Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice

Construction of medical equipment-based doctor health monitoring system

The health status of doctors has been overlooked by the society and even the doctors themselves, especially those doctors who work long hours. Their attention is always on patients, so they are more likely to ignore their own health problems. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a medical equipment-based doctor health monitoring system (hereinafter referred to as Doc-care). Doc-care can be used as a private health manager for doctors, and doctors can monitor their health indicators in real time while using medical equipment to aid diagnosis and treatment. When the doctor's health status is neglected, Doc-care can protect the doctor's health; combining with the convolutional neural network method to detect and grade the doctor's health indicators, to assess the doctor's real-time health status. After referring to the doctor's past health data in the cloud server, giving appropriate advice and predictions about the doctor's health status.

Blood Pressure Classification Using the Method of the Modular Neural Networks

In this paper, we present a new model based on modular neural networks (MNN) to classify a patient's blood pressure level (systolic and diastolic pressure and pulse). Tests are performed with the Levenberg-Marquardt (trainlm) and scaled conjugate gradient backpropagation (traincsg) training methods. The modular neural network architecture is formed by three modules. In the first module we consider the diastolic pressure data; in the second module we use details of the systolic pressure; in the third module, pulse data is used and the response integration is performed with the average method. The goal is to design the best MNN architecture for achieving an accurate classification. The results of the model show that MNN presents an excellent classification for blood pressure. The contribution of this work is related to helping the cardiologist in providing a good diagnosis and patient treatment and allows the analysis of the behavior of blood pressure in relation to the corresponding diagnosis, in order to prevent heart disease.

Central pressures and central hemodynamic values in white coat hypertensives are closer to those of normotensives than to those of controlled hypertensives for similar age, gender, and 24-h and nocturnal blood pressures

INTRODUCTION

There is disagreement whether white coat hypertensives (WCH) have different hemodynamic and structural characteristics compared to normotensives (NT) and hypertensives (HT).

METHODS

We compared cardiovascular prognostic markers (pulse wave velocity [PWV] and aortic stiffness index [ASI]) and data on central hemodynamics and central pressures (augmentation index [AIx], augmentation pressure [AugP] and pulse pressure amplification [PPA]) from aortic pulse wave analysis between NT (n=175), WCH (n=315) and treated HT (n=691), all with 24-h blood pressure (BP) <130/80 and nocturnal BP <120/70 mmHg after matching for age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and and nocturnal BP. The groups were also compared separately in terms of 24-h systolic BP <120 mmHg and 120-129 mmHg.

RESULTS

The percentage of non-dippers was 40.1% in NT, 34.5% in WCH and 38.3 in HT. For similar 24-h and nocturnal systolic BP (NT 109/64±7/5, WCH 110/66±7/6, HT 109/64±7/5 mmHg), aortic stiffness was greater in HT (n=691, PWV 10.8±2.6 m/s and ASI 0.33±0.16, p<0.01) than in WCH (n=316, PWV 9.7±2.4 m/s and ASI 0.28±0.17) and NT (n=175, PWV 9.5±2.0 m/s and ASI 0.29±0.15); AugP and AIx were higher (p<0.01) in HT (13.9±8.2 and 29.6±12.6 mmHg) than in WCH (11.5±8.5 mmHg and 24.9±15.2) and NT (11.0±6.4 mmHg and 26.6±11.5). PPA was lower (p<0.01) in HT (11.3±5.5 mmHg) than in WCH (13.2±7.1 mmHg) and in NT (12.4±4.9 mmHg). The findings were similar when the 24-h systolic BP <120 mmHg and 120-129 mmHg subgroups were analyzed separately.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that for similar age, gender distribution, BMI, and 24-h and nocturnal BP, aortic stiffness, central aortic pressures and wave reflection in WCH are closer to those of NT than to those with treated HT. This supports the idea that white coat hypertension may be a more benign condition than treated hypertension for similar 24-h and particularly nocturnal BP levels.

Anti-hypertensive treatment in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: current management and therapeutic features

Pheochromocytoma (PH) and paraganglioma (PG) are neuroendocrine neoplasms arising from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla and the sympathetic ganglia, respectively. Although are unusual cause of hypertension (HT) accounting for at most 0.1-0.2 % of cases, they may lead to severe and potentially lethal hypertensive crisis due to the effects of the released catecholamines. However, both PH and PG may be asymptomatic as ~30 % of subjects are normotensive or have orthostatic hypotension and in these cases the 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is an important toll to diagnose and treat HT. HT treatment may be difficult when PH or PG occurs in pregnancy or in the elderly subjects and in these cases a multidisciplinary team is required. When surgical excision is mandatory the perioperative management requires the administration of selective α1-adrenergic blocking agents (i.e., doxazosin, prazosin or terazosin) followed by a β-adrenergic blockade (i.e., propranolol, atenolol). This latter should never be started first because blockade of vasodilatory peripheral β-adrenergic receptors with unopposed α-adrenergic receptor stimulation can lead to a further elevation of BP. Although labetalol is traditionally considered the ideal agent due to its α- and β-adrenergic antagonism, experimental studies do not support its use in this clinical setting. As second regimen, the administration of vasodilators as calcium channel blockers (i.e., nicardipine, nifedipine) may be required to control BP. Oral and sublingual short-acting nifedipine are potentially dangerous in patients with hypertensive emergencies and are not recommend. The latest evidences into the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive crisis due to PH and PG are reviewed here.

Effects of an olmesartan medoxomil based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The BENIFICIARY (BENIcar safety and efFICacy evaluatIon: An open-label, single-ARm, titration study in patients with hypertension and tYpe 2 diabetes) study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

After a placebo run-in period, 192 patients received OM 20 mg/day for 3 weeks. If blood pressure (BP) remained > or =120/70 mm Hg, patients were up-titrated to OM 40 mg/day for 3 weeks and subsequently (in 3-week intervals) to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg/day, then OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg/day as necessary. Blood pressure was evaluated by mean 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) from baseline to Week 12. Secondary endpoints included: change in ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to Week 12; changes in ambulatory SBP and DBP during daytime, nighttime, and the last 2, 4, and 6 hours of the dosing interval; and achievement of prespecified ambulatory BP targets. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT00403481.

RESULTS

Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP decreased by 20.4 mm Hg and 11.1 mm Hg, respectively (both P < 0.0001 to baseline), and 61.6%, 47.1%, and 39.0% of patients reached the ambulatory BP targets of <130/80 mm Hg, <125/75 mm Hg, and <120/80 mm Hg, respectively. The study medication was well tolerated with few adverse events: 67/192 patients (34.9%) experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) while 15/192 (7.8%) experienced a drug-related TEAE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this open-label ABPM study, an OM +/- HCTZ based treatment regimen safely and significantly reduced BP in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes when assessed by 24-hour ABPM.

Nocturnal non‐dipping pattern in untreated hypertensives at different cardiovascular risk according to the 2003 ESH/ESC guidelines

AIM

To evaluate in a large population of untreated, uncomplicated essential hypertensives the relationship between alterations in nocturnal blood pressure (BP) profile, i.e. non-dipping pattern, and total cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

A total of 580 consecutive patients with grade 1 or 2 hypertension, referred to our outpatient clinic, underwent the following procedures: (i) clinical and routine laboratory examinations; (ii) 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring; (iii) 24-h collection for microalbuminuria; (iv) echocardiography; and (v) carotid ultrasonography. Cardiovascular risk was assessed according to the stratification scheme suggested by the 2003 ESH/ESC guidelines.

RESULTS

According to this classification, 16.2% of the 580 patients were considered at low added risk, 42.4% at medium added risk and 41.4% at high added risk; 38.5% of the overall population was classified in the high-risk stratum because of at least one manifestation of target organ damage (TOD) and 6.3% for the presence of three or more risk factors. The prevalence rates of a non-dipping pattern (decrease in BP at night < or = 10% compared with the average daytime values) were 28.5% in low-risk, 32.6% in medium-risk and 42.2% in high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Our findings show that the prevalence of a non-dipping profile is significantly greater in patients stratified at high compared with those at low and medium added risk.

The effects of nocturnal dipping on cardiovascular outcomes and proteinuria in essential hypertensive patients

Individuals who do not have a 10% to 20% reduction in blood pressure (BP) during the night are known as ‘nondippers’. Non-dipping patterns in hypertensive patients have been shown to be associated with an excess of target organ damage and other adverse outcomes. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between nocturnal BP pattern, defined on the basis of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recording, and cardiac and renal target organ damage in a population of at least one year treated essential hypertensive subjects. The present analysis involved 123 patients with treated essential hypertension attending the outpatient clinic of our centre. Each patient was subjected to the following procedures: blood sampling for routine blood chemistry, spot urine for proteinuria, 24-hour periods of ABPM, and echocardiography. In the ABPM period, a dipping pattern was observed in 65 of the 123 patients, and a non-dipping pattern in 58 patients. Body mass index was higher in the non-dippers (26 ± 4 versus 28 ± 4, p<0.05). The proteinuria in spot urine was significantly higher in the non-dippers (10 ± 6 versus 24 ± 48, p<0.03). Left ventricular mass, interventricular septum thickness, posterior wall thickness and left ventricular systolic diameter were significantly higher in the non-dippers compared to the dippers. Left ventricular diastolic function was similar in non-dipper cases, except E-wave deceleration time. In treated essential hypertensives the blunted or absent nocturnal fall in blood pressure can be a strong predictor of cardiac and renal events. Hypertensive patients should be evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. To prevent patients at risk for morbidity and mortality casualities as a result of hypertension, patients should be evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. This method can be utilized for exacting future follow-ups with the patient.

Nocturnal blood pressure fall and metabolic syndrome score in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Data relating dipping status to metabolic syndrome (MS) scores are not available. The purpose of this study is to investigate any possible association of different dipping patterns to MS scores in untreated patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

The study included 6256 consecutive, treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension who attended our outpatient clinics. All underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria and patients were classified into five groups: group I (hypertension), group II (hypertension+any one component), group III (hypertension+any two components), group IV (hypertension+any three components), and group V (all five components). Dipping pattern was defined as 'dippers' with nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) falling >or=10 but <20%, 'nondippers' with NSBP falling >or=0% but <10%, 'extreme dippers' with NSBP falling >or=20%, and 'reverse dippers' with NSBP increasing.

RESULTS

Hypertensive patients with MS (n=2573) had higher clinical and ambulatory blood pressure values (P<0.001), whereas the dominant dipping pattern in the non-MS group was nondippers (47.6%), and in the MS group, extreme dippers (37.8%). Furthermore, a considerable decrease in the prevalence of dippers was noticed with the increasing number of MS components (21.1 vs. 19.2 vs. 14.5 vs. 8.4 vs. 7.2%, P<0.001). In contrast, a significant rise in the prevalence of reverse dippers was observed with the increasing number of MS components (7.4 vs. 10.1 vs. 14.9 vs. 20.4 vs. 31.2%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that hypertensive patients have an increased prevalence of abnormal dipping patterns as the number of MS components rises.

Cardiovascular target organ damage in essential hypertensives with or without reproducible nocturnal fall in blood pressure

OBJECTIVE

The clinical significance of classifying patients as dippers and non-dippers on the basis of a single period of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nocturnal dipping status, defined on the basis of two periods of ABPM, and cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage in essential hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 375 never-treated essential hypertensive patients [mean 24-h blood pressure (BP) > or = 125/80 mmHg; mean +/- SD age 45.9 +/- 11.9 years] referred for the first time to our outpatient clinic underwent the following procedures: (i) repeated clinic BP measurements; (ii) blood sampling for routine chemistry examinations; (iii) 24-h urine collection for microalbuminuria; (iv) ABPM over two 24-h periods within 4 weeks; (v) echocardiography; and (vi) carotid ultrasonography.

RESULTS

A reproducible nocturnal dipping (decrease in BP > 10% from mean daytime BP in both ABPM periods) and non-dipping profile (decrease in BP < or = 10% in both ABPM periods) was found in 199 (group I) and 79 patients (group II), respectively; 97 patients (group III) had a variable dipping profile. The three groups did not differ with regard to age, gender, body mass index, clinic BP, 48-h BP and heart rate. Left ventricular mass index, interventricular septum thickness, left atrium and aortic root diameters were significantly higher in group II compared with group I (mean +/- SD 108.5 +/- 19.5 versus 99.7 +/- 19.6 g/m, P < 0.05; 9.3 +/- 0.9 versus 9.1 +/- 0.9 mm, P < 0.05; 33.6 +/- 3.6 versus 32.2 +/- 3.7 mm, P < 0.01; 36.9 +/- 4.6 mm versus 35.5 +/- 4.6, P < 0.05, respectively). The smaller differences seen between groups II and III and between groups I and III were not statistically significant. The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (defined as a left ventricular mass index > 134 g/m in men and > 110 g/m in women) was greater in group II (19%) than in group I (6%) (P < 0.05), whereas the differences between groups II and III and between groups I and III did not reach statistical significance. Differences among the three groups in the prevalence of carotid structural alterations (such as carotid plaques or intima-media thickening) were not statistically significant, and microalbuminuria had a similar prevalence in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar clinic and 48-h BP values, never-treated hypertensive patients with a persistent non-dipper pattern showed a significantly greater extent of cardiac structural alterations compared with subjects with a reproducible dipping pattern, but not those with a variable BP nocturnal profile. A non-dipping pattern diagnosed on two concordant ABPM periods instead of a single monitoring therefore represents a clinical trait associated with more pronounced cardiac abnormalities. Finally, in non-dipping middle-aged hypertensives, echocardiography appears to provide a more accurate risk stratification than carotid ultrasonography or microalbuminuria.