Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases

Atypical Femur Fractures-An Analysis of 69 Patients from 15 Years

Background/Objectives: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing osteoporotic fractures. However, the risk of atypical femur fractures (AFFs) increases with long-term bisphosphonate use. There are few existing publications on the analysis of clinical outcomes of atypical femur fracture cases in Chinese patients. Our objective was to review the clinical outcomes of AFF cases managed in a tertiary center in Hong Kong, China. Methods: Cases of AFF managed in the Prince of Wales Hospital from 2010 to 2024 were included. Data on demographics, type and duration of bisphosphonate use prior to AFF, fixation method, and mobility 1 year post-operation were retrospectively retrieved. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the duration of use prior to the development of AFF between different types of bisphosphonates. Results: Sixty-nine cases of AFF were included, with a mean age of 73.8 ± 9.7 years. A total of 95.6% of patients had a history of bisphosphonate use, with a mean duration of usage of 6.8 ± 5.6 years prior to the occurrence of AFF. The duration of bisphosphonate use prior to the development of AFF was comparable between alendronate, ibandronate, and a history of using more than one type of anti-resorptive agent. A non-union rate of 5.8% was observed in the current cohort, with 48.2% returning to pre-morbid mobility 1 year post-operation. Conclusions: AFF is more commonly seen in female patients with a history of bisphosphonate use. Considering the high success rate demonstrated in the current cohort, treating AFF with closed reduction followed by fixation with a long cephalomedullary device in dynamic locking together with immediate full-weight-bearing rehabilitation post-operation may be effective.

Removal of bent intramedullary nail in diaphyseal segmental femoral fracture with intra-articular distal femoral fracture after below-knee amputation

Refracture accompanied by nail bending in healed or unhealed femoral fractures is a rare complication, and its removal is challenging intraoperatively. A man in his mid-20s presented to the emergency department with a deformed thigh with a puncture wound in a below-knee amputee limb following a road traffic accident, and radiographs revealed a diaphyseal segmental femur fracture with an intra-articular distal femur fracture with a bent femur nail in situ. Attempts to remove a bent femoral nail frequently fail non-invasively and may cause iatrogenic damage. Cutting the bent femur nail using a conventional jumbo cutter and a nail-plate construct (exchange nailing and 14-hole distal femur locking plate with bone grafting) to fix the fracture can tackle this type of condition. He was followed up in the outpatient department and was able to mobilise with crutches with a good range of knee movement and a below-knee prosthesis in situ.

Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of the Fluoroscopic Ruler for Comminuted Femur Fractures: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

Fixation of comminuted femur fractures may result in limb length discrepancy. Intraoperative fluoroscopic measurement of the contra-lateral femur with a ruler is commonly performed to establish a reference for femoral length. No evidence regarding the reliability and accuracy of this technique exists. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and interrater reliability of a fluoroscopic ruler in obtaining correct femoral length in a comminuted femoral shaft fracture model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Approximately 5 cm of bone was removed from the left femoral diaphyses of 8 cadavers. Seven orthopedic surgery residents and 2 attendings measured the length of the intact contralateral femur using a ruler under fluoroscopy. The ruler was then applied to the "fractured" femur with manual traction applied until femoral length matched the measured length of the contralateral femur. The resulting gap in the "fractured" femur was compared with the length of bone that had been resected. Data were analyzed using means, SDs, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven measurements were collected. The mean difference between the measured fracture gap and the length of bone removed was 8.0±5.8 mm (range, 0-22 mm). Femoral length was accurate to 5 mm in 40% of cases, 10 mm in 70%, 15 mm in 81%, 20 mm in 98%, and 25 mm in 100%. The overall interrater reliability was poor (ICC, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.001-0.44).

CONCLUSION

Despite poor interrater reliability, the fluoroscopic ruler resulted in a mean leg length discrepancy of 8.0±5.8 mm in this cadaveric study. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

A Scoring System for Predicting Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Femoral shaft nonunion negatively affects patient quality of life. Although multiple risk factors have been identified for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, there is no quantitative model for predicting nonunion.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

The study is a retrospective cohort study of patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at two level one trauma centers who were followed to fracture union or nonunion. Patient, injury, and surgical characteristics were analyzed to create a quantitative model for nonunion risk after intramedullary nailing.

METHODS

Eight hundred one patients aged 18 years and older with femoral shaft fractures treated with reamed, locked IMNs were identified. Risk factors including demographics, comorbidities, surgical variables, and injury-related characteristics were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was conducted, and several variables were included in a scoring system to predict nonunion risk.

RESULTS

The overall nonunion rate was 7.62% (61/801). Multivariate analysis showed significant association among pulmonary injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19, P = 0.022), open fracture (OR=2.36, P = 0.02), current smoking (OR=3.05, P < 0.001), postoperative infection (OR=12.1, P = 0.007), AO/OTA fracture pattern type A or B (OR=0.43, P = 0.014), and percent cortical contact obtained intraoperatively ≥25% (OR=0.41, P = 0.021) and nonunion. The scoring system created to quantitatively stratify nonunion risk showed that a score of 3 or more yielded an OR of 6.38 for nonunion (c-statistic = 0.693, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral shaft nonunion risk is quantifiable based on several independent injury, patient, and surgical factors. This scoring system is an additional tool for clinical decision making when caring for patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with IMNs.

Analysis of the influence of circumference and displacement of the third fracture fragment on the healing of femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing

The effect of circumference and displacement of the third fracture fragment on fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures with a third fracture fragment was investigated. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the data of 142 patients who suffered femoral shaft fractures with a third fracture fragment and were admitted to the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from February 2016 to December 2021. According to the circumference of the third fracture fragments, these were divided into three types of type 1: 71 cases; type 2: 52 cases; and type 3: 19 cases. On the basis of the diaphyseal diameter, the degree of displacement of the third fracture fragment was classified into three degrees of degree I: 95 cases; degree II: 31 cases; and degree III: 16 cases. Postoperative follow-up was performed to compare the fracture healing rate, healing time, and the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (mRUST) at 9th month after surgery in each group. All 142 patients were followed up after operation, with an average of (14.7 ± 4.1) months, and the overall healing rate was 73.4%. When the third fracture fragments were displaced in degree II and III, the mRUST score at 9th month in the type 1 group was higher than that in the type 2 and 3 groups (P = 0.017). Logistic regression analysis showed that greater displacement of third fracture fragments and greater circumference were associated with lower fracture healing rates (P < 0.05). After intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures, the degree of third fragment displacement and circumference affect fracture healing, and the former has a greater impact. When the third fracture fragment is displaced to degree II or III and its circumference is type 2 or type 3, it significantly affects the fracture healing. Intraoperative intervention to reduce the distance of third displacement of the fragment is required to reduce the incidence of non-union.

LOW INFECTION AND NON-UNION RATES IN POLYTRAUMA FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Objective

Assess complications and risks in staged femoral shaft fracture treatment using external fixation and intramedullary nailing (DCO).

Methods

Analysis involved 37 patients with 40 fractures, mostly male (87.5%), average age 32.9 years. Data included ASA score, AO/OTA and Gustilo classifications, Glasgow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, times to external fixation and conversion, ICU duration, nail type, and reaming status. Complications tracked were mortality, deep infection, and non-union.

Results

Predominant fracture type was AO/OTA A (45%), with 40% open (Gustilo A, 93.8%). Average ISS was 21; GCS was 12.7. Median ICU stay was 3 days; average time to conversion was 10.2 days. Retrograde nails were used in 50% of cases, with reaming in 67.5%. Complications included deep infections in 5% and non-union in 2.5%.

Conclusion

DCO strategy resulted in low infection and non-union rates, associated with lower GCS and longer ICU stays. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Cohort Study.

Comparing outcomes of plate augmentation, nail exchange, and nail exchange with plate augmentation in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation.

RESULTS

Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Antibiotic cement nails manufactured with threaded rods or cannulated intramedullary nails are better than those made with guidewires and do not debond

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate cement debonding at the time of removal of antibiotic cemented coated nails (ABNs) with cores made with a guidewire ($120), a regular intramedullary nail ($1100) or a threaded rod from a circular frame external fixator set ($60).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 32 ABNs that had been implanted for long bone infections after intramedullary nailing. All ABNs were manufactured intraoperatively by the treating surgeon using 2 grams of vancomycin and single package of Tobramycin Simplex Cement (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI). The powder, antibiotics, and polymer were mixed and then injected into an ABN cement mold (Bonesetter Holdings USA). Debonding was assessed at time of removal by the operating surgeon. Rates of cement debonding between the 3 groups were statistically compared.

Results

Debonding occurred in 0/12 of the cement nails manufactured with an intramedullary nail, 0/7 threaded rod ABNs, and 6/13 guidewire ABNs. There was a significant difference in the rate of debonding between the 3 groups (P < 0.01). Removal of the remnant cement was accomplished with thin osteotomes, long pituitary rongeurs, or reamers. The canal was visualized using an arthroscope to ensure complete removal of the cement.

Conclusion

ABNs fabricated with standard intramedullary nails or threaded rods did not lead to any debonding. Debonding of the cement from the inner core of an antibiotic nail often requires significant effort to remove the remnant cement. Given that threaded rods are often cheaper than guidewires, we recommend that ABNs be fabricated with either threaded rods or interlocking nails, but not guidewires, depending on the level of stability required.

Clinical versus radiological method for adjusting rotational alignment during femoral shaft fractures intramedullary nailing and the malrotation impact on the functional outcomes: early results from a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the current study is to assess which is better for obtaining the proper femoral rotation during IMN of femoral fractures, the radiological or clinical method. The secondary objectives were to document malrotation's incidence and its effect on the hip and knee functional outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with unilateral femoral shaft fractures were treated using intramedullary nails (IMN) on a usual radiolucent operative table. Intraoperative rotation adjustment was performed using a radiological method (relying on the contralateral lesser trochanter profile) in 16 patients (group A), while in 17 patients, a clinical method was used (group B). Postoperative assessment of malrotation was performed using a CT scan, and 15 degrees was the cutoff value where below is an acceptable rotation (group I) and above is true malrotation (group II). Functional assessment was performed using the Harris hip score (HHS), the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), and the Neer score.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 30.7 ± 9.3 years; 81.8% were males, and the left side was injured in 63.6% of patients. After a mean follow up of 18.2 ± 6.9 months, all fractures were united, and the overall mean amount of rotational difference between the fractured and the contralateral side was 14.7° ± 6.0 (3-29.4), 84.8% were in external rotation. No difference in the mean rotational deformity in group A compared to group B. Measurements were 13.9 ± 6.7 and 15.7 ± 5.5, respectively (p = 0.47). Seventeen (51.5%) patients in group I with a mean deformity of 9.8 ± 3.4 (3-14.7), while group II consisted of 16 (48.5%) patients with a mean deformity of 19.6 ± 3.7 (15.3-29.4). There was no difference in the functional scores between group I and group II; HHS was 89.4 ± 7.4 versus 87.7 ± 8.9 (p = 0.54), TLKSS was 84.6 ± 9.6 versus 80.4 ± 13.9 (p = 0.32), and Neer score was 87.9 ± 9.5 versus 83 ± 12.5 (p = 0.21) for group I and group II, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in malrotation incidence after unilateral femoral fractures IMN with either an intraoperative clinical or radiological method for rotational adjustment; furthermore, malrotation did not affect the functional outcomes.

Surgical management of bifocal femoral fractures: a systematic review and pooled analysis of treatment with a single implant versus double implants

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the proximal femur accompanied by a fracture of the femoral shaft are relatively rare, with a reported prevalence between 1 and 12%. Multiple surgical options are available, consisting of treatment with a single implant or with double implants. Controversy exists about the optimal management. A systematic review and pooled analysis were performed to assess the most reliable treatment for bifocal femoral fractures of the femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted on July 15, 2022. Selected studies were screened on title and abstract by two researchers independently, and full texts were read by both authors. Emphasis was put on adverse events such as postoperative infection, healing complications, malalignment, and functional outcome using either a single implant or double implants.

RESULTS

For the proximal femoral fractures, no significant difference could be confirmed for avascular necrosis of the femoral neck (5.1% for single implant and 3.8% for double implants), nonunion (6.4% for single implant and 7.8% for double implants), or varus malalignment (6.6% for single implant and 10.9% for double implants). This study also suggests that the number of implants is irrelevant for complications of the femoral shaft regarding the rates of postoperative infection and healing complications. Pooled rates of bone healing complications were 1.6-2.7-fold higher when patients were treated with a single implant, but statistical significance could not be confirmed. For hardware failure, revision surgery, leg length discrepancy, and functional outcome, no difference between the two groups was found either.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled proportions of all postoperative complications had overlapping confidence intervals; thus, no inference about a statistically significant difference on the number of implants used for treating ipsilateral fractures of the femur can be made. Both treatment groups showed a similar functional outcome at the last moment of follow-up, with more than 75% of the patients reporting a good outcome.

Should nails be locked dynamically or statically in atypical femoral fractures? - A radiological analysis of time to union and reoperations in 236 displaced fractures with 4 years average follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are associated with delayed union and higher reoperation rates. Axial dynamization of intramedullary nails is hypothesized to reduce time-to-union (TTU) and fixation failure as compared to static locking.

METHODS

Consecutive acutely displaced AFFs fixed with long intramedullary nails across five centres between 2006 and 2021 with a minimum postoperative follow-up of three months were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was TTU, compared between AFFs treated with dynamically or statically locked intramedullary nails. Fracture union was defined as a modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures score of 13 or greater. Secondary outcomes involved revision surgery and treatment failure, defined as non-union beyond 18 months or revision internal fixation for mechanical reasons.

RESULTS

A total of 236 AFFs (127 dynamically locked and 109 statically locked) were analysed with good interobserver reliability of fracture union assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.82-0.98). AFFs treated with dynamized nails had significantly shorter median TTU (10.1 months; 95% CI = 9.24-10.96 vs 13.0 months; 95% CI = 10.60-15.40) (log-rank test, p = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that dynamic locking was independently associated with greater likelihood of fracture union within 24 months (p = 0.009). Reoperations were less frequent in the dynamic locking group (18.9% vs 28.4%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). Static locking was an independent risk factor for reoperation (p = 0.049), as were varus reduction and lack of teriparatide use within three months of surgery. Static locking also demonstrated a higher frequency of treatment failure (39.4% vs 22.8%, p = 0.006) and was an independent predictor of treatment failure in logistic regression (p = 0.018). Other factors associated with treatment failure included varus reduction and open reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic locking of intramedullary nails in AFFs is associated with faster time to union, lower rate of non-union, and fewer treatment failures.

Outcomes of Angular Stable Locking System in Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures of Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Study

Background

The angular stable locking system (ASLS) was developed to provide additional stability to the distal interlocking screw of the intramedullary (IM) nail. Effects of ASLS on the treatment of femoral diaphyseal fractures in the elderly remain unknown. The aim of this study was to compare radiological outcomes of IM nailing using ASLS screws to IM nails with conventional interlocking screws in elderly patients with femoral shaft fractures.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective review of 129 patients (average age, 73.5 years; 98 women and 31 men) aged 65 years or older who underwent IM nail fixation for femoral diaphyseal fractures (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] classification 32) was conducted. Demographic information of patients, fracture site (subtrochanteric or shaft), fracture type (traumatic or atypical), and AO/OTA fracture classification were investigated. Reduction status was evaluated by postoperative plain radiography. Presence of union and time to union were evaluated through serial plain radiograph follow-up. Reoperation due to nonunion or implant failure was also evaluated.

Results

ASLS was used in 65 patients (50.3%). A total of 118 patients (91.5%) achieved union without additional surgery and the mean union time was 31.8 ± 13.0 weeks. In terms of reduction status, angulation was greater in the group using ASLS. There were no statistically significant differences of union rate, time to union, and reoperation rate according to the use of ASLS (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the outcomes according to the use of ASLS even when the analysis was divided in terms of fracture site or fracture type (p > 0.05). In further subgroup analysis, only the traumatic subtrochanteric area group showed statistically significantly shorter time to union when ASLS was used (p = 0.038).

Conclusions

In geriatric patients with femoral diaphyseal fractures, the use of ASLS was not considered to have a significant effect on fracture healing. Fracture healing seemed to be more affected by surgical techniques such as minimizing the gap and fracture characteristics such as atypical femoral fractures, rather than implants.

Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach

PURPOSE

To compare the intraoperative procedural efficiency of antegrade and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, power reaming devices and fracture tables.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 238 isolated diaphyseal femur fractures fixed with SIGN Standard and Fin nails within three weeks of injury. The data included baseline patient and fracture characteristics, nail type and diameter, fracture reduction methods, operative times and outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were 84 and 154 fractures in the antegrade and retrograde groups respectively. Both groups were similar vis-a-vis baseline patient and fracture characteristics. Closed reduction of the fractures was significantly easier for retrograde than an antegrade approach. The retrograde approach more readily permitted the use of Fin nails. The mean nail diameter used for retrograde was significantly larger than that for antegrade. The time taken to achieve retrograde nailing was significantly lesser than that of antegrade. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of expensive fracture-surgery gadgets, retrograde nailing offers many procedural advantages over antegrade, such as easier closed reduction and canal reaming, the greater possibility of using the Fin nail with fewer interlocking screws and shorter operative times. However, we acknowledge the lack of randomisation and the presence of an unequal number of fractures in the two groups as limitations of this study.

Antibiotic Cement-Coated Interlocked Intramedullary Nails for the Treatment of Infected Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes using an interlocking antibiotic cement-coated nail and culture-specific systematic antibiotics in the treatment of infected nonunion after intramedullary nailing.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Urban level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Forty-one nonconsecutive patients who presented to a level I trauma center who underwent interlocked antibiotic nailing for treatment of infected nonunion status after primary intramedullary nailing.

OUTCOMES

Eradication of infection, radiographic union by 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Antibiotic nailing successfully eradicated infection and led to fracture healing in 35 patients (85.4%), while 6 patients (14.6%) had persistent infection and required further surgical treatment. Of the 6 patients who required further treatment, 5 eventually went on to heal with fracture union and eradication of their infection, while 1 required a salvage procedure. Of the 5 patients who eventually went on to heal, 4 of them healed with repeat antibiotic or intramedullary nails, while 1 required segmental resection and bone grafting before healing.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the proposed interlocked antibiotic nailing technique is a viable therapeutic option to eradicate infected nonunion and support fracture healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of Femoral Shaft Fractures: The Significance of Traction or Operative Position

Background and objective Intramedullary femoral nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for managing femoral shaft fractures (FSFs). Though good clinical outcomes and union rates have been reported following this procedure, it has also been commonly associated with perioperative complications. Positioning the patient in lateral decubitus, avoiding a fracture table, or using manual traction have been touted as possible techniques to reduce perioperative complications in IMN. However, given the scarce availability of comparative research, the decision to employ any of the techniques mentioned above is often guided by surgeon preference alone. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of free-leg draping using either supine or direct lateral positioning with manual traction reduces perioperative complications among trauma patients undergoing an anterograde femoral nailing surgery when compared to using a fracture table. Methods Consecutive adult patients from a level-one trauma center undergoing unilateral antegrade femoral fixation surgeries between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated for possible inclusion in the study. Relevant perioperative and postoperative data, including length of hospital or ICU stay and perioperative complications, were included in the analysis. This study received research ethics board approval before data collection began. Results A total of 91 patients were ultimately included in the final analysis: 61 patients were included in the free-leg draping with manual traction group (FL) and 30 patients were included in the traction table group (TT). Patients in the FL group had a similar operative and fluoroscopy time, blood loss, length of stay, and time on the ventilator. Subgroup analysis comparing positioning within the FL group revealed non-significant differences in fluoroscopy time (p=0.59) and length of stay (p=0.20) between the lateral and supine groups. Moreover, no differences in operative time, blood loss, and time on the ventilator were observed between lateral and supine groups. Conclusion Based on our findings, there were no significant differences in terms of operative or fluoroscopy time, perioperative complications, or length of time in the hospital or on the ventilator between the groups. Our study was limited by its small sample size and incomplete data. Further prospective randomized research is required to reach definitive conclusions on the appropriate manner to treat patients with these complex and morbid injuries.

Use of minimally invasive cerclage wiring for displaced major fragments of femoral shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing promotes bone union and a functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Femoral shaft fractures caused by high energy trauma can be very challenging due to the large variability in fracture morphology and poor functional outcomes. Displaced major fragments of femoral shaft fractures are difficult to manage after closed reduction and intramedullary nailing (IMN). The minimally invasive cerclage wiring (CW) procedure has become an optimal tool for major fragment resetting and stabilization after IMN. However, arguments continue for the potential risk of arterial injury, blood supply disruption, and delayed bone union or non-union with the CW procedure. The surgical algorithm for treating femoral shaft fractures with displaced major fragments remains controversial. Thus, emphasis is placed on whether the CW procedure can promote the bone union rate and improve functional outcomes without significant complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on all patients of femoral shaft fractures with displaced major fragments between June 2015 and August 2019 in our trauma centre. Eligible patients were included and stratified into the CW group and IMN group. Demographics, radiological data, callus formation, union time, and functional outcomes were critically compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included in the present study according to our inclusion/exclusion criteria, of whom 16 (43.2%) were stratified into the CW group, and 21 (56.8%) into the IMN group. The modified radiographic union score for femorae (mRUSH) in the CW group and IMN group was significantly different (11.94 ± 1.29 vs. 7.95 ± 0.74, 6 months; 15.88 ± 0.50 vs. 10.33 ± 0.91, 12 months) (p < 0.0001). The mean union time was significantly different between the CW and IMN groups (7.9 ± 3.2 months vs. 20.1 ± 8.48 months) (p < 0.0001). Bone union at 12 months differed significantly between the CW and IMN groups (15 vs. 5) (p < 0.05). The Harris Hip Score in the CW group was significantly higher than that in the IMN group (88.19 ± 4.69 vs. 76.81 ± 5.26, 12 months; 93.19 ± 4.68 vs. 87.57 ± 5.38, 24 months) (p < 0.01). The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score was significantly different between the CW and IMN groups (78.50 ± 5.65 vs. 67.71 ± 4.65, 12 months; 89.50 ± 5.05 vs. 75.81 ± 8.90, 24 months) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive CW is an optimal supplement for IMN in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with displaced major fragments. As illustrated, the benefits of CW potentially include promotion of the bone union rate and improvement in functional outcomes.

[Short-term effectiveness of orthopedic robot-assisted femoral neck system fixation for fresh femoral neck fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the short-term effectiveness and advantages of the orthopedic robot-assisted femoral neck system (FNS) fixation in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures compared with the traditional manual operation.

METHODS

A clinical data of 74 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures, who had undergone internal fixation with FNS between April 2020 and September 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 31 cases of TiRobot-assisted operation (trial group) and 43 cases of traditional manual operation (control group). There was no significant difference between groups ( P>0.05) in terms of gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side and type. The fracture fixation time (intraoperative fracture reduction to the end of suture), invasive fixation time (incision of internal fixation to the end of suture), the number of placing key-guide needle, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and Harris score of hip function were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

All operations were performed with no neurovascular injury or incision complications. The invasive fixation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of placing key-guide needle, and the incision length in the trial group were superior to the control group ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in fracture fixation time between groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 4-16 months (mean, 7 months). The fracture did not heal in 1 patient of trial group, and the other fractures healed in 2 groups; the fracture healing time was (17.6±1.9) weeks in trial group and (18.2±1.9) weeks in control group, and there was no significant difference between groups ( t=0.957, P=0.345). At last follow-up, the Harris score of the trial group was 82.4±5.8, which was higher than that of the control group (79.0±7.7), but the difference was not significant ( t=-1.483, P=0.147).

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic robot-assisted FNS fixation in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures has the similar short-term effectiveness as the traditional method, but the former has advantages in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the number of placing key-guide needle, making the operation more minimally invasive and quicker, and more suitable for older patients.

Weight Bearing as Tolerated After Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Intramedullary nailing of femur fractures has become the standard of care, with high union rates. Few high-level studies have discussed the effect that early weight bearing has on the healing of these fractures, regardless of nail size or fracture pattern. The goal of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral shaft fractures for patients allowed immediate weight bearing after intramedullary nailing. We performed a retrospective review of 341 femoral shaft fractures, with 131 allowed immediate weight bearing, 99 allowed partial weight bearing, and 111 kept non-weight bearing. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected and analyzed. Increased fracture complexity was associated with higher likelihood of delayed weight bearing. No significant difference was found for nail size or rate of failure with different nail sizes. A total of 50 nonunions were noted (14.7%), with no difference in nonunion rates between weight bearing cohorts. The only significant predictor of nonunion was Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification of OTA32B fractures (P=.02), which were 2 times and 4 times as likely to occur compared with OTA32A and OTA32C fractures, respectively. Failure of interlocking screws occurred among 15 patients (4.4%) and was more common with older patients, osteoporotic bone, and larger diameter nails. In summary, unilateral intramedullary nailing of adult femoral shaft fractures does not show a difference in fracture union rates or implant failure with unrestricted, immediate weight bearing, regardless of nail characteristics. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):e148-e153.].

Intramedullary bone pedestal formation contributing to femoral shaft fracture nonunion: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Femoral shaft fracture is a commonly encountered orthopedic injury that can be treated operatively with a low overall delayed/nonunion rate. In the case of delayed union after antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nail fixation, fracture dynamization is often attempted first. Nonunion after dynamization has been shown to occur due to infection and other aseptic etiologies. We present a unique case of diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture nonunion after dynamization due to intramedullary cortical bone pedestal formation at the distal tip of the nail.

CASE SUMMARY

A 37-year-old male experienced a high-energy trauma to his left thigh after coming down hard during a motocross jump. Evaluation was consistent with an isolated, closed, left mid-shaft femur fracture. He was initially managed with reamed antegrade intramedullary nail fixation but had continued thigh pain. Radiographs at four months demonstrated no evidence of fracture union and failure of the distal locking screw, and dynamization by distal locking screw removal was performed. The patient continued to have pain eight months after the initial procedure and 4 mo after dynamization with serial radiographs continuing to demonstrate no evidence of fracture healing. The decision was made to proceed with exchange nailing for aseptic fracture nonunion. During the exchange procedure, an obstruction was encountered at the distal tip of the failed nail and was confirmed on magnified fluoroscopy to be a pedestal of cortical bone in the canal. The obstruction required further distal reaming. A longer and larger diameter exchange nail was placed without difficulty and without a distal locking screw to allow for dynamization at the fracture site. Post-operative radiographs showed proper fracture and hardware alignment. There was subsequently radiographic evidence of callus formation at one year with subsequent fracture consolidation and resolution of thigh pain at eighteen months.

CONCLUSION

The risk of fracture nonunion caused by intramedullary bone pedestal formation can be mitigated with the use of maximum length and diameter nails and close follow up.

Closure of the femoral medullary canal after retrograde nailing using an in-situ osteochondral autograft-Technical trick and a case series

Retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) is the favored over antegrade intramedullary nailing in fractures of the distal femur. It provides a longer working length and allows for multiple distal screw insertion and therefore a more stable construct. Concerns remain regarding the violation of the knee cartilage and the effect this has on knee function. Many studies have shown high incidence of knee pain with reports varying from 20 to 86%. We describe a novel technical trick aiming at partially restoring the knee cartilage of the operated side and decreasing the hemorrhage stemming from the medullary canal. Our experience of the technique and the case series shows that closing the entrance point of the medullary canal after a RIMN procedure leads to better function and less knee pain in the postoperative period.

Collagen/Nano-hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffold Application with Exchange Reamed Nailing Accelerates Bone Union and Improves Quality of Life in Atrophic Femoral Shaft Nonunions: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Our aim in this study was to evaluate the effect of exchange intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft atrophic nonunions and the use of collagen/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold applied in addition to the cancellous iliac crest autograft on the union, return to work, and quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with an atrophic nonunion in the isthmic region of the femoral shaft were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 24 patients who underwent collagen/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold in addition to exchange intramedullary nailing and iliac autograft, while group B consisted of 30 patients without scaffold. Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire scores, union rates, time to union, return to work were complications were compared.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 47.5 ± 14.1. The mean follow-up period was 3.56 ± 1.88 years. There was no statistically significant difference between Group A and B in terms of age, gender, smoking and alcohol use, and trauma mechanism. Time to union and return to work were statistically significantly shorter in Group A than in Group B (p = 0.004, p = 0.001). All of the SF-36 survey scores at month six were better in Group A. In the first year, mental health and general health perception were still statistically better in group A (p = 0.009, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of atrophic nonunions of the femoral shaft isthmic region, the use of collagen/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds together with exchange intramedullary nailing affects the union positively. This positive effect also brings about earlier return to work and better quality of life.

Current concepts in the management of bisphosphonate associated atypical femoral fractures

Bisphosphonates are a class of drugs used as the mainstay of treatment for osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates function by binding to hydroxyapatite, and subsequently targeting osteoclasts by altering their ability to resorb and remodel bone. Whilst aiming to reduce the risk of fragility fractures, bisphosphonates have been associated with atypical insufficiency fractures, specifically in the femur. Atypical femoral fractures occur distal to the lesser trochanter, until the supracondylar flare. There are a number of the differing clinical and radiological features between atypical femoral fractures and osteoporotic femoral fractures, indicating that there is a distinct difference in the respective underlying pathophysiology. At the point of presentation of an atypical femoral fracture, bisphosphonate should be discontinued. This is due to the proposed inhibition of osteoclasts and apoptosis, resulting in impaired callus healing. Conservative management consists primarily of cessation of bisphosphonate therapy and partial weightbearing activity. Nutritional deficiencies should be investigated and appropriately corrected, most notably dietary calcium and vitamin D. Currently there is no established treatment guidelines for either complete or incomplete fractures. There is agreement in the literature that nonoperative management of bisphosphonate-associated femoral fractures conveys poor outcomes. Currently, the favoured methods of surgical fixation are cephalomedullary nailing and plate fixation. Newer techniques advocate the use of both modalities as it gives the plate advantage of best reducing the fracture and compressing the lateral cortex, with the support of the intramedullary nail to stabilise an atypical fracture with increased ability to load-share, and a reduced bending moment across the fracture site. The evidence suggests that cephalomedullary nailing of the fracture has lower revision rates. However, it is important to appreciate that the anatomical location and patient factors may not always allow for this. Although causation between bisphosphonates and atypical fractures is yet to be demonstrated, there is a growing evidence base to suggest a higher incidence to atypical femoral fractures in patients who take bisphosphonates. As we encounter a growing co-morbid elderly population, the prevalence of this fracture-type will likely increase. Therefore, it is imperative clinicians continue to be attentive of atypical femoral fractures and treat them effectively.

Comparison of Open and Closed Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Open and closed nailing are the two reduction methods used for the fixation of femoral shaft fractures. The study aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of open and closed nailing for closed femoral shaft fractures.

Methodology

A total of 398 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing fixation of nonpathological femoral shaft fracture between January 2016 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Two hundred seventy-four underwent closed nailing, and 124 were considered for open nailing.

Results

The primary outcome reviewed was the union rate of fracture. Other outcomes analyzed were complications, intraoperative blood loss, time to union, and the duration of the procedure. Patients in the open group had a union of fracture in 15.71 weeks, closed nailing group had a union in 15.53 weeks (p-value 0.495). Patients with open nailing had a mean Radiological union scale in tibial (RUST) fracture score of 11.435, whereas the closed nailing group had a mean of 11.664 (p-value 0.187). Operative time was higher in the open group when compared to the closed nailing group (p-value 0.000). However, intraoperative blood loss was more in open nailing in comparison to closed nailing. Furthermore, 15 patients with closed nailing had non-union, whereas 11 had non-union after open nailing (p-0.204). Superficial infection and deep infection requiring debridement were equally observed among the two treatment groups.

Conclusion

Fixation of femoral shaft fractures with open nailing has similar outcomes in union rates, time to union, and rates of significant complication similar to those of close nailing.

Closed reduction and locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal long bone fractures without intra-operative imaging and fracture table

PURPOSE

Early closed reduction and locked intramedullary (IM) nailing has become the standard treatment for diaphyseal long bone fractures in high income countries. The low and middle income countries (LMICs) are still lagging behind in transiting from open surgical reduction and non-operative modalities to closed reduction due to lack of requisite equipment. However, some surgeons in LMICs are beginning to achieve closed reduction even without the equipment.

METHODS

A prospective descriptive study was done on a total of 251 fresh diaphyseal fractures of the humerus, femur and tibia fixed with a locked nail over a 5½-year period. The fractures were grouped into those that had open reduction, closed reduction or reduction with a finger.

RESULTS

Closed reduction was done for 135 (53.8%) fractures belonging to 123 patients. The mean and range of the patients' ages were 41.33 and 13-81 years, respectively. Males constituted 69.9% and mostly (48%) sustained fractures in motorcycle accident. There was a significant negative association between closed reduction and fracture-to-surgery interval (p < 0.001). Closed reduction also had positive associations with: (i) humerus and tibia fractures (p < 0.001), (ii) middle, distal and segmental fractures (p = 0.025), (iii) retrograde approach to femur fracture nailing (p < 0.001), and (iv) wedge or multifragmentary type femur fractures (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

With constant practice, it is possible to achieve closed reduction of many fresh diaphyseal long bone fractures in spite of the limitations imposed on surgeons in LMICs by poor health systems and grossly inadequate fracture care facilities.

Reunion of post nail aseptic non-union of diaphyseal femoral fractures by augmentation plating, decortication and bone grafting - Replacement for exchange nailing

INTRODUCTION

The aim is to re-unite post nail aseptic non-union of diaphyseal femoral fractures in an economical and safe way with almost certainty, reducing dependence on others with early rehabilitation. The cascade of fracture healing is dependent on mechanical stability and uninterrupted cellular and bio-chemical responses (biology). Intra-medullary nailing in fresh diaphyseal femoral fractures is gold standard treatment with high success rate, still non-union of these fractures is reported, though the incidence has declined considerably.

METHOD

This prospective study conducted at level one trauma centre on twenty-one patients in four years starting from July 2015 to June 2019. Eighteen patients had non-union with intact implant and three had broken nail. Non-union site approached through lateral approach. Non-union site fixed by 4.5 broad combi-hole LCP or distal femoral locking compression plate (DF-LCP) depending on fracture site. Decortication, Bone grafting done retaining the previous nail in situ in eighteen patients and in three patients, broken nail was exchanged with same size of unreamed nail and then, similar procedure carried out.

RESULT

All non-unions in 21 patients reunited without any complications. All patients regained painless unsupported walk.

DISCUSSION

The most preferred treatment for this complex non-union is reamed exchanged nailing. Larger nail increases mechanical stability by better frictional contact with surrounding bone in isthumic fracture but fails in cases of fractures with comminution, spacious distal fragment and fracture with small distal fragment. Various studies reported success rate in reamed exchange nailing from 53-96% with an average 74%. The main cause of instability is rotational stress which is completely obliterated by augmentation plating and various studies report 100% success. Augmentation plate with retained nail increases stiffness and strength of construct. Concomitant decortication and cancellous bone graft stimulates osteogenesis.

CONCLUSION

It is a simple, safe and economical procedure, correcting and providing both mechanical and biological environments to convert non-union into osseous union. It will be a treatment of choice in times to come.

Outcome Analysis of Intramedullary Nailing Augmented with Poller Screws for Treating Difficult Reduction Fractures of Femur and Tibia: a Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Poller screws may serve as an adjunctive reduction tool and aid fracture reduction while augmented with intramedullary (IM) nailing for treating diaphyseal or metaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. However, there is no consistent conclusion about whether the method of using IM nailing augmented with poller screws is more advantageous than using IM nailing alone.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients who received IM nailing with or without supportive poller screw for treating long-bone fractures in lower limbs and who experienced difficulties in performing reduction or IM insertion during the surgical process were included in this retrospective cohort study (33 patients with poller screws in group A versus 63 patients without poller screws in group B). Patient demographics including age, gender, and body mass index; injury-related data including fracture location, classification, and injury mechanism; operation-related data including American Society of Anesthesiologists, duration of operation, poller screw time, method of anesthesia, and volume of intraoperative hemorrhage; outcomes including fracture healing time; and incidence of outcomes of nonunion, malunion, infection, and secondary surgical procedures were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fracture healing time of patients in group A was significantly shorter than that of group B (18.3 ± 4.8 weeks versus 24.3 ± 3.0 weeks, p = 0.023). Union rate was higher (100.0% versus 87.3%, p = 0.048), and malunion rate and secondary surgical procedure rate were lower (both are 3.0% versus 19.0%, p = 0.031) in group A than that of group B.

CONCLUSION

Poller screw augmentation of IM nailing is a favourable option to shorten fracture healing time and to reduce complication rates in terms of nonunion, malunion, and secondary surgical procedure in the treatment of both diaphyseal/metaphyseal fractures of the femur or tibia while compare with those treated by IM nailing alone.

"Ratio of fracture site diameter to isthmus femoral canal diameter" as a predictor of complication following treatment of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fracture with antegrade intramedullary nailing

INTRODUCTION

Fixation of infra-isthmus femoral shaft fracture using antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing is difficult and is associated with a high complication rate. This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications following this procedure. The ratio of the fracture site diameter to the diameter of the femoral intramedullary canal of the isthmus (FI ratio) was evaluated as a novel parameter to predict complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent antegrade IM nailing for infra-isthmus femoral shaft fracture between January 2008 and December 2018 and had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was occurrence of complication, including non-union, mal-alignment, fixation failure, or progressive loss of reduction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of complication. The sensitivity and specificity of FI ratio as a predictor of complication was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish an FI ratio threshold to predict occurrence of complication following antegrade IM nailing.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with a mean age of 47.1 years were included. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, comminuted fracture pattern (p=0.026), distance from screws to fracture site (< 3cm) (p=0.002), and higher FI ratio (p=0.001) were associated with complication. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, FI ratio was identified as an independent risk factor for complication following antegrade IM nailing (p=0.038). ROC curve indicated that FI ratio ≥ 2 had sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively, in predicting complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that wider intramedullary diameter at the fracture site was associated with higher complication rate following antegrade IM nailing in distal infra-isthmal femoral fractures. The FI ratio could be a reliable predictor of complication after antegrade IM nailing for such fracture, and alternative strategies should be considered for patients with higher FI ratio (≥ 2).

Augmented compression in exchange nailing for femoral and tibial non-unions accelerates time to radiographic union

PURPOSE

Exchange nailing is widely used for the management of aseptic femoral and tibial non-union. Compressive forces markedly reduce strain, increasing rate and incidence of union. Additional compressive forces can be applied to the non-union site by using the design features of some modern nailing systems. This study hypothesises that the use of additional compression in exchange nailing results in faster time to union.

METHODS

All femoral and tibial shaft non-unions were identified over a 4-year period between 2014-2018. Intraoperative compression during exchange nailing was either applied or not applied with a dedicated active compression device through the intramedullary nail. An initial 'radiographic union score for tibia' (RUST) score was calculated from preoperative lateral and AP radiographs and compared with the postoperative radiographs at 6-8 weeks. Healing was defined as bridging callus on at least three cortices (RUST > 10).

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were identified. Following application of exclusion criteria, we analysed data for 19 patients, 10 undergoing exchange nailing with intraoperative compression and 9 without. The pre-exchange RUST score was comparable between the compressed group and standard exchange group with mean of 7.11 versus 7.5 (p = 0.636). At 6-8 weeks post-op, there was a significant difference between the median RUST score in the compressed group vs standard exchange group, 11 compared to 8.39 (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that time to union was accelerated when additional compression was applied to exchange nailing, resulting in reduced follow-up visits and number of radiographs required.

Comparison of standard versus reconstruction proximal interlocking screw configurations for antegrade intramedullary nail fixation of femoral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The standard proximal interlocking screw (SS) configuration for antegrade intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of femoral shaft fractures is lateral to medial or from the greater to less trochanter. Some authors argue for the routine use of the reconstruction screw (RS) configuration (oriented up the femoral neck) instead to prevent femoral neck complications. The purpose of this study was to compare a matched cohort of patients receiving these screw configurations and subsequent complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of two urban level-one trauma centers identified adults with isolated femoral shaft fractures undergoing antegrade IMN. Patients with RS and SS configurations were matched 1:1 by age, sex, fracture location, and AO classification in order to compare complications.

RESULTS

130 patients with femoral shaft fractures were identified. SS and RS configurations were used in 83 (64%) and 47 (36%) patients. 30 patients from each group were able to be matched for analysis. The RS and SS group did not differ in age, fracture location, AO classification, operative time, or number of distal interlocking screws. The RS group had fewer open fractures and were more likely to have two proximal screws. There were 7 complications, including 5 nonunions and 2 delayed unions, with no detectable difference between RS vs. SS groups (10% vs 13%, Proportional difference -3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -30 to 14%, p = 0.1). There were no femoral neck complications in the entire cohort of 130 patients. On multivariate analysis none of the variables analyzed were independently associated with the development of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this matched cohort of patients with femoral shaft fractures undergoing antegrade IMN fixation, RS and SS configurations were associated with a similar number of complications and no femoral neck complications. The SS configuration remains the standard for antegrade IMN femoral shaft fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Application of Robot Positioning for Cannulated Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture: Retrospective Study

Background

Femoral neck fracture is a common type of hip fracture. Conventional surgical treatment aims at fixing the fracture site with screws and then gradually promoting bone healing. A robot-assisted orthopedic surgery system is computer technology applied to surgical treatment.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect and prognostic value of percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation using robot-assisted positioning in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Methods

From July 2018 to September 2019, 42 cases of femoral neck fracture admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College were randomly and averagely divided into control and study groups. The patients in the control group were treated with conventional percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation, while the patients in the study group were treated with robot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation during surgical treatment. We compared the treatment conditions and results of the operation between the 2 groups. The Harris score was used to evaluate the treatment efficacy. The state of fracture healing was followed up and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The duration of the operation was shorter, there was less fluoroscopy use, and there were fewer drilled holes in the study group than in the control group (all, P<.001). There was no statistical difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between the 2 groups (P=.33). The Harris score (P=.045) and number of excellent and good ratings (P=.01) were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. The difference in the fracture healing rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=.23). The fracture healing duration of the study group was shorter than that of the control group (P=.001).

Conclusions

The use of robotic positioning aids in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can effectively improve the efficiency of surgery, shorten the duration of surgery, and reduce the radiation damage to patients. Meanwhile, it improves postoperative treatment and recovery rates of the patients and shortens the fracture healing time.

Incidence and treatment of adult femoral fractures with osteogenesis imperfecta: An analysis of a center of 72 patients in Taiwan

Background: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare disease characterized by increased bone fragility and susceptibility for fractures. Only few studies have compared the management for femoral fractures in children with OI. Nevertheless, no cohort studies have described the treatment for femoral fractures in adults with OI in Taiwan. This study aimed to investigate and compare the incidence of union and non-union femoral fractures and the best treatment options to avoid non-union fractures. Methods: We enrolled 72 patients with OI who were older than 18 years at MacKay Memorial Hospital between January 2010 and December 2018. Femoral fracture incidence, non-union rate, and treatment modality were analyzed. Results: Of 72 patients with OI, 11 patients had femoral fractures and 4 patients of them had >1 femoral fracture. The incidence for all types of femoral fractures was 651 fractures per 100,000 person-years annually. In 15 total fractures, 4 fractures resulted in non-union, and patients with type 4 OI mostly had shaft fractures. The best outcomes for non-union shaft fracture is achieved by surgical treatment. Conclusion: Adults with OI tended to develop femoral fractures and non-unions. Adults with type 4 OI were particularly at high risk for non-unions in shaft fractures with conservative treatment.

Intramedular fixation after breaking of the femoral plate

Any fracture of the femoral shaft presents a challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Femoral fractures most often occur within polytrauma, by forces of high intensity as is the case with traffic accidents. There are two methods to treat with internal fracture fixation, intra and extra medullary fixation. Both treatments have their advantages and disadvantages and it is necessary to make a good preoperative plan. We present the case of a 23-year-old man who suffered a femoral shaft fracture as a driver in a car accident. He was initially surgically treated with orthopedic repositioning and internal, extramedullary fixation. After 18 months, bending of the osteosynthetic material and dislocation of the fragments with varus and recurvatum were verified. Oligotrophic pseudoarthrosis was also present. Reintervention and fixation with interlocking nail was performed. The weight bearing is allowed after two weeks. After 3 months, patient has full range of motion and there is no palpatory painful sensitivity. Intramedullary fixation is the method of choice for fractures of the femur, especially when there is no comminution and in cases of open fractures of the first and second degree. Rotation of fragments is locked, physical rehabilitation is faster and there is less risk of mal union.

Rotational malalignment in femoral nailing: prevention, diagnosis and surgical correction

Background and aim of the work:

to review and discuss the literature about rotational malalignment during and after femoral nailing.

Methods:

analysis of the literature on prevention and evaluation of rotation during femoral nailing, clinical and subjective consequences of malrotation and techniques used to correct the deformity, both in the acute and chronic phase.

Results:

malrotation is very common after femoral nailing. The exact definition of a malrotated femur is controversial, but it is widely agreed that a rotational malalignment <10° is considered normal while >30° is a deformity which requires correction. The complaints of the patients with a malrotated femur can be various and can involve the hip, the knee or below the knee. The ability to compensate for the deformity while standing and walking may decrease the symptoms. Surgical correction is feasible with many techniques and devices: the procedure involving derotation, changing the locking screws and maintaining the nail is safe, reproducible and relatively easy.

Conclusions:

prevention of malrotation during femoral nailing is the cornerstone of successful operation outcomes. If rotational malalignment is suspected, prompt diagnosis and adequate surgical treatment are mandatory to overcome this common complication. (www.actabiomedica.it)

The effect of platelet-rich plasma on fracture healing in long-bone pseudoarthrosis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on fracture union rate and fracture union time in pseudoarthrosis surgery and to evaluate the clinical and functional results of the patients.

METHODS

The patients who were undergone pseudoarthrosis surgery between 2011 and 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-four patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups with used PRP and not used PRP during surgery. There were 14 patients in the PRP group and 10 patients in the control group. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, fracture union time, and functional scores of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and Upper Extremity Functional Index.

RESULTS

Fractures were healed in both groups, and no complications were encountered. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of fracture union time. The mean time of union was 5.3 months in the PRP group and 11.3 months in the control group (p: 0.000). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of functional scores (p: 0.250).

CONCLUSION

As a result of our study, we concluded that PRP is an effective and safe method in pseudoarthrosis surgery that reduces fracture union time. Controlled studies with more patient numbers are needed.

Does Open Reduction in Intramedullary Nailing of Femur Shaft Fractures Adversely Affect the Outcome? A Retrospective Study

Aim

This study aims to assess the results of open versus closed reduction in intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures and whether it delays union, predisposes to nonunion, or increases the rate of infection.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of all adult patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing was done. The primary outcome is union rate, and the secondary outcomes are operation time and the infection rate.

Results

110 isolated femoral shaft fractures, with 73 (66.4%) in the closed reduction group and 37 (33.6%) in the open reduction group, 90.4% males and 9.6% females, and the average age was 32.6 years. RTA is the most common cause of these injuries followed by the fall from height. The delayed union rate was 20% (22/110) with no difference between the two groups, p value 0.480, and the nonunion rate was 5.5% (6/110), and no statistical difference was observed between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the closed groups, and no difference in the time to union was observed between two groups. No infection was found in the two groups.

Conclusions

There is no statistical difference between the healing rates in closed and open reduction in femoral shaft fractures. In cases where closed reduction is difficult, it is better to open reduce the fracture if closed reduction cannot be achieved in 15 minutes, especially in polytrauma.

Comparison of a multidimensional cross locking plate versus a locking compression plate for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunion: Finite element analysis

The purpose of this study was to explore the advantages and disadvantages of a multi-dimensional cross locking plate (MDC-LP) compared with a locking compression plate (LCP) as the augmentation plate (AP) over an intramedullary nail (IMN) for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunion by using finite element analysis. A finite element model of the femur was developed to analyze the maximum stress, stress distribution, displacement of fixation and nonunion site under increasing axial and torsional loads. Some differences in the stress distribution and stress values on the fixations were observed in the five fixation models. The MDC-LP with eight screw fixation showed the lowest variety of nonunion site displacement under the increasing axial and torsional loads. Models of the MDC-LP were more stable with regard to the bending and torsional forces. The short MDC-LP with eight screw insertion as an augmentation plate over intramedullary nail shows biomechanical advantages compared to the LCP. The MDC-LP may be an appropriate and effective treatment option for femoral shaft nonunion.

Removal of bent intramedullary nail: Two case reports

INTRODUCTION

The removal of bent intramedullary (IM) nail can become a challenge. Therefore, various methods have been reported for the extraction of nails after femoral refracture. We want to share our successful treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Case 1. A 44-year-old man was admitted to our clinic after falling while playing soccer. He complained severe right thigh pain with a visible deformity of the femur. His medical history revealed a right femoral shaft fracture caused in a traffic accident which had been treated with intramedullary nailing. Case 2. A 27-year-old man, who had suffered a right femur fracture after a motorcycle accident and been treated with an IM nail, presented after falling down the stairs. He had severe right thigh pain without any open wound or neurologic deficit.

DIAGNOSIS

Case 1. Plain radiographs revealed a refracture of the right femoral shaft and a bent IM nail. The initial varus deformity of the nail was 60.1° in the coronal plane. Case 2. The valgus deformity of the nail was 16.1° with an apex-posterior angulation of 34.8° in the sagittal image of plain radiographs.

INTERVENTIONS

Case 1. Initial manual reduction was tried in emergency room. Then, under general anesthesia closed reduction of the fracture and bent IM nail was done. After closed reduction, the nail was straightened and extracted smoothly. Case 2. Closed manipulation was attempted initially. But no difference in the deformity was achieved. Therefore, via skin incision, the bent nail was progressively sectioned with high-speed cutting burr until the nail could be straightened.

OUTCOMES

Case 1. The patient was mobilized with partial-weight bearing assisted with a crutch on postoperative day two. One year after surgery, the fracture union was complete and the patient was pain-free. Case 2. Six months after surgery, the fracture union was complete with sufficient callus formation around the fracture site.

CONCLUSION

There is no gold standard method to remove a bent IM nail. However, since manual reduction to straighten the bent nail causes minimal soft tissue damage, it should be considered first. If it fails, other methods should be attempted, progressing from the minimally invasive technique to more invasive methods.

Surgical results of atypical femoral fractures in long-term bisphosphonate and glucocorticoid users - Relationship between fracture reduction and bone union

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) associated with bisphosphonate (BP) use is common, and its pathophysiology is considered to involve severely suppressed bone turnover. Surgical results following AFF fixation have not been optimal, with some cases resulting in delayed union or nonunion. Regarding bone healing, glucocorticoid (GC) has similar properties to BP. We investigated the surgical results of AFF fixation in both users of BP and GC, especially with regard to intraoperative fracture reduction. We included 12 AFFs in 11 patients with a follow-up over one year who all took GC for autoimmune disease and BP for management of GC-induced osteoporosis. Their mean age was 62 years and 10 patients were female. Six fractures were located in the subtrochanteric region of the femur and six were in the diaphysis. Intramedullary nails were used to treat all fractures. Union rate was recorded, and the status of the reduction immediately after the operation was analyzed. Four of the 12 cases developed nonunion, and three of them required additional surgery. The relationship between alignment, cortical continuity, fracture gap, and bone union was not significant. In the nonunion cases, cortical continuity on the anteroposterior and lateral views were never confirmed. Even if cortical continuity in either of the views was there, the two limbs resulted in nonunion. One third of the patients with AFF secondary to long-term BP and GC use developed nonunion despite their fracture reductions being acceptable. We consider strict reduction should be needed for these cases with disadvantage condition to bone union.

Impact of Surrounding Canal Size on Time to Union After Intramedullary Nailing of Femur Fractures: Are 10-mm Nails All We Need?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intramedullary nail (IMN) size and its relation to the canal diameter [nail-canal (NC) diameter] impacts the union rate or time to union in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Two Level 1 and 1 Level 2 trauma centers.

PATIENTS

Two hundred eighty-seven patients met the criteria and were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with either an antegrade or retrograde IMN. Comparisons were first performed comparing 10- versus 11- versus 13-mm nails. Patients were then divided into 3 groups based on the difference between the size of the femoral canal at the isthmus and the IMN (NC diameter). Group 1: <1.0 mm, group 2: >1.0 and <2.0 mm, and group 3: >2.0 mm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Nonunion rates, mean time to union.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-seven patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up, who were treated with size with IMN for femoral shaft fractures, were assessed for fracture characteristics, time to union, and union rate. When comparing IMN size, no statistical difference was found when comparing time to union or overall union rate. When comparing NC diameter, no significant difference was found in union rate and time to union when comparing between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Similar rate of union and time to union were exhibited regardless of nail size or NC diameter. This can correlate to the standard utilization of a reamed, titanium 10-mm IMN with 5.0-mm interlocking screws in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, offering potentially less reaming, shorter operative times, and removing unnecessary stock from inventory.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Comparison of Complications and Union Rates in Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures Treated With Open Versus Closed Reduction

Intramedullary rod fixation is a common technique for treatment of femoral shaft fractures, with both open and closed reduction techniques described. The purpose of this study was to assess union and complication rates among patients treated with open vs closed reduction and intramedullary nailing of closed femoral shaft fractures. A total of 107 patients undergoing intramedullary fixation of nonpathologic femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA type 32) between January 2012 and June 2017 were retrospectively studied. Those undergoing open reduction prior to intramedullary nailing were compared with those undergoing closed reduction. The primary outcome analyzed was union rate. Secondary outcomes were time to union, complications necessitating return to the operating room, and operative times. Mean follow-up was 14 months in both groups (range, 6-48 months). Of the 107 patients, 34.6% (n=37) underwent open reduction and 65.4% (n=70) underwent closed reduction. Patients in the open reduction group had rates of union (89.1%, 33 of 37) similar to those of patients in the closed reduction group (92.9%, 65 of 70; P=.378). Patients in the open reduction group who had union did so in a mean of 6.2 months (range, 3-12 months) vs a mean of 5.4 months (range, 2-11 months) in the closed reduction group (P=.13). Six patients (16.2%) in the open reduction group and 6 patients (8.6%) in the closed reduction group had a postoperative complication requiring return to the operating room (P=.18). Open reduction and intramedullary nailing results in rates of union, time to union, and rates of significant complications similar to those of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(2): 103-107.].

(FLiP) fracture-table vs. lateral positioning for femoral intramedullary nailing: A survey of orthopaedic surgeon preferences

BACKGROUND

Femoral shaft fractures are common and severe injuries that often occur alongside other complex, high-energy injuries. Definitive internal fixation using reamed, locked intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become the standard of care in adequately resuscitated patients, commonly performed in the supine position with utilization of a fracture table. The lateral position, without the use of traction, offers an alternative that may be associated with lower complication rates. Given the lack of high-quality evidence in the area, this study was designed to assess the attitudes, knowledge base and preferences of Orthopaedic surgeons regarding patient positioning during antegrade IMN of femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

Orthopedic surgeon members of the AO North America, Canadian Orthopaedic Association and the Ontario Orthopaedic Association were invited to participate in a web-based survey addressing the management of femoral shaft fractures and the need for further research in this area.

RESULTS

Most surgeons (56%) favored treating mid-shaft femur fractures in the supine position using a fracture table compared to supine/sloppy lateral (29%) or direct lateral (12%) with the leg free draped. Canadian surgeons showed a significantly higher preference for supine positioning with a fracture table when compared to their American colleagues. Academic and higher-level trauma center surgeons were more likely to prefer the sloppy lateral or direct lateral positioning with manual traction compared to community surgeons. The most commonly cited perceived barrier for utilizing the lateral position was expertise and lack of available assistants. Forty-five percent of respondents expressed interest in being involved in a randomized control trial comparing lateral positioning vs. supine with traction.

CONCLUSION

Consensus surrounding the positioning and utilization of traction in femoral shaft fractures is lacking. Given the perceived possible benefits and reduced complications using the lateral position and free-leg draping, further research is warranted to determine the optimal positioning for these injuries during femoral IMN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional Survey.

Design and Analysis of Customized Fixation Plate for Femoral Shaft

BACKGROUND

In the recent years, several techniques have been used to treat femur diaphyseal fracture. Among all the traditional fixation techniques, unstable fixation remains the biggest challenge for orthopedists. Researchers have recommended new approaches to deal with diaphyseal femur fracture. However, solely few had been successful in getting some better results. In the present work, a methodology comprising of design and finite-element analysis of a counter fit customized fixation plate has been suggested to provide a stable fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present work, reverse engineering (RE) approach has been invoked to create a 3D model of a fresh fractured femur diaphysis bone using the computed tomography (CT) scan data available in digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) format. To provide stable fixation, a counter fit customized fixation plate at medial side has been designed and simulated under static physiological loading conditions for three different biocompatible materials, viz., titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), stainless steel (SS-316L), and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy (Co-Cr-Mo).

RESULTS

Static stress distribution and deformation analysis of the clinical setup have been performed for the aforementioned materials. It has been observed that the stresses and deformation developed in all the materials are quite low. It implies that customized fixation plates will provide stable fixation resulting in improved fracture union.

CONCLUSION

The proposed work will assist the medical practitioners regarding the design and analysis of customized implants. This will reduce the post surgical failures and residual pain due to non-union fractured region.

Effects of NSAID use on bone healing: A meta-analysis of retrospective case–control and cohort studies within clinical settings

Introduction

This meta-analysis aims to determine whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is significantly associated with adverse bone healing outcomes within clinical settings, including trauma and elective spine settings. It will also explore bone healing outcomes with the type, route, dosage and duration of NSAID exposure and aims to demonstrate the effects of various other confounding factors on bone healing outcomes.

Methods

Electronic databases including MedLine, Embase and Cochrane were searched from January 1975 to December 2017. A distinct analysis of observational long bone and spine studies in adult populations was performed, assessing the effects of NSAID exposure on bone healing. Studies from paediatric population and randomised trials also underwent separate assessment in the synthesis. Meta-analysis was conducted in compliance with QUORUM and PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Quantitative assessment of observational studies suggested a significant risk of bone healing complications with NSAID exposure across each clinical group: long bone (p = 0.0004) and spine (p = 0.02). Analysis of paediatric studies revealed a non-significant association of poor outcomes with NSAID use (p = 0.36), while assessment of randomised trials demonstrated a statistically significant risk of complications following NSAID administration (p = 0.04). Meta-regression further suggested smoking to be a substantial confounder associated with adverse bone healing outcomes (p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Inclusion of only fair and moderate-quality retrospective cohort and case–control studies in the current synthesis limits the clinical application of its findings and therefore warrants the need for further research. Thus, attempts to conduct high-quality prospective cohort and randomised trials to study the effects of NSAID use on bone healing would be very helpful and will provide a basis for more extensive research in future.

Multidirectional percutaneous drilling and autologous bone marrow injection for the treatment of femoral diaphyseal nonunions: a prospective interventional study

Background

To examine the outcomes of multidirectional percutaneous drilling and autologous concentrated bone marrow (BM) transplantation for atrophic femoral diaphyseal nonunion characterized by intact hardware and mechanical stability at the nonunion site.

Methods

Fourteen patients (22–63 years of age) were admitted to our hospital with atrophic femoral diaphyseal nonunion. All patients were treated with a combination of multidirectional percutaneous drilling and autologous concentrated BM transplantation. Radiographic evaluation was conducted every month after transplantation until bone healing was achieved.

Results

Bony union was achieved in 13 of the 14 patients (92.9%) after an average of 3.9 months (range: 2.5–6 months). The average radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) scale score improved significantly from the preoperative period (6.15±1.21) to follow-up (11.23±0.73; P<0.05). The mean follow-up after transplantation was 31.4±9.5 months (range: 18–50 months). At the final follow-up, the quality of function had improved significantly, allowing a return to normal activities.

Conclusion

Combined multidirectional percutaneous drilling and autologous concentrated BM transplantation is an easy, safe, inexpensive, and efficacious method to treat atrophic femoral diaphyseal nonunion characterized by intact hardware and mechanical stability at the nonunion site.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN29808592

Extraction of a Bent Tibial Nail After Refracture: A Case Report

CASE

A 65-year-old man previously treated by intramedullary nailing for a left tibial shaft fracture presented 6 years later with an open refracture of his left tibia after a motorcycle accident. Treatment required extraction of the bent nail before revision nailing.

CONCLUSIONS

Extraction of deformed intramedullary devices is a skill that will continue to be demanded of orthopaedic surgeons. In this case, standard extraction though the entry point proved successful. Standard extraction offers the safest form of removal and should be contemplated before considering more morbid methods of extraction while examining the fracture's morphology and the device's deformity.

[Femoral shaft fractures]

Femoral shaft fractures after completion of growth predominantly affect young people with healthy bones. The causes are mostly high-velocity traffic accidents, crushing or running over mechanisms and falls from a great height. Gunshot wounds are relatively rare in Germany but have a certain importance internationally and in military medicine. Accompanying injuries in local or other regions are frequent. The predominant fracture types are transverse, wedge, segment and comminuted fractures. Spiral fractures are a sign of indirect force and are therefore frequently found in older patients with osteoporosis. Atypical fractures under or following bisphosphonate treatment are a new entity, which are typically subtrochanteric and begin on the lateral side of the bone. The characteristics of pathological fractures, femoral shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence as well as periprosthetic fractures are not dealt with in this article.

Radiologic Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing in Infraisthmal Femur-Shaft Fracture with or without Poller Screws

Background

Intramedullary nails have been the treatment of choice for acute femur-shaft fractures in adults. However, the infraisthmal location has a high risk of nonunion and is easy to malalign. This study evaluated radiologic outcomes of initial supportive use of poller screws in combination with antegrade femoral nailing in infraisthmal femur-shaft fracture.

Methods

A total of 49 patients who had undergone antegrade nailing with or without supportive poller-screw insertion for infraisthmal femur-shaft fracture were included in this retrospective cohort study (23 patients with poller screws in group 1 versus 26 patients without poller screws in group 2). Patient demographics including sex, age, classification, mechanism of injury, operative time, poller-screw time, and radiologic outcomes, including union rate, time to union, and number of malunions, were evaluated.

Results

Union rate in group 1 (95.6%) was significantly higher than that in group 2 (84.6%) (p = 0.04). Time to union was 19.8 weeks in group 1 and 20.3 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.31).

Conclusion

Initial supportive insertion of two poller screws after nailing took a mean of 21minutes additionally but could lessen the risk of nonunion significantly in this study. We believe that these findings may have important clinical relevance for the treatment of infraisthmal femur-shaft fracture.

Augmentative antirotational plating provided a significantly higher union rate than exchanging reamed nailing in treatment for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion - retrospective cohort study

Background

Atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft fracture after intramedullary (IM) nailing is uncommon. The treatment for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic non-union remained controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical results between exchanging reamed nailing (ERN) and augmentative antirotational plating (AAP) for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the patients with femoral shaft nonunion between the year of 2014 and 2015. The patients with nonunion after plate osteosynthesis, septic nonunion, hypertrophic nonunion, additional surgery during revision surgery were excluded. All the patients were followed up at least 12 months.

Results

Overall, the union rate after revision surgery was 70.8%. The union rate was significantly higher in the AAP group than in the ERN group. Operating time was also significantly shorter in the AAP group. Regarding the location of nonunion, the union rate was comparable between groups for isthmic nonunions. However, for non-isthmic nonunions, the union rate was significantly higher and operating time was significantly shorter in the AAP group.

Conclusion

AAP showed an overall higher union rate for management of femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion compared with ERN. Especially for non-isthmic femoral shaft atrophic nonunions, AAP provided a significantly higher union rate and significantly shorter operating time.