Predicting survival from head trauma 24 hours after injury: a practical method with therapeutic implications

The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review and Consensus Process to Determine the Predictive Value of Demographic, Injury Event, and Social Characteristics on Outcomes for People With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

The objective of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury (AUS-TBI) Initiative is to develop a data dictionary to inform data collection and facilitate prediction of outcomes of people who experience moderate-severe TBI in Australia. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence of the association between demographic, injury event, and social characteristics with outcomes, in people with moderate-severe TBI, to identify potentially predictive indicators. Standardized searches were implemented across bibliographic databases to March 31, 2022. English-language reports, excluding case series, which evaluated the association between demographic, injury event, and social characteristics, and any clinical outcome in at least 10 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Abstracts and full text records were independently screened by at least two reviewers in Covidence. A pre-defined algorithm was used to assign a judgement of predictive value to each observed association. The review findings were discussed with an expert panel to determine the feasibility of incorporation of routine measurement into standard care. The search strategy retrieved 16,685 records; 867 full-length records were screened, and 111 studies included. Twenty-two predictors of 32 different outcomes were identified; 7 were classified as high-level (age, sex, ethnicity, employment, insurance, education, and living situation at the time of injury). After discussion with an expert consensus group, 15 were recommended for inclusion in the data dictionary. This review identified numerous predictors capable of enabling early identification of those at risk for poor outcomes and improved personalization of care through inclusion in routine data collection.

High Long-Term Mortality Rate in Elderly Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Subdural Hematoma due to Ground-Level Fall: Neurosurgery's Hip Fracture?

BACKGROUND

Moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major source of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Little is known about long-term mortality in elderly patients following mild, nonfatal TBI and how the injury mechanism predicts survival. This study aimed to compare long-term mortality in elderly patients with mild TBI and traumatic subdural hematoma (tSDH) due to ground-level fall (GLF) versus those with TBI and tSDH due to another cause (i.e., non-ground-level fall [nGLF]).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 288 patients ≥60 years old from a single Level I trauma center with tSDH and Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15.

RESULTS

Median follow-up after initial TBI presentation was 2.9 years for the GLF group and 2.4 years for the nGLF group. During follow-up, 98 patients died, and median survival for all elderly patients with mild TBI and tSDH was 4.6 years. The GLF group had a higher mortality rate than the nGLF group, with 93 patients in GLF group dying during follow-up compared with 5 in nGLF group (P < 0.0001). The annual death rate for patients in the GLF group was 12.5% per year. For patients 60-69 years old, 39% in GLF group died compared with 4% in nGLF group during follow-up (P = 0.0002). Likewise, for patients 70-79 years old, 29% in GLF group died compared with 7% in nGLF group (P = 0.021). Finally, 56% of patients >80 years old in GLF group compared with 18% in nGLF group (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with mild TBI and tSDH due to GLF have significantly higher long-term mortality than patients with injuries due to nGLF.

Prognostic properties of the association between the S‑100B protein levels and the mean cerebral blood flow velocity in patients diagnosed with severe traumatic brain injury

Craniocerebral injury (CBI) is tissue damage caused by a sudden mechanical force. CBI can result in neurological, neuropsychological and psychiatric dysfunctions. Currently, the severity of CBI is assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale, brain perfusion pressure measurements, transcranial Doppler tests and biochemical markers. This study aimed to determine the applicability of the S-100B protein levels and the time-averaged mean maximum cerebral blood flow velocity (V_mean) as a means of predicting the treatment outcomes of CBI in the first 4 days of hospitalization. The results validated the standard reference ranges previously proposed for the concentration of S-100B (0.05-0.23 µg/l) and the mean of cerebral blood flow velocity (30.9 to 74.1 cm/sec). The following stratification scheme was used to predict the success of treatment: Patients with a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score ≥4 or GOS <4 were stratified into ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’ groups, respectively. The favorable group showed relatively constant levels of the S-100B protein close to the normal range and exhibited an increase in V_mean, but this was still within the normal range. The unfavorable group exhibited a high level of S-100B protein and increased V_mean outside of the normal ranges. The changes in the levels of S-100B in the unfavorable and favorable groups were -0.03 and -0.006 mg/l/h, respectively. Furthermore, the rate of decrease in the V_mean value in the unfavorable and favorable groups were -0.26 and -0.18 cm/sec/h, respectively. This study showed that constant levels of S-100B protein, even slightly above the normal range, associated with an increase in V_mean was indicative of a positive therapeutic outcome. However, additional research is required to obtain the appropriate statistical strength required for clinical practice.

Prevalence of persistent vegetative state compared to recovery, disability, and death in subjects with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The persistent vegetative state has drawn considerable attention since it is the poorest result apart from mortality in subjects with severe traumatic brain injury. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate its prevalence compared to recovery, disability, and death 6 months post severe traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

A systematic-literature search up to May 2020 was performed and 19 studies were detected with 10 368 subjects. They contained data about the subject's status 6 months post severe traumatic brain injury (recovery, disability, persistent vegetative state, and death). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated comparing the prevalence of persistent vegetative state to that of recovery, disability, and death; 6 months post severe traumatic brain injury using the dichotomous method with a random- or fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Significantly higher prevalence was found of recovery (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.20, P < .001); disability (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.06-0.15, P < .001); and death (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.04-0.11, P < .001) compared to the prevalence of persistent vegetative state. The prevalence of persistent vegetative state was variable over time. Also, the prevalence of persistent vegetative states in developing countries was much higher than in developed countries.

CONCLUSIONS

However, persistent vegetative state is the poorest result apart from mortality in subjects with severe traumatic brain injury. Its prevalence is lower than the recovery, disability, and death even in developing counties with its lower healthcare services. The prevalence was variable over time and higher in developing countries. This relationship forces us to recommend improving healthcare services to the extent that a persistent vegetative state could be avoided as much as possible.

Prehospital on-scene anaesthetist treating severe traumatic brain injury patients is associated with lower mortality and better neurological outcome

BACKGROUND

Patients with isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI) are likely to benefit from effective prehospital care to prevent secondary brain injury. Only a few studies have focused on the impact of advanced interventions in TBI patients by prehospital physicians. The primary end-point of this study was to assess the possible effect of an on-scene anaesthetist on mortality of TBI patients. A secondary end-point was the neurological outcome of these patients.

METHODS

Patients with severe TBI (defined as a head injury resulting in a Glasgow Coma Score of ≤8) from 2005 to 2010 and 2012-2015 in two study locations were determined. Isolated TBI patients transported directly from the accident scene to the university hospital were included. A modified six-month Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was defined as death, unfavourable outcome (GOS 2-3) and favourable outcome (GOS 4-5) and used to assess the neurological outcomes. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to predict mortality and good neurological outcome. The following prognostic variables for TBI were available in the prehospital setting: age, on-scene GCS, hypoxia and hypotension. As per the hypothesis that treatment provided by an on-scene anaesthetist would be beneficial to TBI outcomes, physician was added as a potential predictive factor with regard to the prognosis.

RESULTS

The mortality data for 651 patients and neurological outcome data for 634 patients were available for primary and secondary analysis. In the primary analysis higher age (OR 1.06 CI 1.05-1.07), lower on-scene GCS (OR 0.85 CI 0.79-0.92) and the unavailability of an on-scene anaesthetist (OR 1.89 CI 1.20-2.94) were associated with higher mortality together with hypotension (OR 3.92 CI 1.08-14.23). In the secondary analysis lower age (OR 0.95 CI 0.94-0.96), a higher on-scene GCS (OR 1.21 CI 1.20-1.30) and the presence of an on-scene anaesthetist (OR 1.75 CI 1.09-2.80) were demonstrated to be associated with good patient outcomes while hypotension (OR 0.19 CI 0.04-0.82) was associated with poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital on-scene anaesthetist treating severe TBI patients is associated with lower mortality and better neurological outcome.

Effect of Age on Glasgow Coma Scale in Patients with Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Approach with Propensity Score-Matched Population

Background: The most widely used methods of describing traumatic brain injury (TBI) are the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Recent evidence suggests that presenting GCS in older patients may be higher than that in younger patients for an equivalent anatomical severity of TBI. This study aimed to assess these observations with a propensity-score matching approach using the data from Trauma Registry System in a Level I trauma center. Methods: We included all adult patients (aged ≥20 years old) with moderate to severe TBI from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2016. Patients were categorized into elderly (aged ≥65 years) and young adults (aged 20–64 years). The severity of TBI was defined by an AIS score in the head (AIS 3‒4 and 5 indicate moderate and severe TBI, respectively). We examined the differences in the GCS scores by age at each head AIS score. Unpaired Student’s t- and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to analyze normally and non-normally distributed continuous data, respectively. Categorical data were compared using either the Pearson chi-square or two-sided Fisher’s exact tests. Matched patient populations were allocated in a 1:1 ratio according to the propensity scores calculated using NCSS software with the following covariates: sex, pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, sodium, glucose, and alcohol level. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effects of age on the GCS score in each head AIS stratum. Results: The study population included 2081 adult patients with moderate to severe TBI. These patients were categorized into elderly (n = 847) and young adults (n = 1234): each was exclusively further divided into three groups of patients with head AIS of 3, 4, or 5. In the 162 well-balanced pairs of TBI patients with head AIS of 3, the elderly demonstrated a significantly higher GCS score than the young adults (14.1 ± 2.2 vs. 13.1 ± 3.3, respectively; p = 0.002). In the 362 well-balanced pairs of TBI patients with head AIS of 4, the elderly showed a significantly higher GCS score than the young adults (13.1 ± 3.3 vs. 12.2 ± 3.8, respectively; p = 0.002). In the 89 well-balance pairs of TBI patients with head AIS of 5, no significant differences were observed for the GCS scores. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that elderly patients with moderate TBI present higher GCS score than younger patients. This study underscores the importance of determining of TBI severity in this group of elderly patients based on the GCS score alone. A lower threshold of GCS cutoff should be adopted in the management of the elderly patients with TBI.

An epidemiological study of traumatic brain injury cases in a trauma centre of New Delhi (India)

BACKGROUND

Trauma is one of the leading causes of death and disability in Indian population.

AIM

To correlate various variables like epidemiology, clinical status, severity of TBI & associated co-morbid conditions and its outcome.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This study involved retrospective collection, prospective management and follow up of 796 cases of TBI admitted to the neurosurgery department of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi during one year study duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the relevant variables recorded and analyzed with Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) in 6 months into 3 groups i.e. group 1 (GOS-1/Dead), group 2 (GOS-2&3/Bad) and group 3- (GOS-3&4/good).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Compiled data collected, analyzed and difference between two proportions was analyzed using Chi Square test.

RESULTS

This study included 791 cases with 569 (72%) males and 222 (28%) females with average age of 24 years. Fall from height was the main cause of TBI (56%) followed by road traffic injury (RTI) (36%). Majority (61%) patients reached the hospital within 6 hours of injury out of which 27% patients were unconscious. As per Glasgow coma scale mild, moderate & severe grade of TBI was seen in 62%, 22% &16% cases respectively. Radiological examination of other body parts revealed injuries in 11% cases. Only 11% cases required surgical management, rest was managed conservatively. Good outcome noted in 80% cases and 20% cases expired. Average duration of hospital stay was 5 days. According to multivariate analysis, the factors which correlated with poor prognosis are presence of radiological injuries to other body parts, GCS, abnormal cranial nerve examination, abnormal plantar and abnormal pupillary reflex. (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TBI predominantly affects young male population and most of these are preventable. Early transportation to the hospital and first aid results in good outcome. Mortality increases with the severity of TBI and associated injuries therefore multimodality approach in polytrauma is essential.

Identification of a neurologic scale that optimizes EMS detection of older adult traumatic brain injury patients who require transport to a trauma center

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify a scale or components of a scale that optimize detection of older adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who require transport to a trauma center, regardless of mechanism.

METHODS

We assembled a consensus panel consisting of nine experts in geriatric emergency medicine, prehospital medicine, trauma surgery, geriatric medicine, and TBI, as well as prehospital providers, to evaluate the existing scales used to identify TBI. We reviewed the relevant literature and solicited group feedback to create a list of candidate scales and criteria for evaluation. Using the nominal group technique, scales were evaluated by the expert panel through an iterative process until consensus was achieved.

RESULTS

We identified 15 scales for evaluation. The panel's criteria for rating the scales included ease of administration, prehospital familiarity with scale components, feasibility of use with older adults, time to administer, and strength of evidence for their performance in the prehospital setting. After review and discussion of aggregated ratings, the panel identified the Simplified Motor Scale, GCS-Motor Component, and AVPU (alert, voice, pain, unresponsive) as the strongest scales, but determined that none meet all EMS provider and patient needs due to poor usability and lack of supportive evidence. The panel proposed that a dichotomized decision scheme that includes domains of the top-rated scales -level of alertness (alert vs. not alert) and motor function (obeys commands vs. does not obey) -may be more effective in identifying older adult TBI patients who require transport to a trauma center in the prehospital setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing scales to identify TBI are inadequate to detect older adult TBI patients who require transport to a trauma center. A new algorithm, derived from elements of previously established scales, has the potential to guide prehospital providers in improving the triage of older adult TBI patients, but needs further evaluation prior to use.

A systematic review of factors contributing to outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To review, systematically, factors contributing to outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Several studies have determined the significant predictors of outcomes after traumatic brain injury. The comprehensive identification of these reliable factors for traumatic brain injury is critical to both clinical practice and research.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

Eligible studies that combined at least two variables to predict outcomes in patient with traumatic brain injury were identified via electronic database searches, footnote chasing and contact with clinical experts. Quality of selected studies was assessed in terms of internal and external validity using 15 questions. Two reviewers independently examined titles, abstracts and whether each met the predefined inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies which met review criteria were finally selected. Most studies satisfied internal validity in terms of validity of research variables and multivariate analysis, but few were validated externally. The following factors were significantly associated with unfavourable outcomes: sociodemographic factors such as older age, male gender, lower level of education; clinical factors such as lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, injury caused by motor vehicle crash, hypotension, hypoxia, increased intracranial pressure, no pupil reaction, hypo- or hyperglycaemia, anaemia, coagulopathy, hypo- or hyperthermia, abnormal level of electrolytes, duration of coma; higher level of computed tomography classification by Marshall category; type of intracerebral lesions.

CONCLUSION

Further studies on integrating the sociodemographic factors, the course of the clinical condition and a unified CT scoring system, are recommended for the evaluation and improvement of the prognosis of traumatic brain injury.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

A systematic review of factors contributing to outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury will be invaluable in triage criteria, injury prognostication, care and discharge planning, resource use and patient and family counselling.

Safety and efficacy of erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury patients: a pilot randomized trial

Background. Erythropoietin (EPO) is a neuroprotective agent utilized in stroke patients. This pilot study represents the first randomized trial of EPO in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods. Adult, blunt trauma patients with evidence of TBI were randomized to EPO or placebo within 6 hours of injury. Baseline and daily serum S-100B and Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE) levels were measured. Results. TBI was worse in the EPO (n = 11) group compared to placebo patients (n = 5). The use of EPO did not impact NSE (P = .89) or S100 B (P = .53) levels compared to placebo. Conclusions. At the dose used, EPO did not reduce neuronal cell death compared to placebo; however, TBI severity was worse in the EPO group while levels of NSE and S100-B were similar to the less injured placebo group making it difficult to rule out a treatment effect. A larger, balanced study is necessary to confirm a potential treatment effect.

Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous condition that encompasses a broad spectrum of disorders. Outcome can be highly variable, particularly in more severely injured patients. Despite the association of many variables with outcome, prognostic predictions are notoriously difficult to make. Multivariable analysis has identified age, clinical severity, CT abnormalities, systemic insults (hypoxia and hypotension), and laboratory variables as relevant factors to include in models to predict outcome in individual patients. Advances in statistical modelling and the availability of large datasets have facilitated the development of prognostic models that have greater performance and generalisability. Two prediction models are currently available, both of which have been developed on large datasets with state-of-the-art methods, and offer new opportunities. We see great potential for their use in clinical practice, research, and policy making, as well as for assessment of the quality of health-care delivery. Continued development, refinement, and validation is advocated, together with assessment of the clinical impact of prediction models, including treatment response.

Prospective evaluation of a predictive model of mortality in patients with isolated head injury

BACKGROUND

In a previous retrospective study, we developed a predictive model of survival in isolated head injuries based on easily available parameters such as age, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The purpose of the present study is to prospectively evaluate this predictive model.

METHODS

Isolated head injuries admitted to a Level I urban trauma center were prospectively accrued from May 1, 2006 through April 30, 2007. Age, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, head AIS, and survival status were recorded for each patient. Patients with extracranial AIS >3, head AIS = 6, or hypotension were excluded. These data were entered into our previously developed predictive model and the percentage of correct classification was used to measure how well the predictive model predicted outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated and compared with values obtained from our original, retrospective study.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-six patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study with an overall mortality of 5.8% (46 patients). When entered into our predictive model, the percentage of correct classification rate was 92% compared with the 94% rate seen in the original study, which is better than other available predictive tools based on combined scoring systems such as the Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology.

CONCLUSION

When evaluated prospectively, our predictive model has similar accuracy in predicting survival of all patients with head trauma as our original retrospective study and performs better than other predictive models such as the Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology. This study demonstrates that a simple table based on easily obtained admission patient characteristics can rapidly provide information about the probability of survival in patients with head injuries.

Evaluation of models that predict short-term outcome after traumatic brain injury

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify models that predicted the short-term outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the literature and to evaluate their clinical significance.

METHODS

Literatures from PubMED were reviewed. Regression coefficients and intercepts were extracted. A group of 229 cases was used for validation and the unfavourable rate was calculated to assess the validity of these models by the area under receiver operating. Characteristic curve (AUC), C-statistic and Brier score.

MAIN RESULTS

In total, 13 studies of 18 different models were included. Data from the validation group were in accordance with the indicators of the studies reviewed. All models got an AUC value ranging from 0.644-0.890 except two (AUC value <0.6) and their Brier scores were near zero. However, the calibration of most studies was insufficient (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the models included in this study have a good discriminatory power while lacking sufficient calibration. However, they all predict with relative accuracy at the level of individuals. Therefore, current models can be used to predict the survival rate of individual patients and may be useful to inform patients and relatives about the likelihood of a beneficial outcome.

Prognostic indicators and outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Although some predictive models for patient outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury have been proposed, a mathematical model with high predictive value has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the most important indicators of prognosis and to develop the best outcome prediction model.

METHODS

One hundred eleven consecutive patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <9 were examined and 14 factors were evaluated. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure were recorded at admission to the intensive care unit. The absence of the basal cisterns, presence of extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage, and degree of midline shift were evaluated by means of computed tomography within 24 hours after injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for a poor prognosis and to develop the best prediction model.

RESULTS

The best model included the following variables: age (p < 0.01), light reflex (p = 0.01), extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage (p = 0.01), intracranial pressure (p = 0.04), and midline shift (p = 0.12). Positive predictive value of the model was 97.3%, negative predictive value was 87.1%, and overall predictive value was 94.2%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.977, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was 0.866.

CONCLUSIONS

Our predictive model based on age, absence of light reflex, presence of extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial pressure, and midline shift was shown to have high predictive value and will be useful for decision making, review of treatment, and family counseling in case of traumatic brain injury.

Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies

Mortality and morbidity remain high from neurologic emergencies, such as acute stroke, traumatic brain injury, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest. Decisions regarding initial aggressiveness of care must be made at the time of presentation, and perceived prognosis is often used as part of this decision-making process. These decisions are predicated on the accuracy of early outcome prediction, however. Decisions to limit treatment early after neuroemergencies must be balanced with avoidance of self-fulfilling prophecies of poor outcome attributable to clinical nihilism. This article examines the role of prognostication early after neuroemergencies, the potential impact of early treatment limitations, and how these may relate to communication with patients and surrogate decision makers in the context of these acute neurologic events.

A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To describe the modeling techniques used for early prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to identify aspects for potential improvements.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We reviewed key methodological aspects of studies published between 1970 and 2005 that proposed a prognostic model for the Glasgow Outcome Scale of TBI based on admission data.

RESULTS

We included 31 papers. Twenty-four were single-center studies, and 22 reported on fewer than 500 patients. The median of the number of initially considered predictors was eight, and on average five of these were selected for the prognostic model, generally including age, Glasgow Coma Score (or only motor score), and pupillary reactivity. The most common statistical technique was logistic regression with stepwise selection of predictors. Model performance was often quantified by accuracy rate rather than by more appropriate measures such as the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Model validity was addressed in 15 studies, but mostly used a simple split-sample approach, and external validation was performed in only four studies.

CONCLUSION

Although most models agree on the three most important predictors, many were developed on small sample sizes within single centers and hence lack generalizability. Modeling strategies have to be improved, and include external validation.

The profile of head injuries and traumatic brain injury deaths in Kashmir

This study was conducted on patients of head injury admitted through Accident & Emergency Department of Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences during the year 2004 to determine the number of head injury patients, nature of head injuries, condition at presentation, treatment given in hospital and the outcome of intervention. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) deaths were also studied retrospectively for a period of eight years (1996 to 2003).

The traumatic brain injury deaths showed a steady increase in number from year 1996 to 2003 except for 1999 that showed decline in TBI deaths. TBI deaths were highest in age group of 21–30 years (18.8%), followed by 11–20 years age group (17.8%) and 31–40 years (14.3%). The TBI death was more common in males. Maximum number of traumatic brain injury deaths was from rural areas as compared to urban areas.

To minimize the morbidity and mortality resulting from head injury there is a need for better maintenance of roads, improvement of road visibility and lighting, proper mechanical maintenance of automobile and other vehicles, rigid enforcement of traffic rules, compulsory wearing of crash helmets by motor cyclist and scooterists and shoulder belt in cars and imparting compulsory road safety education to school children from primary education level. Moreover, appropriate medical care facilities (including trauma centres) need to be established at district level, sub-divisional and block levels to provide prompt and quality care to head injury patients

Early prediction of outcome in very severe closed head injury

BACKGROUND

People with severe head injury and admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < or =5 have a poor outcome and greatly strain limited resources.

AIM

To identify patients with the best chances of survival, using routine clinical measures.

METHODS

People attending the trauma intensive care unit, who had isolated blunt head injury and GCS< or =5 and who had survived > or =4h, were included in the study, resuscitated and clinically assessed. The GCS score was followed serially after admission. Bivariate analysis of various parameters with outcome was performed using the chi-square test. Serial GCS scores were compared with admission GCS by paired t-testing.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients who were studied prospectively, 78 (76.5%) died and 24 (23.5%) survived. Age, gender, pre-hospital delay and admission GCS scores were comparable between the two groups. Adequate spontaneous respiration, brisk pupillary light reactivity on admission and increase in GCS by at least 2 at 24h after admission significantly affected the outcome (p<0.05). In the presence of all these factors, the survival rate increased from 6.1% to 57.1% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

People with GCS score < or =5 still have a reasonable chance of survival, so all patients should be aggressively managed initially. Better survival was observed among those with adequate spontaneous respiration, good pupillary reaction and improvement in GCS of at least 2 at 24h. These clinical parameters can help to predict survival and thus make best use of limited resources.

Cerebral endothelial damage after severe head injury

We demonstrate that in head injuries the degree of cerebral endothelial activation or injury depends on the type of brain injury and the patients age, and that in severe head injuries measuring the serum levels of thrombomodulin (TM) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) is useful in evaluating cerebral endothelial injury and activation. The values of vWF in the cases of focal brain injury were significantly higher than in the cases of diffuse axonal injury. The serum levels of TM in focal brain injuries were higher than in diffuse axonal injuries, but the differences were not statistically significant. In patients with delayed traumatic intracerebral hematoma (DTICH), vWF levels were much higher than in patients without DTICH. The values of TM and vWF in elderly patients were significantly higher than in younger patients. These findings indicate that: 1) the degree of endothelial activation in focal brain injury is significantly higher than in diffuse brain injury; 2) the degree of cerebral endothelial injury in patients with DTICH is much higher than in those without DTICH; and 3) the degree of cerebral endothelial activation and injury in elderly head injury patients is significantly higher than in younger patients.

Cerebral endothelial injury in elderly patients with severe head injury measured by serum thrombomodulin and von Willebrand factor

Elevated serum levels of thrombomodulin (TM) and von Willebrand factor (vWf) are good indicators of injury and activation of cerebral endothelium in patients with severe simple head injury. The present study evaluated cerebral endothelial injury or activation as the serum levels of TM and vWf in elderly and younger patients with similar brain trauma, to evaluate the primary parenchymal injury of the brain. Patients with head injury were classified into the young group (16-30 years), the middle-aged group (31-65 years), and the elderly group (over 66 years). There was no difference in Glasgow Coma Scale on admission between the three groups. The serum levels of TM and vWf at 2 hours after injury were significantly higher in the elderly group than in the other groups. However, the serum levels of TM and vWf were not significantly different at 3 and 7 days after injury. Cerebral endothelial activation and injury were significantly higher in elderly patients just after head injury than in younger patients, which suggests that greater sensitivity to endothelial injury and activation may be important in the worse outcome after head injury in elderly patients compared with younger patients.

Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis

We studied the prognostic strength of the individual components of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupil reactivity to Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 6 months post-injury. A total of 8721 moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient data from the IMPACT database on traumatic brain injury comprised the study cohort. The associations between motor score and pupil reactivity and 6-month GOS were analyzed by binary logistic regression and proportional odds methodology. The strength of prognostic effects were expressed as the unadjusted odds ratios presented for all individual studies as well as in meta-analysis. We found a consistent strong association between motor score and 6-month GOS across all studies (OR 1.74-7.48). The Eye and Verbal components were also strongly associated with GOS. In the pooled population, one or both un-reactive pupils and lower motor scores were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome (range 2.71-7.31). We also found a significant change in motor score from pre-hospital direct to study hospital enrollment ( p < 0.0001) and from the first in-hospital to study enrollment scores (p < 0.0001). Pupil reactivity was more robust between these time points. It is recommended that the study hospital enrollment GCS and pupil reactivity be used for prognostic analysis.

Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study

Outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is not only dependent on the nature and severity of injury and subsequent treatment, but also on constituent characteristics of injured individuals. We aimed to describe and quantify the relationship between demographic characteristics and six month outcome assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after TBI. Individual patient data on age (n = 8719), gender (n = 8720), race (n = 5320), and education (n = 2201) were extracted from eight therapeutic Phase III randomized clinical trials and three surveys in moderate or severe TBI, contained in the IMPACT database. The strength of prognostic effects was analyzed with binary and proportional odds regression analysis and expressed as an odds ratio. Age was analyzed as a continuous variable with spline functions, and the odds ratio calculated over the difference between the 75 th and 25 th percentiles. Associations with other predictors were explored. Increasing age was strongly related to poorer outcome (OR 2.14; 95% CI 2.00-2.28) in a continuous fashion that could be approximated by a linear function. No gender differences in outcome were found (OR: 1.01; CI 0.92-1.11), and exploratory analysis failed to show any gender/age interaction. The studies included predominantly Caucasians (83%); outcome in black patients was poorer relative to this group (OR 1.30; CI 1.09-1.56). This relationship was sustained on adjusted analyses, and requires further study into mediating factors. Higher levels of education were weakly related to a better outcome (OR: 0.70; CI 0.52-0.94). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, motor score, and pupils, the prognostic effect of race and education were sustained. We conclude that outcome following TBI is dependent on age, race, to a lesser extent on education, but not on gender.

Outcome of head injuries in general surgical units with an off-site neurosurgical service

INTRODUCTION

In order to cope with bed shortages in the only neurosurgical unit (NSU) in KwaZulu-Natal, it has become necessary to manage head injured patients in a general surgical unit (GSU) at the referral hospitals in consultation with the NSU. This study was undertaken to assess the outcome of patients with head injuries managed in a GSU in consultation with a regional NSU.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective pilot study was carried out in a single surgical unit over an 18-month period (July 1997-December 1998), followed by a larger prospective study over a 6-month period (January-June 2001). All patients with head injuries severe enough to warrant admission to hospital (GCS < or =15 or 15 with localising signs) were included.

RESULTS

The pilot study comprised 86 patients and the subsequent study comprised 230 patients, giving a total of 316 patients in the whole study. The mean age was 31 +/- 12 years. Following consultation with the NSU, 265 (84%) patients were managed in the GSU and 51 (16%) required transfer to the NSU. Forty-one patients died giving a mortality rate of 13%. Twenty eight of the 42 patients with GCS < or =8 died (67%) compared to 13 out of 274 with GCS >8 (5%) (p<0.0001). Eleven of the 51 patients destined to the NSU died (22%) compared to 30 of 265 in the GSU (11%) (p=0.046). The average hospital stay was 10 +/- 18 days. Forty surviving patients (17%) from the GSU and 20 from the NSU (51%) were discharged with neurological sequelae (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Head trauma is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Non-surgical treatment of traumatic brain injury at the referral hospital by the GSU is acceptable practice. Outcome is determined primarily by the GCS on presentation. NSU patients had a significantly higher mortality rate. A delay before surgery did not seem to affect outcome.

Prognosis Following Severe Head Injury: Development and Validation of a Model for Prediction of Death, Disability, and Functional Recovery

BACKGROUND

A prognostic model for head trauma patients is useful only if it predicts clinically relevant outcomes accurately on new subjects in various settings. Most existing models consider only dichotomous outcome and have not been tested externally. We developed and validated a rule for prediction of three functional outcome states after severe head injury, using information from day 1.

METHODS

The model was developed in a cohort of 304 adults who were admitted to a Dutch trauma center and had survived and remained comatose for >24 hours following severe head injury. We used ordinal logistic regression analysis to predict the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale after > or =12 months, merged into three categories. We preselected five known predictors of outcome and used bootstrapping techniques to avoid statistical overfitting. The performance of the model was subsequently tested in a cohort of 122 patients from an unrelated hospital.

RESULTS

The model contained age (p < 0.0001), best motor response on day 1 (p = 0.002), pupil response after resuscitation (p = 0.005), computed tomography findings (p = 0.004), and presence of arterial hypotension (p = 0.37) as predictor variables. In the external validation cohort, the model showed adequate agreement between observed and predicted outcome probabilities (calibration). The model had a good ability to discriminate patients with different outcomes (c-statistic 0.808). The predictive accuracy was 66% when the model was used to classify patients across the three outcome categories.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a practical model for predicting the probability of death, survival with major disability, and functional recovery in patients who are comatose 24 hours after severe head injury. The model performed well in an external setting, indicating that measures to avoid statistical overfitting were successful.

Early Prediction of Mortality in Isolated Head Injury Patients: A New Predictive Model

BACKGROUND

To construct a predictive model of survival in isolated head injury patients, on the basis of easily available parameters that are independent risk factors for survival outcome.

METHODS

Trauma registry-based study of head injury patients who had no other major extracranial injuries and were not hypotensive at admission. A predictive model of probability of death was constructed using discriminant analysis, on the basis of admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, head Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), age, and mechanism of injury.

RESULTS

The study included 7,191 patients with head trauma. The overall correct classification rate of the proposed predictive model was 94.2% as compared with 89.0% of the admission GCS score (p < 0.05) and 92.8% of the head AIS (p < 0.05). The correct classification rate of the predictive model developed for the severe head trauma (GCS score 4-8) patients was 79.9%, as compared with 72.6% using the admission GCS score alone or 75.1% (p < 0.05). A one-page, easy to use table summarizing the predicted mortality on the basis of GCS score, head AIS, mechanism of injury, and age was developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model has a significantly better predictive power, especially in severe head trauma, than the extensively used GCS and head AIS. A simple table on the probability of death of a particular patient based on admission GCS score, head AIS, mechanism of injury and age of patient can provide instant information.

Severe head injury and the risk of early death

BACKGROUND

Severe head injury (SHI) is one of the most important health, social and economic problems in industrialised countries. Unfortunately, none of the neuroprotection trials for traumatic brain injury have shown efficacy. One of the reasons for this failure could be the inclusion of patients with high probability of early death. A population-based, retrospective study was conducted to develop a prognostic model for identification of these patients.

METHODS

Between January 1987 and August 1999, a total of 895 patients (> or = 15 years of age) with non-missile SHI were studied, in whom a computed tomography scan was carried out within the first 6 h of injury. The association between early death (first 48 h after injury) and independent prognostic factors was determined by logistic regression analysis. A scoring system was also constructed.

RESULTS

The early-death rate was 20%. Independent predictors of early mortality after SHI were non-evacuated mass (odds ratio (OR) 65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 379), diffuse injury IV (OR 25, 95% CI 5 to 112), diffuse injury III (OR 8, 95% CI 3 to 22), flaccidity (OR 7, 95% CI 3 to 15), non-reactive bilaterally mydriasis (OR 6, 95% CI 3 to 12), evacuated mass (OR 4, 95% CI 1 to 11), age > or = 65 years (OR 4, 95% CI 1 to 9), decerebration (OR 3, 95% CI 2 to 7) and shock (OR 3, 95% CI 2 to 6). The prognostic model correctly identified 93% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This prognostic model is based on simple clinical and radiological data readily available during the first 6 h after injury and is useful for identification of early death after SHI.

Prediction of global outcome with acute neuropsychological testing following closed-head injury

Delaying assessment until emergence from post-traumatic amnesia increases completion rates, but this practice causes variable time delays from the date of injury to testing, which can complicate the interpretation of research findings. In the current study, the performance of 105 head injury survivors on simple tests of language comprehension and attention was used to predict global outcome. It was hypothesized that 1 month performance on these measures would aid in the prediction of Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores collected at 6 months post injury. Only raw scores on the modified Test of Complex Ideational Material accounted for a significant amount of the variance in DRS scores (4.4%) above that accounted for by age, education, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and pupil response. However, testability at 1 month post injury on all four tests consistently accounted for a larger portion of the variance in DRS scores (10.1-13.2%) and significantly improved prediction of GOS scores. Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test scores collected at 1 month post injury accounted for substantially less variance in DRS scores (7.7-8.4%). Neuropsychological data, including the testability of patients, collected uniformly at 1 month following injury can contribute to the prediction of global outcome.

Traumatic Brain Injury and Automotive Design: Making Motor Vehicles Safer

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major public health problem in the United States. Identifying and modifying vehicle designs associated with TBI will have a significant impact on the frequency and severity of TBI in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Our objective, therefore, was to identify interior vehicle contact points associated with severe TBI (head Abbreviated Injury Scale score > 3) among drivers and determine the extent to which modifications of these contact points impact the likelihood of severe TBI.

METHODS

We analyzed drivers in MVCs from the 1993 to 2001 National Automotive Sampling System database. The odds of severe TBI with respect to various vehicle contact points were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. Using computer simulation software, the magnitude of driver head deceleration was modeled while manipulating vehicle design features. The potential impact of this design modification on the frequency and hospital charges of TBI cases was estimated.

RESULTS

There were 18,313 drivers involved who were victims of TBI, equating to a national sample size of 3,275,472 cases. The most frequent contact point associated with severe TBI was the roof rail (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.3). Increasing roof rail padding thickness to 5.0 cm reduced the peak acceleration from 700 g to 218 g, which would potentially reduce the attributable number of severe TBI cases per year from 2,730 to 210, thereby reducing annual acute care charges from $136.5 million to $10.5 million US dollars.

CONCLUSION

Contact with the roof rail significantly increases the likelihood of TBI in MVCs. Minor increases in padding at these points may reduce the frequency of severe TBI, which would have a substantial effect on health care costs.

Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: increased mortality and worse functional outcome at discharge despite lower injury severity

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare data obtained from a statewide data set for elderly patients (age > 64 years) that presented with traumatic brain injury with data from nonelderly patients (age > 15 and < 65 years) with similar injuries.

METHODS

The New York State Trauma Registry from January 1994 through December 1995, from trauma centers and community hospitals excluding New York City (45,982 patients), was examined. Head-injured patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. A relative head injury severity scale (RHISS) was constructed on the basis of groups of these codes (range, 0 = none to 3 = severe). Comparisons were made with nonelderly patients for mortality, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission and discharge, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and RHISS. Outcome was assessed by a Functional Independence Measure score in three major domains: expression, locomotion, and feeding. Data were analyzed by the chi2 test and Mann-Whitney U test, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 11,772 patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of head injury, of which 3,244 (27%) were elderly. There were more male subjects in the nonelderly population (78% male subjects) compared with the elderly population (50% men). Mortality was 24.0% in the elderly population compared with 12.8% in the nonelderly population (risk ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-2.43). The elderly nonsurvivors were statistically older, and mortality rate increased with age. Stratified by GCS score, there was a higher percentage of nonsurvivors in the elderly population, even in the group with only moderately depressed GCS score (GCS score of 13-15; risk ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval, 6.1-9.9 for elderly vs. nonelderly). Functional outcome in all three domains was significantly worse in the elderly survivors compared with the nonelderly survivors.

CONCLUSION

Elderly traumatic brain injury patients have a worse mortality and functional outcome than nonelderly patients who present with head injury even though their head injury and overall injuries are seemingly less severe.

Cerebral autoregulation and outcome in acute brain injury

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between Czosnyka and others' Pressure Reactivity Index (PRx) and neurologic outcome in patients with acute brain injury, including traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cerebrovascular pathology. PRx measures the correlation between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure waves and may reflect cerebral autoregulation in response to blood pressure changes. A negative PRx reflects intact cerebrovascular response, whereas a positive PRx reflects impaired response. Positive PRx has been shown to correlate with poorer outcome in individuals with TBI, but these findings have not been confirmed by replication in other studies, nor have PRx values been reported for individuals with cerebrovascular pathology. In this study, PRx was determined in 52 patients with TBI (n = 27) or cerebrovascular pathology (n = 25). Hierarchical linear regression was used to evaluate the contribution of PRx to outcome, controlling for age and Glasgow Coma Scale score. Analysis of all subjects together did not support the previously reported relationship between PRx and outcome. However, for those with TBI, positive PRx was a significant predictor of negative outcome (P = 0.03). For those with cerebrovascular pathology, the effect was not significant (P = 0.10) and was in the opposite direction. For individuals with TBI, PRx may provide useful information related to cerebral autoregulation that is predictive of outcome. The meaning of PRx in individuals with cerebrovascular pathology is unclear, and further study is needed to examine the paradoxical findings observed.

Characteristics of infection and leukocyte count in severely head-injured patients treated with mild hypothermia

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to characterize the infectious complications and kinetics of leukocyte count in severely head-injured patients treated with mild hypothermia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and severity of infectious complications as well as daily changes in leukocyte count in 41 severely head-injured patients treated with mild hypothermia (group H). They were retrospectively compared with 25 severely head-injured patients treated with high-dose barbiturates (group B) and to 25 other severely head-injured patients treated with no barbiturates (group N).

RESULTS

Initial intracranial pressure was significantly higher in group H than in the other groups. No significant differences existed in the incidence of pneumonia or meningitis among the three groups, whereas the incidence of bacteremia was significantly higher in group H than in the other two groups. Pneumonia was significantly more severe in group H than in the other groups. In six patients of group H, pneumonia spread fulminantly to become life threatening. Daily changes in total leukocyte count showed the same pattern, consisting of a peak, a nadir, and a second peak in all groups. Total leukocyte count was, however, significantly lower during the first 2 weeks in group H than in the other two groups. Lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were also lower in group H.

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications were more severe and leukocyte counts were lower in patients treated with mild hypothermia, who also had the highest initial intracranial pressures, than in patients treated with conventional therapies. Measures against increased susceptibility to infection and leukocyte suppression should be explored.

Use of hypertonic saline/acetate infusion in treatment of cerebral edema in patients with head trauma: experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Hypertonic saline (HS) recently has been introduced as a new form of hyperosmolar treatment in patients with brain injury from diverse causes. We reviewed our experience with the use of continuous hypertonic saline/acetate infusion in patients with cerebral edema attributable to head trauma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted with severe head injury, defined as admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less, in the neurocritical care unit of a University hospital. Intravenous infusion of 2% or 3% saline/acetate for treatment of cerebral edema was introduced in the unit in April of 1993. The clinical characteristics, interventions required, and outcomes in patients who received HS were compared with patients who received 0.9% saline infusion only. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of HS use on in-hospital mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with cerebral edema caused by head trauma received infusion of HS initiated within 48 hours of admission for a mean period of 72 +/- 85 hours. Compared with 46 patients who did not receive HS, there were no differences observed in age and admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Patients who received HS were more likely to have a penetrating injury (p = 0.07) and a mass lesion on initial computed tomographic scan (p = 0.07). There was no difference between frequency of use of hyperventilation, mannitol, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and vasopressors between the two groups. The requirement for pentobarbital coma was higher in HS group (n = 7 patients) versus control group (n = 2,p = 0.04). After adjusting for differences between both groups, infusion of HS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-10.2).

CONCLUSION

HS administration as prolonged infusion does not seem to favorably impact on requirement for other interventions and in-hospital mortality in our experience. Further efforts should be directed toward use of HS as bolus administrations or short infusions.

Surgical outcome of traumatic intracranial hematoma at a regional hospital in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

To report the experience in the management of 489 consecutive patients with traumatic intracranial hematoma and determine the prognostic factors.

METHODS

All patients were classified into three groups based on the number of operations for each case. A total of 538 operations were performed for evacuation of 720 intracranial hematomas.

RESULTS

The most common cause of injury was motor vehicular traffic crashes (68.7%) and most victims were motorcyclists (40.1%). The most common type of lesion was acute epidural hematoma (31.0%). The overall mortality rate was 9.6%, and the complication rate was 11.2%. Follow-up assessment of 480 patients revealed that 270 (56.2%) patients made a good recovery, 99 (20.6%) were moderately disabled, 32 (6.7%) were severely disabled, 21 (4.4%) were vegetative, and 58 (12.1%) had died.

CONCLUSION

The surgical outcome was significantly correlated with the score of the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupillary reactivity, number of operations, and type of lesion.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ameliorates life-threatening infections after combined therapy with barbiturates and mild hypothermia in patients with severe head injuries

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to clarify the effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) administration on infections in patients with severe head injuries after combined therapy with high-dose barbiturates and mild hypothermia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since 1996, we have administered rhG-CSF to eight patients with severe head injuries for 5 days (group G). Their treatment results were compared with those of 22 patients cared for earlier without rhG-CSF treatment (group N). All patients in both groups met the criteria of total leukocyte count (TLC) less than 5,000/mm3, C-reactive protein (CRP) over 10 mg/dL, and the presence of an infectious complication. Changes in the TLC, CRP, respiratory index, intracranial pressure, and infectious condition were evaluated in both groups. In addition, the nucleated cell count and differentiation from bone marrow aspiration, neutrophil functions, serum concentrations of interleukin-6, and plasma concentration of leukocyte elastase were evaluated in group G.

RESULTS

In group G, TLC, nucleated cell count, and neutrophil functions significantly increased, whereas CRP, respiratory index, and interleukin-6 decreased reciprocally. There was no deterioration of intracranial pressure and leukocyte elastase. Consequently, seven of the eight patients in group G recovered from life-threatening infections, and none of the eight patients died. However, in group N, CRP and respiratory index remained high and TLC did not increase as much as it did in group G. Infections continued after 5 days in 17 of the 22 patients, 7 of whom died from severe infections during hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Administration of rhG-CSF ameliorated life-threatening infections without causing lung injury or increasing brain swelling in patients with severe head injuries who were treated with combined therapy involving high-dose barbiturates and mild hypothermia.

Aging effect on psychosocial outcome in traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of age on outcome in persons with traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort design.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

A total of 411 hospitalized subjects with mild to severe traumatic brain injury prospectively studied to 1 year; their age range was 18 to 89 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Glasgow Outcome Scale, living situation, and employment.

RESULTS

Increasing age is associated with increasing levels of psychosocial limitations, especially in persons 60 years of age and older. Part of the reason is the greater severity of injury sustained by older persons as reflected in longer coma (despite equivalent initial coma depth) and greater numbers of complications and surgeries for subdural hematomas. However, the consequences of traumatic brain injuries appear to worsen with increasing age at each level of brain injury severity examined, including the milder injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults clearly show less complete recovery 1 year after brain injury than younger adults, either because they have reduced reserves with which to tolerate brain injury or because their physiologic status creates a more destructive injury. Glasgow Coma Scale alone may underestimate the severity of brain injury in the aged as well as its associated consequences. Caution is advised in generalizing findings based principally on younger individuals to older adults with traumatic brain injuries.