Lack of inhibitory effect of octreotide on intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome in the rat

Pharmacologic management of diarrhea in patients with short bowel syndrome

Diarrhea associated with short bowel syndrome (SBS) can have multiple etiologies, including accelerated intestinal transit, gastric acid hypersecretion, intestinal bacterial overgrowth, and malabsorption of fats and bile salts. As a result, patients may need multiple medications to effectively control fecal output. The armamentarium of antidiarrheal drugs includes antimotility agents, antisecretory drugs, antibiotics and probiotics, bile acid-binding resins, and pancreatic enzymes. An antidiarrheal regimen must be individualized for each patient and should be developed using a methodical, stepwise approach. Treatment should be initiated with a single first-line medication at the low end of its dosing range. Dosage and/or dosing frequency can then be slowly escalated to achieve maximal effect while minimizing adverse events. If diarrhea remains poorly controlled, additional agents can be incorporated sequentially. If modification of the regimen is required, a single medication should be altered or exchanged at a time. After each adjustment of the regimen, sufficient time should be permitted to fully assess response (≥3-5 days) before initiating additional changes. SBS-associated malabsorption is a major obstacle to optimization of an antidiarrheal regimen because drug absorption is impaired. Patients may benefit from high dosages and/or frequent dosing intervals, liquid preparations, or nonoral routes of drug delivery. Although the diarrhea associated with SBS can be debilitating, effective pharmaceutical management has the potential to substantially improve health outcomes and quality of life for these patients.

Novel therapies for the management of short bowel syndrome in children

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is the most common cause of intestinal failure in children. It is defined as the inability to maintain adequate nutrition enterally as a result of a major loss of the small intestine. SBS is a life-threatening entity associated with potential significant morbidity and mortality. The etiology in the pediatric age group includes necrotizing enterocolitis (32%), atresia (20%), volvulus (18%), gastroschisis (17%), and aganglionosis (6%). It is characterized by substrate malabsorption, electrolyte imbalance, intestinal bacterial overgrowth, steatorrhea, and weight loss. Current medical management includes parenteral nutrition, progressive feeds as tolerated, various medications, and surgical manipulations. However, frequently this management is not successful in achieving the goal of attaining normal growth and development without parenteral nutrition. It has been known for decades that there is a normal physiologic response of the residual intestine to massive bowel resection referred to as intestinal adaptation. The mechanisms that control this process are unknown. Unfortunately, intestinal adaptation and the current management are not always successful. As a result of new knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of SBS over the past two decades, several novel strategies have been developed in experimental animal models as well as limited clinical trials in infants and children. They can be divided into several categories that potentially influence intestinal (1) absorption, (2) secretion, (3) motility, and (4) adaptation. More recently, newer modalities have been studied including small intestine transplantation, and the use of specific intestinal growth factors. Ultimately, tissue and organ engineering will become the treatment for infants and children with SBS.

Safety and efficacy of teduglutide after 52 weeks of treatment in patients with short bowel intestinal failure

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although home parenteral nutrition (PN) can save the lives of patients with massive bowel loss that results in short-bowel syndrome and intestinal failure, quality of life is impaired by PN and its complications. We examined the 12-month tolerability and efficacy of teduglutide to reduce PN dependency.

METHODS

Patients who received teduglutide (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg/d) for 24 weeks in a randomized controlled trial were eligible for a 28-week double-blind extension study; 52 patients were given 52 weeks of the same doses of teduglutide. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy (defined as a clinically meaningful ≥20% reduction in weekly PN volume from baseline) at week 52.

RESULTS

The most common adverse events reported included headache (35%), nausea (31%), and abdominal pain (25%); 7 patients withdrew because of adverse events (gastrointestinal disorders in 4). Both groups had progressive reduction in PN. At week 52, 68% of the 0.05-mg/kg/d and 52% of the 0.10-mg/kg/d dose group had a ≥20% reduction in PN, with a reduction of 1 or more days of PN dependency in 68% and 37%, respectively. Four patients achieved complete independence from PN.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with short-bowel syndrome intestinal failure, the efficacy of teduglutide was maintained over 52 weeks and the safety profile was sufficient for it to be considered for long-term use. Further studies are needed to determine whether these effects will translate into improved quality of life and reduced PN complications. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00172185.

Intestinal rehabilitation and the short bowel syndrome: part 2

The management of patients with intestinal failure due to short bowel syndrome is complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that frequently necessitates long-term, if not life-long, use of parenteral nutrition. Despite tremendous advances in the provision of parenteral nutrition over the past three decades, which have allowed significant improvements in the survival and quality of life of these patients, this mode of nutritional support carries with it significant risks to the patient, is very costly, and ultimately, does not attempt to improve the function of the remaining bowel. Intestinal rehabilitation refers to the process of restoring enteral autonomy, and thus, allowing freedom from parenteral nutrition, usually by means of dietary, medical, and occasionally, surgical strategies. While recent investigations have focused on the use of trophic substances to increase the absorptive function of the remaining gut, whether intestinal rehabilitation occurs as a consequence of enhanced bowel adaptation or is simply a result of an optimized, comprehensive approach to the care of these patients remains unclear. In Part 1 of this review, we provided an overview of short bowel syndrome and pathophysiological considerations related to the remaining bowel anatomy in these patients. We also reviewed intestinal adaptation and factors that may enhance the adaptive process, focusing on evidence derived from animal studies. In Part 2, relevant data on the development of intestinal adaptation in humans are reviewed as is the general management of short bowel syndrome. Lastly, the potential benefits of a multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation program in the care of these patients are also discussed.

Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the care of patients with short-bowel syndrome

Short-bowel syndrome is a challenging entity for the gastroenterologist, requiring integration of medical, nutritional, surgical and psychological therapies. Treatment must be based on the patient's age, remaining gastrointestinal anatomy, baseline nutritional status and underlying general health as well as the numerous complications which may arise. This chapter reviews physiological alterations that occur with short-bowel syndrome and how therapies can be tailored to most adequately meet the needs of these patients. Emphasis on early stages of therapy to enhance intestinal adaptation is focused on as management during this time has a significant impact on the long-term outcome of these patients.

Role of gastrointestinal hormones in the proliferation of normal and neoplastic tissues

Gastrointestinal (GI) hormones are chemical messengers that regulate the physiological functions of the intestine and pancreas, including secretion, motility, absorption, and digestion. In addition to these well-defined physiological effects, GI hormones can stimulate proliferation of the nonneoplastic intestinal mucosa and pancreas. Furthermore, in an analogous fashion to breast and prostate cancer, certain GI cancers possess receptors for GI hormones; growth can be altered by administration of these hormones or by blocking their respective receptors. The GI hormones that affect proliferation, either stimulatory or inhibitory, include gastrin, cholecystokinin, gastrin-releasing peptide, neurotensin, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide-2, and somatostatin. The effects of these peptides on normal and neoplastic GI tissues will be described. Also, future perspectives and potential therapeutic implications will be discussed.

Pharmacotherapy and growth factors in the treatment of short bowel syndrome

A review of the pharmacologic substances and growth factors that have been studied experimentally and administered clinically for the management of short bowel syndrome is presented. The medical management of short bowel syndrome is multifaceted. In the acute phase, efforts focus on fluid and electrolyte management and the reduction of gastric acid output. As enteral feeding is initiated, antimotility and antisecretory agents may be effective in reducing gastrointestinal losses. Additional modalities of management, including nutrients and growth factors, may be directed at maximizing absorptive function beyond that which occurs with intestinal adaptation. Continued research aimed at further elucidating the process of intestinal adaptation may allow us to use the various peptides and hormones that act as growth factors for the bowel mucosa. Knowledge gained from these studies combined with gene therapy techniques will result in the permanent enhancement of intestinal function beyond the normal adaptation process, eliminate the dependence on total parenteral nutrition, and avoid the need for intestine transplantation.

Saccharomyces boulardii does not stimulate mucosal hyperplasia after intestinal resection in the rat

BACKGROUND

Polyamines have been shown to be important regulators of the intestinal adaptation process after massive bowel resection. Saccharomyces boulardii is yeast that has the ability to synthesize polyamines. Therefore. S. boulardii may be useful in the treatment of short bowel syndrome.

METHODS

Twenty 150-g male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 80% jejunoileal resection. Another 20 animals received transection and closure and served as pair fed controls. One half of the resected rats and one half of the controls were given S. boulardii 25 mg/day.

RESULTS

After 2 weeks, mucosal mass (mg/cm bowel) did not differ between treated and non-treated animals despite the presence of a marked resection effect. Mucosal DNA, protein, and sucrase activity likewise did not differ. Subsequently, the experiment was repeated four times the original dose (100 mg/day) and found comparable results. In the proximal bowel, mucosal mass was 92+/-6 mg/cm in treated animals versus 107+/-8 mg/cm in untreated rats. In the distal small bowel, comparable values were 85+/-5 mg/cm and 88+/-4 mg/cm. Again, mucosal DNA, protein, and sucrase activity levels paralleled these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although S. boulardii may stimulate polyamine synthesis, it does not seem to be helpful in augmenting gut adaptation in this animal model of short bowel syndrome.

Effects of oral Saccharomyces boulardii on bacterial overgrowth, translocation, and intestinal adaptation after small-bowel resection in rats

BACKGROUND

Small-bowel resection in animals results in alterations of the morphology and functional adaptation in the remaining intestine. The aim of our study was to study the effect of Saccharomyces boulardii versus placebo in rats after 50% small-bowel resection.

METHODS

Sixty-three rats were assigned to one of three groups: small-bowel resection (n = 31), transected surgery controls (n = 16), or non-surgical controls (n = 16). Of the 31 rats with small-bowel resection, 15 were given S. boulardii (140 mg/dl), and 16 were given placebo. Intestinal markers measured included bacterial overgrowth (BO) on days 4 and 8 and translocation into mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, and spleen. Markers of small-bowel adaptation included histomorphology of the mucosa, protein content, and various brush-border enzymes (sucrase, glucoamylase, n-aminopeptidase).

RESULTS

In the jejunal mucosal samples on day 8, S. boulardii-treated rats showed a significant increase in protein content (58.3 +/- 12 mg/10 cm) compared with placebo-treated rats (29.2 +/- 1.8) or non-surgery controls (18.3 +/- 1.2; P < 0.001). S. boulardii-treated rats also had significantly higher levels of all three brush-border enzymes. A significant increase of enzyme-specific activities was observed in the ileum of S. boulardii resected rats compared with the placebo resected group on day 4, and no significant differences were seen in the remnant ileum except an increase in protein content in S. boulardii-treated rats on day 8. Histomorphometric studies showed no differences in ileal villus height or translocation frequencies by day 8 in S. boulardii or placebo resected rats.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that, after resection, S. boulardii does not modify bacterial overgrowth or translocation frequency but does significantly enhance the functional adaptation of the remaining intestinal segments.