Interpretation of renal angiography by radiologists

Interventions for renal artery stenosis: Appraisal of novel physiological insights and procedural techniques to improve clinical outcome

Randomized clinical trials failed to show additional benefit of renal artery stenting on top of medical therapy. Instead of writing an obituary on renal artery stenting, we try to explain these disappointing results. A transstenotic pressure gradient is needed to reduce renal perfusion and to activate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In only a minority of patients included in trials, a transstenotic pressure gradient is measured and reported. Like the coronary circulation, integration of physiological lesion assessment will allow to avoid stenting of non-significant lesions and select those patients that are most likely to benefit from renal artery stenting. Renal artery interventions are associated with peri-procedural complications. Contemporary techniques, including radial artery access, no-touch technique to engage the renal ostium and the use of embolic protection devices, will minimize procedural risk. Combining optimal patient selection and meticulous technique might lead to a netto clinical benefit when renal artery stenting is added to optimal medical therapy.

Defining Hemodynamic Significance of Renal Artery Stenosis: Insights From a Porcine Model of Graded Renal Artery Stenosis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the renal pressure-flow relationship and its relation to renin release, because the renal perfusion pressure below which renal flow starts to decline and renin secretion is upregulated is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A porcine model of graded unilateral renal artery stenosis was created. The severity of the stenosis was expressed as the ratio between distal renal pressure (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa). Pd and renal flow velocity were continuously measured using a combined pressure-flow wire (Combowire®). Hemodynamic measurements and blood sampling for renin, angiotensin and aldosterone were performed in baseline conditions and during progressive balloon inflation in the renal artery leading to Pd decrease per 5% increment. Resistive index (RI) was computed as (1 - (End Diastolic V/Peak Systolic V))*100.

RESULTS

For a 5% decrease in renal perfusion pressure (95% of aortic pressure or 5% decrease compared to Pa), peak systolic velocity started to decrease. A significant decrease in average peak flow velocity was observed when distal renal perfusion pressure decreased by 25% and was associated with activation of ipsilateral renin secretion. The RI decreased already for minimal changes in Pd/Pa ratio.

CONCLUSION

In an animal model of unilateral graded renal artery stenosis, a 25% decrease in perfusion pressure results in a significant decrease in distal renal flow, causing upregulation of renin secretion.

European consensus on the diagnosis and management of fibromuscular dysplasia

The main objectives of this expert consensus are to raise awareness about fibromuscular dysplasia, which is more frequent and more often systemic than previously thought and can sometimes have devastating consequences; to provide up-to-date recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the disease; and to identify research priorities. The emphasis has been put on recommendations for daily practice. The main topics covered include definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of fibromuscular dysplasia in adult patients with symptomatic involvement of the renal arteries, supra-aortic trunks, and digestive and peripheral arteries.

Diagnosis and therapy of atheromatous renal artery stenosis

Atheromatous renal artery stenosis (ARAS), a lesion of systemic atherosclerotic disease, is the leading cause of stenotic lesions in the renal artery, followed by fibromuscular dysplasia, a primary abnormality of the renal artery. As a result of several clinical trails, which failed to show an additional benefit of renal revascularization to medical therapy in ARAS, the treatment of ARAS has shifted, and renal revascularization is less commonly performed for ARAS. However, it is recognized that renal revascularization benefits some patients with ARAS. Advances in imaging modalities would allow more frequent detection of ARAS in a society with a growing elderly population, a group with an increased prevalence of systemic atherosclerotic disease. Therefore, it is imperative to identify the patients with ARAS who could benefit from renal revascularization. This review presents a strategy for the treatment of ARAS based on the results of our analysis.

Non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of renal artery stenosis at 1.5 tesla

Balanced steady-state free precession (Bal-SSFP) techniques produce excellent anatomic images of renal arteries without the use of contrast agents and are relatively flow-insensitive. Electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered and non-ECG-triggered sequences have been shown to be quite sensitive for detection of regional arterial stenosis (RAS), and the already high specificity is likely to increase with further refinement of the techniques. Bal-SSFP sequences can be used as a screening tool or as an alternative to contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) when contrast agents are contraindicated. In addition to morphologic imaging of RAS, non-CE techniques can be used in functional assessment of hemodynamic significance. The complimentary tools can be used alone or in combination with CE-MRA for MR imaging of renal vascular hypertension.

[Atherosclerotic renal artery disease diagnosis update]

Atherosclerotic renal artery disease represents a cause of which little is known but not a cause to be neglected for hypertension and renal insufficiency. Even though its occurrence remains badly defined, atherosclerotic renal artery disease is constantly on the rise due to the aging population, the never prevailing hypertension and diabetes mellitus. This review aims to give a clinical profile of patients presenting with atherosclerotic renal artery disease and to discuss, in the light of study results, which diagnostic evaluation should be used considering the sequence and the benefit and risk of each in order to initiate a personalized treatment. Patients affected by atherosclerotic renal artery disease are likely to have more complications and more extensive target-organ damage than patients without renal artery stenosis. The evolution of the atherosclerotic renal artery disease is in general slow and progressive. Nevertheless, certain clinical cases manifest themselves with the onset of acute renal failure bought upon by the administration of blockers of the rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, or by some other causes responsible for a sudden drop in renal plasma flow (e.g., thrombosis of the renal artery). The relationship between atherosclerotic renal artery disease and atherosclerosis is complex, and mediators implicated in the pathophysiology of renovascular disease may also contribute to the progression of cardiovascular damage. An early assumption of the atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is warranted to determine the adapted treatment (i.e., medical treatment, revascularisation...) just as the assumption and the correction of the more general cardiovascular risk factors.

Advances in contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a potentially curable cause of renovascular hypertension (RVH) and is caused by either atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia in the vast majority of patients. Although intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography is still considered the standard of reference test for the anatomic diagnosis of RAS, MR angiography and functional renal MR imaging are promising alternatives that also allow for functional characterization of RAS. This article provides an overview of these techniques and discusses their relative merits and shortcomings. Because missing RVH may have serious consequences the most important requirement for an alternative test is that it has high sensitivity. An unresolved issue is the prediction of functional recovery after therapy.

[Hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis]

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is often present in patients with severe hypertension and atherosclerotic vascular disease. In this setting it is important to screen patients for renovascular disease, e.g. with Duplex-ultrasound, CT- or MR-angiography. The challenge of treating these patients is to find the evidence proving that the RAS is responsible for hypertension and/or renal dysfunction. Measurement of the intra-arterial pressure gradient is necessary in order to determine hemodynamic relevance. On the other side, in these patients hypertension is often of primary and/or renoparenchymatous origin and is aggravated by a renovascular disease. This explains why hypertension cannot be cured even if a high grade stenosis has been removed. In addition, thromb- and cholesterol-embolic material is often mobilized during an invasive procedure and leads to renaparenchymatous ischemia which sustains hypertension after intervention. An individual evaluation of profit versus risk is important for the decision for or against an invasive procedure, especially since there is no sufficient evidence for a decrease of mortality after interventions of RAS. The optimal conservative treatment, including the treatment of atherosclerotic risk factors is recommended.

Angiographic index for angioplasty-treatable atheromatous renal artery stenosis

The relative reduction of the lumen diameter by an atheromatous lesion (% diameter reduction) is generally used as an angiographic index for atheromatous renal artery stenosis (ARAS), but its association with the clinical outcome of angioplasty has not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to identify an angiographic index(ices) that can be used to identify angioplasty-treatable ARAS. We evaluated the clinical outcome of angioplasty in 27 patients who had unilateral ARAS without renal insufficiency by assessing the reduction in systemic arterial blood pressure (BP) after angioplasty and examined its association with various angiographic indices. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis for BP reduction, the area under the curve was larger for the absolute value of the lumen diameter at the narrowest part of its constriction (the narrowest diameter), an angiographic index introduced in this study, than for % diameter reduction (0.770 vs. 0.731). At a 3-mm maximum threshold, the narrowest diameter identified cases with BP reduction; the sensitivity/specificity was 0.89/0.75 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the narrowest diameter correlated better than % diameter reduction with hemodynamic indices of ARAS. In conclusion, the narrowest diameter is an angiographic index that can effectively identify angioplasty-treatable ARAS in patients without renal insufficiency.

Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has evolved over the past years from an experimental imaging modality to a technique that is now widely applied in clinical practice. This article reviews the fundamentals of the different magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and how they can be applied for abdominal and peripheral arterial imaging. Currently, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), whereby a luminogram is obtained during initial arterial passage of contrast material, is the most widely used technique. With current hardware and software, high-spatial resolution images of the abdominal aorta and proximal visceral branches can be obtained that are equivalent to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). High-quality imaging of the renal arteries demands isotropic voxels and reformations orthogonal to the vessel axis for evaluation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vascular tree is now a highly accurate technique and has replaced diagnostic intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and duplex ultrasonography in many hospitals.

Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a potentially curable cause of renovascular hypertension (RVH) and is caused by either atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) in the vast majority of patients. Although intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) is still considered the standard of reference test for the anatomical diagnosis of RAS, noninvasive techniques such as MR angiography, CT angiography, and color-aided duplex ultrasonography are promising alternatives that also allow functional characterization of RAS. We provide an overview of these techniques and discuss their relative merits and shortcomings. Analysis of high-quality studies shows that both MR and CT angiography are significantly more accurate for the diagnosis of at least 50% atherosclerotic RAS than ultrasonographic techniques. The primary strength of ultrasonography at present is its suggested ability to predict functional recovery based on preinterventional resistance index measurements. A still unresolved issue is the detection of FMD. Because missing RVH may have serious consequences the most important requirement for a screening test is that it has high sensitivity.

Quantitative Assessment of the Morphology of Renal Arteries from X-ray Images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

With the advent of interventional vascular procedures, objective and reproducible tools are needed to assist clinical decision-making and to assess intervention efficacy. The success of quantitative coronary arteriography (QVA) in objectively assessing cardiovascular morphology has initiated the software development for quantitative analysis of peripheral vasculature. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability and quality of a new QVA package applied to renal arteries.

METHODS

A calibration method was developed using markers mounted on a catheter's shaft, ensuring accurate calibration even with small catheter sizes. Given the high prevalence of ostial stenoses in peripheral vessels, a dedicated vessel analysis method was developed to assess these stenoses. Its reproducibility was determined in renal angiography. Variance component analysis was performed to evaluate sources of variability, using angiograms from 74 patients suspected of renovascular hypertension.

RESULTS

For intraobserver variability, the 95% confidence intervals of differences in percent diameter stenosis and minimal lumen diameter were -1.99%-1.04% (P = 0.53, n = 48) and -0.081 mm-0.023 mm (P = 0.27, n = 48), respectively. For the interobserver variability, intervals were -1.86%-2.80% (P = 0.69, n = 66) and -0.46 mm-0.053 mm (P = 0.12, n = 46), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The contribution of intraobserver variation was negligible. The contribution of interobserver variation for different parameters was negligible or comparable with the variation caused by image acquisition. These conclusions demonstrate that QVA can reproducibly measure renal artery geometry.

Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study

The effect of combined morphologic and functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the interobserver and intermodality variability for the grading of renal artery stenosis is assessed. In a randomized, blinded tricenter analysis, seven readers evaluated 43 renal arteries on x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA), 3D-Gadolinium MR angiography (3D-Gd-MRA), cine phase-contrast flow measurement (PC-flow), and a combined analysis of the last two. Interobserver variability was assessed for the grading of renal artery stenosis as well as regional vessel visibility. Intermodality variability for stenosis grading was analyzed in cases in which the readers agreed on the degree of stenosis in DSA. DSA had a substantial interobserver variability for the grading of stenosis (mean kappa kappa 0.64). 3D-Gd-MRA revealed a slightly improved interobserver variability but incorrectly graded 6 of 34 stenoses on a two-point scale (<50%, > or =50%). The combined approach of 3D-Gd-MRA and PC-flow revealed the best (P = 0.0003) interobserver variability (median kappa = 0.75) and almost perfect intermodality agreement with DSA (97% of cases). These findings were confirmed in a prospective analysis of 97 renal arteries. The vessel visibility of the renal artery ostium was significantly better in 3D-Gd-MRA than in DSA, whereas the visibility of the hilar and intrarenal vessels was significantly worse (P = 0.0001). A combined morphologic and functional MR examination significantly reduces interobserver variability and offers reliable and reproducible grading of renal artery stenosis based on stenosis morphology and hemodynamic changes. It can be considered a safe and noninvasive alternative for diagnostic DSA in cases that do not require assessment of intrarenal vessels.

Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography

INTRODUCTION

The question about the most appropriate non-invasive method for detecting a renal artery stenosis (RAS) when comparing contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and color Doppler sonography (CDS) is still under discussion. Therefore we conducted a prospective study in order to evaluate both methods as compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

PATIENTS/METHODS

Thirtysix consecutive patients (53,9 +/- 13,7 years) with suspected RAS were investigated. MRA was performed using gadolinium for contrast enhancement. CDS was performed using a 2.5 and 3,5 MHz transducer. A peak systolic velocity (Vmax) >200 cm/sec within renal arteries and/or a side to side difference of the resistive index (RI) of >0,05 were used to discriminate stenosis. A diameter reduction of > or = 60% by DSA was considered a stenosis relevant to the patient.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight main renal arteries and 9 accessory vessels were detected by DSA. Twenty main and 3 accessory arteries were found to be stenosed > or = 60%, while 4 main and 1 accessory artery presented with occlusion. MRA detected 70 renal vessels (65 main and 5 accessory arteries). Twenty-one stenosed arteries and 4 occluded vessels were correctly diagnosed by MRA. With CDS 68 renal vessels (62 main and 6 accessory arteries) could be visual- ized out of which 21 stenoses were diagnosed because of increased Vmax and 6 stenoses were detected because of a side to side difference of RI. For main renal arteries sensitivities and specificities were 96% and 86% for MRA and 96% and 89% for CDS.

CONCLUSIONS

MRA and CDS are both comparable methods for detection of a renal artery stenosis > or = 60%. Despite several limitations, CDS can at the moment still be favored as a screening method.

Nitric oxide dependence of renal blood flow in patients with renal artery stenosis

In ischemia, nitric oxide (NO) production is increased, possibly to preserve flow. The role of NO was investigated in hypertensive patients with or without renal artery stenosis (RAS). Fifty-five hypertensive patients scheduled to undergo diagnostic renal angiography underwent mean renal blood flow (MRBF) measurements before and after an intrarenal injection of the NO synthase blocker N(g)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) at 0.03 microg/kg, before angiography. A dose-response study indicated that this dose of L-NMMA significantly blocked NO synthesis. MRBF was measured at baseline and 1, 5, 10, and 20 min after L-NMMA treatment. On the basis of the angiographic results, patients were divided into three diagnostic categories, i.e., essential hypertension (n = 26), unilateral RAS (n = 16), or bilateral RAS (n = 8). In essential hypertension, MRBF was decreased by 18 +/- 4% at 20 min. In unilateral RAS, L-NMMA did not affect MRBF in the stenotic kidney but reduced MRBF in the nonstenotic kidney by 40 +/- 9% at 20 min. In bilateral RAS, L-NMMA reduced flow by 32 +/- 14% at 20 min. In the nonstenotic kidney in unilateral RAS, a positive correlation was observed between the effect of NO blockade on MRBF and arterial renin levels (P = 0.009). In the stenotic kidney, in contrast, this correlation was inverse (P = 0.007). In conclusion, MRBF depends on NO in hypertensive patients, except in the stenotic kidney in unilateral RAS. In the nonstenotic kidney in unilateral RAS, NO bioavailability is increased. It is suggested that a compensatory mechanism, regulated by NO and possibly angiotensin II, may preserve renal function.

Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis: impact on blood pressure and renal function

The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease: diagnosis and treatment

The technical expertise and tools required to treat renovascular obstruction have become commonplace, and many series of patients revascularized with surgery, balloon angioplasty or endovascular stenting have been reported. Nevertheless, although hypertension and renal failure are easy to diagnose, their cause often remains elusive. Evidence is developing that patients with hypertension and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may often have hypertension and renovascular disease but not hypertension because of renovascular disease. As a result, diagnosis and therapy are increasingly directed towards the preservation of renal function, and the future of renal revascularization will depend on how well potential therapies address this goal.