Management of proximal interphalangeal joint injuries

Avulsion injuries: an update on radiologic findings

Avulsion injuries result from the application of a tensile force to a musculoskeletal unit or ligament. Although injuries tend to occur more commonly in skeletally immature populations due to the weakness of their apophysis, adults may also be subject to avulsion fractures, particularly those with osteoporotic bones. The most common sites of avulsion injuries in adolescents and children are apophyses of the pelvis and knee. In adults, avulsion injuries commonly occur within the tendon due to underlying degeneration or tendinosis. However, any location can be involved in avulsion injuries. Radiography is the first imaging modality to diagnose avulsion injury, although advanced imaging modalities are occasionally required to identify subtle lesions or to fully delineate the extent of the injury. Ultrasonography has a high spatial resolution with a dynamic assessment potential and allows the comparison of a bone avulsion with the opposite side. Computed tomography is more sensitive for depicting a tiny osseous fragment located adjacent to the expected attachment site of a ligament, tendon, or capsule. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for the evaluation of soft tissue abnormalities, especially the affected muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Acute avulsion injuries usually manifest as avulsed bone fragments. In contrast, chronic injuries can easily mimic other disease processes, such as infections or neoplasms. Therefore, recognizing the vulnerable sites and characteristic imaging features of avulsion fractures would be helpful in ensuring accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management. To this end, familiarity with musculoskeletal anatomy and mechanism of injury is necessary.

Open Dorsal Proximal Interphalangeal Dislocation

We report a case of a 44-year-old male with an uncommon case of an open dorsal proximal interphalangeal (PIP) dislocation. Although open PIP dislocations are often volar, dorsal dislocations are fraught with complications due to the potential for infection and damage to supportive structures. Features of this case are discussed together with its implications, including lack of standardized management in the literature, use of a closed reduction following copious irrigation, and requirement for antibiotic use.

The Role of Dynamic Ultrasound in the Immediate Conservative Treatment of Volar Plate Injuries of the PIP Joint: A Series of 78 Patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of volar plate avulsion fractures in the context of a stable joint and a bony fragment of less than 30% has traditionally been conservative. This study was performed to assess volar plate healing with high-resolution ultrasound in order to provide early full mobilization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2013, 78 patients with volar plate injuries of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (42 distortions and 36 dislocations) were treated conservatively in our department for volar plate avulsion fracture associated with stable joint and bony fragment inferior to 30% of the intra-articular surface assessed both by radiography and ultrasound. Conservative treatment included extension stop splinting for the first 2 weeks and Coban bandage until 6 weeks postinjury. However, it may be possible to modify the duration of extension stop splinting based on clinical and ultrasound findings (with no additional X-ray) performed every 2 weeks for the first 3 months and then at 4 months postinjury. Only patients with residual contracture at the 4-month assessment had prolonged follow-up in order to ensure adequate dynamic splint therapy.

RESULTS

The amount of soft tissue oedema and the mobility of the volar plate were factors used to determine return to full mobilization. Mean extension-stop-splint wear was 16 ± 2 days. During the first 2 follow-up assessments, 4 patients were excluded from the study because of the instability of the PIP joint. One patient required refixation of a large fragment of 30%, 2 patients required superficial flexor tendon (FDS) tenodesis of the unstable volar plate in hyperextension and 1 other patient required arthrodesis of the PIP joint. In 51 patients, the postoperative follow-up was free of complications at 4 months. In 18 patients, flexion contracture of 20° (range 11°-40°) and oedema during follow-up required dynamic extension splints for 3 to 5 months. After this time, 5 patients had a residual contracture of 10° to 15°.

CONCLUSION

Avulsion fractures of the volar plate at the PIP joint are common. In general, they have a good outcome using the conservative treatment with extension block splints. Flexion contracture is a common complication and may be reduced by immediate splints in full extension at night and Coban bandage during the day. High-resolution sonography is a convenient tool to evaluate palmar plate stability, to assess reduction of oedema, and thus to guide safe return to full range of movement.

Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers

BACKGROUND

Immobilisation and early motion (protected or unrestricted) are both used following hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of conservative interventions (non-surgical management) for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (January 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (in The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to January Week 2 2012), EMBASE (1980 to 2012 Week 03), CINAHL (1950 to 24 January 2012), PEDro (1929 to March 2012), trial registers and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised studies comparing immobilisation/protected mobilisation/unrestricted mobilisation in participants with PIP joint hyperextension injuries managed non-surgically.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. There was no pooling of data.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials involving 366 people were identified. All three trials, which were over 15 years old, were methodologically flawed with unclear or high risk of bias. None of the studies reported on self assessment of function. One trial compared unrestricted mobility with immobilisation; one trial compared protected mobilisation with immobilisation; and the remaining trial compared immobilisation for one week versus three weeks. None of these trials found statistically significant differences between their intervention groups in various measures of poor outcome, pain and range of movement at six months follow-up. This lack of difference applied at three years for the comparison between unrestricted mobility with immobilisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from trials testing the need for, and the extent and duration of, immobilisation to inform on the key conservative management decisions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints.

Outcome of late presentation of injuries of the volar plate of the proximal interphalangeal joint

Early recognition and treatment of volar plate injuries within two weeks is reported to give a good outcome, but there is no published information about the consequences of delayed presentation. We present a series of 14 patients with 16 injuries, who presented more than two weeks after the initial injury. All patients were referred to a specialist hand trauma clinic over a 10 months period and were evaluated prospectively and treated with immediate mobilisation by a specialist hand therapist. Mean time to presentation was 27 days (range 14-79) and mean improvement in range of movement was 25 degrees (range 2-52) with mean residual extension lag 10 degrees (range -4-56). All patients returned to their previous levels of function by the time of discharge. We conclude that it is possible to achieve good outcome without surgical intervention even when the presentation time is four weeks if experienced hand therapists manage the rehabilitation.

Management of proximal interphalangeal joint injuries

Injuries to the proximal interphalangeal joint are common but frequently missed. They are often overtreated by prolonged immobilization, resulting in stiffness, which may be permanent. The purpose of the present article is to briefly review the relevant anatomy and biomechanics, present an approach to physical examination and diagnosis, and propose a practical clinical classification. The treatment of the most severe injury - the intra-articular fracture dislocation - is controversial. The various treatment options are discussed, based on personal experience and a review of the literature. A list of relevant references is presented.

Closed Reduction of Hand Fractures

Stiffness is the most frequent consequence of open hand fracture treatment. Although initial injury severity and occurrence adjacent to the flexor tendon sheath are the most highly correlated determinants of hand fracture outcome, operative intervention accentuates the ultimate risk of stiffness. Closed treatment may minimize this risk. Articular fractures are at greater risk for stiffness than extra-articular fractures. Functional tolerance for small amounts of variation from perfect anatomic restoration gives us increased latitude for closed hand fracture management. Operative treatment may be justified for simple closed fractures when they are unstable, irreducible, or open, or when the surgeon believes that the risk-to-benefit ratio is favorable.

Neglected volar dislocations of the interphalangeal joint

Volar dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint, if missed, with extensor tendon entrapment will lead to permanent impairment. Prompt diagnosis followed by open reduction and aggressive rehabilitation is necessary.