Effect of intravenous calcium antagonists on left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension: assessed by pulsed-Doppler echocardiogram

Progression of preserved systolic function heart failure to systolic dysfunction — A natural history study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the natural history of left ventricular (LV) structure and function in sequential heart failure admissions with preserved systolic function.

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) with preserved LV systolic function accounts for between 20% and 30% of typical HF populations. Few data are available concerning the natural history of structural and functional changes in the LV in this patient population.

METHODS

We consented sequential admissions from the community with confirmed heart failure to participate in this study. Doppler-echocardiography was used to assess Ejection Fraction (EF), LV structure, regional wall motion and parameters of diastolic function including E:A ratio, E-wave deceleration time (DtE) and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT). Follow-up echocardiography was carried out at three months (mean 103+/-13 days) from discharge.

RESULTS

Of 210 sequential admissions with primary heart failure 56 had preserved systolic function (LVEF> or =45%). Follow-up data at three months were available in 38 patients (mean age 72 years) with preserved LV systolic function. Of the group, 9 had been admitted within three months of discharge, 5 for recurrent HF. Eight patients (21%) exhibited significant decline in LV systolic function at follow-up, all with LVEF<45%. Three exhibited regional wall-motion abnormalities with the remainder showing dilatation and global reduction in function. None of these eight had presented to hospital for any cause other than routine outpatient department (OPD) visits during the 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with preserved systolic function HF, a significant number may progress to systolic dysfunction with or without clinical events.

Intravenous Nicardipine

Nicardipine is a water soluble calcium channel antagonist, with predominantly vasodilatory actions. Intravenous (IV) nicardipine (Cardene IV), which demonstrates a relatively rapid onset/offset of action, is used in situations requiring the rapid control of blood pressure (BP). IV nicardipine was as effective as IV nitroprusside in the short-term reduction of BP in patients with severe or postoperative hypertension. A potential role for IV nicardipine in the intraoperative acute control of BP in patients undergoing various surgical procedures (including cardiovascular, neurovascular and abdominal surgery), and in the deliberate induction of reduced BP in surgical procedures in which haemostasis may be difficult (e.g. surgery involving the hip or spine) was demonstrated in preliminary studies. Preliminary studies also indicated the ability of a bolus dose of IV nicardipine to attenuate the hypertensive response, but not the increase in tachycardia, after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients. In large, well designed studies, IV nicardipine prevented cerebral vasospasm in patients with recent aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage; however, overall clinical outcomes at 3 months were similar to those in patients who received standard management. Small preliminary studies have investigated the use of IV nicardipine in a variety of other settings, including acute intracerebral haemorrhage, acute ischaemic stroke, pre-eclampsia, acute aortic dissection, premature labour and electroconvulsive therapy.In conclusion, the efficacy of IV nicardipine in the short-term treatment of hypertension in settings for which oral therapy is not feasible or not desirable is well established. The ability to titrate IV nicardipine to the tolerance levels of individual patients makes this agent an attractive option, especially in critically ill patients or those undergoing surgery. Potential exists for further investigation of the use of this agent in clinical settings where a vasodilatory agent with minimal inotropic effects is appropriate.

Comparison of the effects of omapatrilat and irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide on endothelial function and cardiac hypertrophy in the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat

OBJECTIVE

The novel antihypertensive agent, omapatrilat, is both an inhibitor of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme. This study investigated the effects of omapatrilat in comparison with an angiotensin I-receptor antagonist/diuretic combination on blood pressure, endothelial function and cardiac hypertrophy in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP).

METHODS

Male and female SHRSP were treated orally with omapatrilat or irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (I + H) or vehicle for 8 weeks. Systolic blood pressure was measured weekly by tail-cuff. Cardiac hypertrophy was monitored by echocardiography at 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age. Endothelial function [basal nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and stimulated NO release] was examined in carotid arteries using organ bath pharmacology and in mesenteric resistance arteries using wire myography.

RESULTS

Compared with untreated controls, omapatrilat and I + H significantly attenuated hypertension [male control, 198.3 +/- 6.9 mmHg versus omapatrilat, 149.6 +/- 3.8 mmHg (F = 8.63 P < 0.0001), versus I + H, 145.6 +/- 5.1 mmHg (F = 7.38 P < 0.0001); female control, 170.3 +/-8.3 mmHg versus omapatrilat, 120.0 +/- 4.6 mmHg (F = 8.36, P < 0.0001), versus I + H, 112.2 +/- 2.9 mmHg (F = 9.08, P < 0.0001)] and left ventricular hypertrophy [male + female controls, 3.02 +/- 0.38 mg/g versus omapatrilat, 2.47 +/- 0.26 mg/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.27, 0.83), versus I + H, 2.49 +/- 0.21 mg/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.25, 0.83)]. Both treatments also significantly increased male carotid artery basal NO bioavailability relative to control [control, 0.62 +/- 0.17 g/g versus omapatrilat, 1.95 +/- 0.17 g/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, -1.83, -0.36), versus I + H, 1.57 +/- 0.21 g/g (P < 0.026; 95% confidence interval, -1.31, -0.12)]. However, stimulated NO (EC50) was only improved in omapatrilat-treated males [controls, 0.19 +/- 0.06 micromol/l versus omapatrilat, 0.05 +/- 0.01 micromol/l (P = 0.05; 95% confidence interval, -1.16, -0.03)].

CONCLUSIONS

Omapatrilat treatment significantly reduced left ventricular hypertrophy and improved endothelial function in carotid arteries from male SHRSP by NO-dependent mechanisms. Despite equivalent antihypertensive and antihypertrophic actions, a similar improvement in endothelial function, specifically stimulated NO release, was not observed after treatment with I + H.