Dual renin???angiotensin system blockade restores blood pressure???renin dependency in individuals with low renin concentrations

Effect of candesartan and lisinopril alone and in combination on blood pressure and microalbuminuria

Background

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocking drugs (ARB) block the effect of angiotensin II by different mechanisms. It has been suggested that combined therapy may be more effective at reducing blood pressure (BP) than higher doses of either drug.

Methods

Twenty-three elderly patients with systolic hypertension completed a double-blind crossover study comparing placebo, candesartan (C) 16 mg, C32 mg, lisinopril (L) 20 mg, L40 mg and C16 mg + L20 mg. Treatment periods were one month and ambulatory BP measurements were performed at the end of each period. The effects on albumin excretion in eight patients with microalbuminuria were determined.

Results

All treatments lowered BP. The falls in systolic and diastolic BP with C16, C32, L20 and L40 were similar. Plasma renin rose to a similar extent. A plateau effect was reached with C16 and L20. Systolic BP on the combination of C16 + L20 was lower than on each monotherapy (C16, 3.8 mmHg [p=0.002]; C32, 6.4 [0.0003]; L20, 2.9 [0.05]; L40, 3.3 [0.003]). The additional fall in BP with the combination appeared to be due to recruitment of non-responders, rather than to an additive effect in most patients. All treatments reduced microalbuminuria to a similar extent. The combination was well tolerated and there was no deterioration in renal function.

Conclusion

When patients are on a plateau dose of an ACE inhibitor or an ARB, addition of the other drug class has a small but significant incremental effect on BP in the overall group. However, some patients respond better to one drug class than to the other and this may explain the results. This study lends no support to the use of these two drugs in combination to treat hypertension.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase I study of QGC001, a centrally acting aminopeptidase a inhibitor prodrug

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Inhibition of brain aminopeptidase A (APA), which converts angiotensin II into angiotensin III, has emerged as a novel antihypertensive treatment, as demonstrated in several experimental animal models. QGC001 (originally named RB150) is a prodrug of the specific and selective APA inhibitor EC33, and as such it is the prototype of a new class of centrally acting antihypertensive agents. Given by the oral route in hypertensive rats, it enters the brain and generates EC33, which blocks the brain renin-angiotensin system activity and normalises blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of QGC001 in humans.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty-six healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive in double-blind and fasted conditions single oral doses of 10, 50, 125, 250, 500, 750, 1,000 and 1,250 mg of QGC001 (n = 6/dose) or placebo (n = 2/dose). We measured plasma and urine concentrations of both QGC001 and EC33 by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, plasma renin concentrations (PRC), plasma and free urine aldosterone (PAldo and UAldo), plasma copeptine (PCop), and plasma and urine cortisol (PCort and UCort) concentrations, and supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) at various time points.

RESULTS

All doses of QGC001 were clinically and biologically well-tolerated. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of QGC001 and EC33 increased linearly with the dose, with a median time to reach Cmax (tmax) of 1.5 h for QGC001 and 3.0 h for EC33. The median plasma elimination half-life of QGC001 was 1.6 h consistently throughout doses. Urinary excretion of QGC001 and EC33 was below 2% of the administered dose. When compared with placebo, QGC001 did not significantly change PRC, PAldo, UAldo, PCop, PCort or UCort. No significant change was observed for supine HR, SBP and DBP in any treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Single oral administration of QGC001 up to 1,250 mg in healthy volunteers was well-tolerated. Following oral administration, QGC001 is absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract and converted partially into its active metabolite EC33 in plasma. As in animal experiments, in normotensive subjects QGC001 had no effect on the systemic renin-angiotensin-aldosterone parameters and on PCop concentrations, a marker of vasopressin release. In normotensive subjects, a single dose of QCG001 had no effect on SBP, DBP or HR. These data support further evaluation of multiple oral doses of QGC001 in human volunteers and its clinical efficacy in hypertensive patients.

Sequential nephron blockade versus sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade in resistant hypertension: a prospective, randomized, open blinded endpoint study

OBJECTIVE

To compare two drug regimens to treat resistant hypertension.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, open blinded endpoint study, 167 patients with mean baseline daytime ambulatory blood pressure 135 mmHg or more and/or 85 mmHg or more, despite 4 weeks' treatment with irbesartan 300 mg/day, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day, were randomized to sequential nephron blockade (group 1, n = 85) or sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade (group 2, n = 82). First, spironolactone 25 mg/day in group 1 or ramipril 5 mg/day in group 2 were added for 4 weeks. Treatment was increased at weeks 4, 8 or 10 if home blood pressure was 135 mmHg or more and/or 85 mmHg or more by sequentially administering furosemide 20 mg/day, furosemide 40 mg/day and amiloride 5 mg/day in group 1, or ramipril 10 mg/day, bisoprolol 5 mg/day and bisoprolol 10 mg/day in group 2. The primary endpoint was change in systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure at week 12.

RESULTS

At week 12, the mean between-group difference in daytime ambulatory blood pressure was 10/4 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 7-14/2-7; P < 0.001/P = 0.0014) in favour of the group 1. The blood pressure goal (daytime ambulatory blood pressure <135/85 mmHg) was achieved in 58% in the group 1 and 20% in the group 2 (P < 0.0001). Discontinuation for drug-related adverse events was low (group 1, n = 7; group 2, n = 6).

CONCLUSION

In patients with resistant hypertension, sequential nephron blockade induces a large and well tolerated reduction in blood pressure via a progressive increase in sodium depletion, and is more effective than sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade.

Rationale for Combining Blockers of the Renin-Angiotensin System

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT1-receptor (AT1R) blockers has become one of the most successful therapeutic approaches in medicine. The question is no longer whether RAS inhibition helps, but rather how we can optimize inhibition to achieve optimal cardiovascular and renal protection. Indeed, numerous data have shown that the RAS is not blocked fully over 24 hours with current doses of RAS blockers because they trigger a counter-regulatory renin release that can offset pharmacologic inhibition of the RAS. This absence of full blockade may have clinical implications. Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and AT1R antagonists thus has been proposed to inhibit the biological effects of the reactive renin release triggered by single-site RAS inhibition. By using this approach, numerous experimental and clinical studies have suggested that this combination therapy has additive or synergistic effects on blood pressure and on the prevention of cardiovascular and renal lesions. Although similar intensity of RAS blockade can be achieved by either combination therapy or by using high doses of an AT1-receptor antagonist given alone, the ACE inhibitor present in the combination interferes with the bradykinin-nitric oxide pathway and the N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro metabolism, which both may have additional biological effects.

Renin inhibition with aliskiren: where are we now, and where are we going?

With the development of aliskiren, blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at the level of the interaction of renin with a substrate has become a clinical reality. This review covers the specific features of the first agent likely to achieve widespread clinical exposure, aliskiren. The potential of renin inhibition must be viewed in the context of the remarkable efficacy of both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The implications of blockade of the renin system at its rate-limiting step are reviewed, with the therapeutic implications for both the renin inhibitor employed alone or the renin inhibitor combined with an ACE inhibitor or ARB. The relevant and necessary studies are ongoing.

Low-renin status in therapy-resistant hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Therapy resistance is an enduring problem in clinical hypertension. Our aims were to estimate: (1) the contribution of a low-renin status in therapy resistance; (2) whether such status could give a clue to more successful treatment; and (3) the contribution by adrenal cortical adenomas and by primary aldosteronism.

SETTING

Patients were referred from general and internal medicine practices following written invitations and included consecutively. Participants were examined and followed-up on an outpatient basis.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients were divided according to renin status. Low-renin patients were treated with an aldosterone inhibitor in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of low-renin status in therapy resistance. Blood pressure and hormonal responses to specific treatment. Numbers of adrenocortical adenomas and primary aldosteronism.

RESULTS

In 90 treatment-resistant hypertensive, 67% had plasma renin activity (PRA) below 0.5 nmol/l per hour. Of the 60 low-renin patients, 38 were studied on a fixed combination of amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide. Three weeks' treatment reduced blood pressure by 31/15 mmHg compared to placebo (P < or = 0.0001). Serum aldosterone and plasma renin activity increased substantially during active treatment. Through the subsequent 6-12 months of open treatment, seven patients (18%) showing an escape phenomenon had their high blood pressure effectively treated by extra amiloride. Of the 60 low-renin patients, eight had adrenal adenoma.

CONCLUSION

A low-renin status characterized two-thirds of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, who could be treated efficiently by aldosterone inhibition. Patients with an escape phenomenon (18%) could effectively be treated by increasing the aldosterone inhibitor. Low-renin hypertensives had high prevalence of adrenocortical adenomas and primary aldosteronism.

Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and in the management of diabetic nephropathy

Irbesartan (Avapro, Aprovel) is a potent and selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist indicated for use in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. Once-daily administration of irbesartan provided 24-hour control of blood pressure (BP). In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension irbesartan was as effective as enalapril, atenolol and amlodipine, and more effective than valsartan in terms of absolute reduction in BP and response rates. Irbesartan produced a greater reduction in diastolic BP at trough than once-daily losartan, but had a smaller effect than olmesartan; the reduction in systolic BP achieved with irbesartan was similar or greater than that with losartan and similar to that seen with olmesartan. The combination of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide produced additive effects on BP reduction. Irbesartan also induced regression of left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. In two large studies (IRbesartan MicroAlbuminuria type 2 diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients [IRMA 2] and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT]) irbesartan exerted a renoprotective effect in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. The renoprotective effect was at least partly independent of the BP-lowering effect. In the IRMA 2 trial, the proportion of patients progressing to overt nephropathy was significantly lower for recipients of irbesartan 300mg once daily than placebo. In patients with overt nephropathy in the IDNT, irbesartan 300mg once daily provided significantly greater renoprotection than amlodipine 10mg once daily or placebo. The relative risk of doubling of serum creatinine was significantly lower with irbesartan than amlodipine or placebo. Irbesartan is well tolerated in hypertensive patients, including those with type 2 diabetes and incipient or overt nephropathy. The overall incidence of adverse events with irbesartan was similar to that with placebo. Irbesartan was associated with a lower incidence of cough than enalapril and was not associated with ankle oedema or with any clinically significant drug interactions. In conclusion, irbesartan is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent. It also slows the progression of renal disease in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. Thus, irbesartan is a valuable agent in the management of patients with these indications.