Effects of amlodipine on endothelial function in rats with chronic heart failure after experimental myocardial infarction

Improvement of endothelial dysfunction in experimental heart failure by chronic RAAS-blockade: ACE-inhibition or AT1-receptor blockade?

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is believed to be important in the deterioration of endothelial dysfunction in CHF through stimulation of oxidative stress. Whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) improve endothelial function in CHF, the effects of angiotensin II AT1-receptor blockers (ARB) are less well established. Therefore we compared the effects of the ACE-I lisinopril vs. the ARB candesartan on endothelial dysfunction in a rat model of CHF.

CHF was induced by myocardial infarction (MI) after coronary ligation. Two weeks after MI, daily treatment with lisinopril (2 mg/kg) or candesartan cilexetil (1.5 mg/kg) was started. After 13 weeks, rats were sacrificed and endothelial function was determined by measuring acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vasodilation in aortic rings, with selective presence of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) to determine the contribution of nitric oxide (NO).

ACh-induced vasodilation was attenuated in untreated MI (-50%) compared with control rats. This was in part due to an impaired contribution of NO (-49%). Lisinopril and candesartan cilexetil fully normalised ACh-induced dilation, including the part mediated by NO.

Chronic RAAS-blockade with lisinopril and candesartan cilexetil normalised endothelial function in CHF in a comparable way. The effect of both treatments included the increase of the NO-mediated dilation, further indicating the important role of oxidative stress in the relationship between the RAAS and endothelial dysfunction in CHF.

Endothelial dysfunction and infarct-size relate to impaired EDHF response in rat experimental chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

The rat coronary ligation model of chronic heart failure has been extensively used to investigate its pathophysiology including the role of endothelial dysfunction. Inconsistent results have been obtained concerning the role of endothelial dilative mediators nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF).

AIMS

Our aim was to investigate involvement of NO and EDHF in aortic endothelial dysfunction in this model and the influence of individual infarct sizes. Furthermore, we investigated whether it is justified to regard rats that failed to develop large infarct sizes as SHAM controls.

METHODS

We performed coronary ligations and SHAM operations and studied acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxations and underlying endothelial mediators in isolated aortic rings 12 weeks after infarction. By then, cardiac and hemodynamic parameters were deteriorated in animals with large myocardial infarctions (large-MI, 35+/-3%), but not those with small myocardial infarctions (small-MI, 5+/-2%).

RESULTS

Large-MI showed decreased ACh-induced relaxation compared to SHAM due to decreased contribution of EDHF which was inversely correlated with individual infarct-size. Interestingly, small-MI showed significantly increased ACh-induced relaxation compared to SHAM due to increased NO contribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that impaired aortic endothelial dilatory function in large-MI is mainly due to an impaired EDHF response and strongly depends on individual infarct-size. In addition, endothelium-dependent relaxation of small-MI rats differed from SHAM, indicating that both groups may not be pooled to serve as controls. These results emphasize the importance of infarct-size and choice of the control group, and may explain inconsistencies in previous studies.

Comparison of zofenopril and lisinopril to study the role of the sulfhydryl-group in improvement of endothelial dysfunction with ACE-inhibitors in experimental heart failure

We evaluated the role of SH-groups in improvement of endothelial dysfunction with ACE-inhibitors in experimental heart failure. To this end, we compared the vasoprotective effect of chronic treatment with zofenopril (plus SH-group) versus lisinopril (no SH-group), or N-acetylcysteine (only SH-group) in myocardial infarcted (MI) heart failure rats. After 11 weeks of treatment, aortas were obtained and studied as ring preparations for endothelium-dependent and -independent dilatation in continuous presence of indomethacin to avoid interference of vasoactive prostanoids, and the selective presence of the NOS-inhibitor L-NMMA to determine NO-contribution. Total dilatation after receptor-dependent stimulation with acetylcholine (ACh) was attenuated (-49%, P<0.05) in untreated MI (n=11), compared to control rats with no-MI (n=8). This was in part due to impaired NO-contribution in MI (-50%, P<0.05 versus no-MI). At the same time the capacity for generation of biologically active NO after receptor-independent stimulation with A23187 remained intact. Chronic treatment with n-acetylcysteine (n=8) selectively restored NO-contribution in total dilatation to ACh. In contrast, both ACE-inhibitors fully normalized total dilatation to ACh, including the part mediated by NO (no significant differences between zofenopril (n=10) and lisinopril (n=8)). Zofenopril, but not lisinopril, additionally potentiated the effect of endogenous NO after A23187-induced release from the endothelium (+100%) as well as that of exogenous NO provided by nitroglycerin (+22%) and sodium nitrite (+36%) (for all P<0.05 versus no-MI). We conclude that ACE-inhibition with a SH-group has a potential advantage in improvement of endothelial dysfunction through increased activity of NO after release from the endothelium into the vessel wall. Furthermore, this is the first study demonstrating the selective normalizing effect of N-actylcysteine on NO-contribution to ACh-induced dilatation in experimental heart failure.

Biphasic survival response to amlodipine after myocardial infarction in rats: Association with cardiac vascular remodeling

In clinical studies, calcium channel blockers have been found to cause adverse cardiovascular reactions after myocardial infarction; however, such effects appear limited to short-acting agents. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the response to a long-acting calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, in terms of both survival and, cardiac and vascular remodeling after infarction. One week after permanent coronary occlusion, rats were randomized to no treatment or daily amlodipine (5 mg/kg) continued for up to 9 months. Amlodipine resulted in improved survival at 200 days (65% versus 26%; p < 0.05), but no difference at 9 months. However, rats with large infarcts died earlier than untreated animals, while those with smaller infarcts died later or survived for nine months. Amlodipine produced no difference in collagen content in non-infarcted tissue or myocyte cross-sectional area versus untreated hearts; however, scar length was increased. In addition, amlodipine was associated with vascular remodeling; muscle:lumen ratio increased in non-infarcted myocardium as did perivascular fibrosis. Vessels within the scar had reduced lumen area because of smooth muscle proliferation. We also examined infarcted hearts subjected to one week of intravenous amlodipine (1 mg/kg) initiated before occlusion and examined three weeks later. In this study, amlodipine exacerbated muscle proliferation in infarct vessels and was associated with less scar collagen. The vascular remodeling associated with amlodipine treatment is considered unfavorable and so the adverse survival for rats with large infarcts was no surprise. However, the prolonged survival associated with smaller infarcts raises the possibility that these vascular changes, under certain circumstances, are beneficial.