Prognostic value of esophageal manometry in antireflux surgery in childhood

ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Complications in Children With Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Esophageal atresia (EA) is one of the most common congenital digestive anomalies. With improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care treatments, the focus of care of these patients has shifted from mortality to morbidity and quality-of-life issues. These children face gastrointestinal (GI) problems not only in early childhood but also through adolescence and adulthood. There is, however, currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of these patients. The GI working group of International Network on Esophageal Atresia comprises members from ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN and was charged with the task of developing uniform evidence-based guidelines for the management of GI complications in children with EA.

METHODS

Thirty-six clinical questions addressing the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the common GI complications in patients with EA were formulated. Questions on the diagnosis, and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, management of "cyanotic spells," etiology, investigation and management of dysphagia, feeding difficulties, anastomotic strictures, congenital esophageal stenosis in EA patients were addressed. The importance of excluding eosinophilic esophagitis and associated GI anomalies in symptomatic patients with EA is discussed as is the quality of life of these patients and the importance of a systematic transition of care to adulthood. A systematic literature search was performed from inception to March 2014 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, and PsychInfo databases. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was applied to evaluate outcomes. During 2 consensus meetings, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique. Expert opinion was used where no randomized controlled trials were available to support the recommendation.

Comparison of the efficiencies of esophageal manometry, vector volume analysis and esophagus pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux

AIM

In this study, we aimed to compare the superiorities of esophageal manometry, vector volume analysis and 24-hour pH meter studies in showing gastroesophageal reflux disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The files of the patients who presented to pediatric surgery and pediatric gastroenterology outpatient clinics of our hospital with suspicious gastroesophageal reflux disease between 2011 and 2012 and who were investigated were examined and 21 patients whose investigations had been completed were included in the study. The patients were evaluated by treatment method and were divided into three groups as Group 1 who were followed up with medical treatment, Group 2 in whom surgical intervention was performed and Group 3 who were not treated. Chi-square test was used in evaluation of the categorical variables, Kruskal Wallis test was used in comparison of the mean values between the groups and Dunn test was used in subgroup analyses when Kruskal Wallis test was found to be significant. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 21 patients included in the study were female and eight were male. The mean age of the patients was 5.71 years (one-16 years). In the 24-hour pH monitoring study, the mean reflux index was found to be 48.7% in Group 1, 42.4% in Group 2 and 28.3% in Group 3. In esophageal manometry studies, the pressure difference at lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was found to be 13,4 cm H2O in Group 1, 31.8 cm H2O in Group 2 and 4.3 cmH2O in Group 3. In vector volume analyses, the mean vector volume was calculated to be 96.01 cm(3) in Group 1, 2 398.9 cm(3) in Group 2 and 196.3 cm(3) in Group 3. In the 24-hour pH monitoring study, a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found in terms of showing reflux, whereas statistical significance could not be shown in terms of need for surgical treatment or need for medical treatment in any other method (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring was found to be efficient in making a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, whereas esophageal manometry and vector volume analyses were not found to be efficient.

Gastrointestinal complications of fundoplication

In children with medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), fundoplication is effective and safe. However, in a subset of patients, gastrointestinal dysfunction occurs postoperatively. Symptoms include chest pain, persistent dysphagia in 5%, gas bloat in 2% to 4%, diarrhea in up to 20%, and dumping syndrome in up to 30%. Symptoms are often nonspecific, arising from recurrent or persistent GERD, anatomic complications such as disrupted or herniated wrap, functional disturbances such as rapid gastric emptying or altered gastric accommodation, or alternative diagnoses such as cyclic vomiting syndrome or food allergy. Detailed investigation, including various combinations of pHmetry, videofluoroscopy, endoscopy, motility studies, and dumping provocation testing, may be required to clarify pathophysiology and guide management.

Laparoscopic antireflux procedures in the management of gastroesophageal reflux following esophageal atresia repair

OBJECTIVES

The validity of open fundoplication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair is still disputed. The authors have retrospectively evaluated the results achieved in their centers using laparoscopic antireflux procedures (LARP) in children operated for EA at birth.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2002, 350 children underwent LARP. Of these, 21 (6%) underwent EA repair at birth. Our study focused only on the management of these 21 patients; 5 of them (23.8%) were neurologically impaired children (NIC). All underwent LARP, 9 patients according to Nissen, 9 according to Thal, and 3 according to Toupet. The 5 NIC with feeding problems underwent concomitant g-tube placement during the same procedure.

RESULTS

All the procedures were completed in laparoscopy, without intraoperative complications. The mean operative time was 65 minutes (range 45-140). We had no mortality in our series. Hospital stay varied from 2 to 9 days (median 3 days). At a maximum follow-up of 6 years, all patients were evaluated with a 24-hours pH-metry and barium swallow. The 16 neurologically normal children were free of symptoms at the last follow-up; five of them (31.2%) had mild dysphagia, which disappeared spontaneously within 3-6 months. One girl experienced an important episode of aspiration 2 years after the LARP, although there was no evidence of reflux at the follow-up examinations. As for the 5 NIC, one patient eats only through a g-tube, the other 4 undergo mixed feeding (g-tube and mouth); none have signs of GER, but two of them still present respiratory symptoms, and one has delayed gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an appropriate treatment of GER in children operated for EA at birth, independently of the antireflux mechanism adopted; the 31.2% rate of short-term dysphagia presenting as residual respiratory symptoms may be due to a primary dysmotility of the esophagus consequent to the esophageal atresia.