the latter group. The recurrent rates of tumors in dystopia in the liver of the former group were markedly lower than those of the latter group. The 122 cases underwent a total of 1221 PEI. There were no complications such as hemorrhage and severe heart, liver and kidney functional injuries except for 1 case of melena and 4 cases of jaundice who recovered after 1-2 wk under common therapies.

CONCLUSION: The experimental study shows quantified ethanol at intervals of 3-5 d could improve the curative effect of hepatocarcinoma. The clinical study shows PHQEI is an effective therapeutic method for HCC with few side-effects, and a low-cost. The treatment efficacy is more remarkable for tumors ≤ 3 cm in diameter.

Longterm prognosis after hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a critical issue. In addition, the longterm prognosis and prognostic factors of small hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection are not well documented.

STUDY DESIGN

The surgical outcomes of 135 consecutive patients with one to three HCCs of diameter <or= 3 cm who underwent curative hepatic resection between 1987 and 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. Postresection prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 25%, and three patients had hospital deaths (2%), including one (0.7%) operative death. The mean and median overall survival times, including hospital death after surgery, were 53 months and 43 months, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-free survival percentages after hepatic resection were 49%, 30%, and 8%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival percentages after hepatic resection were 73%, 55%, and 18%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age more than 60 years was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor affecting disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.286, 95% confidence interval 1.107 to 1.863, p = 0.046), and the presence of liver cirrhosis was an independently significant factor of poor overall survival (hazard ratio 2.012, 95% confidence interval 1.049 to 3.861, p = 0.035). The cumulative incidence of postoperative recurrence was 82%. The 5-year overall survival in patients with tumor recurrence undergoing repeat hepatectomy (85%) was significantly greater than in patients without second resection (41%). Six patients (4%) survived longer than 10 years after hepatic resection (four with recurrence and two without recurrence). All four of these patients with postoperative recurrence underwent repeat hepatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The postresection survival of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma will differ depending on the presence of liver cirrhosis. Repeat hepatectomy may contribute to the prolongation of survival in such patients with postoperative recurrence.