Affinity of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for N- and C-binding sites of human ACE is different in heart, lung, arteries, and veins

A clinical dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and heterozygous ACE deletion exacerbate Alzheimer's disease pathology in mice

Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a strategy used worldwide for managing hypertension. In addition to converting angiotensin I to angiotensin II, ACE also converts neurotoxic β-amyloid protein 42 (Aβ42) to Aβ40. Because of its neurotoxicity, Aβ42 is believed to play a causative role in the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD), whereas Aβ40 has neuroprotective effects against Aβ42 aggregation and also against metal-induced oxidative damage. Whether ACE inhibition enhances Aβ42 aggregation or impairs human cognitive ability are very important issues for preventing AD onset and for optimal hypertension management. In an 8-year longitudinal study, we found here that the mean intelligence quotient of male, but not female, hypertensive patients taking ACE inhibitors declined more rapidly than that of others taking no ACE inhibitors. Moreover, the sera of all AD patients exhibited a decrease in Aβ42-to-Aβ40-converting activity compared with sera from age-matched healthy individuals. Using human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice, we found that a clinical dose of an ACE inhibitor was sufficient to increase brain amyloid deposition. We also generated human amyloid precursor protein/ACE^+/- mice and found that a decrease in ACE levels promoted Aβ42 deposition and increased the number of apoptotic neurons. These results suggest that inhibition of ACE activity is a risk factor for impaired human cognition and for triggering AD onset.

Influenza A virus mimetic nanoparticles trigger selective cell uptake

Poor target cell specificity is currently a major shortcoming of nanoparticles (NPs) used for biomedical applications. It causes significant material loss to off-target sites and poor availability at the intended delivery site. To overcome this limitation, we designed particles that identify cells in a virus-like manner. As a blueprint, we chose a mechanism typical of influenza A virus particles in which ectoenzymatic hemagglutinin activation by target cells is a mandatory prerequisite for binding to a secondary target structure that finally confirms cell identity and allows for uptake of the virus. We developed NPs that probe mesangial cells for the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme on their surface using angiotensin I (Ang-I) as a proligand. This initial interaction enzymatically transforms Ang-I to a secondary ligand angiotensin II (Ang-II) that has the potential to bind in a second stage to Ang-II type-1 receptor (AT1R). The presence of the receptor confirms the target cell identity and triggers NP uptake via endocytosis. Our virus-mimetic NPs showed outstanding target-cell affinity with picomolar avidities and were able to selectively identify these cells in the presence of 90% off-target cells that carried only the AT1R. Our results demonstrate that the design of virus-mimetic cell interactive NPs is a valuable strategy to enhance NP specificity for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Our set of primary and secondary targets is particularly suited for the identification of mesangial cells that play a pivotal role in diabetic nephropathy, one of the leading causes of renal failure, for which currently no treatment exists.

Efficacy and tolerability of delapril plus indapamide versus lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide combination treatments in mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that antihypertensive monotherapy is commonly insufficient to control blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients and that concomitant use of ≥2 drugs is necessary in ∼50% of these patients. The combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a diuretic, delapril plus indapamide (D + I), has been shown to be effective and tolerable, with no interaction between the 2 components. Another widely used combination of ACE inhibitor and diuretic is lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (L + H).

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to confirm the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination of D + I in mild to moderate hypertension, and to compare its therapeutic efficacy and tolerability with that of L + H.

METHODS

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of D + I (30-mg + 2.5-mg tablets once daily) or L + H (20-mg + 12.5-mg tablets once daily) in patients with mild to moderate hypertension were compared in a multinational, multicenter, randomized, 2-armed, parallel-group study. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years and had a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95 to 115 mm Hg and a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤180 mm Hg, both measured in the sitting position. After a single-blind, placebo run-in period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to receive 1 of the 2 treatments for a 12-week period. The primary efficacy end point was the BP normalization rate (ie, the percentage of patients with a sitting DBP ≤90 mm Hg) after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points were as follows: (1) the responder rate (ie, the percentage of patients whose sitting DBP was reduced by ≥10 mm Hg from baseline or had a DBP ≤90 mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment), (2) the percentage of patients with a DBP ≤85 mm Hg, and (3) changes in sitting SBP and DBP after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 159 hypertensive patients (88 women, 71 men) were randomized to receive D + I (44 women, 36 men; mean [SD] age, 53 [(11)] years) or L + H (44 women, 35 men; mean [SD] age, 55 [(10)] years). No significant between-group differences were found in any of the primary or secondary end points of the study. Both combinations induced a significant reduction in sitting DBP and SBP from baseline (P<0.001 for both groups at week 12), without significant differences between the groups. Five mild to moderate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in each treatment group. No patient dropped out of the study because of an ADR.

CONCLUSION

This study showed no difference between D + I and L + H interms of antihypertensive efficacy or tolerability in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the combination of delapril and indapamide (D+I) to different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of these two combinations. Studies comparing the efficacy of D+I to ACEi+HCTZ combinations in hypertensive patients and published on computerized databases (1974–2010) were considered. Endpoints included percentage of normalized patients, of responders, change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) at different time-points, percentage of adverse events (AEs), and percentage of withdrawal. Four head-to-head randomized controlled trials (D+I-treated, n = 643; ACEi+HCTZ-treated, n = 629) were included. Meta-analysis indicated that D+I-treated patients had a higher proportion with normalized blood pressure (P = 0.024) or responders (P = 0.002) compared to ACEi+HCTZ-treated patients. No difference was observed between treatments on absolute values of DBP and SBP at different time-points. Although the rate of patients reporting at least one AE was similar in both groups (10.4% versus 9.9%), events leading to study withdrawal were lower in the D+I group versus the ACEi+HCTZ group (2.3% versus 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with D+I could provide a higher proportion of normalized or responder patients with good tolerability compared to ACEi+HCTZ combinations.

ACE inhibition prevents diastolic Ca2+ overload and loss of myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity after myocardial infarction

Prevention of adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) remains a therapeutic challenge. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are a well-established first-line treatment. ACE-I delay fibrosis, but little is known about their molecular effects on cardiomyocytes. We investigated the effects of the ACE-I delapril on cardiomyocytes in a mouse model of heart failure (HF) after MI. Mice were randomly assigned to three groups: Sham, MI, and MI-D (6 weeks of treatment with a non-hypotensive dose of delapril started 24h after MI). Echocardiography and pressure-volume loops revealed that MI induced hypertrophy and dilation, and altered both contraction and relaxation of the left ventricle. At the cellular level, MI cardiomyocytes exhibited reduced contraction, slowed relaxation, increased diastolic Ca2+ levels, decreased Ca2+-transient amplitude, and diminished Ca2+ sensitivity of myofilaments. In MI-D mice, however, both mortality and cardiac remodeling were decreased when compared to non-treated MI mice. Delapril maintained cardiomyocyte contraction and relaxation, prevented diastolic Ca2+ overload and retained the normal Ca2+ sensitivity of contractile proteins. Delapril maintained SERCA2a activity through normalization of P-PLB/PLB (for both Ser16- PLB and Thr17-PLB) and PLB/SERCA2a ratios in cardiomyocytes, favoring normal reuptake of Ca2+ in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. In addition, delapril prevented defective cTnI function by normalizing the expression of PKC, enhanced in MI mice. In conclusion, early therapy with delapril after MI preserved the normal contraction/relaxation cycle of surviving cardiomyocytes with multiple direct effects on key intracellular mechanisms contributing to preserve cardiac function.

Peptidase inhibitors in the MEROPS database

The MEROPS website (http://merops.sanger.ac.uk) includes information on peptidase inhibitors as well as on peptidases and their substrates. Displays have been put in place to link peptidases and inhibitors together. The classification of protein peptidase inhibitors is continually being revised, and currently inhibitors are grouped into 67 families based on comparisons of protein sequences. These families can be further grouped into 38 clans based on comparisons of tertiary structure. Small molecule inhibitors are important reagents for peptidase characterization and, with the increasing importance of peptidases as drug targets, they are also important to the pharmaceutical industry. Small molecule inhibitors are now included in MEROPS and over 160 summaries have been written.

Delapril plus indapamide: a review of the combination in the treatment of hypertension

Although many data indicate that the management of hypertension has improved over the last two decades, there is still a large proportion of hypertensive individuals who do not receive adequate management of their blood pressure (BP). Combination therapy with two or more antihypertensive agents from different drug classes is increasingly being recognised as the most effective means of achieving target BP values by pharmacological means, particularly in the large number of patients in whom monotherapy proves to be ineffective. Use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor combined with a diuretic is a well established antihypertensive combination that is very effective because of the different, yet synergistic, mechanisms of actions of agents from these two drug classes. Delapril is a potent antihypertensive ACE inhibitor, and indapamide is a thiazide-like diuretic with additional antihypertensive properties. The combination of delapril and indapamide provides renoprotective effects, and indapamide is also cardioprotective. Use of these two drugs together is therefore a rational selection for combination therapy, and one that has consistently demonstrated lowering of BP to target values with a level of efficacy that is at least as good as other combinations of ACE inhibitors and diuretics. This combination has also been found to provide favourable effects on haemodynamic parameters, including left ventricular mass index and ejection fraction. Furthermore, combining an ACE inhibitor and a thiazide-type diuretic has been associated with a decreased risk of stroke and is recommended for patients with cerebrovascular disease, a setting in which the combination of delapril and indapamide has therapeutic potential. Because of the additive mechanisms of delapril and indapamide, the dose required for an effective antihypertensive effect is relatively low, and the combination is well tolerated at such doses. In particular, metabolic effects normally associated with diuretics are rare at the therapeutic dose of indapamide used in combination with delapril, making the combination suitable for patients with metabolic disorders in whom diuretic therapy would otherwise not be recommended. Delapril 30 mg and indapamide 2.5mg have been combined in a fixed combination, offering the convenience of a one-tablet-per-day antihypertensive drug regimen for most patients, which, along with good tolerability, helps to address the issue of noncompliance.

Human physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for ACE inhibitors: ramipril and ramiprilat

Background

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have complicated and poorly characterized pharmacokinetics. There are two binding sites per ACE (high affinity "C", lower affinity "N") that have sub-nanomolar affinities and dissociation rates of hours. Most inhibitors are given orally in a prodrug form that is systemically converted to the active form. This paper describes the first human physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of this drug class.

Methods

The model was applied to the experimental data of van Griensven et. al for the pharmacokinetics of ramiprilat and its prodrug ramipril. It describes the time course of the inhibition of the N and C ACE sites in plasma and the different tissues. The model includes: 1) two independent ACE binding sites; 2) non-equilibrium time dependent binding; 3) liver and kidney ramipril intracellular uptake, conversion to ramiprilat and extrusion from the cell; 4) intestinal ramipril absorption. The experimental in vitro ramiprilat/ACE binding kinetics at 4°C and 300 mM NaCl were assumed for most of the PBPK calculations. The model was incorporated into the freely distributed PBPK program PKQuest.

Results

The PBPK model provides an accurate description of the individual variation of the plasma ramipril and ramiprilat and the ramiprilat renal clearance following IV ramiprilat and IV and oral ramipril. Summary of model features: Less than 2% of total body ACE is in plasma; 35% of the oral dose is absorbed; 75% of the ramipril metabolism is hepatic and 25% of this is converted to systemic ramiprilat; 100% of renal ramipril metabolism is converted to systemic ramiprilat. The inhibition was long lasting, with 80% of the C site and 33% of the N site inhibited 24 hours following a 2.5 mg oral ramipril dose. The plasma ACE inhibition determined by the standard assay is significantly less than the true in vivo inhibition because of assay dilution.

Conclusion

If the in vitro plasma binding kinetics of the ACE inhibitor for the two binding sites are known, a unique PBPK model description of the Griensven et. al. experimental data can be obtained.

Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of the combination delapril plus indapamide in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a randomised, multicentre, controlled study

The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of two different fixed combinations of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a diuretic: delapril+indapamide (D+I) and captopril+hydrochlorothiazide (C+H) administered for 6 months to patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In all, 96 centres participated in this randomised, parallel groups, controlled study. A total of 829 patients with uncomplicated mild to moderate hypertension were randomised, and 790 were eligible for the analysis of efficacy (intention to treat). Patients of both sexes, aged 18-75 years, newly diagnosed or untreated during the last month were included in the study if their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > or =95 and < or =114 mmHg. The starting doses of the drugs were delapril 30 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg tablets o.d. or captopril 50 mg+hydrolchlorothiazide 15 mg tablets o.d. After a 1-month treatment period, nonresponders (DBP >90 mmHg, or decrease in DBP <10 mmHg) had the daily dose increased to either delapril 30 mg+indapamide 2.5 mg or captopril 50 mg+hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg tablets for a further 5 months. The primary assessment of antihypertensive efficacy was the percentage of patients who responded after a 6-month drug treatment. The responder rates were 72.6% with D+I and 62.9% with C+H (P=0.004 between treatments) after 60 days of treatment, and 92.6% in the D+I and 85.2% in the C+H (P<0.001 between treatments) at the end of the treatment period. The final value of systolic blood pressure was 134.5+/-13.1 mmHg with D+I and 138.3+/-14.0 mmHg with C+H (P<0.001 between treatments). At the final visit, DBP was 84.57+/-7.0 mmHg in the D+I group and 85.57+/-8.0 mmHg in the control group (P=0.017 between treatments). In all, 11 patients in the D+I group and 19 patients in the C+H group were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events. In all, 30 patients (7.6%) with D+I and 32 patients (8.1%) with C+H experienced adverse events. In conclusion, D+I was more effective than C+H in terms of overall reduction in blood pressure and response rate. Greater efficacy was obtained without any increase in adverse effects, since both treatments were equally well tolerated.

Time-effect profile of antihypertensive agents assessed with trough/peak ratio, smoothness index and dose omission: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study with trandolapril vs. quinapril

The duration of action of antihypertensive drugs may be assessed by several methods using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The aim of this double-blind, randomized study was to compare the time-effect profile of once daily Trandolapril (Tra) 2 mg vs. Quinapril (Qui) 20 mg in 92 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. All patients received placebo during a 30-day run-in period followed by 2 months of active therapy and 1-day medication omission. ABPM was conducted on each period. 24 h antihypertensive coverage was assessed by trough:peak ratio (T/P) and smoothness index (SI) methods. Residual lowering of blood pressure after single-blind, 1 day medication omission was investigated as the SBP/DBP 48-h trough effect. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in the mean SBP/DBP peak or trough effect. Individual T/P were not normally distributed and had very large variations explained by BP random- and activity-related fluctuations. Group T/P were 0.85 for Tra and 0.62 for Qui. The SI values were normally distributed and not statistically different between the two treatment groups. After dose omission, Qui was ineffective at 48-h trough while Tra retained a significant effect (SBP/DBP = -3.4/-4.3 mmHg) and this difference was even greater in ABPM-responders. Comparison of the trough:peak ratios and smoothness indexes of Tra and Qui failed to show any statistically significant difference on 24-h antihypertensive coverage. Nevertheless, residual lowering of blood pressure at 48-h trough suggests that Tra had a longer duration of action than Qui.

Mediators of chronic heart failure: how drugs work

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure at the neurohormonal level, and discuss the effect of present and future therapeutic options on these neurohormones.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1986-November 2000) was used to identify important primary literature and reviews. Additional references were obtained from these articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Chronic heart failure is a common, progressive disorder with high morbidity and mortality. Progression is due in large part to several redundant neurohormonal responses. The neurohormones include angiotensin II, norepinephrine, aldosterone, endothelin-1, arginine vasopressin, and tumor necrosis factor. These responses are initially adaptive, but become maladaptive in the long term, impairing the function of the heart, vasculature, and kidneys. Counter-regulatory hormones, such as bradykinin and natriuretic peptides, are insufficient to offset the adverse effects of the other neurohormones. Most drugs used to treat chronic heart failure, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic antagonists, and spironolactone, achieve their benefits through altering the neurohormonal pathways. New agents that affect more or different neurohormones may soon be available.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple agents are required for treatment of chronic heart failure, as no single agent can counteract all of the various adverse pathways. The appropriate prescription and use of such inherently complex regimens require significant physician and patient education.

Comparison of blood pressure responses to intra-arterial and intra-venous injections of angiotensin I, angiotensin II and bradykinin

Because of the reported uneven vascular distribution of the enzyme, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), we hypothesized that the magnitude of blood pressure responses to bolus injections of angiotensin I (Ang I) and bradykinin (BK) would be dependent upon the route of administration, i.e., intra-arterial (i.a.) or intra-venous (i.v.). Anesthetized rats with cannulas in the left carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein were given bolus injections of each agent, alternating between the two cannulas. Intra-venous injections of Ang I produced transient increases in arterial pressure that were significantly greater (27 +/- 12%) and longer (7 +/- 7%) than those induced by equimolar i.a. injections within the same preparation. Intra-venous injections of BK produced transient decreases in arterial pressure that were significantly smaller (72 +/- 4%) and shorter (78 +/- 11%) than similar i.a. injections. Unexpectedly, i.v. injections of Ang II also evoked slightly larger transient increases in arterial pressure (11 +/- 4%) than similar i.a. injections. These results suggest that enzymatic alterations of Ang I and BK probably by angiotensin converting enzyme during their initial passage through the pulmonary circulation has a small but significant influence on their pressor effects.

Calorimetric analysis of lisinopril binding to angiotensin I-converting enzyme

Isothermal titration microcalorimetry has been used to measure changes in enthalpy and heat capacity for binding of lisinopril to the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE; EC 3.4.15.1) and to its apoenzyme at pH 7.5 over a temperature range of 15-30 degrees C. Calorimetric measurements indicate that lisinopril binds to two sites in the monomer of both holo- and apo-ACE. Binding of lisinopril to both systems is enthalpically unfavorable and, thus, is dominated by a large positive entropy change. The enthalpy change of binding is strongly temperature-dependent for both holo- and apo-ACE, arising from a large heat capacity change of binding equal to -2.4 +/- 0.2 kJ/K/mol of monomeric holo-ACE) and to -1.9 +/- 0.2 kJ/K/mol of monomeric apo-ACE), respectively. The negative values of deltaCp for both systems are consistent with burial of a large non-polar surface area upon binding. Although the binding of lisinopril to holo- and apo-ACE is favored by entropy changes, this is more positive for the holoenzyme. Thus, the interaction between Zn2+ and lisinopril results in a higher affinity of the holoenzyme for this drug due to a more favorable entropic contribution.