Regional norepinephrine spillover in response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in healthy subjects

Acute effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition versus angiotensin II receptor blockade on cardiac sympathetic activity in patients with heart failure

The beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure secondary to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are felt to result from prevention of the adverse effects of ANG II on systemic afterload and renal homeostasis. However, ANG II can activate the sympathetic nervous system, and part of the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and ANG II antagonists may result from their ability to inhibit such activation. We examined the acute effects of the ACE inhibitor captopril (25 mg, n = 9) and the ANG II receptor antagonist losartan (50 mg, n = 10) on hemodynamics as well as total body and cardiac norepinephrine spillover in patients with chronic HFrEF. Hemodynamic and neurochemical measurements were made at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 h after oral dosing. Administration of both drugs caused significant reductions in systemic arterial, cardiac filling, and pulmonary artery pressures (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of those hemodynamic effects. Plasma concentrations of ANG II were significantly decreased by captopril and increased by losartan (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for both). Total body sympathetic activity increased in response to both captopril and losartan (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for both); however, there was no change in cardiac sympathetic activity in response to either drug. The results of the present study do not support the hypothesis that the acute inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has sympathoinhibitory effects in patients with chronic HFrEF.

Renal Denervation

Sympathetic nervous system over-activity is closely linked with elevation of systemic blood pressure. Both animal and human studies suggest renal sympathetic nerves play an important role in this respect. Historically, modulation of sympathetic activity has been used to treat hypertension. More recently, catheter based renal sympathetic denervation was introduced for the management of treatment resistant hypertension. Sound physiological principles and surgical precedent underpin renal denervation as a therapy for treatment of resistant hypertension. Encouraging results of early studies led to a widespread adoption of the procedure for management of this condition. Subsequently a sham controlled randomised controlled study failed to confirm the benefit of renal denervation leading to a halt in its use in most countries in the world. However, critical analysis of the sham-controlled study indicates a number of flaws. A number of lessons have been learnt from this and other studies which need to be applied in future trials to ascertain the actual role of renal denervation in the management of treatment resistant hypertension before further implementation. This chapter deals with all these issues in detail.

The role of the kidney and the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension

Nearly one-third of the world's population has hypertension. The human and societal impact of hypertension is enormous. Primary hypertension accounts for 95 % of cases of hypertension in adults. The pathogenesis of primary hypertension is complex. The kidney and the sympathetic nervous system play important roles in the development and maintenance of hypertension. This review discusses their respective roles, the interaction between the two, implications of sympathetic overactivity in kidney disease and therapeutic interventions that have been developed on the basis of this knowledge, especially modulation of the sympathetic nervous system.

The sympathetic nervous system as a target for the treatment of hypertension and cardiometabolic diseases

The regulation of blood pressure by the sympathetic nervous system is reviewed with an emphasis on the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the development and maintenance of hypertension. Evidence from patients and animal models is summarized. Because it is clear that there is a neural contribution to many types of human hypertension and other cardiometabolic diseases, the case is presented for a renewed emphasis on the development of sympatholytic approaches for the treatment of hypertension and other conditions associated with hyperactivity of the sympathetic nervous system.

Brain angiotensin peptides regulate sympathetic tone and blood pressure

Brain angiotensin II (Ang II) induces tonic sympathoexcitatory effects through AT1 receptor stimulation of glutamatergic neurons and sympathoinhibitory effects via GABAergic neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, the brainstem 'pressor area'. NADPH-derived superoxide production and reactive oxygen species signalling is critical in these actions, and AT2 receptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla appear to mediate opposing effects on sympathetic outflow. In the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, Ang II has AT1 receptor-mediated sympathoexcitatory effects and enhances nitric oxide formation, which in turn inhibits the Ang II effects through a GABAergic mechanism. Ang II also decreases the tonic sympathoinhibitory effect of gamma amino butyric acid within the paraventricular nucleus. Angiotensin III and Angiotensin IV increase blood pressure via brain AT1 receptor stimulation. Angiotensin (1-7) influences cardiovascular function through a specific Mas-receptor. This review examines the evidence that brain angiotensin peptides, glutamate, gamma amino butyric acid and nitric oxide interact within the rostral ventrolateral medulla and paraventricular nucleus to control sympathetic tone and blood pressure.

Response of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity to intravenous irbesartan in heart failure

To determine the effect of irbesartan treatment on resting levels and arterial baroreflex control of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) in heart failure (HF), we studied conscious normal sheep and sheep with HF induced by rapid ventricular pacing for 8-10 wk (n = 7 per group). In HF, there is a large increase in CSNA that is detrimental to outcome. The causes of this increase in CSNA and the effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on CSNA in HF are unclear. CSNA, arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and arterial baroreflex curves were recorded during a resting period and after 90 min of irbesartan infusion (12 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) iv). This dose of irbesartan abolished the pressor response to intravenous ANG II infusion but caused only a slight decrease in the pressor response to centrally administered ANG II. In HF, there was a large increase in CSNA (from 44 +/- 3 to 87 +/- 3 bursts/100 heartbeats). Irbesartan reduced arterial pressure in the normal and HF groups, but the usual baroreflex-mediated increases in CSNA and HR were prevented. This resulted from a significant leftward shift in the CSNA and HR baroreflex curves in both groups. Irbesartan also decreased the sensitivity of the arterial baroreflex control of CSNA. Short-term treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker, at a dose that abolished the response to circulating, but not central, ANG II, prevented the reflex increase in CSNA in response to the drug-induced fall in arterial pressure.

Decreased renal sympathetic activity in response to cardiac unloading with nitroglycerin in patients with heart failure*

AIMS

To examine changes in renal sympathetic outflow in response to cardiac unloading with nitroglycerin (GTN) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and healthy subjects (HS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Renal (RNAsp) and total body (TBNAsp) noradrenaline (NA) spillover were measured with radiotracer methods in 16 patients with CHF (50+/-3 years, LVEF 20+/-1%) and nine HS (57+/-2 years) during right heart and renal vein catheterisation. Low dose GTN decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAm: CHF -7+/-2 mm Hg, HS -4+/-1 mm Hg, p<0.05 vs. baseline) but not mean arterial pressure (MAP: CHF -2+/-1 mm Hg, HS -2+/-1 mm Hg) and did not affect RNAsp in any of the study groups. High dose GTN lowered MAP (CHF -12+/-1 mm Hg, HS -12+/-2 mm Hg, p<0.05 vs. baseline) and PAm (CHF -13+/-2 mm Hg, HS -5+/-1 mm Hg, p<0.05 vs. baseline) and was accompanied by a significant reduction in RNAsp only in CHF (1.3+/-0.1 nmol/min baseline to 0.9+/-0.2 nmol/min, p<0.05), whereas RNAsp in HS remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of a reduction in both arterial pressure and cardiac filling pressures, renal sympathetic activity decreased in CHF and did not increase in HS. These findings suggest that the altered loading conditions resulting from high-dose GTN infusion have renal sympathoinhibitory effects.

Angiotensin II and norepinephrine release: interaction and effects on the heart

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin (Ang) II may enhance the influence of the sympathetic nervous system at various levels by facilitating norepinephrine (NE) release. We investigated whether such an interaction is evident in the human heart and whether it has an impact on left ventricular (LV) structure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ang I and Ang II concentrations were determined in arterial and coronary sinus (CS) plasma samples in a group of normotensive (n = 10) and hypertensive (n = 18) subjects. Total systemic and cardiac NE spillover was measured using isotope dilution methodology and LV structure by echocardiography. Arterial and CS concentrations of Ang I and Ang II were similar in both groups (Ang II CS, 5.8 +/- 4.0 versus 3.7 +/- 3.1 fmol/ml; P = not significant), as was the Ang II/Ang I ratio (CS, 0.56 +/- 0.17 versus 0.54 +/- 0.22 fmol/fmol; P = not significant). Total systemic (223 +/- 145 versus 374 +/- 149 ng/min; P < 0.05) and cardiac NE spillover (11.7 +/- 6.3 versus 19.4 +/- 10.5 ng/min; P < 0.05) were increased in hypertensive patients, as was LV mass index (LVMI) (86.7 +/- 14.7 versus 117.2 +/- 19.4 g/m; P < 0.001). LVMI correlated with cardiac NE spillover (r = 0.47; P < 0.02). No correlation was evident between CS Ang II and cardiac NE spillover (r = 0.001; P = not significant) or LVMI (r = -0.20; P = not significant). Arterial Ang II tended to correlate with total systemic NE spillover (r = 0.34; P = 0.081). When hypertensive subjects were divided into two groups with either high or low CS Ang II concentration, cardiac NE spillover and LVMI did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a growth-promoting effect of increased cardiac sympathetic tone on cardiomyocytes in hypertensive patients, but do not support the notion of a significant role of Ang II for norepinephrine release and LV hypertrophy in the hypertensive human heart.