Calcium antagonist clevidipine reduces myocardial reperfusion injury by a mechanism related to bradykinin and nitric oxide

The Current Role of Clevidipine in the Management of Hypertension

Acute hypertension, which may damage blood vessels, causes irreversible organ damage to the vasculature, central nervous system, kidney, and heart. Clevidipine, the first third-generation calcium channel antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the past 20 years, is an ultra-short-acting calcium channel blocker that inhibits L-type calcium channels with high clearance and low distribution, can be rapidly metabolized into the corresponding inactive acid, and is rapidly hydrolyzed into inactive metabolites by esterase in arterial blood. Clevidipine is the same as nicardipine in that the main physiological effect is vasodilation and the main target is the arterial system, which has a limited effect on capacitor vessels. Unlike nitroglycerin, clevidipine has a limited effect on preload. In contrast to other direct-acting vasodilators, clevidipine has an ultra-short half-life due to metabolism by nonspecific blood and tissue esterases. Clevidipine trials conducted in adult populations have proven that it can rapidly control blood pressure in cardiac surgery situations and that adverse reactions to clevidipine are similar to those with other antihypertensive agents. In recent years, clinical trials have shown that clevidipine has excellent blood pressure-lowering capability in patients with acute neurological injury (hemorrhage, stroke, and subarachnoid and acute intracerebral hemorrhage), those  undergoing coronary artery bypass graft or spinal surgery, and in those with cerebral aneurysm/pheochromocytoma, acute heart failure, acute aortic syndromes, or renal insufficiency with severe hypertension, and it is equivalent to commonly used blood pressure-lowering medicines such as nicardipine or nitroglycerin. However, there is a lack of large-scale clinical trial data on the efficacy and safety of clevidipine in children during the perioperative period.

Effects of statins on ischemia-reperfusion complications in breast free flaps

BACKGROUND

Administration of statins or other cardiovascular medications (CVMs) could potentially protect against the development of ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in free flap reconstruction. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of statins and other CVMs decreased the rate of I/R injury in autologous free flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed on women who had undergone mastectomy and autologous free flap breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2010. Patient characteristics, use of statin and/or CVMs, and I/R-related complications were ascertained. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify associations between independent risk factors and specific complications.

RESULTS

There were 702 free flap breast reconstructions included in this study; 45 performed in patients on statins, 70 in patients on CVMs, and 38 in patients on both. Overall complication rate in patients on statins and patients on CVMs was significantly higher than those not on any medication (46.7% versus 31.5%, P=0.037 and 45.7% versus 31.5%, P=0.017, respectively). When I/R complications were pooled, there were no significant differences between patients not on any medications and those on statins (P=0.26), CVMs (P=0.18), and both (P=0.83.)

CONCLUSIONS

Although there may be theoretical pharmacologic benefits of statins and/or CVMs to reduce the incidence of IR injury in autologous free flap breast reconstruction, the results of this study showed no clear advantages when these drugs were used.

The Effect of Statins and Other Cardiovascular Medication on Ischemia-Reperfusion Damage in a Human DIEP Flap Model: Theoretical and Epidemiological Considerations

Background. Statins and other cardiovascular medication possess antioxidant capacity. It was examined whether chronic use of these medications protects from the development of ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) related complications after DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Free Flap) surgery. This paper contains a literature study on the antioxidant working mechanisms of these drugs. Methods. Medical information of 134 DIEP patients (173 flaps) was studied from their medical files. Patient and operative characteristics were registered, as well as I/R related complications. Results. Of the group that didnot use statins, 16.3% developed complications versus 30.8% amongst patients that did use these drugs (P = 0.29). Amongst patients that chronically use other cardiovascular medication, 26.8% developed I/R related complications versus 14.4% of the patients without medication (P = 0.10). Conclusions. Chronic use of statins or other cardiovascular medication didnot decrease the occurrence of I/R related complications after DIEP surgery. Therefore, research should be aimed at evaluating short-term pre-treatment with statins.

Clevidipine : a state-of-the-art antihypertensive drug under the scope

INTRODUCTION

Clevidipine butyrate is the first intravenous antihypertensive drug to be approved by the FDA over the last decade. This medication is approved for use in the USA, Australia and New Zealand, but is still pending for approval in Europe. It is a new agent that might change the current management for severe acute hypertension in the critical care, emergency and perioperative areas.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review summarizes the pharmacological and clinical characteristics of this third-generation dihydropyridine intravenous calcium channel blocker, and was done using the literature available from the first publication in 1999 up until now, including the pivotal trials that led to its approval.

EXPERT OPINION

This agent is arterially selective, has an ultrashort half-life, with no CYP-mediated interactions with other medications and is easily titratable. These characteristics place it in a unique category compared with other commonly used antihypertensives. Clevidipine butyrate reaches target systolic blood pressure in more than 90% of patients, within 30 min. It has a low incidence of adverse reactions and is generally well tolerated. The main goal of this review is to provide healthcare providers with a comprehensive appraisal of this promising medication.

Cardioprotection by kappa-opioid receptor agonist U50488H is mediated by opioidergic regulation but not by calcium current modulation

Background

Because the κ-opioid receptor (OR) agonist U50488H stimulates opioidergic regulation and inhibits L-type Ca²⁺ channels, this study was aimed at assessing the roles of OR and L-type Ca²⁺ channels on U50488H-induced cardioprotection.

Methods

Langendorff-perfused rat hearts were subjected to 30 min of regional ischemia and 2 h of reperfusion. Isolated hearts were treated with U50488H with or without the κ-OR antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) or the Ca²⁺ channels activator BAY K 8644. Infarct size was measured with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining.

Results

U50488H treatment at reperfusion: (1) significantly reduced infarct size (11.3 ± 1.3%) compared to control hearts (27.7 ± 1.1%, P < 0.001), an effect that was completely blocked by nor-BNI (24.0 ± 0.9%, P < 0.001 vs. U50488H) but not by BAY K 8644 (7.1 ± 1.7%, P > 0.05 vs. U50488H); (2) significantly increased left ventricular developed pressure (65.3 ± 4.8%) after 2 h of reperfusion compared to control hearts (44.8 ± 3.6%, P < 0.05), an effect that was abrogated by nor-BNI (40.5 ± 4.5%, P > 0.05 vs. control) but not by BAY K 8644 (64.3 ± 5.6%, P < 0.01 vs. control); and (3) significantly decreased heart rate (P < 0.01 vs. control), an effect that was completely abrogated by both nor-BNI and BAY K 8644.

Conclusions

U50488H significantly limits myocardial infarction and stunning in isolated rat hearts after ischemia-reperfusion induction. The infarct size limitation and contractility improvement observed with U50488H treatment during reperfusion are entirely mediated by OR stimulation and not by Ca²⁺ channel modulation.

Clevidipine for the treatment of severe hypertension in adults

BACKGROUND

Intravenous antihypertensive agents are used when immediate control of blood pressure (BP) is required, including during the perioperative cardiac surgery period. Controlling postoperative BP is challenging because of the need to adequately reduce BP while maintaining appropriate end-organ perfusion. Clevidipine is an intravenous, ultra-short-acting, third-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist with selectivity for arteriolar vasodilatation. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of severe hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of clevidipine.

METHODS

To minimize selection bias, each author conducted an independent search for English-language publications indexed on MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts through January 2010 using the term clevidipine. All identified prospective, randomized and nonrandomized Phase III trials were included in the review.

RESULTS

Seven Phase III trials were identified in which clevidipine was compared with baseline, placebo, or other intravenous antihypertensive agents in the settings of severe hypertension (1 study), preoperative cardiac surgery (1), perioperative cardiac surgery (1), and postoperative cardiac surgery (4). In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of clevidipine in treating preoperative hypertension, the mean reduction from baseline in mean arterial pressure was 31.2% with clevidipine and 11.2% with placebo (P < 0.001). In a randomized, open-label, prospective study involving separate comparisons of clevidipine with nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, and nicardipine, the median total AUC for digression in systolic BP from the predetermined target range differed significantly between clevidipine and nitroglycerin (4.14 vs 8.87 mm Hg . min/h; respectively, P < 0.001) and between clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside (4.37 vs 10.5 mm Hg . min/h; P = 0.003), but not between clevidipine and nicardipine (1.76 and 1.69 mm Hg . min/h). Another study found no significant difference in efficacy in controlling BP during the 3-hour study period between clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside (AUC for mean [SD] arterial pressure, 106 [25] and 101 [28] mm Hg . min/h, respectively). Adverse events in these studies included atrial fibrillation (13.0%-36.1% clevidipine vs 12.0% placebo), nausea (5.0%-21.0% vs 12.0%, respectively), fever (19.0% vs 13.7%), insomnia (12.0% vs 6.1%), and acute renal failure (9.0% vs 2.0%). In the studies reviewed, only 1 case of chest discomfort in the setting of severe hypertension was considered a serious adverse event related to clevidipine therapy.

CONCLUSION

In the Phase III trials reviewed, clevidipine was effective in controlling BP in the settings of perioperative cardiac surgery and severe hypertension and was associated with minimal adverse effects.

Intravenous clevidipine for management of hypertension

Hypertension remains one of the most prevalent diseases affecting our society, and its complications lead the list of causes of mortality all over the world. Most efforts to control the disease are unsuccessful, failing in at least two-thirds of affected patients, despite the availability of multiple drugs for its treatment. The limited number of medications available for aggressive management of hypertensive crises has intensified the search for novel drugs that can achieve a rapid decrease in blood pressure without increasing the possible complications. Clevidipine is a novel, vasculoselective, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker characterized by a very fast onset and offset of action. Metabolism of clevidipine does not occur in the liver or kidneys, and thus there are no restrictions to using clevidipine in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction. This agent has been widely used to reduce blood pressure when oral therapy is not appropriate, and its use in the perioperative setting has been shown to be beneficial. This manuscript reviews the key characteristics of clevidipine and its role in the management of acute hypertension.

Clevidipine Butyrate Injectable Emulsion

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing inservices. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The November 2008 monograph topics are on romiplostim, rivaroxaban, golimumab, dronedarone, and degarelix. The DUE is on romiplostim.

New therapeutic perspectives with clevidipine: an ultra-short-acting intravenous Ca2+channel blocker

Intravenous antihypertensive agents are used in clinical situations in which the immediate, precise control of blood pressure is a clinical necessity. Clevidipine is a new, vascular-selective, dihyrdopyridine Ca(2+) channel blocker, which exerts its hemodynamic effects through selective arterial vasodilation without effects on the venous circulation. Because it is a potent coronary vasodilator, reduction in mean arterial pressure does not impair coronary perfusion. The unique properties of clevidipine include an ultra-short pharmacodynamic duration of action and a half-life after intravenous administration of approximately 2 min, resulting in very rapid onset and offset of antihypertensive effects. In clinical trials performed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, clevidipine proved superior to nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in maintaining blood pressure within predetermined ranges during the perioperative period. Its safety profile is comparable to nicardipine and nitroglycerin and, in one study, was associated with reduced 30-day mortality compared with nitroprusside. Clevidipine constitutes a useful addition to available intravenous agents and could prove particularly valuable in circumstances that require the ability to rapidly terminate the blood pressure-lowering effects of administered agents.

Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Effects of Clevidipine, an Ultrashort-Acting Calcium Antagonist for Rapid Blood Pressure Control

Clevidipine is an ultrashort-acting vasoselective calcium antagonist under development for short-term intravenous control of blood pressure. Studies in animals, healthy volunteers and patients have demonstrated the vascular selectivity and rapid onset and offset of antihypertensive action of clevidipine, a synthetic 1,4-dihydropyridine that inhibits L-type calcium channels. Clevidipine has a high clearance (0.05 L/min/kg) and is rapidly hydrolyzed to inactive metabolites by esterases in arterial blood. Its half-life in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is less than one min. Unlike sodium nitroprusside, a drug commonly used for the short-term control of blood pressure, which dilates both arterioles and veins, clevidipine reduces blood pressure through a selective effect on arterioles. As documented in animals and in cardiac surgical patients, clevidipine reduces peripheral resistance without any undesirable effect on cardiac filling pressure. It increases stroke volume and cardiac output. In anesthetized patients undergoing cardiac surgery clevidipine, unlike sodium nitroprusside, does not increase heart rate. In addition of having a favorable hemodynamic profile, suitable for rapid control of blood pressure, clevidipine protects against ischemia/reperfusion injuries, which are not uncommon during major surgery. In anesthetized pigs, clevidipine reduced infarct size after 45 min-long myocardial ischemia by 40%. In rats, renal function and splanchnic blood flow were better maintained when blood pressure was reduced with clevidipine than with sodium nitroprusside. Clevidipine was well tolerated in Phases I and II of clinical trials that included more than 300 individuals/patients. Since there are no known compounds with similar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties in clinical development, it is anticipated that clevidipine, a compound tailored to the needs of anesthesiologists, has the potential to become a drug of choice for controlling blood pressure during surgical procedures.

Failure to demonstrate myocardial protective effects of the ultra short-acting calcium antagonist clevidipine in a closed-chest reperfusion porcine model

Restoration of myocardial perfusion is essential in acute myocardial infarction for the salvaging of myocardial tissue. However, reperfusion per se can provoke myocardial necrosis within the jeopardized tissue. Yet, no intervention has been successfully applied to the clinical situation in this matter. Clevidipine, an ultra-short acting calcium antagonist, has, in open-chest animal models, shown to reduce the extent of reperfusion injury. In the present study we intended to reproduce those findings in a closed-chest porcine model with a clinically applicable set up. Pigs were subjected to balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) for 45 minutes. During 25 minutes, starting 1 minute prior to reperfusion, clevidipine, Intralipid, or saline was infused antegradely into the endangered myocardium. As no significant effects on infarct size were achieved, the model was modified. In a second phase, different anesthesias were evaluated addressing the same issue. Nonetheless no significant effects on infarct size were observed. Different techniques of occluding LAD, in an open-chest model, were investigated in a third phase, and revealed no significant differences between the techniques. However, when comparing all the closed- versus open-chest models, significant reduction in infarct size by the use of clevidipine was only obtained in the open-chest models. We could not demonstrate any significant myocardial protective effect with clevidipine in our porcine, closed-chest, acute infarct, and reperfusion model. However, in a modified open-chest model we obtained significant reduction in infarct size. Further studies are required to explain the discrepancies.

Novel Vascular Biology of Third-Generation L-Type Calcium Channel Antagonists

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were developed as vasodilators, and their use in cardiovascular disease treatment remains largely based on that mechanism of action. More recently, with the evolution of second- and third-generation CCBs, pleiotropic effects have been observed, and at least some of CCBs’ benefit is attributable to these mechanisms. Understanding these effects has contributed greatly to elucidating disease mechanisms and the rationale for CCB use. Furthermore, this knowledge might clarify why drugs are useful in some disease states, such as atherosclerosis, but not in others, such as heart failure. Although numerous drugs used in the treatment of vascular disease, including statins and angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors, have well-described pleiotropic effects universally accepted to contribute to their benefit, little attention has been paid to CCBs’ potentially similar effects. Accumulating evidence that at least 1 CCB, amlodipine, has pharmacologic actions distinct from L-type calcium channel blockade prompted us to investigate the pleiotropic actions of amlodipine and CCBs in general. There are several areas of research; foci here are (1) the physicochemical properties of amlodipine and its interaction with cholesterol and oxidants; (2) the mechanism by which amlodipine regulates NO production and implications; and (3) amlodipine’s role in controlling smooth muscle cell proliferation and matrix formation.