Who treats facial fractures?

Facial trauma coverage among level-1 trauma centers of the United States

PURPOSE

A large portion of patients admitted to trauma centers present with isolated or concomitant facial injuries. Multiple surgical specialties including oral and maxillofacial, plastic, and otolaryngology/head and neck surgeons are trained and involved in the management of oral and maxillofacial trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current distribution of different specialties that cover facial trauma among the leading trauma centers in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the number of emergency department admissions, the 5 busiest hospitals for each state within the United States were determined from the American Hospital Association, representing a total of 255 hospital emergency rooms. Seventy-six (N = 76) level-1 trauma centers were identified by directly contacting the hospital facility. Information was requested by mail from the chief of surgery and emergency medicine department regarding the percentage of facial trauma coverage by the different surgical specialties. In addition, the professional societies representing the 3 main specialties: American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS), American Association of Plastic Surgeons (AAPS), and the American Academy of Otolaryngologists/Head and Neck Surgeons (AAO-HNS) were contacted to determine an estimate of the number of active members within each specialty.

RESULTS

Information was obtained from 57 (75%) level-1 trauma hospitals. The remaining 19 (25%) hospitals failed to respond to our survey. The distribution of facial trauma coverage by the different specialties was as follows: plastic surgeons, 39.6%; oral and maxillofacial surgeons, 36.6%; otolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons, 23.3%; and other services (general surgery and oculoplastics), 0.5%. According to the respective professional societies contacted, there are approximately 7,003 plastic surgeons, 6,377 oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and 7,720 head and neck surgeons that are practicing members of their respective societies.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of facial trauma is an essential and demanding aspect of all the surgical specialties that provide this service. All major trauma centers require the support of facial trauma specialists for management of these injuries. When considering the ratio of surgeons per specialty and the percentage of facial trauma coverage provided by each specialty, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and plastic surgeons provide the greatest proportion of facial trauma coverage among the level-1 trauma centers that participated in the survey.

Etiology and incidence facial fractures in children and adults

Facial trauma has presented an increasing occurrence in the last four decades, due especially to the growth of accidents with automobiles as well as to the urban violence. Both of which continue being the main cause of such traumas. Aim: To evaluate the features of the population victim of facial trauma as to gender, age, occupation, origin, type of fracture and its cause. Design study: retrospective clinical with transversal cohort. Material and Method: Retrospective study consulting hospital registers of 513 patients victms of the facial trauma. Results: There was a higher incidence of facial trauma on men (84,9%), white (82,7) and with an average age of 29. Regarding occupation, the trauma was mostly occurred to students (16,6%) and Masons (11,2%). The jaw was the most affected place (35%), followed by zygoma (24%) and by the nose (23%), though most patients presented a single facial fracture (82,5%). Among the causes, accidents with automobiles (28,3%), aggressions (21%) and accidental fall s (19,5%) were the most common. Conclusions: Accidents with automobiles continue being the main cause of facial trauma, especially of multiple factures due to the great transmission of kinetic energy.

Etiologia e incidência das fraturas faciais em adultos e crianças: experiência em 513 casos

O trauma facial apresenta incidência crescente nas últimas quatro décadas, principalmente devido ao aumento dos acidentes automobilísticos e da violência urbana, que continuam sendo as principais causas desses traumatismos em indivíduos jovens. OBJETIVO: Estudar as características da população vítima de trauma facial através das variáveis sexo, idade, profissão, tipo de fratura e suas causas. FORMA DE ESTUDO: clínico retrospectivo com coorte transversal. MAETERIAL E MÉTODO: Estudo retrospectivo por consulta a prontuários de 513 pacientes vítimas de trauma facial. RESULTADOS: Houve maior incidência de trauma de face em homens (84,9%), brancos (82,7%) e com idade média de 29 anos. Quanto à profissão, estudantes (16,6%) e pedreiros (11,2%) foram os mais acometidos. A mandíbula foi o local mais afetado (35%), seguido do zigoma (24%) e do nariz (23%), sendo que a maioria dos pacientes tinha fratura única de face (81,5%). Dentre as causas, destacaram-se os acidentes automobilísticos (28,3%), agressões (21%) e as quedas acidentais (19,5%). CONCLUSÕES: Os acidentes automobilísticos continuam sendo a principal causa de trauma de face, principalmente de fraturas múltiplas devido à grande transmissão de energia cinética.

Referral patterns for the treatment of facial trauma in teaching hospitals in the United States

PURPOSE

The management of facial trauma is considered an integral part of the training of several specialties, including general plastic surgery, otolaryngology, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. Referral patterns of patients who have sustained facial trauma to these various specialty services, however, vary at different institutions according to physician preferences and protocols. The purpose of this project was to examine the referral patterns of facial trauma in the United States at teaching hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire survey of physician-chiefs of emergency or trauma services at teaching hospitals was carried out. Scenarios involving a variety of facial injury patterns were presented, and a hypothetical referral was requested. In addition, questions regarding preferences and opinions regarding the various services were included.

RESULTS

Most teaching hospitals had a formal protocol for the referral of patients with facial injuries. With the exception of mandible fractures, referral patterns for patients with facial injuries were relatively even across the 3 specialties. Interestingly, only 56% of respondents would seek the same referral for themselves or relatives in the same way as they would refer a patient based on their in-house protocol. In regard to timeliness, efficiency, and perceived competency in the handling of facial trauma, oral and maxillofacial surgery had statistically significant higher scores than otolarygology and plastic surgery, which were not statistically distinguishable between each other.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 specialties appear to be involved in the management of facial trauma at teaching institutions in the United States; therefore, it seems unlikely that any one specialty will be singled out as the sole provider of these services at all institutions.