Late outcome of nonoperative management of thoracolumbar vertebral wedge fractures

Percutaneous vertebral-disc plasty for thoracolumbar very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A randomized controlled study

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes and radiological parameters of patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus those undergoing percutaneous vertebral-disc plasty (PVDP) for back pain, segmental instability, and kyphosis due to thoracolumbar very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (vsOVCFs).

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled study included elderly patients with thoracolumbar vsOVCFs. All the patients were randomly allocated into the PVP group (who underwent conventional PVP) and the PVDP group (who underwent PVP combined percutaneous cement discoplasty). The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), local kyphosis angle, and disc height were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

Significant postoperative improvements in the VAS, ODI, and the local kyphosis angle (LKA) were shown, compared with the preoperative values in both groups (p < 0.05). The average VAS, ODI, and LKA for patients in the PVP group were increased compared to those in the PVDP group observed at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). The DHA, DHP, and LKA were seen to be maintained in the PVDP group at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). The change was significantly lower in the PVDP group at the last follow-up in those parameters (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PVDP may be a feasible and effective technique for the treatment of very severe OVCFs, that can restore intervertebral height, provide segmental stabilizing and relieve back pain in the short term.

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF THORACOLUMBAR CORONAL SPLIT FRACTURES: FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the behavior of thoracolumbar fractures of the coronal split type using the finite element method. Methods Two comparative studies were conducted through simulation of coronal split fractures in a finite model in which the first lumbar vertebra (L1) was considered to be fractured. In the first case, the fracture line was considered to have occurred in the middle of the vertebral body (50%), while in the second model, the fracture line occurred in the anterior quarter of the vertebral body (25%). The maximum von Mises stress values were compared, as well as the axial displacement between fragments of the fractured vertebra. Results The stress levels found for the fracture located at half of the vertebral body were 43% higher (264.88 MPa x 151.16 MPa) than those for the fracture located at the anterior 25% of the vertebra, and the axial displacement of the 50% fractured body was also greater (1.19 mm x 1.10 mm). Conclusions Coronal split fractures located in the anterior quarter of the vertebral body incurred less stress and displacements and are more amenable to conservative treatment than 50% fractures occurring in the middle of the vertebral body. Level of Evidence III; Experimental study.

Predictors of Recovery After Conservative Treatment of AO-Type A Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures Without Neurological Deficit

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, correlational, exploratory, clinical research.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors determining a patient's recovery after conservative treatment of compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The reported results of compression fractures are poor. These results are not influenced by the severity of compression, the fracture site, or the residual deformity. Otherwise, the factors that determine a patient's recovery are unknown.

METHODS

In 48 conservatively treated patients the preinjury versus the 12-month follow-up differences (Δ) in back pain (visual analogue scale for pain), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Greenough and Fraser low back outcome scale were prospectively recorded. For these differences and for time lost from work and satisfaction, multiple linear regressions with combinations of 16 factors were performed.

RESULTS

At 1 year, patients with an income-insurance were 9% (P = 0.096) more disabled than those without. They reported a 15% less favorable global outcome and 27% less participation. Smokers were 13% (P = 0.010) more disabled and 11% (P = 0.044) less satisfied. With each increase of the AO-fracture type from A1 to A3 the disability was 8% worse. Patients with pre-existent chronic low back pain (CLBP) returned two points (on a visual analogue scale [VAS] pain total of 10) more closely (P = 0.041) to their preinjury pain level than those without but were 21% (P = 0.001) less satisfied. Our model offers an explanation for more than 25% of the variability of ΔODI and of the satisfaction. For sick leave, no significant predictors were found.

CONCLUSION

Smoking and insurance status are the strongest negative predictors for recovery. LBP patients returned more closely to their preinjury back pain level, but were less satisfied. The AO fracture type had a marked influence on disability, the sagittal deformity had not. The time lost from work did not depend on patient or injury-related factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Closed therapy of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body fractures in trauma patients

Background

The failure rate for the closed/non-surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body fractures (TLVBF) in trauma patients has not been adequately evaluated utilizing computed tomography (CT) studies.

Methods

From 2007 to 2008, consecutive trauma patients, who met inclusion criteria, with a CT diagnosis of acute TLVBF undergoing closed treatment were assessed. The failure rates for closed therapy, at 3 months post-trauma, were defined by progressive deformity, vertebral body collapse, or symptomatic/asymptomatic pseudarthrosis. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification was utilized to classify the fractures (groups A1 and non-A1 fractures) and were successively followed with CT studies.

Results

There were 54 patients with 91 fractures included in the study; 66 were A1 fractures, and 25 were non-A1 fractures. All had rigid bracing applied with flat and upright X-ray films performed to rule out instability. None had sustained spinal cord injuries. Thirteen patients (24%) failed closed therapy [e.g. 13 failed fractures (14%) out of 91 total fractures]. Five failed radiographically only (asymptomatic), and eight failed radiographically and clinically (symptomatic). A1 fractures had a 4.5% failure rate, while non-A1 fractures failed at a rate of 40%.

Conclusion

Failure of closed therapy for TLVBF in the trauma population is not insignificant. Non-A1 fractures had a much higher failure rate when compared to A1 fractures. We recommend close follow-up particularly of non-A1 fractures treated in closed fashion using successive CT studies.

The effects of orthosis on thoracolumbar fracture healing: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Various methods have been used as a conservative treatment of stable thoracolumbar fracture. Presently, it is controversial, whether the use of spinal orthoses reduces pain and deformity associated with vertebral fracture or not. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of orthoses on vertebral fractures healing in thoracolumbar area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was carried out on Medline, ISI web of knowledge, Google Scholar and Embasco. The keywords used included thoracolumbar fracture; brace, orthosis, and conservative treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one papers were selected for final analysis. The quality of the most of the papers was poor, as most of them were retrospective studies with various follow-up periods.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results of these studies, it can be concluded that subjects with a fracture of thoracolumbar achieved a high ability to return to their jobs. The use of orthosis did not influence the kyphosis angulation in subjects with stable fracture in thoracolumbar spine. The effects of orthoses would be mostly immobilization, protection and remaining.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current concepts of conservative care

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a growing public health problem with important socio-economic effects in western countries. In the USA, 10 million people over 50 suffer from osteoporosis. In these patients, 1.5 million annual fractures have been registered, and 50% of these are vertebral compression.

SOURCES OF DATA

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL and Embase databases using various combinations of the keywords 'osteoporosis', 'vertebral compression fractures', 'brace', 'bracing', 'orthosis', 'conservative management' and 'rehabilitation' over the years 1966-2011. All articles relevant to the subject were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references in the context of conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Conservative management for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures includes bed rest, pain medication, physiotherapy and bracing.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

A conservative management for patients with osteoporotic VCFs s has not been standardized. The utility of vertebral augmentation techniques has been questioned by recent randomized controlled trials.

GROWING POINTS

Randomized controlled trials are being performed worldwide on vertebral augmentation techniques.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Although spinal orthoses are commonly used for the management of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, in the literature there is only one randomized controlled trial on bracing for this condition. While the best conservative management for subjects with osteoporotic VCFs s is not defined and standardized, no conclusions on the superiority of vertebral augmentation techniques over conservative management can be drawn.

Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are an increasing public health problem. Recently, randomised controlled trials on the use of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of these fractures have been published, but no definitive conclusions have been reached on the role of these interventions. The major problem encountered when trying to perform a meta-analysis of the available studies for the use of cementoplasty in patients with a VCF is that conservative management has not been standardised. Forms of conservative treatment commonly used in these patients include bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and bracing.

In this review, we report the best evidence available on the conservative care of patients with osteoporotic VCFs and associated back pain, focusing on the role of the most commonly used spinal orthoses. Although orthoses are used for the management of these patients, to date, there has been only one randomised controlled trial published evaluating their value. Until the best conservative management for patients with VCFs is defined and standardised, no conclusions can be drawn on the superiority or otherwise of cementoplasty techniques over conservative management.

Nonoperative treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective randomized study of different treatment options

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare nonoperative treatment methods for traumatic thoracic and lumbar compression fractures and burst fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up.

SETTING

Two general hospitals in the Netherlands.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a traumatic thoracic or lumbar spine fracture, without neurologic damage, with less than 50% loss of height of the anterior column and less than 30% reduction of the spinal canal were included.

INTERVENTION

Patients in the compression group were randomized to physical therapy and postural instructions, a brace for 6 weeks, or a Plaster of Paris cast for 6 or 12 weeks. Patients in the burst group received a brace or a Plaster of Paris cast, both for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Follow-up examinations included radiographs, Visual Analogue Scores for toleration of treatment and persistent pain, and an Oswestry Disability Index at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 133 patients: 108 in the compression group and 25 in the burst group. For compression fractures, physical therapy and brace were considered the most tolerable. Brace therapy scored significantly better on the Visual Analogue Scores for residual pain and on the Oswestry Disability Index. None of the treatments had any significant effect on the residual deformity measurements. For burst fractures, no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Brace treatment with supplementary physical therapy is the treatment of choice for patients with compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Furthermore, more than 20% of all patients had moderate or severe back pain at long-term follow-up.

No evidence for the effectiveness of bracing in patients with thoracolumbar fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The use of braces is widespread in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. The effectiveness of bracing, however, is controversial. We sought evidence for the effect of bracing in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures based on outcome and length of hospital stay (LOS). Furthermore, we evaluated the incidence of complications of bracing.

METHODS

An electronic search strategy with extensive MeSH headings was used in various databases to identify studies that compared bracing and non-bracing therapies. Two reviewers independently selected systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and observational studies, and both assessed the methodological quality and extracted the data.

RESULTS

No systematic reviews or RCTs were found. 7 retrospective studies were included. None of these studies showed an effect of bracing. Because of poor methodological quality, no best-evidence synthesis could be performed. One observational study was selected in which a complication of bracing was reported.

INTERPRETATION

In the present literature, there is no evidence for the effectiveness of bracing in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The lack of high-quality studies prevents relevant conclusions from being drawn.

Nonoperatively treated type A spinal fractures: mid-term versus long-term functional outcome

This study focuses on the mid-term (four years) and long-term (ten years) functional outcome of patients treated nonoperatively for a type A spinal fracture without primary neurological deficit. Functional outcome was measured using the visual analogue scale spine score (VAS) and the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). The 50 patients included were on average 41.2 years old at the time of injury. Four years post injury, a mean VAS score of 74.5 and a mean RMDQ score of 4.9 were found. Ten years after the accident, the mean VAS and RMDQ scores were 72.6 and 4.7, respectively (NS). No significant relationships were found between the difference scores of the VAS and RMDQ compared with age, gender, fracture sub-classification, and time between measurements. Three (6%) patients had a poor long-term outcome. None of the patients required surgery for late onset pain or progressive neurological deficit. Functional outcome after a nonoperatively treated type A spinal fracture is good, both four and ten years post injury. For the group as a whole, four years after the fracture a steady state exists in functional outcome, which does not change for ten years at least after the fracture.

Nonoperative management and treatment of spinal injuries

STUDY DESIGN

Review of literature.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate and discuss nonoperative treatment and treatment of spinal injuries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonoperative methods have been a mainstay of care for spinal injuries since ancient Egypt. The vast majority of all spinal injuries should be treated in the nonoperative fashion. The indications and methods continue to evolve.

METHODS

A PubMed search of the literature returned more than 1000 articles related to spine trauma. A total of 270 were references to nonoperative treatment, and 100 were thought to be relevant and included in this review.

RESULTS

All spine injuries are treated in a nonoperative manner, at least initially. The vast majority of injuries are successfully and appropriately treated in a definitive manner with nonsurgical methods. Over the past 10-15 years, the advent of better rigid cervical fixation has decreased the use of halo vests as definitive treatment of many cervical injuries. In contrast, during the same time, more thoracolumbar injuries are being treated in a nonsurgical fashion because the outcomes have been shown to be similar or superior.

CONCLUSIONS

As with all of medicine, the treatment of spine trauma will continue to evolve with time. It is paramount that the physician selects the treatment that will provide the best short-term recovery with the least impact on long-term function.

Measurement of fracture kyphosis with the Oxford Cobbometer: intra- and interobserver reliabilities and comparison with other techniques

STUDY DESIGN

Statistical analysis of 3 techniques for measuring thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to fracture.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the reliability of using an Oxford Cobbometer and assess the most reliable measurement technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The reproducibility of Cobb angles for the assessment of saggital plane deformity on spine radiographs has been shown to have significant variability in both intra- and interobserver error.

METHODS

Twenty-four lateral spine radiographs of patients with thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures were measured on 2 separate occasions, in random order, by 4 blinded observers using the same Oxford Cobbometer and ruler.

RESULTS

Method 2, the angle from the inferior endplate of the vertebra above the fractured vertebra to the superior endplate of the vertebra below the fractured vertebra, had the greatest intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities (rho = 0.856-0.976 and rho = 0.95, respectively). The other 2 methods had lower reliabilities; however, all 3 methods were well above the statistically acceptable threshold of >0.8, and the intraobserver reliabilities with each observer was 99% overall. These reliabilities supersede results reported previously using the conventional Cobb technique. The absolute mean difference between readings and 95% limit of agreement also improves on previous data, 2 degrees and +/- 5.8 degrees , respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Highest intraclass correlation coefficients were obtained using method 2. Using the Oxford Cobbometer to measure fracture kyphosis has higher reliability than the standard Cobb angle technique. It is easy and quick to use in a clinical setting.