Candida esophagitis in a child with achalasia

Prevalence, Predictive Factors, and Clinical Manifestations of Fungal Esophagitis in Children

OBJECTIVES

Fungal esophagitis (FE) is the most common cause of esophageal infection and its prevalence in immunocompetent adults is rising. However, there is minimal data on FE in children without human immunodeficiency virus. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, symptoms, endoscopic appearances, and predictive factors of FE in children, regardless of immune status.

METHODS

A 2010-2020 retrospective case-control study was conducted on 1823 children presenting to Sydney Children's Hospital for elective endoscopy with esophageal biopsy. Histopathology reports were reviewed to identify FE cases and determine prevalence rates. Thirty-two patients with FE were age- and sex-matched (1:2) to 64 controls. Significant symptoms and risk factors of FE were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of FE in children was 1.76%. Common symptoms included dysphagia (25%), heartburn (25%), poor oral intake (21.9%), vomiting (18.8%), cough (15.6%), nausea (12.5%), and weight loss (9.4%). No significant differences in symptoms were found between cases and controls. On endoscopy, although white plaques were associated with FE ( P < 0.001), visually normal findings were reported in 28.1% of cases. Topical swallowed corticosteroids were a significant independent risk factor for FE (adjusted odds ratio = 10.740, 95% confidence interval: 1.213-95.101, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of FE in this pediatric cohort reflects rates among immunocompetent adults. Given that many of these children presented with a wide range of gastrointestinal symptoms, esophageal biopsy is required to accurately diagnose FE. Pediatricians should consider the risk of FE when prescribing topical swallowed corticosteroids.

Infectious Esophagitis in Children

Infectious esophagitis is the third most common cause of esophagitis after gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and should always be considered in the differential of patients with dysphagia and odynophagia. The most common organisms causing disease are candida, Herpes simplex virus (HSV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV). It is well recognized that an impaired local or systemic immune system is a risk factor for disease; however, esophageal dysmotility and disruptions in esophageal homeostasis and the esophageal milieu are likely to represent additional risk factors in disease pathogenesis.

Achalasia Previously Diagnosed as Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease by Relying on Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring: Use of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry in Children

Gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) is the most common esophageal disorder in children. Achalasia occurs less commonly but has similar symptoms to GERD. A nine-year old boy presented with vomiting, heartburn, and nocturnal cough. The esophageal impedance-pH monitor revealed nonacidic GERD (all-refluxate clearance percent time of 20.9%). His symptoms persisted despite medical treatment for GERD, and he was lost to follow up. Four years later, he presented with heartburn, solid-food dysphagia, daily post-prandial vomiting, and failure to thrive. Endoscopy showed a severely dilated esophagus with candidiasis. High-resolution manometry was performed, and he was diagnosed with classic achalasia (also known as type I). His symptoms resolved after two pneumatic dilatation procedures, and his weight and height began to catch up to his peers. Clinicians might consider using high-resolution manometry in children with atypical GERD even after evaluation with an impedance-pH monitor.

Pattern of esophageal eosinophilic infiltration in patients with achalasia and response to Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is now recognized as a common cause of dysphagia. Eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus has also been associated with other conditions, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, the incidence, pattern, and clinical significance of eosinophilic infiltration in achalasia are poorly documented. We sought to characterize this histological finding in patients undergoing Heller myotomy (HM) for achalasia. Ninety-six patients undergoing laparoscopic HM for primary achalasia between 1999 and 2008 were identified from a prospective database. Serial mid and distal per-endoscopic esophageal biopsies taken from patients before and after surgery were assessed for the presence of elevated intraepithelial eosinophils (EIEs). Slides from patients with reports suggestive of EIE were reviewed independently by two pathologists, and the highest eosinophil count/high-power field (eos/hpf) was recorded. Dysphagia scores (0 = none to 5 = severe dysphagia), GERD health-related quality of life scores (0 = best to 45 = worst), and 24-hour pH results were compared before and 3 months after surgery. We related the highest eos to the symptoms and response to HM. Data are presented as median (range). Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined significance, *P < 0.05. Of 96 patients with achalasia, 50 had undergone pre-HM biopsies revealing EIE in 17/50 (34%), with a median of 3 eos/hpf (1-21). Two patients were found to have superimposed esophageal candidiasis. One patient met the pathologic criteria for EoE. Twenty-five of 50 (50%) postoperative biopsies demonstrated a median of 5 eos/hpf (1-62) for a total of 28/50 patients (56%) with EIE in either the preoperative or postoperative period. Four patients (8%) met the pathologic criteria for EoE, and two demonstrated persistent esophageal candidiasis. A decrease in eosinophils was found in 6/28 patients (21%) from 3/hpf (1-21) to 0.5/hpf (0-4). Increase in eosinophils was found in 22/28 patients (79%) from 0.5/hpf (0-8) to 5/hpf (1-62). Preoperative and postoperative dysphagia scores were available in 23 patients. Dysphagia scores improved in 22/23 patients. (3 [0-5] to 0 [0-2])*. Preoperative and postoperative GERD scores were available in 21 patients. GERD scores improved in 20/21 patients (10 [3-38] to 2 [2-14])*. Four of 13 patients (30.7%) demonstrated significant reflux in the postoperative period. No difference in clinical response to HM was detected between patients with preoperative EIE compared with patients with no EIE. No correlation between postoperative esophageal pH and eos was observed. A significant number of patients with achalasia demonstrate esophageal eosinophilic infiltration even at numbers demonstrable in patients with EoE (8% 4/50). While the interaction between achalasia and esophageal eosinophilic infiltration needs further investigation, this does not represent a distinct clinical entity. Thus, the presence of esophageal eosinophils in patients presenting with dysphagia should not preclude further work-up for other etiologies, including achalasia.

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum due to achalasia: a case report

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) is a rare and benign clinical entity characterized by free air around mediastinal structures. Precipitating factors include violent cough, asthma, inhalational drugs, labor and exercise. We report a case of SPM due to achalasia which to the best of our knowledge, has never been reported. In achalasia, Valsalva maneuver might accompany severe vomiting. This causes alveolar rupture due to elevated intrabronchial and intra-alveolar pressure. Air tracks along the mediastinal spaces cause SPM. In our patient, there was no evidence of esophageal perforation. Tension pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are complications of SPM.