Thoracoscopy in the trauma patient: what is its role?

A review on delayed presentation of diaphragmatic rupture

Diaphragmatic rupture is a life-threatening condition. Diaphragmatic injuries are quite uncommon and often result from either blunt or penetrating trauma. Diaphragmatic ruptures are usually associated with abdominal trauma however, it can occur in isolation. Acute traumatic rupture of the diaphragm may go unnoticed and there is often a delay between the injury and the diagnosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the terms "delayed presentation of post traumatic diaphragmatic rupture" and "delayed diaphragmatic rupture". The diagnostic and management challenges encountered are discussed, together with strategies for dealing with them. We have focussed on mechanism of injury, duration, presentation and site of injury, visceral herniation, investigations and different approaches for repair. We intend to stress on the importance of delay in presentation of diaphragmatic rupture and to provide a review on the available investigations and treatment methods. The enclosed case report also emphasizes on the delayed presentation, diagnostic challenges and the advantages of laparoscopic repair of delayed diaphragmatic rupture.

[The value of thoracoscopy in thorax trauma]

A hemodynamically stable patient presenting with persistent bleeding through his chest tube (ICD) is a classic indication for early thoracoscopic intervention in trauma. The source of bleeding and air leaks can be identified and often treated: bleeding and perforated pulmonary segments can be resected, and chest wall bleeding may be coagulated or sutured. Injuries to the diaphragm are difficult to diagnose, as they might not be seen in conventional trauma imaging without gross herniation of intra-abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity. Identifying the site of diaphragm perforation can give useful hints in thoracoabdominal trauma, identifying injured cavities and localizing the bullet or stab tract. Most often, diaphragmatic defects may be closed during diagnostic thoracoscopy as well. Non- or partially drainable hemothorax is another indication for thoracoscopy. Coagulated blood can be mechanically mobilised, and aspirated or primary bleeding may be stopped. Effective lavage and a high-performance suction device are required. Correct placement of the drainage is part of optimized therapy, along with inspection of all intrathoracic organs and surfaces. Furthermore, surgical and anaesthesiological teamwork and experience are prerequisites for the fast, professional application of a minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach in chest trauma patients. Diagnostically and theurapeutically, thoracoscopy plays an important role in the trauma setting--in the case of hemodynamically stable patients.

A comparison of rigid -v- video thoracoscopy in the management of chest trauma

Between December 1, 1994 and April 1,1998, 44 thoracoscopic procedures were performed in 42 patients following chest injuries. Indications included exploration in 15, retained haemothorax in 10, continued bleeding after chest tube placement in 3, air leak in 5 and empyema in 11. Video thoracoscopy was used in 24 cases and rigid thoracoscopy in 20, including 14 patients in whom video thoracoscopy was contraindicated. There was no difference in the operative times, length of stay or incidence of complications. Two formal and 3 "mini" thoracotomies were used in the video thoracoscopy group. Three "mini" thoracotomies were required in the rigid thoracoscopy group. Rigid thoracoscopy is an effective tool that, in selected cases, increases the utility of thoracoscopy in the management of chest trauma and its complications.

Posttraumatic empyema thoracis: a 24-year experience at a major trauma center

The purpose of this paper is to review the outcome of patients with posttraumatic empyema thoracis. Between April 1972 and March 1996, the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery at the King-Drew Medical Center managed or was consulted on 5,474 trauma patients (4,584 patients with penetrating injuries and 890 with blunt injuries) who were admitted emergently for thoracic and thoracoabdominal injuries and who underwent tube thoracostomy. Patients were not given routine prophylactic antibiotics merely because they had a chest tube placed. Based on our previous reports on thoracic trauma, our criteria for empiric antibiotic administration included (1) emergent or urgent thoracotomy, (2) soft-tissue destruction of the chest wall by shotgun injuries, (3) lung contusion with hemoptysis, (4) associated abdominal trauma requiring exploratory laparotomy, or (5) associated open long-bone fractures. Eighty-seven of these 5,474 patients developed posttraumatic empyema thoracis, for an incidence of 1.6%. These 87 patients were treated with tube thoracostomy, image-guided catheter drainage, or open thoracotomy with decortication. Seventy-nine of 87 patients (91%) were cured without conversion to open thoracostomy. Four patients required conversion to open thoracostomy, and there were three deaths. Even though a majority of our patients required decortication, successful management of posttraumatic empyema thoracis also was achieved with closed-tube thoracostomy or image-guided catheter drainage based on clinical and radiographic findings with appropriate patient selection. When thoracic empyema did occur in our group, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microbe isolated, followed by anaerobic bacteria. In correlating microbiologic data with outcomes, S. aureus, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus, was the most frequent cause of antibiotic failure. Because of the low incidence of posttraumatic empyema thoracis, we do not recommend routine antibiotic prophylaxis for all trauma patients who undergo closed-tube thoracostomy. A review of the role of tube thoracostomy, intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy, image-guided catheter drainage, video-assisted thoracoscopy, and open thoracotomy for the management of thoracic empyema is provided.