Evaluation of pregnant women after blunt injury

Emergency cesarean section in pregnant trauma patients presenting after motor vehicle collision

Background

Most pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) present after motor vehicle collision (MVC). The national rate and risk factors for emergency cesarean section (ECS) during the index hospitalization for pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) are unknown. We sought to investigate the national rate of ECS in PTPs presenting after MVC, hypothesizing a higher risk of ECS among those with severe injuries or elevated shock index (SI).

Methods

The 2020-2021 TQIP was queried for PTPs presenting after MVC. PTPs that underwent ECS were compared to patients that did not undergo ECS. Elevated SI was defined as ≥1. Severe injury was defined by abbreviated injury scale grade ≥3. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

From 1183 PTPs, 95 (8.0 %) underwent ECS. The median time to ECS was 115 min. The ECS group had higher rates of lung (27.4 % vs. 12.2 %, p < 0.001) injury, spleen (18.9 % vs. 5.5 %, p < 0.001) injury, and elevated SI (22.1 % vs. 9.8 %, p < 0.001). ECS patients had higher rates of complication (9.5 % vs. 2.1 %, p < 0.001) and death (4.2 % vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.012). Independently associated risk factors for ECS included severe head (OR 2.65, CI 1.14-6.17, p = 0.023) or abdominal (OR 2.07, CI 1.08-3.97, p = 0.028) injuries and elevated SI (OR 2.17 CI 1.25-3.79, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The national rate of ECS among PTPs presenting after MVC is 8 % with most occurring within the first 2 hours of arrival. Severe head and abdominal injuries as well as elevated SI are risk factors for ECS.

Diagnostic accuracy of Kleihauer-Betke (Kb) testing to predict fetal outcomes associated with fetomaternal hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic and screening utility of Kleihauer-Betke (KB) testing as a triage tool in predicting adverse fetal outcomes associated with fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH).

STUDY DESIGN

Single center retrospective cohort study evaluated a primary composite outcome of fetal complications associated with FMH between KB-negative and KB-positive test groups. Screening tests for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were determined.

RESULTS

641 women (97%) had KB-negative and 22 (3%) had KB-positive tests. The primary composite outcome between KB-negative and KB-positive pregnancies was similar (30% vs. 36%, p = 0.54). Screening exhibited high specificity (97%), however, test sensitivity was poor (4%) with only moderate positive and negative predictive values (36.4 and 69.7%).

CONCLUSION

Fetal outcomes associated with FMH were not significantly different between KB-positive and KB-negative test cohorts; KB testing offers no diagnostic precision in the emergency triage evaluation of women with suspected FMH.

Use of Fetal Hemoglobin Quantitation for Rh-Positive Pregnant Females: A National Survey and Review of the Literature

CONTEXT.—

The Kleihauer-Betke (KB) test is validated for estimating the dose of Rh immune globulin needed for Rh-negative pregnant females. However, some clinicians are also ordering the test for Rh-positive women. The degree to which this practice occurs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate the number of laboratories that perform the KB test on Rh-positive pregnant women, and to establish current ordering practices for this indication.

DESIGN.—

We added 9 supplemental questions regarding KB test use for fetomaternal hemorrhage to the 2016 College of American Pathologists proficiency test survey. We also reviewed the available literature regarding the diagnostic utility of the KB test for Rh-positive women.

RESULTS.—

A total of 1578 surveys were evaluated and revealed that 52% (824) of respondents perform these tests for Rh-positive women, and more than 50% (440 of 819; 53.7%) of these laboratories report that the results for Rh-positive women are treated as important or very important.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The KB test is commonly used for Rh-positive women, and the information obtained from the test is considered as urgent and important. However, the available literature in support of this practice is still nonconclusive.

Usefulness of maternal fetal red blood cell count in rhesus-positive pregnant women

Background Fetal red blood cells (FRBC) in maternal blood are counted in rhesus-negative women to determine the amount of anti-D immunoglobulin to be administered in the case of a rhesus-positive fetus. In rhesus-positive pregnant women this is done in not always very well-defined indications including trauma, miscarriage, fetal death and diminished fetal movements. The aim of this study is to determine if the detection of FRBC is useful in rhesus-positive pregnant woman. This was done by assessing maternal and fetal characteristics that are more likely to give a positive test. Materials and methods This was a retrospective cohort study. Results A total of 169 FRBC tests were performed in 161 rhesus-positive pregnant women. FRBC were found in 45 (26.6%) of the women. Three patients experienced a miscarriage although their FRBC tests were negative (p = 0.295). Of the seven patients who experienced unexpected stillbirths, three tested positive. The deaths were not less likely to occur if the results had been negative (p = 0.631). There was a statistically significant difference between the different types of trauma indications (p = 0.025): the test was more likely positive if there had been a fall on the ground or staircase or blunt trauma (p = 0.041, 0.026 and 0.018, respectively). FRBC were not more frequently present in the absence of fetal movements (n = 16, p = 0.693). Conclusion FRBC in maternal blood were more likely positive in the case of a fall on the ground, or from a staircase. However, a positive test does not necessarily imply fetal pathology and, therefore, does not contribute to clinical management.

Guidelines for the Management of a Pregnant Trauma Patient

OBJECTIVE

Physical trauma affects 1 in 12 pregnant women and has a major impact on maternal mortality and morbidity and on pregnancy outcome. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted to optimize outcome for both the mother and her fetus. The aim of this document is to provide the obstetric care provider with an evidence-based systematic approach to the pregnant trauma patient.

OUTCOMES

Significant health and economic outcomes considered in comparing alternative practices.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library from October 2007 to September 2013 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., pregnancy, Cesarean section, hypotension, domestic violence, shock) and key words (e.g., trauma, perimortem Cesarean, Kleihauer-Betke, supine hypotension, electrical shock). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English between January 1968 and September 2013. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to February 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This guideline is expected to facilitate optimal and uniform care for pregnancies complicated by trauma. Summary Statement Specific traumatic injuries At this time, there is insufficient evidence to support the practice of disabling air bags for pregnant women. (III) Recommendations Primary survey 1. Every female of reproductive age with significant injuries should be considered pregnant until proven otherwise by a definitive pregnancy test or ultrasound scan. (III-C) 2. A nasogastric tube should be inserted in a semiconscious or unconscious injured pregnant woman to prevent aspiration of acidic gastric content. (III-C) 3. Oxygen supplementation should be given to maintain maternal oxygen saturation > 95% to ensure adequate fetal oxygenation. (II-1B) 4. If needed, a thoracostomy tube should be inserted in an injured pregnant woman 1 or 2 intercostal spaces higher than usual. (III-C) 5. Two large bore (14 to 16 gauge) intravenous lines should be placed in a seriously injured pregnant woman. (III-C) 6. Because of their adverse effect on uteroplacental perfusion, vasopressors in pregnant women should be used only for intractable hypotension that is unresponsive to fluid resuscitation. (II-3B) 7. After mid-pregnancy, the gravid uterus should be moved off the inferior vena cava to increase venous return and cardiac output in the acutely injured pregnant woman. This may be achieved by manual displacement of the uterus or left lateral tilt. Care should be taken to secure the spinal cord when using left lateral tilt. (II-1B) 8. To avoid rhesus D (Rh) alloimmunization in Rh-negative mothers, O-negative blood should be transfused when needed until cross-matched blood becomes available. (I-A) 9. The abdominal portion of military anti-shock trousers should not be inflated on a pregnant woman because this may reduce placental perfusion. (II-3B) Transfer to health care facility 10. Transfer or transport to a maternity facility (triage of a labour and delivery unit) is advocated when injuries are neither life- nor limb-threatening and the fetus is viable (≥ 23 weeks), and to the emergency room when the fetus is under 23 weeks' gestational age or considered to be non-viable. When the injury is major, the patient should be transferred or transported to the trauma unit or emergency room, regardless of gestational age. (III-B) 11. When the severity of injury is undetermined or when the gestational age is uncertain, the patient should be evaluated in the trauma unit or emergency room to rule out major injuries. (III-C) Evaluation of a pregnant trauma patient in the emergency room 12. In cases of major trauma, the assessment, stabilization, and care of the pregnant women is the first priority; then, if the fetus is viable (≥ 23 weeks), fetal heart rate auscultation and fetal monitoring can be initiated and an obstetrical consultation obtained as soon as feasible. (II-3B) 13. In pregnant women with a viable fetus (≥ 23 weeks) and suspected uterine contractions, placental abruption, or traumatic uterine rupture, urgent obstetrical consultation is recommended. (II-3B) 14. In cases of vaginal bleeding at or after 23 weeks, speculum or digital vaginal examination should be deferred until placenta previa is excluded by a prior or current ultrasound scan. (III-C) Adjunctive tests for maternal assessment 15. Radiographic studies indicated for maternal evaluation including abdominal computed tomography should not be deferred or delayed due to concerns regarding fetal exposure to radiation. (II-2B) 16. Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents can be considered when maternal benefit outweighs potential fetal risks. (III-C) 17. In addition to the routine blood tests, a pregnant trauma patient should have a coagulation panel including fibrinogen. (III-C) 18. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma should be considered for detection of intraperitoneal bleeding in pregnant trauma patients. (II-3B) 19. Abdominal computed tomography may be considered as an alternative to diagnostic peritoneal lavage or open lavage when intra-abdominal bleeding is suspected. (III-C) Fetal assessment 20. All pregnant trauma patients with a viable pregnancy (≥ 23 weeks) should undergo electronic fetal monitoring for at least 4 hours. (II-3B) 21. Pregnant trauma patients (≥ 23 weeks) with adverse factors including uterine tenderness, significant abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, sustained contractions (> 1/10 min), rupture of the membranes, atypical or abnormal fetal heart rate pattern, high risk mechanism of injury, or serum fibrinogen < 200 mg/dL should be admitted for observation for 24 hours. (III-B) 22. Anti-D immunoglobulin should be given to all rhesus D-negative pregnant trauma patients. (III-B) 23. In Rh-negative pregnant trauma patients, quantification of maternal-fetal hemorrhage by tests such as Kleihauer-Betke should be done to determine the need for additional doses of anti-D immunoglobulin. (III-B) 24. An urgent obstetrical ultrasound scan should be undertaken when the gestational age is undetermined and need for delivery is anticipated. (III-C) 25. All pregnant trauma patients with a viable pregnancy who are admitted for fetal monitoring for greater than 4 hours should have an obstetrical ultrasound prior to discharge from hospital. (III-C) 26. Fetal well-being should be carefully documented in cases involving violence, especially for legal purposes. (III-C) Obstetrical complications of trauma 27. Management of suspected placental abruption should not be delayed pending confirmation by ultrasonography as ultrasound is not a sensitive tool for its diagnosis. (II-3D) Specific traumatic injuries 28. Tetanus vaccination is safe in pregnancy and should be given when indicated. (II-3B) 29. Every woman who sustains trauma should be questioned specifically about domestic or intimate partner violence. (II-3B) 30. During prenatal visits, the caregiver should emphasize the importance of wearing seatbelts properly at all times. (II-2B) Perimortem Caesarean section 31. A Caesarean section should be performed for viable pregnancies (≥ 23 weeks) no later than 4 minutes (when possible) following maternal cardiac arrest to aid with maternal resuscitation and fetal salvage. (III-B).

Practice management guidelines for the diagnosis and management of injury in the pregnant patient: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group

Trauma during pregnancy has presented very unique challenges over the centuries. From the first report of Ambrose Pare of a gunshot wound to the uterus in the 1600s to the present, there have existed controversies and inconsistencies in diagnosis, management, prognostics, and outcome. Anxiety is heightened by the addition of another, smaller patient. Trauma affects 7% of all pregnancies and requires admission in 4 of 1000 pregnancies. The incidence increases with advancing gestational age. Just over half of trauma during pregnancy occurs in the third trimester. Motor vehicle crashes comprise 50% of these traumas, and falls and assaults account for 22% each. These data were considered to be underestimates because many injured pregnant patients are not seen at trauma centers. Trauma during pregnancy is the leading cause of nonobstetric death and has an overall 6% to 7% maternal mortality. Fetal mortality has been quoted as high as 61% in major trauma and 80% if maternal shock is present. The anatomy and physiology of pregnancy make diagnosis and treatment difficult.

[Traumatic uterine rupture: a rare complication of motor vehicle accidents during pregnancy. A case report]

The rupture of gravid uterus is a rare complication concerning less than one percent of the pregnant women involved in a motor vehicle accident. The authors report the case of a 39-year woman, gravida 4, referred for an uterine rupture with intrauterine fetal death at 24 weeks gestation, following a car crash. The surgical laparotomic exploration in emergency showed a wide fundal uterine tear with placental abruption. The placenta and the fetus were found in the abdominal cavity. A conservative surgical treatment could be realized. Principles of management, which must be quick and co-ordinated, are reminded.

Orthopaedic trauma in the pregnant patient

Trauma affects up to 8% of pregnancies and is the leading cause of death among pregnant women in the United States. A pregnancy test is mandated for all females of childbearing age who are involved in trauma. Orthopaedic trauma in the pregnant patient is managed similarly to that for all trauma patients. Initial resuscitation efforts should focus on the pregnant patient because stable patient vital signs provide the best chance for fetal survival. In the stable patient, fetal assessment and a pelvic examination are mandatory. Radiographs as well as abdominal ultrasound of the patient and fetal ultrasound are useful. No known biologic risks are associated with magnetic resonance imaging, and no specific fetal abnormalities have been linked with standard low-intensity magnetic resonance imaging. Emergency surgery can be safely performed in most pregnant patients. Avoiding patient hypotension and using left lateral decubitus positioning increase the likelihood of success for the patient and fetus. An experienced multidisciplinary team consisting of an obstetrician, perinatologist, orthopaedic surgeon, anesthesiologist, radiologist, and nursing staff will optimize the treatment of both the pregnant patient and her fetus.

Blunt Abdominal Injury in the Pregnant Patient: Detection with US

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for the detection of blunt intraabdominal injury in pregnant patients and to compare differences between pregnant and nonpregnant patients of childbearing age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of results of all consecutive emergency blunt trauma US examinations performed at a level I trauma center from January 1995 to June 2002 was conducted. Data on demographics, free fluid location, and patient outcome were collected. Injuries were determined on the basis of results of computed tomography and/or laparotomy. The Student t test was used to detect differences between continuous variables, and chi(2) analysis was used to evaluate differences between proportions.

RESULTS

A total of 2319 US examinations for blunt trauma were performed in girls and women between the ages of 10 and 50 years. There were 328 pregnant patients, 23 of whom had intraabdominal injury. The mean age of the pregnant patients was 24.7 years +/- 6.1 (standard deviation) (age range, 14-42 years). In pregnant patients, the sensitivity of US was 61% (14 of 23 patients), the specificity was 94.4% (288 of 305 patients), and the accuracy was 92.1% (302 of 328 patients). Pregnant patients were significantly more likely to have sustained injuries from assault (odds ratio: 2.6, P < .001). The most common pattern of free fluid accumulation detected at US in pregnant patients was that of fluid in the left and right upper quadrants and pelvis (n = 4, 29%); the second most common pattern was one of isolated pelvic fluid (n = 3, 21%).

CONCLUSION

For detection of intraabdominal injury, US was less sensitive in pregnant patients than in nonpregnant patients but was highly specific in both subgroups. The sensitivity of US was highest in pregnant patients during the first trimester.

Kleihauer-Betke Testing Is Important in All Cases of Maternal Trauma

BACKGROUND

In maternal trauma, the Kleihauer-Betke (KB) test has traditionally been used to detect transplacental hemorrhage (TPH), so that Rh-negative women could receive appropriate Rh immune prophylaxis. Reasoning that the magnitude of TPH would reflect uterine injury, we evaluated Kleihauer-Betke testing as an independent predictor of preterm labor (PTL) after maternal trauma.

METHODS

Admissions to the Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, from January 1996 to January 2002, were reviewed. Of 30,362 trauma patients admitted, 166 were pregnant, and 93 of these underwent electronic fetal monitoring. Their records were abstracted for demographics, injury type, three separate trauma scores, documented uterine contractions, PTL (contractions with progressive cervical change), and serious perinatal complications. In 71 cases, transplacental hemorrhage was assessed by maternal KB test.

RESULTS

TPH, defined as KB-positive for greater than 0.01 mL of fetal blood in the maternal circulation, occurred in 46 women. Forty-four had documented contractions (25 had overt PTL) and 2 had no contractions. In 25 women with a negative KB test, none had uterine contractions. All patients with contractions or PTL had positive KB tests. By logistic regression, KB test result was the single risk factor associated with PTL (p < 0.001; likelihood ratio, 20.8 for positive KB test). Compared with other sites, abdominal trauma was associated more often with uterine contractions (p < 0.001), PTL (p = 0.001), and a positive KB test (p < 0.001, chi). None of the trauma scoring systems predicted PTL.

CONCLUSION

Kleihauer-Betke testing accurately predicts the risk of preterm labor after maternal trauma. Clinical assessment does not. With a negative KB test, posttrauma electronic fetal monitoring duration may be limited safely. With a positive KB test, the significant risk of PTL mandates detailed monitoring. KB testing has important advantages to all maternal trauma victims, regardless of Rh status.

Trauma in pregnancy

The anatomic and physiologic changes make treatment of the pregnant trauma patient complex. The fetus is the challenge, because, in pregnancy, trauma has little effect on maternal morbidity and mortality. Aggressive resuscitation of the mother, in general, is the best management for the fetus, because fetal outcome is directly related to maternal outcome. Recent literature has attempted, with little success, to identify factors that may predict poor fetal outcomes. Cardiotocographic monitoring should be initiated as soon as possible in the emergency department to evaluate fetal well-being. Other key points include: Maternal blood pressure and respiratory rate return to baseline as pregnancy approaches term. Initial fetal health may be the best indicator of maternal health. Inferior vena cava compression in the supine patient may cause significant hypotension. Maternal acidosis may be predictive of fetal outcome. Kleihauer-Betke testing is not necessary in the emergency department. Early ultrasonographic evaluation can identify free intraperitoneal fluid and assess fetal health. Necessary radiographs should not be withheld at any period of gestation. Radiation beyond 20 weeks' gestation is safe. Patients with viable gestations require at least 4 hours of CTM monitoring after even minor trauma.

Rh negative status and isoimmunization update: a case-based approach to care

Prior to the 1970s and the advent of Rho (D) immune globulin (RIG) for Rh negative women, hemolytic disease of the newborn led to morbidity, long-term disabilities, and mortality. Antepartum RIG administration has been a standard of practice since 1983. Yet, Rh isoimmunization (sensitization) and its sequelae have not been completely eradicated. Rh-related issues remain clinical challenges facing perinatal and neonatal nurses. Evidence for the administration of RIG prenatally and during the postpartum period is presented including controversies and challenges. Current information about fetal and neonatal care of erythroblastosis fetalis and immune hydrops is also presented.

Blunt trauma in the obstetric patient: monitoring practices in the ED

This study was undertaken to determine the usually used approach to fetal monitoring in the emergency department (ED) of the less severely injured obstetric patient who has sustained blunt trauma. A written survey was sent to clinical directors of teaching programs in emergency medicine (EM) with inquiries on the usual way of monitoring, what studies were performed, and the usual disposition of the less-injured obstetric patient. From the 112 teaching programs surveyed in early 1996, there were 87 responses (78%). Seventy-eight percent of programs generally have fetal monitoring performed for 2 to 4 hours in obstetric trauma patients when the trauma is more than minor extremity injury. In 68%, fetal monitoring was not performed in the ED from the time of the initial assessment of fetal heart tones until the mother went to an obstetric area even though the average estimated time to radiographically clear a cervical spine was 36 minutes. In 92% of programs residents are taught cardiotocographic changes indicative of fetal distress but only 15% have such monitoring equipment in their department. However, 51% do have sonographic equipment in their department. Given a patient with a viable fetus who has no abdominal pain, 46% routinely use fetal monitoring if the mechanism is a simple fall whereas 92% use monitoring only if the mechanism is a rollover motor vehicle collision or a strike to the abdomen. It is generally recognized that fetal distress may occur subtly without overt clinical signs and that obstetric area monitoring for a period of several hours should take place. However, most teaching programs do not institute continuous fetal monitoring during the first 30 to 60 minutes that the mother is undergoing her work-up even though residents are taught such monitoring.

Pelvic fractures in pregnancy: factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes associated with pelvic fractures in pregnancy.

METHODS

A literature review of pelvic and acetabular fractures during pregnancy was performed, providing 101 cases for analysis (1 case report was included). Factors influencing maternal and fetal mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

Pelvic and acetabular fractures during pregnancy were associated with a high maternal (9%) and a higher fetal (35%) mortality rate. Automobile-pedestrian collisions had a trend toward a higher maternal mortality rate, and vehicular collisions had a trend toward a higher fetal mortality rate, compared with falls. Injury severity influenced both maternal and fetal outcomes. Fracture classification (simple vs. complex), fracture type (acetabular vs. pelvic), the trimester of pregnancy, and the era of literature reviewed did not influence mortality rates. When considering potential causes of fetal death, direct trauma to the uterus, placenta, or fetus was not associated with a higher fetal mortality rate, compared with maternal hemorrhage. Pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery has rarely been reported in this patient population.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic and acetabular fractures in pregnancy continue to be associated with a high fetal mortality rate. Mechanism of injury and injury severity appeared to influence mortality rates, whereas the fracture classification, the fracture type, the trimester of pregnancy, and the era of literature reviewed did not.

SMA statement the benefits and risks of exercise during pregnancy. Sport Medicine Australia

There are numerous benefits to pregnant women of remaining active during pregnancy. These include improved weight control and maintenance of fitness. There may also be benefits in terms of reduced risk of development of gestational diabetes meilitus and improved psychological functioning. Moderate intensity aerobic exercise has been shown to be safe in pregnancy, with a number of studies now indicating that for trained athletes it may be possible to exercise at a higher level than is currently recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Studies of resistance training, incorporating moderate weights and avoiding maximal isometnc contractions, have shown no adverse outcomes. There may be benefits of increased strength and flexibility. The risk of neural tube defects due to exercise-induced hyperthermia that is suggested by animal studies is less likely in women, because of more effective mechanisms of heat dissipation in humans. There is accumulating evidence to suggest that participation in moderate intensity exercise throughout pregnancy may enhance birth weight, while more severe or frequent exercise, maintained for longer into the pregnancy: may result in lighter babies. There have been no reports of foetal injury or death in relation to trauma or contact during sporting activities. Despite this, a risk of severe blunt trauma is present in some sporting situations as pregnancy progresses. Exercise and lactation are compatible in the post-partum period, providing adequate calories are consumed. Considerations of pelvic floor function and type of delivery are relevant in planning a return to certain types of exercise at this time.

The risk of abdominal injury to women during sport

Although trauma to pregnant women is a potential risk during sport, as there is no published information about the magnitude of this risk, it is presumed to be low. Whilst there is an emerging literature about the risk of adverse outcomes following severe and catastrophic trauma to pregnant women, this literature almost exclusively focuses on road trauma victims or the result of assault. This paper describes the risk of abdominal injuries to women participants across a range of sports in Australia. An extensive search of the available literature could not identify any studies that had discussed this issue specifically in pregnant women. Studies, which have reported injuries in athletes, have generally found abdominal/chest injuries to account for fewer than 2% of all injuries, even in contact sports. Most of these published studies do not differentiate between the chest and abdomen and provide no specfic details on the exact nature or mechanisms of the injuries. Given the limitations of the published studies, an examination of data from two Australian general injury databases (one describing hospital admissions, the other hospital emergency department presentations), three Australian sports-injury treatment databases (sports medicine clinic attendances and medical coverage services) and one cohort study was undertaken to describe sports-related abdominal injuries. These analyses confirm that the risk of abdominal injury during sport is very low. In conclusion, currently there is not an adequate evidence-base for quantifying the risk of abdominal injuries during sport in women, let alone pregnant women or for justifying a ban of sport on this basis. Recommendations for future epidemiological sports injury studies and the potential for linkages with perinatal morbidity and mortality databases are given.

Periventricular cystic lesions in a preterm infant after a car accident during pregnancy

We report on a preterm infant born at 30+5/7 gestational weeks who developed severe cystic cerebral lesions after exposure to a car accident one day before delivery. The literature on car accidents during pregnancy is reviewed with specific focus on neonatal neurological outcome.

Abdominal ultrasound examination in pregnant blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND

The ability of abdominal ultrasound to detect intraperitoneal fluid in the pregnant trauma patient has been questioned.

METHODS

Pregnant blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during an 8-year period were reviewed. Ultrasound examinations were used to detect intraperitoneal fluid and considered positive if such fluid was identified.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven (61%) of 208 pregnant patients had abdominal ultrasound during initial evaluation in the emergency department. Seven patients had intra-abdominal injuries, and six had documented hemoperitoneum. Ultrasound identified intraperitoneal fluid in five of these six patients (sensitivity, 83%; 95% confidence interval, 36-100%). In the 120 patients without intra-abdominal injury, ultrasound was negative in 117 (specificity, 98%; 95% confidence interval, 93-100%). The three patients without intra-abdominal injury but with a positive ultrasound had the following: serous intraperitoneal fluid and no injuries at laparotomy (one) and uneventful clinical courses of observation (two).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of abdominal ultrasonography in pregnant trauma patients is similar to that seen in nonpregnant patients. Occasional false negatives occur and a negative initial examination should not be used as conclusive evidence that intra-abdominal injury is not present. Ultrasound has the advantages of no radiation exposure.

Management of traumatically injured patients in the emergency department observation unit

An EDOU may be an ideal setting for the short-term monitoring and treatment of certain acutely injured patients. The patients choosen for observation, and the diagnostic studies used, will be specific to a particular institution's availability and expertise. Pathways should be developed in conjunction with all services caring for these patients.

Trauma in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the severity of maternal injury or other maternal and fetal variables will predict the outcome of pregnancy in the injured pregnant patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective review of pregnant patients hospitalized at a level 1 trauma center from 1986 to 1996, we analyzed the maternal Injury Severity Score, maternal mortality, fetal-neonatal mortality, maternal hypotension, and fetal heart rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-one pregnant women were identified who were hospitalized after trauma. The mean +/- SD maternal age was 26.6 +/- 6.6 years. The distribution of trauma per gestational age was 21%, 20%, and 59% for the first, second, and third trimester, respectively. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crashes. Long-term pregnancy outcome was available in 53 patients (87%). There was 1 maternal death. Fetal-neonatal death occurred in 8 (15%) of 53 pregnancies. Most maternal physiologic variables were not predictors of pregnancy outcome. We were unable to detect a difference in the distribution of Injury Severity Scores between viable and nonviable pregnancies. However, maternal hypotension and low fetal heart rate were common in nonviable pregnancies (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal hypotension and fetal heart rate are potential predictors of pregnancy outcome after trauma. Other maternal and fetal physiologic variables are poor measures of fetal well-being and are unable to predict fetal outcome. Fetal-neonatal death does not necessarily correlate with severity of maternal injury.

Fetal death from abruptio placentae associated with incorrect use of a seatbelt

A female driver, 24 weeks pregnant, was wearing a three-point seatbelt in the manner usual for nonpregnant women, when her automobile collided head-on with another vehicle. A cardiotocographic examination after the accident revealed the fetus to be alive. Five days after the accident, however, a cardiotocographic examination showed fetal death. At that time, a transverse ecchymotic band on the lower abdominal wall that had not been observed at the first examination was noticed. Eight days after the accident, the mother delivered a macerated female fetus. At autopsy, the baby showed no abnormality, but there was a hematoma on the placental surface toward the uterus. These results suggest that the fetus died of abruptio placentae associated with incorrect placement of the lap belt.

Predictors of outcome in trauma during pregnancy: identification of patients who can be monitored for less than 6 hours

BACKGROUND

The first objective of this study was to identify risk factors in pregnant patients suffering blunt trauma predictive for uterine contractions, preterm labor, or fetal loss. The second objective was to identify patients who can safely undergo fetal monitoring for 6 hours or less after blunt trauma by selecting out those patients demonstrating the identified risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1998. Charts were reviewed for numerous possible risk factors for adverse outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed by using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 271 pregnant patients admitted after blunt trauma were identified. Risk factors significantly predictive of fetal death included ejections, motorcycle and pedestrian collisions, maternal death, maternal tachycardia, abnormal fetal heart rate, lack of restraints, and Injury Severity Score > 9. Risk factors significantly predictive of contractions or preterm labor included gestational age >35 weeks, assaults, and pedestrian collisions.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant patients who present after blunt trauma with any of the identified risk factors for contractions, preterm labor, or fetal loss should be monitored for at least 24 hours. Patients without these risk factors can safely be monitored for 6 hours after trauma before discharge.

Pelvic fractures in pregnant multiple trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

To study the outcome of pelvic fractures and fetuses in pregnant patients involved in blunt multiple trauma.

DESIGN

Retrospective follow-up study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

Pregnant multiple trauma patients with pelvic fractures between 1974 and 1998.

INTERVENTIONS

Conservative and operative treatment of pelvic fractures adapted to the clinical status of the mother.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical, functional, and social outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 4,196 patients with blunt multiple trauma treated between 1974 and June 1998, seven demonstrated the combination of blunt multiple trauma, pregnancy, and pelvic fractures. These patients had a mean Injury Severity Score of 29.9 points. Five mothers and three fetuses survived their injuries. All dead fetuses died on the scene. One surviving fetus was found to have hydrocephalus unrelated to the injury; the remaining fetuses had an uneventful delivery and were healthy. In two of the three patients whose fetuses survived, the treatment of the pelvic fracture was modified for the sake of fetal well-being. In all of these patients, acceptable outcome was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Modification of the treatment of the pelvic fracture in pregnant women with multiple trauma may be necessary to minimize the risk of fetal injury. In our experience with these rare cases, this modified treatment did not severely alter the clinical outcome of the mother's pelvic fracture.

Screening helical CT for evaluation of blunt traumatic injury in the pregnant patient

Pregnant patients who sustain severe blunt trauma are infrequently encountered in most practices. However, detection of internal injuries including those to the gravid uterus is essential since maternal disability or fetal loss are physical and psychologic catastrophes that have long-term effects on the mother and her family. Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to detect blunt traumatic injuries and can play an important role in the screening of the injured pregnant woman. The normal gravid uterus and physiologic changes of pregnancy can confound CT interpretation. Inhomogeneous enhancement of placental cotyledons, hydronephrosis, and enlarged ovarian veins are normal findings. Avascular regions in the placenta indicate infarction or abruption with impending fetal demise. Although CT can demonstrate uterine rupture and retroperitoneal hemorrhage, direct detection of fetal injuries is rare. Fetal demise is more common when maternal injuries include trauma to the uterus. Although screening ultrasonography can depict fetal distress, use of screening CT allows a concurrent evaluation of multiple areas in the pregnant trauma patient including the uterus. CT is a useful diagnostic tool in the triage of the critically injured pregnant woman.

Trauma in pregnancy

Serious trauma in pregnancy is an uncommon event but is particularly challenging to the physician, due to the presence of a potential second patient. Responding to the challenge requires a knowledge of the physiological changes which may alter the maternal response to injury, as well as an understanding of the maternal-fetal relationship. Fetal outcome is dependent on maternal well-being, and thus timely and appropriate resuscitation of the mother is the first priority. Initial management of the pregnant trauma patient includes attention to the airway-breathing-circulation (ABC). Certain injuries are more common in pregnancy and are influenced by the presence of the gravid uterus. The physician needs an awareness of the common complications of pregnancy and additional skills may be required to diagnose and assess fetal viability. The principles of the perimortem section should be understood, as well as the social implications of domestic violence towards pregnant women.

Trauma in pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy imposes significant physiologic demands that may confuse and complicate the evaluation, resuscitation, and definitive management of pregnant women who sustain trauma. Accurate prediction of fetal outcome after trauma remains elusive. The objective of this study was to characterize patterns of injury in pregnant women, to determine if pregnancy affects maternal morbidity and mortality after trauma, and to identify predictors of fetal death.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, case-control analysis of all injured pregnant patients admitted to the Trauma Service at the University of California San Diego Medical Center from 1985 to 1995.

RESULTS

We identified 114 injured pregnant patients. Motor vehicle crashes accounted for 70% of injuries, and of these, 46% of patients were not using seat belts or helmets. Violence accounted for 12% of injuries. Injured pregnant women with Injury Severity Scores > 8 demonstrated similar mortality, morbidity, and length of stay to matched nonpregnant control patients. Pregnant women were more likely to sustain serious abdominal injury and were less likely to sustain severe head injury. Identified risk factors for fetal loss include maternal death, overall maternal injury severity, the presence of severe abdominal injury, and the presence of hemorrhagic shock.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be a group of pregnant women in San Diego at high risk for traumatic injury who should be targeted for preventative strategies including improved seat belt use. Pregnancy does not increase mortality or morbidity after trauma but influences the pattern of injury. Maternal death, high Injury Severity Score, serious abdominal injury, and hemorrhagic shock are risk factors for fetal loss.

Obstetric and gynecologic emergencies

This article reviews the pearls and pitfalls of obstetric and gynecologic emergencies occurring in women presenting to the emergency department. Some pitfalls include failure to screen for ectopic pregnancy, tachycardia as an unreliable indicator of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy, and the use of serum hCG as a testing procedure during pregnancy. Updates include serologic markers of ectopic pregnancy, ultrasonography in the emergency department, methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy, traumatic placental separation, and fetomaternal hemorrhage.

Motor vehicle accident during the second or third trimester of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the need of immediate treatment, follow-up and consequences of different types of traffic accidents during pregnancy.

METHOD AND MATERIAL

A retrospective analysis covering five years involving thirty-five pregnant women involved in motor vehicle accidents at 22-39 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

Fifteen of the 35 women were involved in frontal impact collisions, and suffered mild subjective and objective symptoms; all their fetuses survived and were delivered at term. Fifteen other women were involved in broadside collisions; two of these were riding a bicycle. These 15 women had clear objective findings like uterine contractions or tenderness, and some of them needed tocolytic therapy and hospitalization up to eight days. This was significantly longer than in those involved in frontal impact collisions. However, the broadside accidents did not have any adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes either. Five women were involved in serious accidents at speeds of 80-110 km/h, and one mother and her fetus died immediately because of rupture of the uterus and the cervical joint and spinal canal. Four other fetuses were found dead on arrival at hospital or soon after. In all cases the cause of fetal loss was placental abruption. The presence of fetal blood cells in maternal blood was evaluated in 15 of 35 patients, but was positive in only one.

CONCLUSION

Frontal collisions are associated with lower vehicular speed, less trauma and no acute or later effects on pregnancy, whereas broadside collisions and high speed (> 80 km/h) cause more symptoms. The latter type of accidents are associated with high risk of placental abruption and of fetal and maternal death. Fortunately the symptoms are evident immediately after the accident, and early hospital discharge is possible if no abnormalities are present during the first hours.

Fetomaternal haemorrhage discovered after trauma and treated by fetal intravascular transfusion

Fetomaternal haemorrhage can occur spontaneously, or after abdominal trauma. We describe a case of fetomaternal haemorrhage diagnosed at 27 weeks gestation after blunt trauma. The Kleihauer-Betke smear on admission and during the first week was positive, ranging between 3% and 5%. Cordocentesis revealed a fetal haemoglobin of 8.8 gm/dl. An intravascular fetal transfusion was performed. The weeks until delivery and the neonatal period were unremarkable. Fetal anaemia can be a serious complication of fetomaternal haemorrhage, however, intravascular fetal transfusion is an effective treatment when this occurs. The Kleihauer-Betke test should be performed in every patient with a history of abdominal trauma during pregnancy.

Trauma in pregnancy: the role of interpersonal violence

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine what role interpersonal violence as intentional injury plays in the pregnant trauma victim.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective review of medical records.

RESULTS

During a 9-year period in a single university medical and trauma center, 203 pregnant women were treated for a physically traumatic event. Sixty-four women (31.5%) were victims of intentional injury, in most cases by the husband or boyfriend. Although the mean Injury Severity Score was higher in women with fetal death than in women with successful pregnancy outcomes (7.25 vs 1.74, respectively; p < 0.01), 5 of the 8 women with fetal losses incurred these despite an apparent absence of physical injury (maternal Injury Severity Score = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

Interpersonal violence during pregnancy is a frequent and increasingly common cause of maternal injury. The inconsistent relationship between Injury Severity Score and serious fetal injury or death is underscored by the loss of 5 fetuses despite an Injury Severity Score of 0.