A prospective randomized trial of external fixation and plaster cast immobilization in the treatment of distal radial fractures

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Treatment Modalities for Patients Older Than 60 Years with Distal Radius Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and complications of different treatment modalities for elderly patients with distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Eight databases were searched. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were RCTs that compared different treatment modalities (surgical or nonoperative) in patients older than 60 years with displaced or unstable intra-articular and/or extra-articular DRFs.

RESULTS

Twenty-three RCTs met the eligibility criteria (2020 patients). For indirect comparisons, the main findings of the NMA were in volar locking plate (VLP) versus cast immobilization, with the mean differences for the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at -4.45 points (p < 0.05) and grip strength at 6.11% (p < 0.05). Additionally, VLP showed a lower risk ratio (RR) of minor complications than dorsal plate fixation (RR: 0.02) and bridging external fixation (RR: 0.25). Conversely, VLP and dorsal plate fixation showed higher rates of major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other treatment modalities, VLP showed statistically significant differences for some functional outcomes; however, most differences were not clinically relevant. For complications, although most differences were not statistically significant, VLP was the treatment modality that reported the lowest rate of minor and overall complications but also showed one of the highest rates of major complications in these patients. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022315562.

Effectiveness of surgical versus conservative treatment of distal radius fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether surgical treatment is more effective than conservative treatment in terms of functional outcomes in elderly patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

An electronic search of the Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed, from inception until July 2021. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were randomized clinical trials that compared surgical versus conservative treatment in subjects older than 60 years with DRFs. Two authors independently performed the search, data extraction, and assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB tool.

RESULTS

Twelve trials met the eligibility criteria, and nine studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. For volar plate versus cast immobilization at 1-year follow-up, the mean difference (MD) for PRWE was -5.36 points (p=0.02), for DASH was -4.03 points (p=0.02), for grip strength was 8.32% (p=0.0004), for wrist flexion was 4.35 degrees (p=0.10), for wrist extension was -1.52 degrees (p=0.008), for pronation was 2.7 degrees (p=0.009), for supination was 4.88 degrees (p=0.002), and for EQ-VAS was 2.73 points (p=0.0007), with differences in favor of volar plate. For K-wire versus cast immobilization at 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences in wrist range of motion (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was low to high evidence according to GRADE ratings, with a statistically significant difference in functional outcomes in favor of volar plate versus conservative treatment at 1-year follow-up. However, these differences are not minimally clinically important, suggesting that both types of management are equally effective in patients older than 60 years with DRFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; Therapeutic (Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials).

Treatment options in extra-articular distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review aimed to make a detailed overview on the clinical and functional outcomes and to get insight into the possible superiority of a treatment method for extra-articular distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies describing treatment results. Five treatment modalities were compared: plaster cast immobilization, K-wire fixation, volar plating, external fixation, and intramedullary fixation.

RESULTS

Out of 7,054 screened studies, 109 were included in the analysis. Overall complication rate ranged from 9% after plaster cast treatment to 18.5% after K-wire fixation. For radiographic outcomes, only volar tilt in the plaster cast group was lower than in the other groups. Apart from better grip strength after volar plating, no clear functional differences were found across treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Current literature does not provide uniform evidence to prove superiority of a particular treatment method when looking at complications, re-interventions, and long-term functional outcomes.

What Is the Relative Effectiveness of the Various Surgical Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Many acceptable treatment options exist for distal radius fractures (DRFs); however, a simultaneous comparison of all methods is difficult using conventional study designs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on DRF treatment to answer the following questions: Compared with nonoperative treatment, (1) which intervention is associated with the best 1-year functional outcome? (2) Which intervention is associated with the lowest risk of overall complications? (3) Which intervention is associated with the lowest risk of complications requiring operation?

METHODS

Ten databases were searched from inception to July 25, 2019. Search and analysis reporting adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Included studies were English-language RCTs that assessed at least one surgical treatment arm for adult patients with displaced DRFs, with less than 20% loss to follow-up. We excluded RCTs reporting on patients with open fractures, extensive bone loss, or ipsilateral upper extremity polytrauma. Seventy RCTs (n = 4789 patients) were included. Treatments compared were the volar locking plate, bridging external fixation, nonbridging external fixation, dynamic external fixation, percutaneous pinning, intramedullary fixation, dorsal plating, fragment-specific plating, and nonoperative treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted for intraarticular fractures, extraarticular fractures, and patients with an average age greater than 60 years. Mean (range) patient age was 59 years (56 to 63) and was similar across all treatment groups except for dynamic external fixation (44 years) and fragment-specific plating (47 years). Distribution of intraarticular and extraarticular fractures was approximately equal among the treatment groups other than that for intramedullary fixation (73% extraarticular), fragment-specific plating (66% intraarticular) [13, 70], and dorsal plating (100% intraarticular). Outcomes were the DASH score at 1 year, total complications, and reoperation. The minimum clinically important different (MCID) for the DASH score was set at 10 points. The analysis was performed using Bayesian methodology with random-effects models. Rank orders were generated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. Evidence quality was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Most studies had a low risk of bias due to randomization and low rates of incomplete follow-up, unclear risk of bias due to selective reporting, and high risk of bias due to lack of patient and assessor blinding. Studies assessing bridging external fixation and/or nonoperative treatment arms had a higher overall risk of bias while studies with volar plating and/or percutaneous pinning treatment arms had a lower risk of bias.

RESULTS

Across all patients, there were no clinically important differences in terms of the DASH score at 1 year; although differences were found, all were less than the MCID of 10 points. Volar plating was ranked the highest for DASH score at 1 year (mean difference -7.34 [95% credible interval -11 to -3.7) while intramedullary fixation, with low-quality evidence, also showed improvement in DASH score (mean difference -7.75 [95% CI -14.6 to -0.56]). The subgroup analysis revealed that only locked volar plating was favored over nonoperative treatment for patients older than 60 years of age (mean difference -6.4 [95% CI -11 to -2.1]) and for those with intraarticular fractures (mean difference -8.4 [95% CI -15 to -2.0]). However, its clinical importance was uncertain as the MCID was not met. Among all patients, intramedullary fixation (odds ratio 0.09 [95% CI 0.02 to 0.84]) and locked volar plating (OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.39]) were associated with a lower complication risk compared with nonoperative treatment. For intraarticular fractures, volar plating was the only treatment associated with a lower risk of complications than nonoperative treatment (OR 0.021 [95% CI < 0.01 to 0.50]). For extraarticular fractures, only nonbridging external fixation was associated with a lower risk of complications than nonoperative treatment (OR 0.011 [95% CI < 0.01 to 0.65]), although the quality of evidence was low. Among all patients, the risk of complications requiring operation was lower with intramedullary fixation (OR 0.06 [95% CI < 0.01 to 0.85) than with nonoperative treatment, but no treatment was favored over nonoperative treatment when analyzed by subgroups.

CONCLUSION

We found no clinically important differences favoring any surgical treatment option with respect to 1-year functional outcome. However, relative to the other options, volar plating was associated with a lower complication risk, particularly in patients with intraarticular fractures, while nonbridging external fixation was associated with a lower complication risk in patients with extraarticular fractures. For patients older than 60 years of age, nonoperative treatment may still be the preferred option because there is no reliable evidence showing a consistent decrease in complications or complications requiring operation among the other treatment options. Particularly in this age group, the decision to expose patients to even a single surgery should be made with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Long-term follow-up of distal radius fractures, an evaluation of the current guideline: the relation between malunion, osteoarthritis and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Last decades there is an increased tendency of performing surgery on displaced distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear whether this affects the development of osteoarthritis. This study aims to determine the relation between anatomical position, radiological osteoarthritis and functional outcome of the elderly wrist, 10-15 years after a distal radius fracture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

173 patients between the age of 50 and 70 at time of trauma were included in this retrospective cohort study with a 10-15-year follow-up. Based on the reassessed initial X-rays, the patients were placed into 4 groups (1: anatomical, 2a: acceptable, 2b: current operative indication but treated conservative, 2c: operative indication and operated). Functional outcome was measured, questionnaires were answered, and new bilateral X-rays of the wrist were obtained. Factors influencing osteoarthritis, the difference in osteoarthritis between the groups and the difference between the fractured and non-fractured wrists were studied.

RESULTS

Group 2b showed a significantly higher degree of osteoarthritis in comparison with the contralateral wrist. In the other groups, this difference was not observed. We found no significant difference in OA and functional outcomes between the groups. The degree of osteoarthritis of the non-fractured wrist appeared to be highly associated with osteoarthritis of the fractured wrist.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that the degree of radiocarpal osteoarthritis is higher in conservatively treated patients that should have been operated on according to current guidelines in comparison with patients without an indication for surgery. This might suggest that our current guidelines can be effective in prevention of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. However, the effect on the functional outcome is very limited. Since the degree of radiocarpal osteoarthritis of the non-fractured wrist appeared to be highly associated with the degree of osteoarthritis of the fractured wrist, future studies should always assess osteoarthritis of both wrists in order to study the real posttraumatic effect of a fracture.

Neurologic complications in common wrist and hand surgical procedures

Nerve dysfunction after upper extremity orthopedic surgery is a recognized complication, and may result from a variety of different causes. Hand and wrist surgery require incisions and retraction that necessarily border on small peripheral nerves, which may be difficult to identify and protect with absolute certainty. This article reviews the rates and ranges of reported nerve dysfunction with respect to common surgical interventions for the distal upper extremity, including wrist arthroplasty, wrist arthrodesis, wrist arthroscopy, distal radius open reduction and internal fixation, carpal tunnel release, and thumb carpometacarpal surgery. A relatively large range of neurologic complications is reported, however many of the studies cited involve relatively small numbers of patients, and only rarely are neurologic complications included as primary outcome measures. Knowledge of these neurologic outcomes should help the surgeon to better counsel patients with regard to perioperative risk, as well as provide insight into workup and management of any adverse neurologic outcomes that may arise.

Temporary ipsilateral stiff shoulder after operative fixation of distal radial fractures

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to identify variables affecting the development of temporary stiff shoulder after operative fixation for distal radial fractures (DRF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed 167 patients who had undergone internal fixation using volar locking plate for DRF between 2010 and 2013. Group 1 was denoted as the "normal group," and group 2 was denoted as the "stiff shoulder group." Basic demographic factors evaluated included age, sex, bone mineral density (BMD), and the dominancy. Also investigated were radiologic variables, including concurrent fractures of the styloid process, positive ulnar variances, classification of DRF, and morphologic type of the distal radioulnar joint. Finally, the type of plate, methods used for postoperative protection, and time of union were analyzed.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 114 patients, and group 2 consisted of 53 patients. On overall univariate analysis, BMD, hand dominancy, and the protective methods after plating were significantly different between the 2 groups. On multivariate analysis, a lower BMD and injury on the nondominant side were significant factors for shoulder stiffness. Stiffness was significantly higher in patients with a mean BMD < -2.6 than in patients with a mean BMD ≥ -2.6. At the final follow-up, all of the 53 patients in group 2 were relieved of the symptoms of a stiff shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower BMD and injury on the nondominant distal radius were distinct factors for the development of a stiff shoulder after operative fixation in DRF. Fortunately, nonoperative treatments, such as stretching exercises/injections, were useful for the relief of these symptoms in the short-term follow-up.

Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation

Distal radius fractures account for nearly 1 of every 5 fractures in individuals aged 65 or older. Moreover, increased susceptibility to vertebral and hip fractures has been documented in patients a year after suffering a distal radius fracture. Although women are more susceptible to hip fractures, men experience a higher mortality rate in the 7 years following a distal radius fracture. Traditional approaches to distal radius fractures have included both surgical and nonsurgical treatments, with predominant complaints involving weakness, stiffness, and pain. Nonsurgical approaches include immobilization with or without reduction, whereas surgical treatments include dorsal spanning bridge plates, percutaneous pinning, external fixation, and volar plate fixation. The nature of the fracture will determine the best treatment option, and surgeons employ a multifactorial treatment approach that includes the patient’s age, nature of injury, joint involvement, and displacement among other factors. Historically, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have been the most popular approaches. However, volar plate fixation is quickly becoming a popular option as it minimizes tendon irritation, reduces immobilization time, and decreases risk of complication. The goal of treatment is to restore mobility, reduce pain, and improve functional outcomes following rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to summarize the most common treatments and importance of early referral to hand therapy to improve functional outcomes.

Radiological criteria for acceptable reduction of extra-articular distal radial fractures are not predictive for patient-reported functional outcome

The purpose of this study was to assess the association between arm-specific disability measured with the QuickDASH questionaire and radiological criteria in patients with extra-articular distal radial fractures. A consecutive series of 385 patients were initially treated non-operatively for an extra-articular distal radial fracture and 257 (69 %) patients were included in the study. In 203 of these patients (78%) the quality of radiographic reduction was judged to be adequate by radiological parameters, which included dorsal tilt, radial inclination, and radial shortening. In 54 patients (22%) the quality of radiographic alignment was judged to be inadequate. We observed no effect of radiographic parameters on the functional outcome. Female sex and longer duration of follow-up (>35 months) were the only independent prognostic factors significantly associated with a worse QuickDASH score.

[The significance of displacement in dorsally angled distal radial fractures]

BACKGROUND

Distal radial fractures occur very frequently. Most are dorsally displaced (Colles' fracture). In contrast to previously, approximately a quarter of these patients now undergo surgery. This is more than the number that is reduced and immobilised in a plaster cast. Volar plate osteosynthesis is now the most common type of surgery. There is great uncertainty regarding indications for surgery.

METHOD

The article is based on own research, a search in PubMed and a review of reference lists to identify articles that compare radiological and clinical outcomes after Colles' fractures.

RESULTS

A number of national orthopaedic associations have reviewed the literature in an attempt to draw up guidelines for indications for performing surgery on distal radial fractures, without being able to arrive at definite recommendations based on randomised studies. Our review of the literature indicates a very uncertain correlation between radiological displacement and the final clinical outcome. This applies particularly to elderly patients (over 55-65), where by far the majority of the studies do not find any such correlation. Complications and reoperation are common among patients who have undergone volar plate surgery.

INTERPRETATION

There is surprisingly little correlation between the radiological and clinical outcome after Colles' fractures. A practice where a large proportion of patients undergo surgery is probably not justified. Elderly patients will very seldom benefit from surgery in the longer term.

The relationship between displacement and clinical outcome after distal radius (Colles') fracture

We reviewed 260 patients who had been treated non-operatively for a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture a mean 6.3 (range 2.5-12.7) years earlier, in an attempt to find the limits of displacement compatible with a good clinical outcome. We excluded patients with previous or later injuries to the same limb. Bivariate analysis revealed a highly statistically significant relationship between radiographic displacement at review and clinical outcome scores. Correlation coefficients varied between 0.14 and 0.30. However, multiple linear regression analysis using most factors commonly thought to be of importance in determining the clinical outcome as independent variables explained only 23% of the variability of the clinical outcome. Dorsal angulation, ulnar variance, and radial inclination together accounted for only 11% of the variability. We conclude that the final alignment of the distal radius as shown radiologically has only a minor influence on the clinical outcome of Colles' type distal radius fractures.

Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment

BACKGROUND

There is much debate regarding the optimal treatment of displaced, unstable distal radial fractures in the elderly. The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare outcomes for elderly patients with a displaced distal radial fracture who were treated with or without surgical intervention.

METHODS

This case-control study examined ninety patients over the age of sixty-five who were treated with or without surgery for a displaced distal radial fracture. All fractures were initially treated with closed reduction and splinting. Patients who failed an acceptable closed reduction were offered surgical intervention. Patients who did not undergo surgery were treated until healing with cast immobilization. Patients who underwent surgery were treated with either plate-and-screw fixation or external fixation. Baseline radiographs and functional scores were obtained prior to treatment. Follow-up was conducted at two, six, twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two weeks. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was completed at each visit, while functional scores were obtained at the twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two-week follow-up evaluations. Outcomes at fixed time points were compared between groups with standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with a mean age of seventy-six years were treated nonoperatively, and forty-four patients with a mean age of seventy-three years were treated operatively. Other than age, there was no difference with respect to baseline demographics between the cohorts. At twenty-four weeks, patients who underwent surgery had better wrist extension (p = 0.04) than those who had not had surgery. At one year, this difference was not seen. No difference in functional status based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores and pain scores at any of the follow-up points was seen between the groups. Grip strength at one year was significantly better in the operative group. Radiographic outcome was superior for the patients in the operative group at each follow-up interval. There was no difference between the groups with regard to complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that minor limitations in the range of wrist motion and diminished grip strength, as seen with nonoperative care, do not seem to limit functional recovery at one year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

WITHDRAWN: Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine when, and if so what type of, surgical intervention is the most appropriate treatment for fractures of the distal radius in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group specialised register (November 2002), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003), EMBASE (1988 to 2003 Week 8), CINAHL (1982 to February 2003), the National Research Register (Issue 1, 2003), PEDro, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials involving skeletally mature patients with a fracture of the distal radius, which compared surgical treatment with conservative treatment, different types of surgical intervention or the duration of immobilisation after surgery. The main categories of surgical intervention were external fixation, percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation, and the insertion of bone scaffolding materials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All trials, meeting the selection criteria, were independently assessed by both reviewers for methodological quality. Data were extracted for anatomical, functional and clinical outcomes (including complications). The trials were grouped into categories relating to the main comparisons and types of surgical intervention. Despite clear heterogeneity in the characteristics of comparable trials, pooling of data was undertaken where possible and appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty eight trials, examining 25 treatment comparisons, met the inclusion criteria of this review. These involved a total of 3371 mainly female and older patients with generally displaced, often comminuted and potentially or evidently unstable fractures. Nearly half of the trials compared surgery with plaster cast immobilisation. Summarising the outcomes was hampered by the variation between the studies in participant characteristics, interventions, quality of trial methodology and reporting, and outcome measurement. Surgical methods were usually associated with better anatomical appearance after fracture healing, but there was inadequate evidence to confirm that these had resulted in better functional and clinical outcomes for the patients.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The 48 randomised trials do not provide robust evidence for most of the decisions necessary in the management of these fractures. Although, in particular, there is some evidence to support the use of external fixation or percutaneous pinning, their precise role and methods are not established. It is also unclear whether surgical intervention of most fracture types will produce consistently better long-term outcomes.There is a need for good quality evidence for the surgical management of these fractures.

Distal radius fractures in older patients: is anatomic reduction necessary?

The relationship between radiographic and functional outcomes in older patients with distal radius fractures is controversial. We explored this relationship by assessing the influence of radiographic displacement and fracture comminution on the functional outcomes of these fractures. We also asked whether operative intervention and demographic factors (age, gender, duration of followup) influenced outcome. We examined 53 patients older than 55 years with distal radius fractures with various functional assessments: range of motion (ROM) and strength measurements, three subjective surveys (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation; Modernized Activity Subjective Survey of 2007), a Gartland and Werley score, and an objective, standardized hand performance test (Jebsen-Taylor). We measured angulation, articular gap/stepoff, and radial shortening on final radiographs and fracture comminution of preoperative radiographs. We observed no effect of radiographic displacement on subjective or objective outcome assessments, including standardized hand performance timed testing. Surgically treated fractures were less likely to display residual dorsal angulation and radial shortening, but surgical intervention did not independently predict functional outcome. Fracture comminution, patient gender, and months of followup similarly had no effect on outcome. We found no relationship between anatomic reduction as evidenced by radiographic outcomes and subjective or objective functional outcomes in this older patient cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation--a systematic literature review

The goal of our systematic literature search was to prove whether the experimentally shown influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation could be confirmed in clinical studies. Despite significant effects in several studies, this is not supported by pooled data due to lack of accurate osteoporosis assessment and complication definitions.

INTRODUCTION

The fact that osteoporosis causes fractures is well-known; the assumption that it aggravates their orthopaedic treatment has not been proven. The goal of our systematic literature search was to find out whether the experimentally proven influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation could be confirmed in clinical studies.

METHODS

A systematic electronic database search was performed identifying articles that evaluated complications after fracture fixation among patients suspected of having osteoporosis as measured by BMD or surrogates including Singh index or risk factors. To determine complications risks (relative risk within 95% confidence interval) data were pooled across studies, weighted by sample size and stratified by treatment type.

RESULTS

Ten studies out of 77 randomized controlled trials (51 hip, 23 distal radius and three proximal humerus studies) and three systematic reviews finally met eligibility criteria. Despite significant differences of the relative complication risk between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients in several studies, this could not be proven in the pooled data.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to biomechanical evidence that local osteoporosis affects anchorage of implants, this could not be reproduced in clinical studies, due to the lack of accurate osteoporosis assessment, missing complication definitions and heterogeneous inclusion criteria in these studies. Prospective studies are required that address specifically the correlation between local bone status and the risk of fixation failure.

External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the distal radius ('broken wrist') is a common clinical problem. It can be treated conservatively, usually involving wrist immobilisation in a plaster cast, or surgically. A key method of surgical fixation is external fixation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the evidence from randomised controlled trials comparing external fixation with conservative treatment for fractures of the distal radius in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (September 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials involving adults with a fracture of the distal radius, which compared external fixation with conservative treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

After independent study selection by all review authors, two authors independently assessed the included trials. Independent data extraction of new trials was performed by two authors. Pooling of data was undertaken where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen heterogeneous trials, involving 1022 adults with dorsally displaced and potentially or evidently unstable distal radial fractures, were included. While all trials compared external fixation versus plaster cast immobilisation, there was considerable variation especially in terms of patient characteristics and interventions. Methodological weaknesses among these trials included lack of allocation concealment and inadequate outcome assessment. External fixation maintained reduced fracture positions (redisplacement requiring secondary treatment: 7/356 versus 51/338 (data from 9 trials); relative risk 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.32) and prevented late collapse and malunion compared with plaster cast immobilisation. There was insufficient evidence to confirm a superior overall functional or clinical result for the external fixation group. External fixation was associated with a high number of complications, such as pin-track infection, but many of these were minor. Probably, some complications could have been avoided using a different surgical technique for pin insertion. There was insufficient evidence to establish a difference between the two groups in serious complications such as reflex sympathetic dystropy: 25/384 versus 17/347 (data from 11 trials); relative risk 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 2.32.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence to support the use of external fixation for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius in adults. Though there is insufficient evidence to confirm a better functional outcome, external fixation reduces redisplacement, gives improved anatomical results and most of the excess surgically-related complications are minor.

A randomized, controlled trial of distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity: closed reduction and casting versus closed reduction, spanning external fixation, and optional percutaneous K-wires

OBJECTIVES

To compare closed reduction and casting with closed reduction and external fixation with optional K-wire fixation for distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Multicenter study at 3 University teaching hospitals.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 113 skeletally mature patients with distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement, but without joint incongruity, were randomized to receive 1 of 2 standardized treatment protocols. Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

INTERVENTION

Closed reduction and casting (n = 59) or closed reduction and external fixation (n = 54).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Upper extremity function was measured using upper extremity MFA domain scores, overall Jebsen Taylor scores, and pinch and grip strength tests. Global function and pain were measured using the SF-36. Radiographic evaluation and range of motion were documented.

RESULTS

Upper extremity MFA scores, Jebsen Taylor scores, SF-36 bodily pain scores, and grip strength improved significantly during the first year for all patients. By 2 years, mean Jebsen Taylor scores and SF 36 bodily pain scores for patients in both groups were similar to scores for normal age- and gender-matched population controls. At all points, there was a trend for better function in the external fixation; however, this did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend for better length and palmar tilt restoration with external fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

For distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but with a congruous joint, there exists a trend for better functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes when treated by immediate external fixation and optional K-wire fixation.

Use of an External Fixation Combined with the Buttress-Maintain Pinning Method in Treating Comminuted Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporotic Patients

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to keep the alignment of a distal radius fracture in patients with osteoporosis and prevent malunion. Therefore, we hoped to design better method to maintain alignment.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients over 65 years old with a displaced unstable distal radius fracture were treated by the external fixator combined with buttress-maintain pinning method and were compared with a group of 66 patients less than 60 years old treated by the same method.

RESULT

The radiologic results demonstrated that postoperative and final radial length and volar tilt were not statistically different between both groups. The functional result (excellent and good) in the elderly group was 87.5% and 89% to that of the control group. There was only one complication of pin tract infection in the elderly group.

CONCLUSIONS

External fixation for unstable distal radius fracture combined with buttress-maintain pinning method can be used in the osteoporotic bone of older adults with results similar to those for young adults at 18 months follow-up.

Treatment of distal radius fractures with intrafocal (kapandji) pinning and supplemental skeletal stabilization

The technique of intrafocal pinning was originally described by Kapandji. This technique, along with the addition of supplemental external or internal bridging fixation, can be performed quickly with minimal soft tissue damage. This technique is indicated for the treatment of unstable extra-articular or minimally displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. Studies demonstrate that young patients with displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures and minimal comminution can be treated by percutaneous intrafocal pin fixation alone, whereas, patients over 55 years of age and younger patients with comminution involving two or more surfaces of the radial metaphysis (or > 50% of the metaphyseal diameter) require bridging fixation besides percutaneous pin fixation. The use of this technique achieves the goal of surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: restoration of hand and wrist function through the restoration of alignment and articular surface congruity.

Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius

A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius was randomised to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed up for two years. During the first year the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiological restoration of anatomical features or the range of movement between the groups.

During the period of two years, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimised.

Norian SRS cement compared with conventional fixation in distal radial fractures. A randomized study

BACKGROUND

A prospective, randomized multicenter study was conducted to evaluate closed reduction and immobilization with and without Norian SRS (Skeletal Repair System) cement in the management of distal radial fractures. Norian SRS is a calcium-phosphate bone cement that is injectable, hardens in situ, and cures by a crystallization reaction to form dahllite, a carbonated apatite equivalent to bone mineral.

METHODS

A total of 323 patients with a distal radial fracture were randomized to treatment with or without Norian SRS cement. Stratification factors included fracture type (intra-articular or extra-articular), hand dominance, bone density, and the surgeon's preferred conventional treatment (cast or external fixator). The subjects receiving Norian SRS underwent a closed reduction followed by injection of the cement percutaneously or through a limited open approach. Wrist motion, beginning two weeks postoperatively, was encouraged. Control subjects, who had not received a Norian SRS injection, underwent closed reduction and application of a cast or external fixator for six to eight weeks. Supplemental Kirschner wires were used in specific instances in both groups. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically at one, two, four, and between six and eight weeks and at three, six, and twelve months. Patients rated pain and the function of the hand with use of a visual analog scale. Quality of life was assessed with use of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health status questionnaire. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Significant clinical differences were seen at six to eight weeks postoperatively, with better grip strength, wrist range of motion, digital motion, use of the hand, and social and emotional function, and less swelling in the patients treated with Norian SRS than in the control group (p < 0.05). By three months, these differences had normalized except for digital motion, which remained significantly better in the group treated with Norian SRS (p = 0.015). At one year, no clinical differences were detected. Radiographically, the average change in ulnar variance was greater in the patients treated with Norian SRS (+2.0 mm) than in the control group (+1.4 mm) (p < 0.02). No differences were seen in the total number of complications, including loss of reduction. The infection rate, however, was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the control group (16.7%) than in the group treated with Norian SRS (2.5%) and the infections were always related to external fixator pins or Kirschner wires. Four patients with intra-articular extravasation of cement were identified; no sequelae were observed at twenty-four months. Cement was seen in extraosseous locations in 112 (70%) of the SRS-treated patients; loss of reduction was highest in this subgroup (37%). The extraosseous material had disappeared in eighty-three of the 112 patients by twelve months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that fixation of a distal radial fracture with Norian SRS cement may allow for accelerated rehabilitation. A limited open approach and supplemental fixation with Kirschner wires are recommended. Additional or alternate fixation is necessary for complex articular fractures.

Orthopedic management of vertebral and long bone fractures in patients with osteoporosis

Because of the evolving demographics of the world's population, fracture surgeons must become experts in the treatment of fractures in osteoporotic bone. Toward this end, fracture surgeons are learning to modify the classic techniques of internal fixation to adapt them to the elderly population. Screws should be placed into the best quality of bone available, which, in most cases, is an opposing cortex. Screw fixation can be augmented using acrylic cement. When using plate fixation, stable bone contact at the fracture site is the most important factor in reducing strain in the plate. Shortening of the affected bone is advisable to achieve this contact in comminuted fractures. Plates should not be used to bridge areas of comminution in osteoporotic bone. Plates should generally be as long as is compatible with the affected bone, with screws placed as close to and as far away from the fracture site as possible. When confronted with diaphyseal fractures or fractures with metaphyseal-diaphyseal comminution, locked intramedullary nails can be used. Angled blade plates are applicable to osteoporotic metaphyseal fractures but should be used as tension band plates, which require stable load-sharing contact opposite the plate. Antiglide plating and use of tension band wires are also effective strategies for osteoporotic fractures. Finally, to reduce the morbidity of bone graft harvest and to ensure adequate volumes of graft, the use of bone graft substitutes is particularly applicable in elderly patients. All patients with evidence of osteoporosis should be started on a medical regimen to combat further bone loss that includes calcium supplementation with a prescription for antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or hormone replacement therapy.

Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine when, and if so what type of, surgical intervention is the most appropriate treatment for fractures of the distal radius in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (November 2002), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003), EMBASE (1988 to 2003 Week 8), CINAHL (1982 to February 2003), the National Research Register (Issue 1, 2003), PEDro, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials involving skeletally mature patients with a fracture of the distal radius, which compared surgical treatment with conservative treatment, different types of surgical intervention or the duration of immobilisation after surgery. The main categories of surgical intervention were external fixation, percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation, and the insertion of bone scaffolding materials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All trials, meeting the selection criteria, were independently assessed by both reviewers for methodological quality. Data were extracted for anatomical, functional and clinical outcomes (including complications). The trials were grouped into categories relating to the main comparisons and types of surgical intervention. Despite clear heterogeneity in the characteristics of comparable trials, pooling of data was undertaken where possible and appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty eight trials, examining 25 treatment comparisons, met the inclusion criteria of this review. These involved a total of 4371 mainly female and older patients with generally displaced, often comminuted and potentially or evidently unstable fractures. Nearly half of the trials compared surgery with plaster cast immobilisation. Summarising the outcomes was hampered by the variation between the studies in participant characteristics, interventions, quality of trial methodology and reporting, and outcome measurement. Surgical methods were usually associated with better anatomical appearance after fracture healing, but there was inadequate evidence to confirm that these had resulted in better functional and clinical outcomes for the patients.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The 48 randomised trials do not provide robust evidence for most of the decisions necessary in the management of these fractures. Although, in particular, there is some evidence to support the use of external fixation or percutaneous pinning, their precise role and methods are not established. It is also unclear whether surgical intervention of most fracture types will produce consistently better long-term outcomes. There is a need for good quality evidence for the surgical management of these fractures.

Conservative treatment of redisplaced Colles' fractures in elderly patients older than 60 years old - anatomical and functional outcome

A retrospective study was carried out to compare the functional outcome in two groups of patients who were 60 years old or older. One group had Colles' fractures, which had been reduced and did not redisplace. The other group's fractures redisplaced and were treated conservatively. Of the 11 patients in the first group, 82% had excellent or good functional outcome, which was not significantly different when compared with the second group of 25 patients with 68% having excellent or good functional outcome.

A safer pin position for external fixation of distal radial fractures

Injury or entrapment of the superficial radial nerve is common in external fixation for fractures of the distal radius. However, by insertion of the half pins dorsally (rather than dorso-radially) in the diaphysis of radius, the nerve should be safe. None of the 40 patients we treated with this safer position of the pins developed symptoms related to the superficial radial nerve.

Results of transarticular fixator application in distal radius fractures

From January 1989 until October 1993, 102 patients with 103 distal radius fractures were included in a prospective study with the Pennig wrist fixator (Orthofix, Srl, Italy). 90.5% of these patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Using the functional outcome score according to Gartland and Werley, we obtained 41% excellent, 46% good, 10% fair and 3% poor results. Additional procedures such as K-wires, bone grafting or radio-ulnar stabilizations were carried out in 61% of cases. The complications included five fixator displacements, four of which happened with the prototype used until the first half of 1990. Two major pin-track-infections required surgical intervention, three patients in the beginning of the series encountered irritations of the superficial radial nerve, one pin cut out of the second metacarpal bone and one patient sustained algodystrophy. The results show the significance of an anatomical reduction, the restoration of the radial length seems to be of special importance to obtain good functional outcome. This can not always be achieved with the fixator alone; often additional procedures are required in order to obtain an anatomical joint reconstruction. The advantage of this fixator lies in its lightweight and small-size design as well as in its easy application technique and the possibility to carry out the reduction after mounting the fixator with the double ball joint centered on the fracture level and the carpus.

Intrafocal (Kapandji) pinning of distal radius fractures with and without external fixation

Seventy-three patients were treated with either intrafocal pinning (Kapandji technique) alone or in combination with external fixation between 1988 and 1993 for extra-articular fractures of the distal radius (with or without a nondisplaced extension into the radiocarpal articular surface) with inadequate alignment after initial closed reduction. Sixty-one patients were available for follow-up examination at an average of 34 months (range, 24-71 months). The average age was 52 years (range, 16-84 years). Thirty-three of the patients were female. The patients all had dorsally displaced extra-articular fractures, although 56% had a nondisplaced extension of the fracture into the radiocarpal joint and 46% had a nondisplaced fracture extending into the distal radioulnar joint. The patients were separated into groups based on age, degree of comminution, and whether external fixation was also used. In the older patients, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief were significantly better when external fixation was used, even when only 1 cortex of the radius demonstrated comminution. In the younger patients, good results in terms of range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief were obtained when percutaneous intrafocal pins were used alone in patients with comminution of only 1 surface of the radius (<50% of the metaphyseal diameter). When > or = 2 sides of the radial metaphysis were comminuted, the patients with external fixation had better results than those without external fixation. Although the correction of palmar tilt and radial tilt did result in better functional results, the restoration of radial length had the most significant effect on range of motion and grip strength.

Closed reduction and external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal radius

The anatomical and functional outcome and complications after closed reduction and external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal radius were reviewed in 29 patients. The fractures were reduced by longitudinal traction and closed manipulation under fluoroscopic control, and the reduced position was retained by a standard half-frame Hoffmann external fixator for six to eight weeks. The mean follow-up time was four (3-7) years. The reduction failed in three patients after too early removal of the fixator (three to five weeks). For the rest of the patients the dorsal angulation, the radial length, the articular step-off, and the intra-articular gap between fragments were significantly improved. Twenty-two patients had excellent or good anatomical alignment and in seven it was fair. One patient had a superficial pin infection, six patients had transient paraesthesias, and one patient transient mild dystrophia. At follow-up one patient had some finger stiffness; this was the only persistent complication. The median Gartland and Werley functional score was 3. The functional end result was excellent or good in 22 patients, fair in four, and poor in three.

Anatomical and functional results five years after remanipulated Colles' fractures

During 1988 we recorded all Colles' fractures (n = 530) in a prospective study in the city of Bergen. According to defined criteria, the fractures were treated by immobilisation in plaster cast with or without reduction; reduction and immobilisation by a Hoffman external fixation device; or open reduction and internal fixation. Included in the present study were 26 patients with secondary displacement after immobilisation in a plaster cast (8% of the reduced fractures). The fractures were remanipulated and splinted in a new cast for four more weeks. The patients were followed up five years after the fracture, and underwent subjective, radiographic, and functional evaluation. The anatomical end result was significantly improved compared with the initial deformity. The dorsal angulation improved significantly compared with the "slipped' position, whereas the radial length did not. The functional end result was excellent or good in 20 patients (77%). The total movement in all directions was correlated negatively with ulna plus, and the grip strength correlated negatively with the degree of osteoarthrosis. There were no other significant linear relationships between anatomical and functional variables. Total pronation and supination correlated with the initial radial length and dorsal angulation, and the total movement in all directions correlated with the initial radial length.

Wrist pain in adult athletes

As more and more adults become physically active, primary care physicians are seeing an increasing number of wrist injuries. Effective treatment is based on (1) accurate diagnosis, (2) maintenance of bone and joint-surface alignment until healing of bone, soft tissue, or both occurs, and (3) institution of an appropriate rehabilitation program. After symptoms have subsided, patients can gradually return to athletic participation. The long-term sequelae of wrist injuries are yet to be determined. If it is assumed that such injury causes a form of joint trauma, then analogies may be drawn to other types of musculoskeletal trauma, in which such factors as joint-surface and bone malalignment can lead to abnormal cartilage wear, predisposing patients to degenerative arthritis. Similarly, untreated ligament injuries may alter joint biomechanics, which can also lead to joint-surface trauma. Further clinical study should clarify the long-term effects of wrist injury.

Prediction of secondary displacement in Colles' fracture

In a prospective study, 645 consecutive Colles' fractures treated conservatively were followed until union. The fractures subsequently lost some of their manipulated position during the immobilization period. However, the anatomical end result was significantly improved compared with the initial deformity. The mean shortening of the radius during plaster-cast treatment was 3 mm, and the mean increase of dorsal angulation was 7 degrees. Multiple regression analyses showed that initial dorsal angulation, age, and Older type were important predictor variables for the end result of dorsal angulation. Initial radial length, age and initial dorsal angulation were of importance for the end result of radial length. The strongest linear relationship was found between the end result of radial length and the initial radial length (r = 0.67). This may indicate that the patients who will malunite with radial shortening are those with significant radial axial shortening at the initial presentation. Thus, these patients should be treated with a more stable fixation device.

Cast or external fixation for fracture of the distal radius. A prospective study of 126 cases

In a prospective 4-year study, 126 consecutive patients with a fracture of the distal radius were followed. Functional, anatomic, and radiographic final results of fixation with above-the-elbow cast immobilization were compared with the results obtained with external fixation. The results following external fixation of comminuted intraarticular fractures were better than those of similar fractures treated in a cast. Aged osteoporotic patients tolerated better residual deformities, and the clinical results had a relatively low correlation with the final anatomic alignment. We suggest that extraarticular fractures of the distal radius should be treated with cast immobilization. Comminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal radius should be treated with external fixation, which maintains accurate anatomic position until solid fracture healing is achieved.