Aluminum in large and small volume parenterals used in total parenteral nutrition: response to the Food and Drug Administration notice of proposed rule by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Administering Parenteral Nutrition in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Logistics, Existing Challenges, and a Few Conundrums

Use of parenteral nutrition (PN) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) requires evaluating the need for central venous catheters, potential drug incompatibilities, unintentional exposures, and suboptimal energy and nutrient intake during the transition to full enteral nutrition. Risks of photooxidation reactions in PN components, refeeding syndrome, and excess early amino acid intake should prompt the reevaluation of routine practices. The goal of this paper is to review the practicalities, challenges, and conundrums of administering PN in the NICU.

Use of bone densitometry to assess bone disease in aluminum toxicity complicating parentral nutrition: A case report

Aluminum toxicity affecting bone mineral density is a known complication of long-term parentral nutrition. In this report, we describe a similar patient who suffered from bone disease and had a favorable response to chelation therapy using deferoxamine. We believe this may be a possible agent improving the life quality for the above mentioned group of patients.

Aluminum and Phthalates in Calcium Gluconate: Contribution From Glass and Plastic Packaging

BACKGROUND

Aluminum contamination of parenteral nutrition solutions has been documented for 3 decades. It can result in elevated blood, bone, and whole body aluminum levels associated with neurotoxicity, reduced bone mass and mineral content, and perhaps hepatotoxicity. The primary aluminum source among parenteral nutrition components is glass-packaged calcium gluconate, in which aluminum concentration in the past 3 decades has averaged approximately 4000 μg/L, compared with <200 μg/L in plastic container-packaged calcium gluconate. A concern about plastic packaging is leaching of plasticizers, including phthalates, which have the potential to cause endocrine (male reproductive system) disruption and neurotoxicity.

METHODS

Aluminum was quantified in samples collected periodically for more than 2 years from 3 calcium gluconate sources used to prepare parenteral nutrition solutions; 2 packaged in glass (from France and the United States) and 1 in plastic (from Germany); in a recently released plastic-packaged solution (from the United States); and in the 2 glass containers. Phthalate concentration was determined in selected samples of each product and leachate of the plastic containers.

RESULTS

The initial aluminum concentration was approximately 5000 μg/L in the 2 glass-packaged products and approximately 20 μg/L in the plastic-packaged product, and increased approximately 30%, 50%, and 100% in 2 years, respectively. The aluminum concentration in a recently released Calcium Gluconate Injection USP was approximately 320 μg/L. Phthalates were not detected in any calcium gluconate solutions or leachates.

CONCLUSIONS

Plastic packaging greatly reduces the contribution of aluminum to parenteral nutrition solutions from calcium gluconate compared with the glass-packaged product.

Aluminum exposure in neonatal patients using the least contaminated parenteral nutrition solution products

Aluminum (Al) is a contaminant in all parenteral nutrition (PN) solution component products. Manufacturers currently label these products with the maximum Al content at the time of expiry. We recently published data to establish the actual measured concentration of Al in PN solution products prior to being compounded in the clinical setting [1]. The investigation assessed quantitative Al content of all available products used in the formulation of PN solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the Al exposure in neonatal patients using the least contaminated PN solutions and determine if it is possible to meet the FDA “safe limit” of less than 5 μg/kg/day of Al. The measured concentrations from our previous study were analyzed and the least contaminated products were identified. These concentrations were entered into our PN software and the least possible Al exposure was determined. A significant decrease (41%–44%) in the Al exposure in neonatal patients can be achieved using the least contaminated products, but the FDA “safe limit” of less than 5 μg/kg/day of Al was not met. However, minimizing the Al exposure may decrease the likelihood of developing Al toxicity from PN.

Aluminum in pediatric parenteral nutrition products: measured versus labeled content

OBJECTIVE

Aluminum is a contaminant in all parenteral nutrition solutions. Manufacturers currently label these products with the maximum aluminum content at the time of expiry, but there are no published data to establish the actual measured concentration of aluminum in parenteral nutrition solution products prior to being compounded in the clinical setting. This investigation assessed quantitative aluminum content of products commonly used in the formulation of parenteral nutrition solutions. The objective of this study is to determine the best products to be used when compounding parenteral nutrition solutions (i.e., those with the least amount of aluminum contamination).

METHODS

All products available in the United States from all manufacturers used in the production of parenteral nutrition solutions were identified and collected. Three lots were collected for each identified product. Samples were quantitatively analyzed by Mayo Laboratories. These measured concentrations were then compared to the manufacturers' labeled concentration.

RESULTS

Large lot-to-lot and manufacturer-to-manufacturer differences were noted for all products. Measured aluminum concentrations were less than manufacturer-labeled values for all products.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual aluminum concentrations of all the parenteral nutrition solutions were significantly less than the aluminum content based on manufacturers' labels. These findings indicate that 1) the manufacturers should label their products with actual aluminum content at the time of product release rather than at the time of expiry, 2) that there are manufacturers whose products provide significantly less aluminum contamination than others, and 3) pharmacists can select products with the lowest amounts of aluminum contamination and reduce the aluminum exposure in their patients.

Aluminum Toxicity in Neonatal Parenteral Nutrition: What Can We Do?

Aluminum toxicity has been described in patients of all ages who are receiving a variety of therapies, including dialysis, phosphate-binding medications, and parenteral nutrition (PN). Neonates are at an increased risk of aluminum toxicity because of anatomic, physiologic, and nutrition-related factors not present in other populations. In 2004, the Food and Drug Administration recommended restricting daily aluminum administration to 5 μg/kg/day and now requires that additives used to compound PN have the maximum aluminum content at expiration listed on the product label. Although the pharmacist can work to decrease aluminum toxicity in this population, it remains difficult to reach this threshold.

Aluminum loading in preterm neonates revisited

Preterm neonates receiving parenteral nutrition are at risk of aluminum (Al) overload because of the presence of Al as a contaminant in parenteral formulations. Despite US Food and Drug Administration regulation, commercial products continue to present Al contamination. To reassess Al exposure in the premature neonatal population, the present study evaluated the Al balance (intake vs urinary excretion) in a group of preterm neonates during the period in which they stayed in the intensive care unit (NICU) under total parenteral nutrition. For the 10 patients selected, daily infusion solutions (nutrition and medication) were collected and the level of Al contamination was measured. From the urine collected daily, an aliquot was taken for Al determination. Blood was also collected for Al determination on the first and last day in the NICU. The measurements were carried out by atomic absorption spectrometry. The difference between Al administered and excreted revealed that 56.2% +/- 22.7% of the Al intake was not eliminated. The mean serum Al levels from the first to the last day decreased from 41.2 +/- 23.3 to 23.5 +/- 11.2 microg/L. The resulting mean Al daily intake of the 10 patients was 15.2 +/- 8.0 microg x kg(-1) x day(-1). Because Al intake was higher than that excreted and Al in serum decreased to practically half during the period in the NICU (+/-7.3 days), some amount of Al deposition occurred. Moreover, premature neonates were receiving, on average, 3 times the amount of 5 microg x kg(-1) x day(-1), considered by the Food and Drug Administration as a safe limit.

Aluminum content of parenteral nutrition in neonates: measured versus calculated levels

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Aluminum (Al) is associated with significant central nervous system toxicity and bone and liver damage. Because Al is a contaminant of parenteral nutrition (PN) components including calcium and phosphate additives, premature infants are at potentially high risk for toxicity. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has mandated PN component product labeling and recommended maximum Al daily exposure limits. The objective of this article is to determine the actual Al content of neonatal PN solutions, compare these values to the calculated amounts from manufacturers' PN product labels, and ascertain whether the actual Al exposure exceeds the FDA recommended maximum of 5 microg . kg(-1) . day(-1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples from 40 neonatal patient PN solutions were selected for sampling and Al content determination. Samples were also taken from 16 manufacturer's component products used in PN formulation. All of the samples were sent to Mayo Laboratories for Al content measurement. The calculated Al concentrations in PN samples were determined from the manufacturer's labeled content.

RESULTS

Both measured and calculated Al concentrations exceeded the FDA recommended safe limit of <5 microg . kg(-1) . day(-1). The actual measured Al content was significantly lower than the calculated Al content in both the patient PN solutions and the component product samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Al exposure exceeded the FDA recommended maximum limit for all patient samples; however, the actual measured Al content of all the samples was significantly less than the calculated Al content based on manufacturer's labels. These findings suggest that manufacturers label their products with actual Al content at the time of product release rather than at time of expiration. Periodic monitoring of Al levels should be considered with prolonged PN therapy. Changes in manufacturing processes, including the use of better raw materials, are essential to reduce Al contamination to meet FDA mandates.

Effect of additive selection on calculated aluminum content of parenteral nutrient solutions

PURPOSE

The quantity of aluminum in common ingredients used to compound parenteral nutrient (PN) solutions was calculated to quantify the actual aluminum content, and opportunities to modify the aluminum content by changing the manufacturer of the ingredients were explored.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of a random sample of 10 neonatal, 10 pediatric, and 10 adult patients who received PN solutions was performed to quantify the aluminum content in these solutions on the basis of the ingredients used at the authors' institution. A recalculation was performed using the lowest aluminumcontaining ingredients to determine the potential for aluminum minimization in each PN solution.

RESULTS

Various manufacturers produce each ingredient required to make PN solutions. Significant variation exists among manufacturers, vial size, and concentrations. Statistically significant differences in the mean aluminum content of PN solutions before and after aluminum minimization were found to exist within each sample of patients. Among the neonatal PN solutions, aluminum content was significantly reduced from a mean +/- S.D. of 84.16 +/- 47.61 to 33.6 +/- 16.69 mug/kg/day. The pediatric PN solutions had a significant decline in aluminum content from a mean +/- S.D. of 16.24 +/- 3.66 to 6.84 +/- 2.66 mug/kg/day. Aluminum content in the high-risk adult PN solutions significantly decreased from a mean +/- S.D. of 4.58 +/- 2.06 to 2.31 +/- 0.63 mug/kg/day.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variability in the aluminum concentration of injectable products used in the compounding of PN solutions. Selecting products with low aluminum concentration may substantially reduce the amount of the element administered to patients.

Aluminum load in ICU patients during stress ulcer prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence has linked high aluminum (Al) levels with toxicity and disease. Our objective was to evaluate the Al exposure of ICU patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate and ranitidine.

METHODS

Within a large prospective, randomized study, a subgroup of 30 critically ill, renally intact patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation who were being treated in intensive care units (ICU) of a university hospital were allocated to two prophylaxis subgroups: enteral sucralfate, 1 g six times daily by gastric tube (n=15), or intravenous ranitidine, 200 mg daily by 24-h continuous intravenous infusion (n=15). The Al content of large and small-volume parenterals was measured and Al intake calculated for each patient and day. Aluminum levels in serum and 24-h urine were monitored every 2 days during the 16-day observation period (days 0-15).

RESULTS

Mean daily parenteral Al exposure ranged from 101.3 to 158.7 mug/day for sucralfate and ranitidine patients, respectively. In both groups, Al serum levels increased from baseline on days 1-13 and on days 3-7 in the sucralfate and ranitidine groups, respectively. From days 3-13, Al serum levels were significantly higher with sucralfate than with ranitidine (P<0.05). On days 7-13, 24-h urinary Al excretion was also significantly higher in the sucralfate than in the ranitidine group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In ICU patients, only approximately 50% of parenterally administered Al is eliminated renally. Sucralfate additionally increases patients exposure to Al. In ICU patients, the mean absorption of enteral Al from sucralfate is only 0.019%.

Should adding albumin to parenteral nutrient solutions be considered an unsafe practice?

PURPOSE

The technical issues surrounding the use of albumin in parenteral nutrient (PN) solutions are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Five criteria have been suggested to determine which compounds are optimal for addition to PN solutions: (1) stable dosage regimen over 24 hours, (2) pharmacokinetic profile supporting a 24-hour infusion, (3) stable PN solution infusion rate, (4) documented physical stability over at least 24 hours, and (5) documented chemical stability over at least 24 hours. Albumin is stable in solutions containing dextrose and electrolytes, but its stability in solutions containing dextrose and amino acids has not been evaluated. Signs of precipitation and flocculation have been reported when albumin and zinc chloride were added simultaneously to a two-in-one PN solution. Similar to hemoglobin, albumin is nonenzymatically glycosylated in vivo. One of the most common complications associated with the use of PN solutions is catheter-related bloodstream infection. Albumin 25 g/L in two-in-one PN solutions has been shown to clog 0.2-microm filters. Albumin products have historically contained a large amount of aluminum contamination; thus, the addition of albumin to PN solutions would further contribute to accumulated aluminum contaminants in patients receiving PN therapy, particularly neonates.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, the addition of albumin to PN solutions cannot be recommended. The potential for complications due to infection and physical and chemical incompatibility and instability exists. Adding albumin to PN solutions can affect infusion flow rates and pump pressures, thereby compromising the appropriate delivery of PN solutions to patients. The theoretical risk of glycosylation and related complications outweigh potential benefits of albumin administration via PN solution.

Short bowel syndrome and intestinal transplantation in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent knowledge and clinical practice for pediatric patients suffering extensive intestinal resection causing short bowel syndrome. This condition requires the use of parenteral nutrition, as long as intestinal failure persists, and may be, in some selected cases, an indication for intestinal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biological evaluation of intestinal failure is becoming possible with the use of plasma citrulline as a marker of intestinal mass. Few epidemiological data are available; some indicate an increased incidence of short bowel syndrome-related gastroschisis and persistent high incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis. Morbidity and mortality data in pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome are limited, while long-term outcome is better documented from recently reported cohorts. Non-transplant surgery is one of the best options for patients with unadapted short bowel syndrome. Isolated liver transplantation may be avoided. The use of trophic factors for enhancing mucosal hyperplasia still remains disappointing.

SUMMARY

The management should include therapies adapted to each stage of intestinal failure, based on a multidisciplinary approach in centers involving pediatric surgery, pediatric gastroenterology, parenteral nutrition expertise, home-parenteral nutrition program, and liver-intestinal transplantation experience. If managed appropriately, the prognosis of short bowel syndrome is excellent, with limited indications for intestinal and/or liver transplantation. Timing for patient referral in specialized centers remains an issue.

Causes and management of intestinal failure in children

Intestinal failure is a condition requiring the use of parenteral nutrition as long as it persists. Causes of severe protracted intestinal failure include short bowel syndrome, congenital diseases of enterocyte development, and severe motility disorders (total or subtotal aganglionosis or chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome). Intestinal failure may be irreversible in some patients, thus requiring permanent parenteral nutrition. Liver disease may develop with subsequent end-stage liver cirrhosis in patients with intestinal failure as a consequence of both underlying digestive disease and unadapted parenteral nutrition. Death will occur if combined liver-intestine transplantation is not performed. Catheter-related sepsis and/or extensive vascular thrombosis may impede the continuation of a safe and efficient parenteral nutrition and may also require intestinal transplantation in some selected cases. Thus management of patients with intestinal failure requires an early recognition of the condition and the analysis of its risk of irreversibility. Timing of referral for intestinal transplantation remains a crucial issue. As a consequence, management should include therapies adapted to each stage of intestinal failure based on a multidisciplinary approach in centers involving pediatric gastroenterology, parenteral nutrition expertise, home parenteral nutrition program, pediatric surgery, and liver intestinal transplantation program.

Irreversible intestinal failure

Intestinal failure (IF) can be defined as the reduction of functional gut mass below the minimal amount necessary for digestion and absorption adequate to satisfy the nutrient and fluid requirements for maintenance in adults or growth in children. In developed countries, IF mainly includes individuals with the congenital or early onset of conditions requiring protracted or indefinite parenteral nutrition (PN). Short bowel syndrome was the first commonly recognized cause of protracted IF. The normal physiologic process of intestinal adaptation after extensive resection usually allows for recovery of sufficient intestinal function within weeks to months. During this time, patients can be sustained on parenteral nutrition. Only a few children have permanent intestinal insufficiency and life-long dependency on PN. Non-transplant surgery including small bowel tapering and lengthening may allow weaning from PN in some cases. Hormonal therapy with recombinant human growth hormone has produced poor results while therapy with glucagon-like peptide-2 holds promise. Congenital diseases of enterocyte development such as microvillus inclusion disease or intestinal epithelial dysplasia cause permanent IF for which no curative medical treatment is currently available. Severe and extensive motility disorders such as total or subtotal intestinal aganglionosis (long segment Hirschsprung disease) or chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome may also cause permanent IF. PN and home-PN remain are the mainstays of therapy regardless of the cause of IF. Some patients develop complications while receiving long-term PN for IF especially catheter related complications (thrombosis, sepsis) and liver disease. These patients may be candidates for intestinal transplantation. This review discusses the causes of irreversible IF and emphasizes the specific medico-surgical strategies for prevention and treatment of these conditions at several stages of IF.

Influence of the glass packing on the contamination of pharmaceutical products by aluminium. Part III: Interaction container-chemicals during the heating for sterilisation

The interaction of chemicals with the container materials during heating for sterilisation was investigated, storing the components of parenteral nutrition solutions individually in sealed glass ampoules and in contact with a rubber stopper, and heating the system at 121 degrees C for 30 min. Subsequently, the aluminium content of the solutions was measured by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). The assay was also carried out with acids, alkalis and some complexing agents for Al. The containers were decomposed and also assayed for aluminium. 30 different commercial solutions for parenteral nutrition, stored either in glass or in plastic containers, were assayed measuring the aluminium present in the solutions and in the container materials. The results of all investigated container materials revealed an aluminium content of 1.57% Al in glass, 0.05% in plastic and 4.54% in rubber. The sterilisation procedure showed that even pure water was able to extract Al from glass and rubber, 22.5 +/- 13.3 microg/L and 79.4 +/- 22.7 microg/L respectively, while from plastic the aluminium leached was insignificant. The Al released from glass ampoules laid between 20 microg/L for leucine, ornithine and lysine solutions and 1500 microg/L for solutions of basic phosphates and bicarbonate; from rubber stoppers it reached levels over 500 microg/L for cysteine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid and cystine solutions. Ion-exchange properties and influence of pH can explain the interaction of glass with some chemicals (salts, acids and alkalis), but only an affinity for aluminium could explain the action of some amino acids and other chemicals, as albumin and heparin, on glass and rubber, considering the aluminium release. Experiments with complexing agents for Al allowed to conclude that the higher the stability constant of the complex, the higher the Al release from the container material.