Evolution in the management of the complex liver injury at a Level I trauma center

Outcome analysis of management of liver trauma: A 10-year experience at a trauma center

AIM: To review the outcomes of liver trauma in patients with hepatic injuries only and in patients with associated injuries outside the liver.

METHODS: Data of liver trauma patients presented to our center from January 2003 to October 2013 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of patients who had hepatic injuries only. Group 2 consisted of patients who also had associated injuries outside the liver.

RESULTS: Seven (30.4%) patients in group 1 and 10 (28.6%) patients in group 2 received non-operative management; the rest underwent operation. Blunt trauma occurred in 82.8% (48/58) of the patients and penetrative trauma in 17.2% (10/58). A higher injury severity score (ISS) was observed in group 2 (median 45 vs 25, P < 0.0001). More patients in group 1 were hemodynamically stable (65.2% vs 37.1%, P = 0.036). Other parameters were comparable between groups. Group 1 had better 30-d survival (91.3% vs 71.4%, P = 0.045). On multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model, ISS was found to be associated with mortality (P = 0.004, hazard ratio = 1.035, 95%CI: 1.011-1.060).

CONCLUSION: Liver trauma patients with multiple injuries are relatively unstable on presentation. Despite a higher ISS in group 2, non-operative management was possible for selected patients. Associated injuries outside the liver usually account for morbidity and mortality.

Long-term follow-up after non-operative management of biloma due to blunt liver injury

INTRODUCTION

Some case series have reported that hepatectomy was used to treat major bile leakage and biloma. However, it is unknown whether non-operative management (NOM) can be used to treat these complications. Our hospital uses NOM primarily for blunt liver injuries. This study describes the incidence and treatment of newly developed biloma in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt liver trauma and investigates NOM as a treatment option.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2006 to May 2012 at a tertiary care hospital in Japan. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of biloma and the number of patients who required operative management. Biloma was defined as a cystic lesion with low density near the site of liver injury on contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography.

RESULTS

Chart review identified 98 patients (63 males and 35 females). Thirty-five of 98 patients (35.7 % [95 % CI, 26.2-45.2]) developed biloma. Infected biloma in three, of whom one required percutaneous drainage. Hepatectomy was not performed.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that biloma after NOM of blunt liver injury is common (36 %), but infected biloma is rare. All patients with bilomas were treated using NOM. Most bilomas are self-limited, and NOM is feasible.

Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline

BACKGROUND

During the last century, the management of blunt force trauma to the liver has changed from observation and expectant management in the early part of the 1900s to mainly operative intervention, to the current practice of selective operative and nonoperative management. These issues were first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma in the Practice Management Guidelines for Nonoperative Management of Blunt Injury to the Liver and Spleen published online in 2003. Since that time, a large volume of literature on these topics has been published requiring a reevaluation of the previous Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guideline.

METHODS

The National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database were searched using PubMed (http://www.pubmed.gov). The search was designed to identify English-language citations published after 1996 (the last year included in the previous guideline) using the keywords liver injury and blunt abdominal trauma.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six articles were reviewed, of which 94 were used to create the current practice management guideline for the selective nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury.

CONCLUSION

Most original hepatic guidelines remained valid and were incorporated into the greatly expanded current guidelines as appropriate. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries currently is the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of the grade of injury or patient age. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries should only be considered in an environment that provides capabilities for monitoring, serial clinical evaluations, and an operating room available for urgent laparotomy. Patients presenting with hemodynamic instability and peritonitis still warrant emergent operative intervention. Intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomographic scan is the diagnostic modality of choice for evaluating blunt hepatic injuries. Repeated imaging should be guided by a patient's clinical status. Adjunctive therapies like angiography, percutaneous drainage, endoscopy/endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopy remain important adjuncts to nonoperative management of hepatic injuries. Despite the explosion of literature on this topic, many questions regarding nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries remain without conclusive answers in the literature.

Non-operative management of right side thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries--the value of testing chest tube effluent for bile

INTRODUCTION

While mandatory surgery for all thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries is advocated by some, the high rate of unnecessary operations challenges this approach. However, the consequences of intrathoracic bile remains poorly investigated. We sought to evaluate the outcome of patients who underwent non-operative management of right side thoracoabdominal (RST) penetrating trauma, and the levels of bilirubin obtained from those patients' chest tube effluent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We managed non-operatively all stable patients with a single RST penetrating injury. Chest tube effluent samples were obtained six times within (4-8 h; 12-16 h; 20-24 h; 28-32 h; 36-40 h; 48 h and 72 h) of admission for bilirubin measurement and blood for complete blood count, bilirubin, alanine (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferases (AST) assays. For comparison we studied patients with single left thoracic penetrating injury.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with RST injuries were included. All had liver and lung injuries confirmed by CT scans. Only one patient failed non-operative management. Chest tube bilirubin peaked at 48 h post-trauma (mean 3.3+/-4.1 mg/dL) and was always higher than both serum bilirubin (p<0.05) and chest tube effluent from control group (27 patients with left side thoracic trauma). Serum ALT and AST were higher in RST injury patients (p<0.05). One RST injury patient died of line sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative management of RST penetrating trauma appears to be safe. Bile originating from the liver injury reaches the right thoracic cavity but does not reflect the severity of that injury. The highest concentration was found in the patient failing non-operative management. The presence of intrathoracic bile in selected patients who sustain RST penetrating trauma, with liver injury, does not preclude non-operative management. Our study suggests that monitoring chest tube effluent bilirubin may provide helpful information when managing a patient non-operatively.

Operative and nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults: a single-center report

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Liver trauma, especially that as result of road traffic accidents, still remains a complicated problem in severely injured patients. The aim of this study was to extract useful conclusions from the management in order to improve the final outcome of such patients.

METHODS

Details for 86 patients with blunt hepatic trauma who were examined and treated in our department during a 6-year period were analyzed. We retrospectively reviewed the severity of liver injury, associated injuries, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-nine liver injuries (57%) were of low severity (grades I and II), while 37 (43%) were of high severity (grades III, IV, and V). Liver trauma with associated injury of other organs was noted in 62 (72.1%) patients. Forty-three (50%) patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy within the first 24 h of admission. Thirty-five (71.4%) of the 49 patients with low-grade hepatic injuries were managed conservatively; no mortality occurred. Six (14%) of forty-three patients with liver trauma initially considered for conservative management required surgery due to hemodynamic instability. Five (13.5%) of 37 patients who were finally managed nonoperatively required adjunctive treatment for biloma, hematoma, or biliary leakage; no mortality occurred. The overall mortality rate was 9.3%; mortality rates of 5.8% and 3.5% were due to liver injuries and concomitant injuries, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe hepatic injuries require surgical intervention due to hemodynamic instability. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results, while patients with hepatic trauma with associated organ injuries require surgery, because they continue to have significantly higher mortality.

Major hepatic trauma: warm ischemic tolerance of the liver after hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

The management of severe hepatic trauma frequently involves exposing the liver to varying periods of warm ischemia. The ischemic tolerance of the liver, in the setting of hemorrhagic shock (HS) and trauma, is presently unknown. We tested the hypothesis that warm ischemic tolerance of the porcine liver will be decreased following resuscitation from HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three Yorkshire pigs were divided into three groups: 1) hepatic ischemia alone (HI, n = 9); 2) hemorrhagic shock alone (HS, n = 3); and 3) hemorrhagic shock plus hepatic ischemia combined (HSHI, n = 11). Following reperfusion, a liver biopsy was obtained and serial blood chemistries were sampled.

RESULTS

Post-operative day 7 mortality was increased in the HSHI group (7/11) compared to the HI (0/9) group, P = 0.038. Notably, deaths did not result from acute liver failure, but rather from intra-operative hemodynamic collapse shortly following hepatic reperfusion. In addition, the HSHI group experienced significantly elevated lactic acid, serum creatinine and liver enzyme levels. Analysis of the liver biopsy samples is consistent with a more severe liver injury in the HSHI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The warm ischemic tolerance of the liver following resuscitation from HS is significantly decreased in this porcine model compared to HS or HI alone. Mortality was associated with acute intra-operative hemodynamic collapse occurring shortly after hepatic reperfusion.

Selective management of blunt hepatic injuries including nonoperative management is a safe and effective strategy

BACKGROUND

The justification and preference for operative versus nonoperative management of hepatic injuries caused by blunt trauma remains ambiguous. This review assesses the outcome of operative and nonoperative management of liver injury after blunt trauma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, severity of injury, severity of liver injury, associated concomitant injuries, management scheme, and outcome of patients with documented hepatic injury from 1993 to 2003.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 9.4%, with 3.7% caused by the liver injury itself. Fifty-nine percent (330 of 561) of liver injuries were of low severity (grades I and II), with an overall mortality rate of 6.6% caused by concomitant injuries and liver-related mortality of 0%. Forty-one percent (231 of 561) of liver injuries were high-severity injuries (grades III, IV, and V). Mortality for nonoperative management of high-severity liver injuries was 2.2%. If operative intervention was required because of hemodynamic instability or concomitant injuries then the mortality rate was significantly higher at 30%. Forty-two of the 378 (11%) liver injuries treated nonoperatively required an adjunctive procedure for successful management.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective management of liver injuries presented a low liver-related mortality rate. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results. High-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively, if operative intervention is not required for hemodynamic instability or associated injuries, with a low mortality. In these patients, adjunctive procedures will be required selectively for successful nonoperative management of high-grade liver injuries. High-grade injuries requiring operative management because of hemodynamic instability or concomitant injuries continue to have significantly higher mortality.

Traumatismes graves fermés du foie : à la recherche de critères décisionnels pour le choix du traitement non-opératoire. À propos d'une série de 88 cas

AIM OF THE STUDY

To analyze the predictive value of computed tomography (CT) and initial physiologic and laboratory data findings in the immediate operative (OP) or non-operative (NOP) management of blunt liver injury (BL).

METHODS

Eighty-eight BL, grade III (51), grade IV (28) and nine grade V (9), aged 26.2 years (16-75) were identified. Hemoperitoneum on CT, hemodynamic status, physiologic and laboratory data <24 hours or preoperative (transfusion, vascular filling) and follow-up >48 hours were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data of 71/88 (80%) NOP and 17/88 (20%) OP patients were reviewed. A secondary laparotomy or laparoscopy was necessary in 11/71 TNO. Six OP (35%) and 1 NOP patients died. Blood units transfused were 1.33 (0-10) vs 5.9 (0-22) and vascular filling 1.45 (0.5-5.5) vs 3.6L (2-12) (P<10(-6), P<4.10(-3) respectively). NOP patients had less severe hemoperitoneum (31 vs 94%, P<10(-5)) and hemodynamic instability (8.5 vs 94%, P<10(-4)). But, there was an overlap of values of blood units transfused, amount of vascular filling and initial haemoglobin levels between NOP and OP patients and among CT grades of liver injury. No cut-off values could be determined: 33% NOP received >4 blood units and >3 L vascular filling; 30% had severe hemoperitoneum. In OP group 23.5% patients had lower values and no severe hemoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

In the management of BL, vascular filling and blood transfusion increased with the grade of CT liver injury and were globally more elevated in the operative group but did not individually correlate with hemodynamic stability and did not authorize, by themselves, to decide between operative versus non-operative management.

Diagnostic imaging of acute thoracic injury

In recent years, the advent of multidetector CT (MDCT) has begun to change the imaging approach to patients sustaining blunt or penetrating thoracic injury. The ability to directly detect some injuries that are often occult on chest radiography, such as pericardial hemorrhage, major thoracic vascular injury, small pneumothorax, and diaphragm tears, as well as the ability to better define the extent of other injuries, such as lung contusion and laceration, account for this transition. This article reviews current concepts of diagnostic imaging in acute chest trauma from both blunt force and penetrating mechanisms, emphasizing the spectrum of diagnostic imaging findings for various injuries, primarily based on multidetector MDCT.

A multidisciplinary approach in the management of hepatic injuries

We reviewed 87 patients with hepatic injuries who were admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, from January 1995 to December 1999; 76% of them had sustained blunt trauma and 24% penetrating trauma. Their injury severity scores (ISS) ranged from 4 to 57 (mean 20.94+/-12.8); 50% of them were in shock on arrival; 8.1, 28.7, 25.3, 19.5, and 18.4% suffered from hepatic injuries graded I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Seventeen patients (19.5%) were successfully managed non-operatively; three of them underwent hepatic angiography, which in two revealed leakage of contrast medium from the right hepatic artery; both were successfully treated by embolization. One patient had bile leakage and collection, which was successfully treated by ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage. Seventy patients (80.5%) underwent exploratory laparotomy; nine of them died in the operating room. Of the remaining 61 who left the operating room alive, 21 had perihepatic packing, which was frequently used in those with injuries to segments V, VI, VII, and VIII (Couinaud's nomenclature). Eight patients who had packing and one who had not died in the postoperative period. Two patients who had packing underwent subsequent hepatic angiography with embolization before successful pack removal. The overall mortality was 20.7%. The mortality in complex hepatic injuries (grades IV and V) was 13 out of 33 (39.4%). We believe that non-operative management should be considered in haemodynamically stable patients. Angiography with embolization is invaluable in improving outcome in both non-operative and operative patients. Perihepatic packing is life-saving in complex hepatic injuries that cannot be effectively treated by simple surgical procedures. Finally, ultrasound- or CT-guided percutaneous drainage of bile leakage or collections spared a number of patients from open and complicated surgery.

Intra-operative blood salvage in abdominal trauma: a review of 5 years' experience

We performed a retrospective audit of 1235 patients presenting between 1992 and 1997, following the introduction of intra-operative blood salvage at our hospital. Twenty-two cases of severe abdominal trauma requiring emergency laparotomy and intra-operative blood salvage were identified. The impact of intra-operative blood salvage in aiding resuscitation and reducing demand on allogeneic blood supplies is discussed.

Delayed laparoscopy facilitates the management of biliary peritonitis in patients with complex liver injuries

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management is now regarded as the best alternative for the treatment of patients with complex blunt liver injuries. However, some patients still require surgical treatment for complications that were formerly managed with laparotomy and a combination of image-guided studies.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 15 patients who had complex blunt liver injuries that were managed nonoperatively and in which biliary peritonitis developed.

RESULTS

Delayed laparoscopy was performed 2-9 days after admission in patients with extensive liver injuries. All 15 patients had developed local signs of peritonitis or a systemic inflammatory response. Laparoscopy was indicated to drain a large retained hemoperitoneum (eight patients), bile peritonitis (four patients), or an infected perihepatic collection (three patients). Laparoscopy was successful in all patients, and there was no need for further interventions.

CONCLUSION

The data indicate that as more patients with complex liver injuries are treated nonoperatively and the criteria for nonoperative management continue to expand, more patients will need some type of interventional procedure to treat complications that historically were managed by laparotomy. At this point, laparoscopy is an excellent alternative that should become part of the armamentarium of the trauma surgeons who treat these patients.

Evolution in the treatment of complex blunt liver injuries

Over the last decade, major changes in the treatment of patients with blunt liver injuries have occurred, specifically with the nonoperative treatment of more complex injuries. These major changes can be summarized as follows: 1. Patients with blunt liver injuries are screened expeditiously by surgeon-performed ultrasonography. Depending on the initial findings and response to resuscitation, further decisions are made regarding the further evaluation. 2. Computed tomographic scanning is the mainstay of diagnosis for hepatic injuries after blunt trauma; the initial CT findings will help the trauma surgeon to determine the nonoperative treatment. 3. Liver injuries of grades I through III can be observed safely in a monitored unit and not necessarily in an ICU setting. Patients with injuries of grades IV and V are best initially observed in an ICU. 4. More than two thirds of patients with injuries of grades IV and V can be treated nonoperatively. However, 50% of these patients will require some type of interventional treatment, but not necessarily a laparotomy. 5. Initial findings on the CT scan can help to identify those patients who will need some type of interventional treatment and to identify associated injuries. 6. Elderly patients or patients with associated medical comorbidities can also be treated nonoperatively if strict guidelines are followed. 7. Complications in patients with complex blunt liver injuries are not uncommon. However, most of the complications can be safely treated by less invasive procedures.

Y. A Successful Multitnodality Strategy for Management of Liver Injuries

The treatment of liver injuries involves many strategies ranging from observation to operative intervention and includes numerous options such as angiography, packing, and damage-control procedures. In July 1994 we instituted a protocol for the management of traumatic liver injuries. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the management of liver injuries occurring since the institution of the protocol. Two hundred three consecutive adult patients with liver injuries were evaluated at our Level I trauma center between July 1994 and May 1999. Eighty-eight per cent of the injuries were blunt with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 24.3 ± 0.8 and a survival probability (Ps) of 90.0 ± 1.5 per cent. The overall mortality was 6.4 per cent. A comparison between patients with minor liver injuries and patients with more severe injuries [Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) <3 vs >3] demonstrated no difference in mortality between the two groups despite a Ps of 93.8 ± 1.3 per cent in patients with an AIS <3 versus 84.1 ± 3.3 per cent in patients with an AIS >3. The most common complication in our patient population was posthemorrhagic anemia, which was seen in 10.8 per cent of cases. Severity of injury did not result in a significant difference in the complication rate. Patients who underwent laparotomy had a statistically higher ISS, a lower Ps, and a mortality rate of 11.5 per cent compared with 3.7 per cent ( P = 0.03) in patients managed nonoperatively. However, a comparison of patients undergoing laparotomy with those who did not and who had equivalent ISS demonstrated no difference in mortality. Our results demonstrated that a preplanned management strategy was a successful way in which to treat patients with traumatic liver injuries. Although nonoperative management of liver injuries has been common practice a management plan that involves a multimodal surgical strategy is essential.

CT criteria for management of blunt liver trauma: correlation with angiographic and surgical findings

PURPOSE

To determine the contrast material-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) criteria for selection of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt hepatic injury for angiographic evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-two patients with blunt liver injury underwent CT and hepatic angiography. Hepatic injuries were graded with CT-based classification. Scans were assessed for evidence of contrast extravasation and laceration or contusion extending into the hepatic vein(s), inferior vena cava, porta hepatis, or gallbladder fossa. Medical, angiographic, and surgical records were reviewed to determine angiographic findings, surgical indications and findings, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with hepatic angiography, CT was 65% (11 of 17 patients) sensitive and 85% (41 of 48 patients) specific for detection of arterial vascular injury. When CT severity grades 2 and 3 were analyzed, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 100% (three of three patients) and 94% (34 of 36 patients), respectively (P <.001). Injury involving at least one major hepatic vein was found in 15 (88%) of 17 patients who required liver-related surgery and in 23 (42%) of 55 of the other patients (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

CT-based criteria, including hepatic injury grade, signs of arterial vascular injury, and presence or absence of major hepatic venous involvement assists in selecting patients for hepatic angiography and those at increased risk of ongoing or delayed hepatic bleeding or other posttraumatic complications.