Combined effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on renal injury

Evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for development of fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity has been described in two randomized controlled trials and several observational studies. However, little is known regarding its incidence and the population(s) at risk.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to quantify the incidence and identify potential risk factors for development of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving fenofibrate.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted in the South Texas Veterans Health Care System. Data were collected regarding baseline demographics, concurrent medical conditions, medications, laboratory results, and fenofibrate use.

RESULTS

Within 6 months after initiation of fenofibrate in 428 patients, 115 (27%) experienced an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL. Any renal disease (P = .001), chronic kidney disease (P = .01), and diabetes (P = .02) were significantly more prevalent in patients with fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity. Patients with nephrotoxicity had significantly greater serum creatinine (1.2 [SD 0.3] vs. 1.1 mg/dL [SD 0.3], P = .0002) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (72 [SD 20] vs 81 mL/min/1.73 m² [SD 20], P < .0001) at baseline. These patients also had greater use of calcium channel blockers (P = .0003), furosemide (P = .02), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P = .02). The incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly greater in patients initiated on high-dose versus those on low-dose fenofibrate (P = .002). In a multivariable regression model, renal disease (P = .02), high-dose fenofibrate (P = .001), and dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker use (P = .02) were determined to be independent predictors of development of increased serum creatinine on fenofibrate.

CONCLUSION

This observational study suggests fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity occurs more frequently than previously reported, particularly in patients with renal disease and in those receiving high-dose fenofibrate or concomitant calcium channel blockers.

Trandolapril, but not verapamil nor their association, restores the physiological renal hemodynamic response to adrenergic activation in essential hypertension

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of antihypertensive drugs on renal hemodynamics in hypertensive patients during an adrenergic activation by mental stress (MS), which induces renal vasoconstriction in healthy subjects. Renal hemodynamics was assessed twice in 30 middle-aged essential hypertensive patients (57±6 years)-after 15 days of pharmacological wash-out and after 15 days of treatment with Trandolapril (T, 4 mg, n=10), Verapamil (V, 240 mg, n=10), or both (T 2 mg+V 180 mg, n=10). Each experiment consisted of 4 30-min periods (baseline, MS, recovery I and II). Renal hemodynamics was evaluated with effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from plasminogen activator inhibitor and inulin clearance, respectively. MS increased blood pressure (BP) to a similar extent before and after each treatment. Before treatment, the increasing BP was not associated with any modification of ERPF in the 3 groups. Renal vascular resistances (RVR) markedly increased during MS (+23% in the T group, +21.6% in the V group, and +32.9% in the T+V group); GFR remained constant during the whole experiment. After treatment, ERPF decreased significantly during MS in the T group (-15%, P<0.05) and in the V group (-11.7%, p<0.01); in the T+V group, ERPF modifications were not statistically significant (P=0.07). In the T group, ERPF reverted to baseline values at the end of the stimulus, whereas in the V group, renal vasoconstriction was more prolonged. Only in hypertensive patients treated with 4 mg of T, RVR reverted to baseline during the recovery I, whereas in the V group, RVR remained elevated for the whole experiment. No modifications of GFR were observed in all groups. The kidney of hypertensive patients cannot react to a sympathetic stimulus with the physiological vasoconstriction. A short-term antihypertensive treatment with 4 mg of T restores the physiological renal response to adrenergic activation.

Prevalence and risk factors of microalbuminuria in Thai nondiabetic hypertensive patients

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence and risk factors of microalbuminuria in nondiabetic hypertensive patients in Thailand.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed during January to December 2007 at outpatients departments of Bhumibol Adulyadej hospital. Nondiabetic hypertensive patients without a history of pre-existing kidney diseases participated in this study. A questionnaire was used for collecting information on demographics, lifestyle, and family history of cardiovascular and kidney disease. Spot morning urine samples were collected for albuminuria estimation. Albuminuria thresholds were evaluated and defined using albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR).

RESULTS

A total of 559 hypertensive patients (283 males, 276 females), aged 58.0 +/- 11.6 years were enrolled in this study. Microalbuminuria (ACR 17 to 299 mg/g in males and 25 to 299 mg/g in females) was found in 93 cases (16.6%) [15.0%-18.2%]. The independent determinants of elevated urinary albumin excretion in a multiple logistic regression model were; body mass index > or =30 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.24, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.33-3.76) and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DCCB) use (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.22-3.02).

CONCLUSION

In Thai nondiabetic hypertensive patients, microalbuminuria was not uncommon. Obesity and use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker were found to be the important predictors. Prognostic value of the occurrence of microalbuminuria in this population remains to be determined in prospective cohort studies.

Is renoprotection by angiotensin receptor blocker dependent on blood pressure?: the Saitama Medical School, Albuminuria Reduction in Diabetics with Valsartan (STAR) study

To explore the effects of various antihypertensive regimes on microalbuminuria, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), valsartan, was substituted for or added to treatment with a calcium channel blocker (CCB). After a 6-month CCB baseline period, 28 Japanese hypertensive patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy (defined as a urinary albumin excretion [UAE] of 30-300 mg/g creatinine), were assigned to two groups according to their blood pressure (BP) levels: in patients with a BP of more than 130/85 mmHg (n=17), valsartan was added to the CCB (Group A), while in patients with a BP <130/85 mmHg, valsartan alone was given (Group B: n=11) for 12 months. UAE was determined before and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of ARB. Although the initial BP was significantly higher in Group A (150/83 mmHg) than Group B (127/77 mmHg), BP was decreased to 141/78 mmHg in Group A and slightly, but not significantly, increased to 130/82 mmHg in Group B. In both groups, UAE was significantly decreased after ARB treatment (to 89% of the basal value in Group A and to 40.5% of the basal value in Group B) and did not differ each other and the amount of decrease did not differ significantly between the two groups. These results suggest that combination therapy with an ARB and CCB is very effective in lowering BP and UAE in cases in which BP is not well controlled, while, even in patients with a sufficient BP control of <130/85 mmHg, the use of ARB singly resulted in a significant decrease in UAE without a further decrease in BP, implying that the ARB had a renoprotective action independent of changes in BP.

Is proteinuria a plausible target of therapy?

Microalbuminuria is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk, irrespective of kidney disease. Recent pharmacologic interventions have resulted in a significant delay and even an arrest in the progression of microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria or to chronic kidney disease. Focus should be placed on agents that not only lower blood pressure but also improve albuminuria levels. Current guidelines recommend that hypertensive patients with renal disease should be started on agents that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The use of three to four different agents is frequently necessary to reach the guideline goal blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg.

Blood pressure control and nephroprotection in diabetes

Achievement of recommended levels of blood pressure as prescribed by guidelines (i.e., systolic blood pressure of < 130 mmHg in people with nephropathy secondary to type 2 diabetes) generally requires three or more different antihypertensive agents that have complementary modes of action. This systolic goal blood pressure, recommended by generally all international guideline committees, was derived from largely observational studies demonstrating a greater reduction of cardiovascular risk and preservation of kidney function at these levels. Commonly used antihypertensive combinations include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, which have compelling indications for use in people with kidney disease and/or diabetes, combined with a diuretic, generally a thiazide-type agent. If additional therapy is required, either a beta-blocker or a calcium antagonist may be added to this antihypertensive "cocktail." Beta-blockers are particularly effective in people with a high sympathetic drive (i.e., high pulse rates) to lower blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk. Moreover, in recent studies, their benefits on kidney function, both by reducing macroalbuminuria and slowing the decline of kidney function, make them good agents to add in the appropriate clinical setting. With all these potential benefits of achieving blood pressure goals, it is unfortunate that only 11% of people being treated for hypertension with diabetic kidney disease achieve the blood pressure goal of < 130 mmHg, likely contributing to the climbing incidence of people starting dialysis. Physicians need to work harder and educate patients on the importance of achieving these lower blood pressure guidelines.

Differential effects of calcium antagonist subclasses on markers of nephropathy progression

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies suggest that the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (DCAs) and nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists (NDCAs) have differential antiproteinuric effects. Proteinuria reduction is a correlate of the progression of renal disease. In an earlier systematic review, calcium antagonists were shown as effective antihypertensive drugs, but there was uncertainty about their renal benefits in patients with proteinuria and renal insufficiency.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to assess the differential effects of DCAs and NDCAs on proteinuria in hypertensive adults with proteinuria, with or without diabetes, and to determine whether these differential effects translate into altered progression of nephropathy. Studies included in the review had to be randomized clinical trials with at least 6 months of treatment, include a DCA or NDCA treatment arm, have one or more renal end points, and have been initiated after 1986. Summary data were extracted from 28 studies entered into two identical but separate databases, which were compared and evaluated by independent reviewers. The effects of each drug class on blood pressure (N= 1338) and proteinuria (N= 510) were assessed.

RESULTS

After adjusting for sample size, study length, and baseline value, there were no statistically significant differences in the ability of either class of calcium antagonist to decrease blood pressure. The mean change in proteinuria was +2% for DCAs and -30% for NDCAs (95% CI, 10% to 54%, P= 0.01). Consistently greater reductions in proteinuria were associated with the use of NDCAs compared with DCAs, despite no significant differences in blood pressure reduction or presence of diabetes.

CONCLUSION

This analysis supports (1) similar efficacy between subclasses of calcium antagonists to lower blood pressure, and (2) greater reductions in proteinuria by NDCAs compared to DCAs in the presence or absence of diabetes. Based on these findings, NDCAs, alone or in combination with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), are suggested as preferred agents to lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients with nephropathy associated with proteinuria.

The role of calcium antagonists in chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review goals of antihypertensive treatment in chronic kidney disease in the context of what role calcium antagonists play toward reducing progression of kidney disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

All recently published guidelines recommend a blood pressure goal of less than 130/80 mmHg in patients with chronic kidney disease. Use of calcium antagonists is not recommended as part of the initial armamentarium. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, when used in concert with diuretics reduce blood pressure as well as both proteinuria and the rate of decline in the glomerular filtration rate. The evidence for calcium antagonists in this regard is more divergent. Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, e.g. amlodipine, felodipine, help achieve blood pressure goals and reduce stroke risk. When used with a renin-angiotensin system blocker they do not detract from the benefits of this blockade on slowing progression of kidney disease. Non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, e.g. verpamil or diltiazem, decrease proteinuria and in studies with 5 to 6 years follow-up preserve kidney function similarly to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The reason for this outcome difference between calcium antagonists is partial preservation of renal autoregulation compared to its obliteration by the dihydropyridine subclass.

SUMMARY

Use of calcium antagonists is safe and necessary to achieve blood pressure goals in people with chronic kidney disease. While both subclasses are safe and necessary to achieve blood pressure goals, dihydropyridine calcium antagonists fail to significantly slow the progression of kidney disease among patients with established nephropathy and macroalbuminuria when compared to agents that block the renin-angiotensin system.

Renoprotective Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Combined with α1-Adrenergic Antagonist in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats with Renal Ablation

To assess the renal benefits of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonism, we studied the antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of temocapril (TMP) alone and in combination with doxazosin (DOX) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR)/Izumo rats with renal ablation. Five-Sixths-nephrectomized rats were assigned to receive TMP (10 mg/kg/day) (TMP group), TMP plus DOX (2 mg/kg/day) (TMP+DOX group), or vehicle (control group) orally for 12 weeks. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urinary excretion of albumin (UalbV) in the control group progressively increased during the experimental period and were significantly higher than in sham-operated rats. Treatment with either TMP or TMP plus DOX had similar antihypertensive effects in this rat model. Twelve weeks after initiation of treatment, the SBP values in the control, TMP, and TMP+DOX groups were 265+/-8, 157+/-4, and 163+/-3 mmHg, respectively, in comparison with 233+/-4 mmHg in sham-operated rats (p<0.0001 control vs. sham, p<0.001 TMP vs. control, p<0.001 TMP+DOX vs. control). UalbV, serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and heart weight/body weight (HW/BW) ratio were significantly lower in the TMP and TMP+DOX groups than in the control group (UalbV: p<0.05; Scr: p<0.01; [BUN, HW/BW ratio]: p<0.0001; and [UalbV, Scr, BUN, HW/BW ratio]: p<0.0001 vs. control, respectively). The index of glomerular sclerosis (IGS) and relative interstitial volume (RIV) were significantly lower in the TMP+DOX group than in the control group (IGS: p<0.05; RIV: p<0.01). Especially, UalbV, IGS, and RIV were significantly better in the TMP+DOX group than in the TMP group ([IGS, RIV]: p<0.05; UalbV: p<0.01). These results suggest that simultaneous administration of TMP and DOX provides greater renoprotective effects than administration of TMP alone.

Calcium channel blockers in the prevention of end stage renal disease: a review

Hypertension and high levels of proteinuria are independent risk factors for accelerated progression of renal failure. There is increasing evidence that strict control of both blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria are beneficial in slowing the rate of progression of chronic renal disease in diabetic as well as non-diabetic nephropathy. The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin 2 receptor blockers (ARB) have clearly demonstrated their beneficial effect on both reduction of BP and proteinuria. The calcium channel blockers (CCB) have individual pharmacological and therapeutic properties that may vary, but as a group they are effective antihypertensive agents in patients with renal disease. Their effects on the kidney may extend beyond BP reduction alone. Current studies suggest that CCB do not worsen the progression of renal disease but may rather provide benefit when systemic BP has been tightly normalised. The non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NDHP), diltiazem and verapamil, slow the progression of type 2 diabetic nephropathy with overt proteinuria almost to a similar extent as observed with ACE-I. The dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP) have a variable effect on proteinuria. Pharmaceutical compounds, which inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAAS), remain the drugs of first choice in the treatment of hypertension and/or proteinuria in chronic nephropathy. However, a combination of two or more drugs is almost always required to attain sufficient BP reduction. CCB may have an advantage in combination with ACE-I and/or ARB.

Progression of chronic renal failure in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: consequence of podocyte damage or of tubulointerstitial fibrosis?

The decline in renal function in chronic renal failure is based on the progressive loss of viable nephrons. The pathways to nephron loss in conjunction with chronic renal disease generally start in the glomerulus, extending onto the tubulointerstitium via the urinary pole. Pathways to nephron degeneration starting focally in the tubulointerstitium have yet to be described. The deleterious effects of protein leakage on progression appear to be a result of podocyte damage, the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors a result of podocyte protection.

Use of calcium antagonists and worsening renal function in patients receiving angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess whether calcium antagonists, which have been proven to dilate the afferent glomerular arteriole, might prevent increases in serum creatinine levels among older subjects who started treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.

METHODS

We explored the association between use of calcium antagonists and incident increases in serum creatinine in 780 elderly patients with baseline creatinine levels <1.2 mg/dL (106.19 micromol/L), who were enrolled in a multicenter pharmacoepidemiology study, and who started using ACE inhibitors during their hospital stay. Among these participants, 279 also started using calcium antagonists. Demographic variables, comorbid conditions, medications, and objective tests, which were associated with increasing serum creatinine levels in separate regression models, were examined as potential confounders in a summary model.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving ACE inhibitors, serum creatinine levels increased in 22% of participants who were dispensed calcium antagonists, and in 31% of other patients (P=0.005). In the summary regression model, use of calcium antagonists was associated with a decreased risk of worsening renal function (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.84). The adjusted risk of increasing serum creatinine was lower (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.05-0.95) in participants receiving higher calcium antagonists dosages than in those taking lower dosages. This protective effect of calcium antagonists was not detected in patients not dispensed ACE inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

ACE inhibitors are underused in older subjects, mainly because of the higher incidence of renal damage among geriatric populations. Our results indicate that among elderly patients receiving ACE inhibitors, the use of calcium antagonists is associated with a reduced risk of worsening renal function. Thus, these results warrant trials aiming at establishing whether combined treatment with calcium antagonists might allow the use of ACE inhibitors in clinical practice to be expanded to the elderly population.

Effects of antihypertensive drugs in experimental type 2 diabetes-related nephropathy

BACKGROUND

It has been extensively reported that antihypertensive drugs reduce proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis (GS) in many experimental nephropathies and in humans. However, the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the prevention of proteinuria and GS remains controversial and in most cases only dihidropyridine-CCBs are studied. Few studies have reported whether the time at which drug administration is initiated plays a role in the reduction of proteinuria and GS.

METHODS

Fifty-six male Obese Zucker rats (OZR) were used as a model of spontaneous type 2 diabetes-related nephropathy. Biochemical and histological analysis were performed to compare the efficacy of a non-dihydropyridine-CCB diltiazem [DZM; 100 mg/kg body weight (BW)/day], an ACEI quinapril (10 mg/kg BW/day), or both in diminishing proteinuria and GS, and to determine their role in effective prevention and treatment.

RESULTS

Only quinapril was able to diminish proteinuria. As far as histological lesions, both treatments were effective, although only quinapril prevented GS. The combination of quinapril plus DZM did not demonstrate any beneficial effects. Surprisingly, quinapril ameliorated the damage of podocytes whereas DZM did not, thus leading to doubt concerning the efficiency of DZM in long-term studies. Nonetheless, the combination of quinapril plus DZM demonstrated a greater reduction in podocyte damage than treatment with DZM alone, which shows an interesting association in the prevention of longer-term glomerular damage. Few differences were found between prevention and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinapril, but not DZM, was able to diminish proteinuria in OZR. Both treatments were effective in diminishing GS, although only quinapril totally prevented it. The combination of both drugs prevented long-term glomerular damage, which is intriguing.

Podocyte is the major culprit accounting for the progression of chronic renal disease

The concept that the podocyte is the major culprit underlying development and progression of glomerular diseases leading to chronic renal failure is well established. The essential steps in this process are (1) the establishment of tuft adhesions to Bowman's capsule; (2) the formation by capillaries contained in a tuft adhesion of a filtrate that is delivered, instead into Bowman's space, towards the interstitium; and (3) the spreading of this filtrate on the outer aspect of the affected nephron leading to the degeneration of this nephron. The present review summarizes the pros and cons concerning the relevance of misdirected filtration for a nephron-to-nephron transfer of the disease at the level of the tubular interstitium. Surprisingly, the histopathology clearly shows that interstitial proliferation surrounding degenerating nephrons tends to encapsulate the degenerative process, confining it to the already affected nephron. No evidence is available that the disease, mediated by interstitial proliferation and matrix deposition, may jump to a neighboring, so far unaffected, nephron. It appears that the process that leads to the degeneration of a nephron in the context of "classic" FSGS always starts separately in the respective glomerulus by severe podocyte injury.

Diabetic renal disease in African Americans

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the No. 1 cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States and is highly prevalent in African Americans. Almost all DN in African Americans is caused by type 2 diabetes. Glycemic control and control of blood pressure are essential to prolong renal survival and to protect against cardiovascular events. Among African Americans, diabetic nephropathy seems to affect women more than men, which may be related to increased rates of obesity and diabetes in African American women. In addition to gender, the development of albuminuria, family history, and possibly birth weight are factors that predict progression of renal disease in African Americans with DN. The impact of glycemic control, appropriate antihypertensives, and the optimal level of blood pressure control in African Americans with advanced DN require further study. This article will review the clinical characteristics, risk factors, predictors of disease progression, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy in African Americans.

Comparative effects of selective T- and L-type calcium channel blockers in the remnant kidney model

We have previously reported that the dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have an adverse impact on glomerulosclerosis (GS) in the remnant kidney model despite significant blood pressure (BP) reduction, because of the concurrent deleterious effects on renal autoregulation. The effects of the CCB mibefradil, which is approximately 10-fold more selective for T- than L-type channels, were compared with the L-type selective amlodipine. One week after 5/6 ablation, rats were left untreated or received mibefradil or amlodipine. Systolic BP was monitored by continuous radiotelemetry. At 7 weeks, proteinuria and percent GS were quantitated. Average BP was significantly and comparably reduced after mibefradil (141+/-3 mm Hg) and amlodipine (143+/-5 mm Hg) compared with untreated rats (188+/-5 mm Hg). Despite the reduction in BP, proteinuria and percent GS in the mibefradil- or amlodipine-treated groups were not significantly different from those in the untreated rats. Excellent correlations were observed between BP and GS in each group (r=0.74 to 0.85, P<0.02). However, the slope of the relationship between GS and BP (increase in percent GS/mm Hg increase in average BP) was made significantly steeper by both mibefradil (2.7+0.6) and amlodipine (1.9+0.6) as compared with untreated rats (0.7+/-0.2; P<0.01). Thus, at any given BP elevation, greater GS was seen in mibefradil- and amlodipine-treated rats as compared with untreated rats. Additional studies performed at 3 weeks after renal ablation showed that the ability to autoregulate renal blood flow, already impaired in untreated rats, was essentially abolished by both mibefradil and amlodipine, thus providing an explanation for the shift in the slope of the relationship between BP and GS. These data indicate that CCBs with selectivity for either the T- or L-type calcium channel fail to protect against GS despite significant BP reductions because of the similar adverse effects on renal autoregulation and BP transmission.

Blood pressure in diabetic nephropathy--current controversies

Hypertension has been recognized as an early and constant feature of diabetic nephropathy, but recent studies also suggest that a genetic predisposition to hypertension is an important risk factor for diabetic nephropathy. Antihypertensive treatment attenuates progression in diabetic nephropathy, but there is increasing evidence that very early treatment and very low target blood pressures should be implemented. There is also evidence for local activation of the renin system in the kidney as a result of hyperglycaemia. Apart from blood pressure, proteinuria should be monitored and dosing of ACE inhibitors should be guided, also by reduction of protein excretion.

Amlodipine/benazepril: fixed dose combination therapy for hypertension

Myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure and end-stage renal disease have all been linked to inadequate control of blood pressure. Despite overwhelming evidence that uncontrolled hypertension is responsible for a sizeable number of adverse health-related outcomes, control of the disease remains considerably suboptimal. Available data demonstrate that in order to achieve adequate blood pressure control, a large number of patients require therapy with more than one medication. Fixed dose combination antihypertensive therapy has many advantages over other treatment options. Positive effects on blood pressure control, rates of adherence, adverse effects and cost have been identified. Amlodipine/benazepril (Lotrel), Novartis) is a fixed dose combination product indicated for the treatment of hypertension. Although not currently recommended as first-line therapy, studies confirm that this combination of a long-acting calcium antagonist and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor possesses substantial blood pressure lowering capabilities. Whereas adverse events tend to become more frequent with increasing doses of antihypertensive monotherapy, the rate of adverse events attributed to amlodipine/benazepril in clinical trials often correlates with rates ascribed to placebo. Amlodipine/benazepril is capable of sustaining blood pressure control over a 24 h period and appears to be minimally affected by an occasional dose omission. Unlike the older calcium antagonists, amlodipine is unlikely to cause alterations in myocardial contractility. Additionally, the amlodipine/benazepril combination product costs less than the same therapy administered as the individual components. It is, therefore, reasonable to consider therapy with amlodipine/benazepril in appropriate patients after an adequate trial of antihypertensive monotherapy.

Effect of antihypertensive therapy on renal injury in type 2 diabetic rats with hypertension

In a previous study, we demonstrated that doxazosin (DZN), an alpha(1)-adrenergic blocker, prevented proteinuria in streptozotocin diabetic rats. In this study, we investigated whether DZN would lower established proteinuria by improving glomerular sclerosis in spontaneously hypertensive corpulent rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DZN treatment was compared with treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril (LIS) alone, and DZN in combination with LIS. Combination therapy was used to examine any additive effect of either drug alone in the reduction of proteinuria and glomerular sclerosis. Both male and female rats age 6 months with established proteinuria were used. The rats were allocated randomly to 1 of 4 groups: untreated, DZN treated, LIS treated, or a combination of DZN and LIS treatment. Drug treatment was continued for 16 weeks. The results show that (1) either drug alone or in combination significantly lowered systolic blood pressure; (2) DZN, LIS, or combination therapy reduced albuminuria at 16 weeks of treatment from baseline by 38.61+/-5.77%, 30.70+/-4. 21%, and 42.17+/-4.77% (mean+/-SE), respectively. No difference in albuminuria was observed among the 3 groups of rats; (3) the fractional mesangial area, which was 20.55+/-3.77% in untreated rats, was significantly reduced to 11.18+/-1.32% in DZN-treated rats, with a further reduction to 8.72+/-0.64% in LIS-treated rats and to 3.48+/-0.35% in rats treated with DZN+LIS; and (4) DZN but not LIS significantly improved plasma glucose levels in spontaneously hypertensive corpulent rats (untreated 21.06+/-0.97 mmol/L versus DZN treated 15.81+/-0.93 mmol/L or DZN+LIS treated 17.38+/-1.10 mmol/L; P<0.025 to 0.005). Thus, the data suggest that 16-week treatment with either DZN or LIS improves established proteinuria and glomerular sclerosis, but combination therapy is superior to either DZN or LIS alone in preventing glomerular sclerosis in type 2 diabetic rats with hypertension.

Calcium-channel blockers and the progression of renal disease

Effective blood pressure (BP) reduction is now generally recognized as a clinically proven strategy to retard the seemingly inexorable downhill progression of patients with diabetic and nondiabetic chronic renal disease. Although calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) are effective antihypertensive agents, the available experimental and clinical data are quite contradictory as to whether BP reduction achieved with CCBs provides the expected renoprotection. Blockade of the "L" type, voltage-gated Ca channels that mediate the BP reduction also concurrently impairs renal autoregulatory responses of the preglomerular vasculature. Because these renal autoregulatory resistance changes provide the primary protection against the transmission of systemic hypertension to the renal microvasculature, the adverse effects of CCBs on renal autoregulation counteract the beneficial effects on BP reduction. The degree of renoprotection achieved, therefore, depends on the balance between these two opposing effects. The data also indicate that there are probably important and clinically relevant differences between the classes of CCBs, with the dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs most likely to have consistent deleterious effects on renal autoregulation. However, the available data also indicate that the adverse effects of DHP CCBs are not likely to be observed if BP is lowered well into the normotensive range, possibly through the use of combination therapies. Even when used as adjunctive therapy, close monitoring may be advisable to ensure BP normalization and the absence of any untoward effects on proteinuria and renal function.

The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers

Tight blood pressure control among diabetic and nondiabetic patients with hypertension is perhaps the single most effective intervention used to delay progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The renoprotective actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy is well established. Drugs of this class fairly uniformly reduce glomerulosclerosis, delay the deterioration in renal function, and improve proteinuria, a predictive surrogate marker for renal injury. Calcium- channel blockers (CCBs) in the phenylalkylamine (verapamil) and benzothiazepine (diltiazem) classes also improve proteinuria and delay the progression of renal disease in diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive nephropathy beyond that attributable to blood pressure control. The short-acting dihydropyridine CCBs worsen proteinuria and accelerate renal injury in both animal models and humans with hypertension or diabetes. A very limited number of studies in animals or humans with hypertension or diabetes have demonstrated at least an additive renoprotective effect when the combination of ACE inhibitors and nondihydropyridine CCBs has been compared with each agent administered as monotherapy. Because patients with impaired renal function and either hypertension or diabetes appear to benefit from aggressive blood pressure reduction, many of these patients will require two or more drugs to achieve the currently recommended blood pressure goals. Combinations of ACE inhibitor and CCB are attractive because they may provide better blood pressure control, appear to be better tolerated with fewer side effects than either drug alone, and may exert a greater renoprotective effect in patients at risk for renal failure than either an ACE inhibitor or a CCB.

Differential effects of T- and L-type calcium antagonists on glomerular dynamics in spontaneously hypertensive rats

To determine whether there is a difference in the effects of T- and L-type calcium antagonists on systemic, renal, and glomerular hemodynamics, the pathological changes of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-exacerbated nephrosclerosis and clinical alterations were investigated in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Seven groups of 17-week-old male SHRs were studied: Group 1, control; Group 2, mibefradil, 50 mg. kg(-1). d(-1); Group 3, L-NAME in drinking water, 50 mg/L; Group 4, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus mibefradil (50 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)); Group 5, L-NAME (50 mg/L) plus amlodipine (10 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)); Group 6 and 7, L-NAME (50 mg/L) for 3 weeks followed by mibefradil (50 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)) or amlodipine (10 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)), respectively, for the subsequent 3 weeks. Both the T- and L-channel calcium antagonists similarly reduced mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance index. These changes were associated with significant decreases in afferent and efferent glomerular arteriolar resistances and the ultrafiltration coefficient (P<0.01). Furthermore, the histopathological glomerular and arterial injury scores and urinary protein excretion were also significantly improved (P<0.01), and left ventricular and aortic masses were significantly diminished in all treated groups. Both drugs, mibefradil and amlodipine, had effects of increasing the single-nephron glomerular filtration ratio (SNGFR), and single-nephron plasma flow (SNPF), and of reducing glomerular afferent arteriolar resistance and urinary protein excretion. Thus, the T-type (mibefradil) and L-type (amlodipine) calcium antagonists each prevented and reversed the pathophysiological alterations of L-NAME-exacerbated hypertensive nephrosclerosis in SHR. The T-type calcium antagonist (mibefradil) seemed to have been more effective than the L-type amlodipine antagonist and it produced a greater reduction in afferent arteriolar resistance while preserving SNGFR.

The role of the podocyte in glomerulosclerosis

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is a pathological hallmark of many forms of progressive renal disease. The 'classic' lesion, based on the adhesion of the capillary tuft to Bowman's capsule, results from the loss of podocytes from the capillary basement membrane. The recently described 'collapsing' variant, in contrast, has an apparent excess of extracapillary cells, which may represent dedifferentiated, 'dysregulated' podocytes.

Effects of an ACE inhibitor/calcium antagonist combination on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The degree of proteinuria in patients with diabetes correlates strongly with both an increase in progression of nephropathy as well as cardiovascular events. Moreover, post hoc analyses of recent clinical trials support the concept that reductions of blood pressure and proteinuria correlate with a slowed progression of nephropathy. Both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists, (non-DHPCAs) reduce both arterial pressure and proteinuria in those with diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

The present randomized, open label, parallel group designed study tests the hypothesis that, at similar levels of blood pressure, the combination of an ACE inhibitor, trandolapril (T) with the non-DHPCA, verapamil (V) produces a greater reduction in proteinuria over either agent alone at one year. Thirty-seven participants, mean age 59.6 +/- 5.8 years, with nephropathy (baseline creatinine 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dl and proteinuria of 1342 +/- 284 mg/dl) secondary to type 2 diabetes completed the study. Doses of drug were titrated in each group over eight weeks to achieve a goal blood pressure of < 140/90 mm Hg. All participants were counseled to ingest a sodium diet of < 120 mEq/day.

RESULTS

Proteinuria reduction from baseline was significantly greater in the T+V group compared to either T alone (-33 +/- 8%, T vs. -62 +/- 10%, T+V; P < 0.001) or V alone (-27 +/- 8%, V vs. -62 +/- 10%, T+V; P < 0.001). No significant differences in either glomerular filtration rate, arterial pressure, fasting blood glucose or urinary sodium excretion were noted at one year. The mean daily dose of the individual components of T+V (2.9 +/- 0.8 mg, T/219 +/- 21.1 mg V) was significantly lower than the dose of either T alone 5.5 +/- 1.1 mg/day (P < 0.01) or V alone 314.8 +/- 46.3 mg, given in two divided doses (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These data support the concept that the combination of an ACE inhibitor with a non-DHPCA reduce proteinuria to a greater extent than either agent alone. This added antiproteinuric effect occurs at lower doses of each drug and is independent of further reductions in arterial pressure. These findings could have ramifications for slowing renal disease progression in patients with nephropathy from type 2 diabetes.

Diabetic hypertensive patients: improving their prognosis

Diabetes is a devastating disease with multiple adverse effects on the vasculature. Moreover, hypertension is a prerequisite for patients with diabetes to progress to end-stage renal disease and to develop cardiovascular complications. Adequate control of blood glucose and blood pressure are the two most important factors that predict a favorable renal outcome. Recent studies have also shown that some classes of antihypertensive medications, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, may be ideal initial agents to control blood pressure in the hypertensive diabetic patient and thus to preserve renal function. In addition, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers have been shown to retard the decline in renal function in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) nephropathy who have lost at least 50% of their renal function. Retrospective analyses demonstrate that a reduction in blood pressure, especially to levels of <130/85 mg Hg in diabetic patients, retards the progression of renal disease. Reduction in arterial pressure to these low levels is probably more important than the agents used to achieve this goal. Because many of these patients require more than one medication to achieve these lower levels of arterial pressure, it is clear that fixed-dose combinations of such agents will both improve the likelihood of achieving a given blood pressure goal as well as medication compliance.

Nephroprotective effect of antihypertensive drugs in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Effective antihypertensive treatment has prevented target-organ involvement in hypertension, markedly reducing morbidity and mortality from strokes, coronary heart disease, cardiac failure, and hypertensive emergencies. However, the incidence of hypertension-related end-stage renal disease continues to increase, suggesting that therapeutic reduction in arterial pressure by itself is not sufficient to prevent the development of hypertensive renal failure.

OBJECTIVE

To examine experimental and clinical data concerning the protective effect of reduction of arterial pressure on the progression of hypertension-related renal disease, and the evidence indicating that some antihypertensive agents may afford more nephroprotection, over and above that attributable to reduction of arterial pressure.

RESULTS

Results of numerous studies clearly indicate that adequate control of arterial pressure, irrespective of the antihypertensive agent used, slowed the progression of renal disease. Results of some studies suggest that lowering arterial pressure below the level that is usually considered adequate has an additional beneficial effect by slowing the progression of renal injury.

CONCLUSION

Results of a number of studies evaluating nephroprotective effects of various drugs and regimens have indicated that certain agents, most notably angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and their combination with calcium antagonists, afford more protection than do others at similar levels of reduction of arterial pressure. Results of still other studies suggest that certain agents that exert greater nephroprotection are more efficient at controlling arterial pressure. Therefore, further data are needed before any final conclusion can be drawn. However, it is clear that, in order to establish nephroprotection in patients with essential hypertension, the problem should not be further complicated by additional comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus.